National Livestock Brand of Canada Act

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-208
June 11, 2025 (18 days ago)
Canadian Federal
First reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to recognize a national livestock brand as a symbol of Canada and of western and frontier heritage
Indigenous Affairs
Social Issues

Summary

This bill, called the National Livestock Brand of Canada Act, officially recognizes a specific livestock brand as Canada's national symbol of livestock. The bill states that livestock brands are part of Canada's western and frontier history, dating back before Canada’s founding. These brands help identify animals and are also symbols of pride for livestock owners. The bill emphasizes that this history is shared with Indigenous peoples. Recognizing this symbol aims to promote national unity by highlighting Canada’s pioneer and farming heritage. The bill approves the particular livestock brand shown in the schedule as the official national brand of Canada.

What it means for you

This law officially designates a specific livestock brand as a national symbol. It is mainly a cultural recognition rather than a change that directly affects most people. The symbol aims to celebrate and preserve part of Canada's history connected to farming, ranching, and the frontier era. It does not introduce new rules or requirements for the public. It may foster a sense of pride in Canada’s agricultural heritage across the country.

Expenses

There is no publicly available information about the bill’s costs or savings. Since the bill mostly recognizes a symbol and does not specify extensive programs or administrative costs, its financial impact is likely minimal. No specific funding or expenses are outlined.

Proponents' View

Supporters say that recognizing the livestock brand as a national symbol honors Canada's historical roots in ranching and frontier culture. They believe it can promote national unity by celebrating shared heritage. Some see it as a way to acknowledge the contribution of Indigenous peoples and pioneer culture to Canada’s history.

Opponents' View

Opponents might argue that officially recognizing a livestock brand has little practical benefit for most Canadians. They could see it as a symbolic gesture that does not lead to tangible improvements in agriculture or rural communities. Some may question whether setting this as a national symbol truly reflects the diversity of Canadian identities or priorities.

Original Bill