Back to Bills

Jury Duty Appreciation Week Act

Full Title:
An Act respecting Jury Duty Appreciation Week

Summary#

  • This bill would create a national “Jury Duty Appreciation Week” in Canada.

  • It sets the second week of May each year to recognize people who serve on juries and to highlight jurors’ well-being and mental health.

  • Names the second week of May as Jury Duty Appreciation Week across Canada.

  • Aims to raise public awareness about the role of juries in justice and democracy.

  • Encourages education about juror experiences, including stress and mental health needs.

  • Makes no changes to jury pay, time off rules, or how courts run trials.

What it means for you#

  • Jurors and potential jurors

    • You may see public thanks, messages, or resources during the second week of May.
    • Your jury summons, pay, and employer protections do not change under this bill.
    • You might see more information on coping with stress from jury service.

  • General public

    • You may notice news stories, social media posts, or community events explaining how juries work.
    • It is a recognition week only. It does not add new duties for the public.

  • Employers

    • No new legal requirements for scheduling or pay.
    • You may receive requests to share information or recognize employees who serve, but participation is voluntary.

  • Courts and governments

    • Have a set week to share information about juries and juror well-being.
    • No new legal powers or duties are created by this bill.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Honors the civic service of jurors, who help keep the justice system fair.
  • Raises awareness of how important juries are to democracy.
  • Promotes education about juror stress and mental health, which can improve support for people serving.
  • A national week creates a clear time for courts, schools, and communities to share facts and resources.

Opponents' View#

  • Largely symbolic; it does not change pay, time off, counseling, or other concrete supports for jurors.
  • May draw attention away from broader reforms that affect jurors, which are often set by provinces and territories.
  • Could lead to small promotion costs without clear, measurable results.
  • Adds a named week to the calendar but may not change public behavior or improve jury experiences on its own.