Back to Bills

Foreign Influence Registry and Accountability Act

Full Title: An Act to establish the Foreign Influence Registry and to amend the Criminal Code

Summary#

The Foreign Influence Registry and Accountability Act introduces an obligation for individuals acting on behalf of foreign entities to report their interactions with Canadian public officials, creating a public registry for oversight. This aims to increase transparency about foreign influence in politics while also imposing strict compliance deadlines and penalties for non-compliance.

What it means for you#

Various groups may be impacted, including:

  • Foreign Lobbyists and Organizations: They will need to navigate new reporting requirements, which could limit their activities in Canada.
  • Small Businesses and NGOs: These entities might struggle with compliance costs and complexities, as they could unintentionally fall under the definition of foreign agents.
  • Political Officials and Legislators: Increased transparency may affect how they engage with foreign parties.

Expenses#

The costs incurred may include:

  • Compliance Costs: Individuals and organizations may need to spend significant time and resources to prepare and file returns, which could be particularly challenging for smaller entities.
  • Legal Costs: There could be expenses related to legal advice on navigating the new requirements and avoiding penalties.
  • Penalties: Fines can reach up to $200,000 for non-compliance or false reporting, which would impose a significant financial burden.

Proponents view#

Supporters believe this Act is essential in combating foreign interference in governance, claiming it protects national integrity and democratic processes. They argue that transparency protects public administrators from corrupt practices and that potential foreign actors would think twice before attempting to engage in manipulative behavior. Additionally, proponents assert that the act could improve security by clearly delineating which foreign influences are under scrutiny.

Opponents view#

Critics argue that the bill may create excessive regulatory burdens and unfairly target legitimate activities. The vague definitions could lead to overreach, potentially penalizing those involved in mere advocacy or collaboration. They worry that the administrative load could deter foreign investment and beneficial partnerships, stifling innovation and projects that could benefit Canada due to fear of penalties. The high fines and possible imprisonment for minor infractions may exacerbate these concerns, impacting not just foreign agents but also the broader landscape of international relations.

Foreign Affairs
National Security
Trade and Commerce

Votes