Summary#
This bill is about the office that handles conflict-of-interest rules for Members of British Columbia’s Legislative Assembly (MLAs). It temporarily lifts the normal time limit on how long an “acting” Conflict of Interest Commissioner can serve. The goal is to keep ethics oversight running without a gap while a permanent commissioner is chosen.
- Lets an acting commissioner serve longer than the usual six-month limit.
- Applies to acting commissioners appointed on or after January 6, 2025.
- Ends on March 31, 2026, or earlier if cabinet sets an earlier date.
- Does not change the commissioner’s powers or duties—only how long an acting commissioner may continue.
- Aims to avoid any pause in ethics advice and investigations for MLAs.
What it means for you#
- Most people: No direct day-to-day change.
- Public and voters: Continuous ethics oversight of MLAs continues, with no gap in handling complaints or giving advice on conflicts of interest (when private interests could affect public duties).
- MLAs: You can keep getting timely advice and rulings on conflict-of-interest questions from the acting commissioner.
- Government and legislature: More time to recruit and agree on a permanent commissioner without interrupting services.
Expenses#
Estimated additional cost: minimal.
- The bill does not create a new office or program. It extends how long an acting commissioner can serve.
- The office’s regular budget, staff, and salary costs continue as usual.
Proponents' View#
- Prevents any gap in watchdog services while a permanent commissioner is selected.
- Maintains public trust by keeping conflict-of-interest advice and investigations available at all times.
- Gives reasonable flexibility if recruitment takes longer than expected.
- Limited in time, ending by March 31, 2026, which keeps the change temporary.
Opponents' View#
- Weakens a safeguard in the law that limits temporary appointments, reducing pressure to appoint a permanent commissioner quickly.
- An acting commissioner serving for an extended period may feel less accountable than a fully appointed permanent commissioner.
- Changes rules midstream, which some may see as setting a poor precedent even if temporary.
- Lack of a set appointment timeline could prolong uncertainty about leadership of the office.