Back to Bills

Government To Publish List Of Large Forgiven Debts

Full Title: An Act to amend the Financial Administration Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts (debt forgiveness registry)

Summary#

This bill requires the government to create an online list of large debts and obligations that certain companies or organizations owe to the government. If these debts are $1 million or more, and have been forgiven or written off, they will be publicly listed. The bill also updates some other laws to restrict sharing of confidential information related to these debts for tax and other legal purposes.

What it means for you#

The government will have a searchable online database showing big debts owed by corporations or partnerships that have been forgiven or settled. This can increase transparency about large public debts and how they are handled. It may also provide the public with better information about the government's financial dealings with large companies. The updates to other laws mainly prevent sharing of certain financial and tax information that could reveal details about these debts, in some cases restricting that information to specific government purposes.

Expenses#

The bill does not specify the cost of creating and maintaining the new online registry. It is likely that the government will need to spend resources to set this up and keep it current. Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

Supporters argue that the public registry increases transparency by making information about large debts publicly accessible. They say this helps hold organizations accountable and provides clearer information about government financial obligations. The law also enhances privacy by limiting the sharing of sensitive financial information, which proponents believe protects individuals and companies involved.

Opponents' View#

Opponents may worry that the new public list could harm the reputation of companies or lead to unnecessary public scrutiny of business affairs. They might also argue that restricting the sharing of confidential information could limit transparency in other areas, such as taxation and legal matters. Additionally, critics may be concerned about the costs of setting up and maintaining the registry and whether those resources could be used elsewhere.

Economics
Public Lands

Votes