This bill, called the Protect Our Food Act, 2025, aims to protect farmland in Ontario. It creates a new Advisory Committee to develop a plan called the Foodbelt Protection Plan. This plan will help keep a continuous area of farmland intact. The bill also changes the Planning Act, a law about land use, to require that land zoned for farming cannot be changed without a special land assessment called an Agricultural Impact Assessment. This assessment looks at how changes might affect farmland and its future use. The bill sets deadlines for the committee to finish its work and report to the government. It also establishes rules to prevent rezoning farmland unless certain conditions are met.
If you live in Ontario, especially near farmland, this bill could affect how land is used around your community. It aims to stop a lot of farmland from being turned into housing or commercial areas by requiring assessments before land is rezoned. The plan will identify key farmland areas that should be protected and suggest ways to prevent land speculation (buying land just to sell later at a higher price). These changes could help keep local food production going and prevent farmland from being lost to development. However, it also means that any proposals to change farming land will need careful review, possibly making it harder or slower to rezone land. The Advisory Committee is supposed to consider the needs of farmers and rural communities in making these decisions.
No publicly available information.
Supporters say this bill will protect Ontario’s farmland from being lost to development. They believe it will help ensure there is enough land for food production now and in the future. Creating the Foodbelt Protection Plan and requiring assessments before rezoning will help prevent unnecessary land loss and land speculation. Proponents think this will support farmers, maintain soil health, and keep local food sources strong. They also argue that involving farmers and experts in the planning process will lead to better decisions.
Opponents argue that the bill might make it harder to develop land when needed. They say requiring assessments could slow down the process for building new housing or other projects. Some believe this could increase costs and delays for landowners and developers. Others worry that the bill might limit local governments’ flexibility to manage land use based on local needs. There is concern that overly strict protections could reduce available land for growth, impacting housing options or economic development. Skeptics also question whether the committee’s recommendations will be practical or effective in balancing farmland protection with development needs.