An Act to provide for the recognition of the Canada jay as the national bird of Canada

Close Icon

At second reading in the Senate

Bill-S-221
May 28, 2025 (5 days ago)
Canadian Federal
First reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to provide for the recognition of the Canada jay as the national bird of Canada
Indigenous Affairs
Culture and Heritage

Summary

This bill officially names the Canada jay as Canada's national bird. It highlights the bird's strong connection to Canadian history, geography, and culture. The bill notes that the Canada jay is found across all parts of Canada and is not endangered. It is admired for qualities like intelligence and curiosity. The bill also states that the bird is popular among birdwatchers, naturalists, and Canada's Indigenous peoples. The law aims to celebrate this bird as a symbol of Canada’s natural heritage.

What it means for you

Canada will now have an official national bird, the Canada jay. This may lead to new symbols, logos, or celebrations recognizing the bird. Schools, parks, and natural groups might include it in educational programs. The bill does not change laws about wildlife or hunting, as the Canada jay is not protected differently under this law. It is mainly a symbolic recognition of Canada’s natural heritage.

Expenses

No publicly available information. The bill does not specify any costs for government agencies or programs related to recognizing the Canada jay as the national bird.

Proponents' View

Proponents say this bill helps celebrate Canadian wildlife and culture. They argue that recognizing the Canada jay highlights the importance of conservation and appreciation of nature. Supporters believe it can boost interest in Canada's natural parks and birdwatching, which can benefit tourism and education. They also see it as an opportunity to promote pride in Canada’s unique natural environment.

Opponents' View

Opponents might argue that naming a bird as a symbol does not require new laws or spending, so its practical effect is limited. They could say that this bill is mostly symbolic and does not address real environmental or wildlife issues. Additionally, some may think the government should focus on more urgent matters like conservation efforts or climate change. Others might view it as unnecessary or a distraction from other policy priorities.

Original Bill