Back to Bills

Foreign Credential Advisory Committee Act

Full Title: Foreign Credential Advisory Committee Act

Summary#

  • This bill sets up a temporary advisory committee to help Alberta recognize foreign education and training faster and more fairly.

  • The committee will review Alberta’s laws and rules, look at what works in other provinces, and recommend ways to improve, especially in jobs with worker shortages.

  • It must deliver a report within one year of the law taking effect. The law ends two years after it is approved.

  • Key points:

    • Creates a Foreign Credential Advisory Committee of up to 13 Alberta residents.
    • Members are appointed by the provincial cabinet based on recommendations from several ministries (Immigration and Multiculturalism; Advanced Education; Jobs, Economy and Trade; Health; Technology and Innovation).
    • Focus is on speeding up and improving recognition of foreign diplomas, degrees, and certificates.
    • The committee can set its own internal rules and will get staff support from the Ministry of Immigration and Multiculturalism.
    • Members may receive pay and expense reimbursement (set by cabinet).
    • The Minister must table the committee’s report in the Legislature.

What it means for you#

  • Internationally trained workers

    • No immediate change to licensing or job access.
    • The committee may recommend steps to make recognition faster or clearer, especially in fields with current or expected labour shortages (for example, health care or technology).
    • Any actual rule changes would come later and would depend on the government and professional regulators.
  • Employers

    • No instant change to hiring rules.
    • If the government acts on the recommendations, it could become easier to hire qualified internationally educated workers in shortage areas.
  • Professional regulatory organizations (licensing bodies)

    • Your rules and practices may be reviewed by the committee.
    • You may receive recommendations to streamline assessments or align with successful approaches used in other provinces.
    • The committee cannot force changes; it is advisory.
  • Alberta residents

    • In the short term, nothing changes.
    • Over time, if recommendations are adopted, you could see more qualified workers in key services (like health care), which may help reduce wait times or service gaps.
  • Government of Alberta

    • Must appoint the committee, support its work, and table its report.
    • Decides whether to act on the recommendations after the report is delivered.
  • Timing

    • Takes effect three months after approval.
    • Committee must report within one year after it starts.
    • The law ends two years after approval unless replaced or extended by new legislation.

Expenses#

  • Estimated annual cost: modest administrative spending for a temporary advisory committee; no official dollar estimate is provided.

  • What drives cost:

    • Possible member remuneration and expense reimbursement (amounts set in appointments).
    • Staff (secretarial) support from the Ministry of Immigration and Multiculturalism.
    • Time-limited mandate reduces long-term costs; no new ongoing programs are created in the bill.

Proponents' View#

  • It will help fill labour shortages by speeding up recognition for qualified newcomers in high-need jobs.
  • Learning from other provinces’ best practices can cut red tape and make the process clearer and fairer.
  • A cross-ministry committee ensures the right people are at the table and recommendations are practical.
  • The timeline is focused: report in one year, so action can come sooner.
  • Public transparency improves because the report must be tabled in the Legislature.

Opponents' View#

  • It adds another layer of bureaucracy and may duplicate work already underway in departments or regulators.
  • The committee is advisory only; it cannot change rules, so benefits are uncertain.
  • The short timeline may limit deep consultation or complex reforms.
  • Reviewing regulators’ rules could be seen as pressuring independent bodies, which some worry could affect standards and public safety.
  • There are costs for members and staff, with no guarantee the recommendations will be implemented.

Timeline

Dec 4, 2023

Second Reading

Mar 18, 2024

Committee of the Whole

Mar 25, 2024

Third Reading

Mar 28, 2024

Royal Assent

Jun 28, 2024

Comes into Force