Canada to Decriminalize Simple Drug Possession

Summary#

This bill would shift Canada’s approach to simple drug possession from criminal law to health. It orders a national strategy on decriminalization and repeals federal criminal offences for simple possession in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). It also makes technical changes to related federal laws. The repeal of possession offences would take effect on a date set by Cabinet, not right away (Coming into Force).

• Repeals CDSA sections 4 and 4.1, which criminalize possession and set “Good Samaritan” protections tied to that offence (Clause 5).
• Orders the Minister of Health to develop a national decriminalization strategy with other ministers and provinces/territories (National Strategy s.(1)-(4)).
• Requires a conference within 180 days of coming into force and a public report to Parliament within 2 years of Royal Assent (National Strategy s.(4); Report to Parliament s.(1)-(2)).
• Does not change laws against trafficking, production, importing, or exporting controlled substances (unchanged CDSA provisions).
• Updates references in the CDSA, Criminal Code, and Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act to reflect decriminalization of possession (Clauses 6-13).

What it means for you#

• Households and people who use drugs

  • After Cabinet sets a date, simple possession of substances in Schedules I–IV would no longer be a federal crime. Police could not charge under CDSA section 4 because it would be repealed (Clause 5; Coming into Force).
  • There would be no immediate replacement penalty. The bill asks for an “administrative sanctions” model to be considered in the strategy (for example, warnings, fines, or mandatory treatment referral), but it does not create one (National Strategy s.(2)(e)).
  • The “Good Samaritan” overdose protections in section 4.1 would be repealed. Because simple possession would also no longer be an offence, those specific protections would no longer be needed for possession charges (Clause 5).

• Workers and service users (health, social services)

  • The strategy must consider expanding treatment, harm reduction, and other health diversion options, and how to fix access and capacity limits (National Strategy s.(2)(b)-(c)). This is a planning requirement, not new funding.
  • Roles for health, social services, police, and courts must be defined in the strategy (National Strategy s.(2)(f)).

• Police, courts, and justice system

  • No CDSA charge for simple possession once the repeal is in force (Clause 5; Coming into Force).
  • Trafficking, production, and other CDSA offences remain enforceable. The bill does not change those crimes.
  • Limitation periods and “designated substance offence” definitions are updated to remove possession references (Clause 4; Clause 6).
  • A national conference within 180 days will address coordination with provinces and territories (National Strategy s.(4)).

• Provinces and territories, Indigenous partners, and communities

  • Required consultations include provincial/territorial governments and First Nations, Inuit, and Métis persons and organizations (National Strategy s.(2)-(3)).
  • The strategy must set national objectives and consider a possession threshold that, above a set amount, could remain criminalized. The bill itself does not set any threshold (National Strategy s.(2)(d)).

• Employers, schools, and businesses

  • No direct new obligations or liabilities in the bill.
  • Workplace, campus, or service policies are unaffected by federal criminal-law changes unless changed by those organizations.

• Timing

  • Strategy work starts after Royal Assent. A ministerial conference is due within 180 days. A public report is due within 2 years (National Strategy s.(4); Report to Parliament s.(1)-(2)).
  • Decriminalization of possession takes effect only when Cabinet issues an order bringing Clauses 4–13 into force (Coming into Force).

Expenses#

• Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• Key points

  • No fiscal note provided. Data unavailable.
  • No explicit appropriations or new funding in the bill. Data unavailable.
  • No new federal fees or fines are created by the bill. Data unavailable.
  • Administrative costs to develop the strategy, run the conference, and report are not quantified. Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

• Treating substance use as a health issue, not a crime, aligns law with expert advice and international evidence cited in the preamble (Preamble).
• Repealing simple possession offences removes criminal records for personal use moving forward, which proponents say can reduce barriers to housing, jobs, and education (Clause 5).
• Required consultations and the 180-day conference are meant to build a coordinated plan across health, justice, and public safety systems (National Strategy s.(2)-(4)).
• The strategy must consider expanding treatment and harm reduction and fixing capacity issues, which proponents argue targets the causes of harm (National Strategy s.(2)(b)-(c)).
• Considering an administrative model (warnings, fines, referrals) could maintain accountability without criminal charges (National Strategy s.(2)(e)).

Opponents' View#

• The bill contains no funding to expand treatment, detox, housing, or harm reduction; without resources, the strategy may not change outcomes (National Strategy s.(2)(b)-(c); Expenses).
• It repeals possession offences before setting any national threshold or administrative sanctions, leaving a potential policy gap until follow-up measures are in place (Clause 5; National Strategy s.(2)(d)-(e)).
• Decriminalization starts only on a future Cabinet date, creating uncertainty for police, courts, and the public during the transition (Coming into Force).
• No provision for clearing past possession records; people with prior convictions receive no relief from this bill (Bill silent).
• Implementation depends on coordination with provinces, territories, and Indigenous partners; uneven service capacity and differing policies may lead to inconsistent access to diversion or care (National Strategy s.(2)-(4)).