Canada Limits Trade Changes for Dairy and Eggs

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-202
May 29, 2025 (a month ago)
Canadian Federal
First reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act (supply management)

Summary

This bill changes how the Canadian government handles trade agreements related to dairy, poultry, and eggs. It states that the Minister of Foreign Affairs cannot make promises or commitments in trade deals that would raise the limit on tariffs (taxes on imports) for these products or lower tariffs on imported goods that exceed current limits. The goal is to keep the current trade restrictions on these food items intact.

What it means for you

This bill mainly affects dairy, poultry, and eggs. It means that Canada will not agree to trade deals that allow more imports of these products without additional tariffs or that reduce tariffs on imports that go beyond current limits. For consumers, this could help keep prices of dairy, poultry, and eggs stable or higher, because fewer imports at lower tariffs might mean less competition for local producers. It also means the government is less likely to loosen trade restrictions on these food items in international agreements, potentially supporting Canadian farmers and producers.

Expenses

No publicly available information. The bill mainly limits future trade commitments and does not require new spending. It could influence trade negotiations, but any cost or savings to the government from these changes are not specified in the bill.

Proponents' View

Supporters argue this bill helps protect Canadian farmers and the local food industry. By preventing trade deals that could reduce tariffs or increase import limits, it aims to keep prices stable for Canadian consumers and support domestic producers. They believe this promotes local agriculture and keeps Canadian food supplies secure.

Opponents' View

Opponents say the bill could limit Canada's ability to participate in international trade agreements freely. By restricting the Minister’s power to make certain trade commitments, it might reduce opportunities for trade that could benefit consumers through lower prices or more product choices. Critics also warn it could make Canada less flexible in global trade negotiations and could lead to higher food prices if imports are restricted.

Original Bill