Back to Bills

Fast Track Major Project Approvals

Full Title:
Expedited 120-Day Approvals Act

Summary#

  • This bill creates a fast-track path for certain major projects in Alberta. The goal is to make government approval decisions within 120 business days (weekdays), unless a shorter deadline already exists in law.

  • Companies can apply to have a project named a “qualified project.” If approved by Cabinet, all listed provincial approvals for that project must be decided by set dates.

  • The bill does not remove environmental reviews or Indigenous consultation. It asks for the status of both as part of the application.

  • It takes effect on a future date set by the government (by Proclamation).

  • Key changes:

    • Sets a firm deadline: approval decisions must be made within about six months, or faster if another law already sets a shorter clock.
    • Lets Cabinet pick which projects qualify, based on factors like economic impact, jobs, and whether planned capital spending is over $250 million.
    • Requires orders naming qualified projects to be published in The Alberta Gazette, with the specific approvals and deadlines listed.
    • Allows the Minister to ask for more information and to deny applications; Cabinet can also cancel a project’s fast-track status in extraordinary cases.
    • Limits apply only to approvals under laws that the government later names in regulation.

What it means for you#

  • Businesses and project developers

    • You can apply to have a project fast-tracked. You must provide details on the project, timeline, spending, needed approvals, and the status of environmental assessments and Indigenous consultation.
    • If designated, you get clear decision dates for listed provincial approvals, reducing uncertainty and carrying costs.
    • Fast-track status does not guarantee approval. All normal standards still apply.
    • The 120-day clock starts after the government publishes the order in The Alberta Gazette.

  • Workers and job seekers

    • Faster decisions on large projects could move hiring and construction up sooner.
    • More activity is likely in sectors that align with government priorities and involve large capital spending.

  • Local communities and residents

    • Big projects near you may start sooner if they are fast-tracked.
    • Environmental reviews and other safeguards still occur, but timelines for decisions are tighter, which may shorten windows for public input in some processes.

  • Indigenous communities

    • The application must report the status of consultation. The bill does not change the Crown’s duty to consult.
    • Shorter decision timelines could put pressure on engagement schedules, depending on how regulators manage the process.

  • Environmental and community groups

    • Environmental impact assessments and other approvals remain required.
    • Compressed timelines may raise concerns about the depth of review and the time available for comments.

  • Regulators and agencies

    • You would need to meet firm decision deadlines for designated projects.
    • Workloads may bunch up if multiple large projects are fast-tracked at once.

  • Scope and timing

    • Only approvals under specific provincial laws named later by regulation will be covered.
    • Municipal permits are not automatically included.
    • The Act is not in force until the government proclaims it.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Speeds up investment and job creation by setting clear, predictable timelines.
  • Cuts “red tape” without removing safeguards, since all normal standards and reviews still apply.
  • Improves investor confidence by reducing delays and holding agencies to deadlines.
  • Targets projects with large economic benefits, including those with over $250 million in capital spending.
  • Includes safety valves: government can deny applications or rescind fast-track status in extraordinary situations.
  • Supports provincial autonomy by focusing on Alberta’s priorities and jurisdiction.

Opponents' View#

  • Tight deadlines may rush complex reviews and reduce the depth of environmental and technical scrutiny.
  • Shorter timelines could limit meaningful public and Indigenous participation, leading to weaker input or later disputes.
  • Gives broad discretion to Cabinet to pick “aligned” projects, which could favor certain sectors or firms.
  • Unclear scope until regulations name the covered laws, creating uncertainty for others.
  • May strain regulators, increasing risk of mistakes or legal challenges if processes feel compressed.
  • Emphasis on very large projects (e.g., over $250 million) may sideline smaller but valuable local projects.