Back to Bills

Fast-Track Energy Plan, Boost Arms for Ukraine

Full Title: An Act to fast track energy and mining projects and to facilitate the provision of munitions to Ukraine and develop its munitions industry

Summary#

This bill orders a federal plan to speed up Canadian energy and mining projects and makes it easier to send munitions to Ukraine. It also tells two Crown corporations to prioritize building Ukraine’s munitions industry. The bill does not itself approve any projects or spend money.

  • Requires a plan within 60 days to “fast track” energy and mining projects, including LNG and civilian nuclear; plan must be published in the Canada Gazette (Part 1).
  • Requires the Defence Minister to offer surplus or no‑longer‑useful defence supplies to Ukraine while any Ukrainian territory is occupied by Russia (Defence Production Act amendment).
  • Extends certain general export and brokering permits so the same types of munitions allowed for the U.S. can also go to Ukraine, under the same terms (Export and Import Permits Act ss.7(1.2), 7.1(3)).
  • Bars adding to the Export Control List any munition excluded for U.S. export if that munition is intended for export to Ukraine (Export and Import Permits Act s.3(3)).
  • Directs Export Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada to give preference to projects that build munitions manufacturing capacity in Ukraine (Export Development Act s.10(1.011); BDC Act s.4(3), s.14(5)(b)).

What it means for you#

  • Households

    • No direct changes to bills, taxes, or benefits. The government must publish a plan, not change laws on approvals yet (Part 1).
  • Workers

    • Energy and mining workers could see more proposals if later actions follow the plan. The bill itself does not change permitting timelines or rules (Part 1).
    • Defence sector workers may see more export activity tied to Ukraine under extended general permits (Export and Import Permits Act ss.7(1.2), 7.1(3)).
  • Energy and mining companies

    • The Minister of Natural Resources must work with provinces to draft a “fast track” plan and publish it within 60 days of Royal Assent (Part 1).
    • The bill does not amend environmental, impact assessment, or Indigenous consultation laws. It creates a plan only (Part 1).
  • Defence manufacturers and exporters

    • If you can export a type of munition to the U.S. under a general export permit, you may export the same type to Ukraine under the same terms while that U.S. permit remains in force (Export and Import Permits Act s.7(1.2)).
    • If you can broker (arrange a sale) of a type of munition for end‑use in certain countries under a general brokering permit, you may broker that same type for end‑use in Ukraine under the same terms while that permit is in force (Export and Import Permits Act s.7.1(3)).
    • Munitions excluded from the Export Control List when exported to the U.S. cannot be put on that list when the destination is Ukraine (Export and Import Permits Act s.3(3)).
  • Brokers and logistics firms

    • Brokering to Ukraine for end‑use in Ukraine is allowed under the same general brokering permit terms that apply to other named countries, for as long as those permits are in force (Export and Import Permits Act s.7.1(3)).
  • Canadian Armed Forces and Department of National Defence

    • The Minister must periodically review inventories and offer to donate any supplies the Minister judges surplus or no longer useful to Canada, for as long as any Ukrainian territory is occupied (Defence Production Act amendment).
  • Export Development Canada and Business Development Bank of Canada clients

    • EDC and BDC must give preference to projects that develop munitions manufacturing capacity in Ukraine. This could influence which transactions receive support or investment priority (Export Development Act s.10(1.011); BDC Act s.4(3), s.14(5)(b)).
  • Provinces and territories

    • The Minister of Natural Resources must collaborate with provincial resource ministers in drafting the fast‑track plan and publish it (Part 1).

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable (no fiscal note; no appropriations in the bill).

  • Administrative cost to draft and publish the fast‑track plan within 60 days: Data unavailable (Part 1).
  • Value of defence supplies to be offered as donations: Data unavailable. The bill sets a duty to offer surplus or no‑longer‑useful items, but lists no amounts and provides no replacement funding (Defence Production Act amendment).
  • Impact on federal revenues from expanded munitions exports or brokering: Data unavailable.
  • EDC/BDC portfolio effects from giving preference to Ukraine munitions projects: Data unavailable. The bill changes priorities but does not authorize new spending (Export Development Act s.10(1.011); BDC Act s.4(3), s.14(5)(b)).

Proponents' View#

  • Speeds delivery of munitions to Ukraine by matching Canada’s general export and brokering permit terms to those used for U.S. shipments, which reduces case‑by‑case approvals (Export and Import Permits Act ss.7(1.2), 7.1(3)).
  • Ensures regular reviews and donations of surplus defence supplies so useful items do not sit idle while Ukraine needs them (Defence Production Act amendment).
  • Builds Ukraine’s own munitions capacity by directing EDC and BDC to prioritize such projects, supporting long‑term self‑sufficiency (Export Development Act s.10(1.011); BDC Act s.4(3), s.14(5)(b)).
  • Starts a concrete, time‑bound process to fast track energy and mining, including LNG and civilian nuclear, to help allies and displace imports from “hostile countries” (Part 1).
  • Relies on existing institutions and permits. The bill sets preferences and permissions but does not require new appropriations (Entire bill; no funding sections).

Opponents' View#

  • Risks to Canadian readiness: mandatory offers of “surplus” items depend on the Minister’s judgment and continue as long as any Ukrainian territory is occupied; replacement needs and costs are not addressed (Defence Production Act amendment).
  • Weakens export oversight: automatically extending general permits from U.S. shipments to Ukraine could reduce case‑by‑case scrutiny and lessen ministerial control, raising diversion or compliance concerns even if permit terms still apply (Export and Import Permits Act ss.7(1.2), 7.1(3)).
  • Skews Crown finance priorities: requiring EDC and BDC to give preference to Ukraine munitions projects may divert support from Canadian SMEs or other sectors and increase risk exposure in a war‑affected market (Export Development Act s.10(1.011); BDC Act s.4(3), s.14(5)(b)).
  • Vague policy target: the plan must aim to “displace energy exports from hostile countries,” a term the bill does not define, which could complicate trade policy or create uncertainty (Part 1).
  • Process concerns: calling to “fast track” projects may signal pressure to compress environmental reviews or consultation, including with Indigenous communities, even though this bill itself does not change those laws (Part 1).

Timeline

May 2, 2024 • House

First reading

Foreign Affairs
National Security
Trade and Commerce
Infrastructure
Climate and Environment
Economics