Summary

This bill amends the Ontario law that manages provincial parks. It allows the creation of two new types of parks:

• Urban Class Parks: Parks near cities to give people easy access to nature activities.
• Adventure Class Parks: Parks that offer activities like rock climbing, mountain biking, and snowmobiling, which may change the natural environment.

The bill also allows the government to make rules about adding more park types and setting goals for them. The bill will become law once the King or Queen’s representative approves it.

What it means for you

This change aims to give more people access to parks and outdoor activities. Urban parks would make it easier for city residents to enjoy nature without traveling far. Adventure parks would offer new outdoor sports and activities, possibly in places that are already natural or partly developed. These parks could provide more recreation options.

However, some activities like snowmobiling and mountain biking may cause changes or impacts to the environment. The bill does not specify how or where these parks will be made, or what rules will control their impact.

Overall, the bill is about expanding park types to promote recreation for more people. It does not specify costs or exact locations yet.

Expenses

The bill does not include specific funding details. Making new parks or enlarging existing ones might cost money, but the bill does not estimate these costs. The government will decide later how to fund new parks and regulate activities.

There is no information about how much additional spending this change might require, so data is unavailable.

Proponents' View

Supporters of the bill say it will give more people easier access to parks and outdoor fun. Urban parks can help city residents enjoy nature close to home. Adventure parks can attract visitors and boost outdoor sports. This expansion could support tourism, health, and outdoor recreation.

Supporters believe creating new parks will preserve outdoor spaces and offer diverse activities. They argue this helps improve quality of life and supports outdoor tourism and local economies.

They also say that allowing more recreational options in certain parks can be done with proper rules to protect the environment.

Opponents' View

Opponents worry that creating adventure parks might harm the environment, especially if activities need to change natural landscapes. They say some outdoor activities, like snowmobiling, can disturb wildlife and natural areas.

Critics also argue that the bill does not set details on how parks will be chosen or managed. They fear that without clear rules, parks may be overused or damaged, especially in urban areas.

Some may also be concerned that focusing on recreation might overlook the importance of conserving natural ecosystems. Without proper oversight, environmental harm is possible.

Overall, opponents want safeguards to make sure new parks do not harm nature or local communities.