Bill Clarifies Sterilization as Maiming Acts

Close Icon

At second reading in the Senate

S-228
June 5, 2025 (25 days ago)
Canadian Federal
First reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sterilization procedures)
Social Issues
Criminal Justice

Summary

This bill changes the Criminal Code to make it clear that sterilization procedures are considered acts that wound or maim a person. The law defines sterilization procedures as actions that permanently prevent a person from reproducing. Examples include cutting or tying the fallopian tubes, ovaries, or uterus. The bill also addresses historical issues, noting that sterilizing people without their consent has a harmful history tied to discrimination and racism against Indigenous and racialized groups.

What it means for you

The law now clearly states that sterilization procedures count as acts that wound or maim. This may help protect people from non-consensual sterilization, especially among groups that have faced discrimination. If a person undergoes sterilization without giving valid consent, this could be prosecuted under the Criminal Code. The bill emphasizes the importance of respecting individual consent in medical procedures related to reproductive health.

Expenses

No publicly available information about the costs of this bill.

Proponents' View

Supporters believe this bill helps protect people's rights. They argue that clarifying that sterilization is an act that wounds or maims can prevent non-consensual procedures. Advocates say it recognizes past abuses against Indigenous and racialized groups and aims to improve medical ethics and consent standards. They see it as a step toward addressing historical injustices.

Opponents' View

Opponents may be concerned that the law’s language could lead to unintended legal consequences or overreach in medical situations. They might worry about defining sterilization procedures broadly, which could impact medical practices or create legal risks for health providers. Some may also question whether this change will significantly improve protections or if it addresses the root issues of consent and discrimination.

Original Bill