This bill, called the Ukrainian Heritage Month Act, officially designates September as Ukrainian Heritage Month in Canada. It highlights that over 1.3 million Ukrainian-Canadians live in the country. The bill recognizes the long history of Ukrainians in Canada, starting from their first arrival over 125 years ago. It emphasizes the close ties between Canada and Ukraine, especially their shared values like human rights, democracy, and international law. The bill also celebrates the contributions of Ukrainian-Canadians to Canada's culture, including arts, language, food, religion, and traditions. Each year, September will be a month to remember, celebrate, and teach about Ukrainian-Canadians' important role in Canada.
This bill means that every September will be recognized as Ukrainian Heritage Month across Canada. During this time, events and activities may be held to celebrate Ukrainian culture and history. It offers Canadians a chance to learn about Ukrainian traditions and the important contributions of Ukrainian-Canadians. There is no direct cost to individuals, but communities and organizations might organize celebrations or educational programs. It helps promote understanding and friendship between different cultural groups in Canada.
No publicly available information.
Supporters of this bill say it is important to recognize the history and culture of Ukrainian-Canadians. They believe it will strengthen Canada-Ukraine friendship and educate people about Ukrainian contributions. Advocates argue that celebrating Ukrainian Heritage Month can encourage cultural understanding, pride, and community involvement. They see it as a positive step to honor the valuable role that Ukrainian-Canadians have played and continue to play in Canadian society.
Opponents may argue that officially designating a month for one group could divert attention or resources from other cultures or issues. They might say that recognizing many groups equally could be more inclusive. Some might believe that the cost of organizing celebrations and education efforts is unnecessary or that existing cultural celebrations are enough. Others could see it as a symbolic gesture that does not lead to tangible changes. However, specific formal opposition statements are not provided.