This bill changes the Export and Import Permits Act to make it stricter about exporting weapons and related items. It removes special exemptions for certain countries and requires more information from exporters. The bill also makes it harder to get general permits and requires annual reports to Parliament. It aims to better follow the international Arms Trade Treaty, which controls the global trade of weapons. The bill includes rules about verifying where weapons are going and how they are used, especially to prevent war crimes. It also sets deadlines for existing permits and updates how exports are reviewed and reported.
If you or a business export weapons or related items from Canada, these new rules will make it harder to get permits. Companies will need to check more about where their weapons are going and how they will be used. They must also get end-use certificates from the importing country’s government if there is a risk that the weapons could be used for war crimes or other serious violations. The government will report annually on how Canada’s exports follow these rules. For most people, these changes mean Canada will work to prevent weapons from being used in conflicts or crimes, but it could also mean delays or more paperwork for exporters.
Data unavailable.
Supporters say this bill makes Canada’s weapons export rules stronger. It closes loopholes that allowed some weapons to be exported more easily. They believe requiring end-use certificates and banning general permits will prevent weapons from being used in crimes or conflicts. Supporters also argue that reporting each year on exports helps Canada be transparent and accountable. Overall, they see these changes as aligning Canada with international standards and promoting responsible export practices.
Opponents argue that the new rules could slow down or complicate legal exports of weapons. They say banning general permits might restrict legitimate trade and harm businesses. Some worry that increased paperwork and reporting could add costs and delays. They also believe that the government might find it harder to balance safety concerns with economic interests. Critics note that data on how these changes will impact real exports is not available, making it difficult to see if the rules will be practical or effective.