Canada Limits Assisted Dying for Mental Disorders

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-218
June 20, 2025 (9 days ago)
Canadian Federal
First reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)
Healthcare

Summary

This bill changes Canada's laws about medical assistance in dying (MAID). It says that having a mental disorder alone cannot be considered a reason for someone to receive MAID. This means that mental health issues are now excluded as a valid medical condition for assisted dying. The bill aims to prevent mental health problems from being seen as an acceptable reason for ending one's life with medical help. It also updates how these rules are applied if other related laws come into effect.

What it means for you

If someone has a mental disorder, they will no longer be able to get medical assistance in dying because of that condition alone. The law now considers mental disorders as not enough for MAID. This change might affect people who are experiencing mental health issues and are considering options for ending their lives. It emphasizes that support for mental health care and suicide prevention should be priority instead of MAID. For families and friends, this law clarifies that mental health problems should not lead to assisted death under current rules.

Expenses

Data unavailable.

Proponents' View

Supporters of the bill believe that excluding mental disorders from qualifying conditions helps protect vulnerable people. They argue that mental health issues can change over time and might not justify ending life. The bill aligns with the goal of providing mental health support and suicide prevention rather than assisted dying. Proponents say this change can prevent possible misuse or premature decisions for MAID based on mental health alone.

Opponents' View

Opponents argue that the bill could limit access to MAID for some people with mental disorders who might be in severe suffering. They believe that mental health conditions can be serious and unchangeable, and excluding them might deny some individuals their right to choice. Critics worry that the law could reduce support options for people in mental health crises and increase stigma around mental illness. They also point out that mental health care and mental illness are complex, and some argue for careful case-by-case assessments instead of blanket exclusions.

Original Bill