This bill creates new rules and responsibilities for Ontario's 9-1-1 emergency services. It requires the government to improve 9-1-1 infrastructure, such as connecting calls, sharing information, and tracking locations. It also sets standards for call centre staffing, training, and support for employees. Additionally, the bill adds a new role called the Assistant Ombudsman, who will help oversee 9-1-1 services and ensure proper investigations and public awareness. The bill officially becomes law when it receives Royal Assent.
If you dial 9-1-1 in Ontario, the call will be directed to a call centre that is better connected with police, fire, and ambulance services. Call centres will have more up-to-date tools to find your location and share information quickly. The bill also aims to ensure call takers and dispatchers are well-trained and supported, which could lead to faster and more accurate emergency responses. For the public, there will be more transparency and oversight of 9-1-1 services through the new Assistant Ombudsman role. Overall, these changes aim to improve how emergencies are managed in Ontario.
Data unavailable.
The bill does not specify exact costs but requires significant upgrades to technology, staffing, and training. These improvements might involve government spending. The costs could include new equipment, system integration, staff training, and additional personnel. The government will need to manage these expenses to implement the bill's requirements effectively.
Supporters believe the bill will make Ontario’s emergency response safer and faster. They say improving infrastructure, such as location tracking and communication systems, will help responders reach people quicker. They also argue that better training and mental health support for call centre staff will reduce errors and burnout. The creation of the Assistant Ombudsman role adds oversight, which proponents believe will improve accountability and public trust in emergency services.
Critics are concerned about the potential costs of these upgrades and whether the government has enough funds to implement them fully. They worry that requiring new systems and training could lead to higher taxes or divert funds from other services. Some also question whether the timeline is realistic, especially the goal for systems to be compatible by December 2026. Opponents may also argue that more oversight alone does not improve response times or quality without addressing underlying staffing issues.