Back to Bills

Shielding School, Sport, and Youth Health Rules

Full Title:
Protecting Alberta’s Children Statutes Amendment Act, 2025

Summary#

This bill adds legal shields to parts of three Alberta laws on schools, sports, and health care for minors. It says those parts will still apply even if they limit certain rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Alberta Bill of Rights, or the Alberta Human Rights Act. This uses the “notwithstanding clause” (a rule that lets a legislature pass a law that works even if it may limit certain Charter rights, for up to five years at a time).

Key changes:

  • Education Act: Declares that several recent school rules will operate even if they conflict with Charter or human rights protections.
  • Fairness and Safety in Sport Act (2024): Declares the whole Act will operate the same way, and it treats the Fairness and Safety in Sport Regulation (AR 124/2025) as if it were part of the Act so the shield applies to it too.
  • Health Professions Act: Declares that new sections on youth care will operate the same way, and it treats related regulations and orders—including Ministerial Order No. 31/2025—as part of the Act so the shield covers them.
  • Clarifies that these protections apply to those regulations and orders, not just the Acts themselves.

What it means for you#

  • Students and parents

    • School rules covered by this bill (for example, recent rules on parental notification and related matters) will stay in force even if someone argues they violate certain rights.
    • Courts and human rights bodies will have limited power to change or pause those rules while the declaration is in place.
    • You can still use school board policies and complaint processes, but rights-based legal challenges face new limits.
  • Teachers, principals, and school boards

    • Clear direction to follow the covered school rules, with added protection from some Charter and human rights challenges.
    • Local policies need to align with the covered provincial rules.
  • Youth athletes and sports organizations

    • The current sport eligibility rules (including who can play in female categories) remain in force and are shielded from many rights-based challenges.
    • Provincial sport bodies are expected to apply the provincial rules, even if national policies differ.
  • Health professionals and clinics

    • Practice rules and limits on gender-related care for minors set by regulation or ministerial order remain in force and are shielded from many rights-based challenges.
    • Colleges and members must follow these rules; patient rights complaints may not change them while the shield is active.
  • General public

    • Using the notwithstanding clause means these rules apply for up to five years at a time, and the Legislature can renew them.
    • Other kinds of legal challenges (for example, on issues not covered by the clause) may still occur, but the path is narrower.

Expenses#

Estimated annual cost: No publicly available information.

  • The bill mainly changes legal status, not programs or services.
  • Any fiscal impact would likely relate to legal costs, but no official estimate is available.

Proponents' View#

  • Says it protects children’s safety and well-being by keeping clear rules in place in schools, sports, and health care.
  • Argues it upholds parents’ role in key decisions affecting their children.
  • Claims it ensures fairness and safety in women’s and girls’ sports.
  • Provides certainty for teachers, coaches, and health professionals about what rules apply.
  • Notes the notwithstanding clause is a lawful tool that lets elected lawmakers set policy without long court delays.

Opponents' View#

  • Warns it overrides Charter and human rights protections, especially affecting LGBTQ2S+ youth.
  • Says it removes or weakens legal remedies for people who feel they are being discriminated against.
  • Criticizes the broad use of the clause, including applying it to regulations and ministerial orders, as undermining checks and balances.
  • Argues the rules could harm vulnerable youth and limit professional judgment in health care.
  • Notes there may still be legal uncertainty on issues the clause does not cover, leading to confusion and conflict.