Back to Bills

Revive Company to Clear Property Title

Full Title:
Bill PR45, Jinghua Trading (Canada) Ltd. Act, 2026

Summary#

  • This private bill brings back a single Ontario company, Jinghua Trading (Canada) Ltd., that dissolved in 2017.

  • The goal is to let the company legally handle a piece of real estate that was in its name when it dissolved.

  • Revives the company as if it had never been dissolved.

  • Restores the company’s property, rights, and legal powers, and also its debts and duties, from the date it dissolved.

  • Protects any rights other people gained after the company was dissolved.

  • Takes effect as soon as it becomes law.

What it means for you#

  • Most people: No direct impact.

  • Property buyers, sellers, and tenants tied to the company’s land:

    • The company can now sell, transfer, mortgage, or manage the property in its own name.
    • This can clear up title (who legally owns the property) and make deals easier to complete.

  • Creditors and people with claims from before 2017:

    • You can pursue claims against the company again, since it exists in law.
    • The company can also bring claims it had before.

  • Former directors and shareholders:

    • You can use the company to resolve property issues.
    • The company’s past duties and debts also come back, not just its assets.

  • Land registry and legal professionals:

    • Clear authority to register transfers or other documents for the property under the company’s name.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: minimal; mostly administrative.

  • No change to tax rates or broad program spending.
  • Any costs are likely limited to routine legislative and registry processing.
  • No publicly available fiscal estimate.

Proponents' View#

  • Fixes a practical problem so the company can legally deal with land it still holds.
  • A narrow, one-company measure with no broad policy change.
  • Restores both assets and debts, so it is not a “free pass.”
  • Protects rights that others gained after dissolution, reducing risk to third parties.
  • Improves clarity for land titles and may prevent costly legal disputes.

Opponents' View#

  • Uses legislative time to solve a private matter for one company.
  • Reviving a dissolved company can reopen old disputes or debts, which may surprise some people.
  • Retroactive revival could create confusion about past transactions or responsibilities.
  • Some argue issues like this should be handled through normal corporate procedures instead of special laws.