Back to Bills

Modernize Mental Health Assessments and Hearings

Full Title:
The Mental Health Amendment Act

Summary#

  • This bill changes Manitoba’s Mental Health Act to broaden who can assess people for urgent mental health care, and to allow some exams and hearings to happen by phone or video.

  • The goal is to improve access, especially in places with few doctors, and to modernize how exams and hearings are done.

  • Key changes:

    • Creates a new category called “qualified health professional.” At first, this includes physicians and certain physician or clinical assistants. Later, nurse practitioners and other types may be added by regulation.
    • Lets qualified health professionals and psychiatrists do some mental health exams remotely (by phone or video) when an in‑person exam is not reasonably possible, following rules set by regulation.
    • Requires that the psychiatrist who asks for an involuntary psychiatric assessment (an assessment without the person’s consent) cannot be the same one who conducts it.
    • Allows the mental health review board to hold hearings partly or fully by electronic means.
    • Updates wording in related laws to match these changes.
    • Most changes take effect on October 1, 2026. Adding nurse practitioners and other professions will start later, on a date the government sets.

What it means for you#

  • Patients and families

    • You may be assessed by more types of health workers, not only physicians. This could shorten wait times.
    • If an in‑person exam is not practical, some exams may happen by phone or video. Rules will guide when and how this can be used.
    • The psychiatrist who applies for an involuntary assessment cannot be the one who assesses you. This is meant to reduce conflicts of interest.
    • Hearings about your care may be available online, which can save travel and time.
  • People in rural or remote areas

    • More providers can start or carry out assessments, which may help in areas with few doctors.
    • Remote exams and hearings can reduce long trips to hospitals or hearing rooms.
  • Health workers

    • Physician assistants and clinical assistants are clearly authorized to examine and apply for involuntary psychiatric assessments.
    • Nurse practitioners and other health professions may be added later by regulation, with set qualifications.
    • You may conduct certain exams remotely when in‑person assessment is not reasonably possible, but must follow provincial regulations.
    • A psychiatrist who applies for an involuntary assessment cannot perform that assessment.
  • Courts, police, and review boards

    • A justice (judge) may order an examination by a qualified health professional.
    • The review board may run hearings by electronic means, which can make scheduling easier.
  • Timing

    • Most changes start on October 1, 2026.
    • The parts that add nurse practitioners and allow government to name other professions will start later, on a date the government announces.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Expands access to mental health care by allowing more qualified providers to assess people, which can reduce wait times and help in under‑served areas.
  • Remote exams make care more reachable during bad weather, long distances, or staff shortages, while regulations can set safety standards.
  • Separating who applies for and who conducts an involuntary assessment adds a safeguard for patients.
  • Remote hearings can cut delays, reduce travel costs, and make participation easier for patients and families.
  • Modernizes outdated language and aligns related laws.

Opponents' View#

  • Remote exams may miss important signs that are easier to notice in person, which could affect decisions about involuntary care.
  • Letting non‑physicians handle assessments could lower the level of medical oversight in complex cases.
  • Technology limits and privacy concerns may make remote exams or hearings hard for some people, especially those without stable internet or private space.
  • Staging the rollout and leaving details to future regulations may create uncertainty about who is qualified and when new rules will apply.