Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month

Summary#

SR-124, “Relative to Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month of 2026,” is a California Senate resolution, not a bill that amends an existing law. It proclaims September 2026 as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month; its stated goal is to recognize people affected by ovarian cancer and raise awareness.

  • The resolution proclaims September 2026 as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month.
  • It directs the Secretary of the Senate to send copies of the resolution to its author for distribution.
  • Its statements about preventive care and awareness are not requirements for patients, health professionals, or institutions.

What it means for you#

  • General public: September 2026 is officially recognized by the resolution as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month.
  • People seeking health care: The resolution does not create a screening program, require screening, or change access to care.
  • Secretary of the Senate: The Secretary must send copies of the resolution to its author for distribution.

Money#

No cost information is in the available material.

  • The Secretary of the Senate must send copies, but no cost estimate is given.
  • The resolution does not provide funding or create a paid program.

What is unclear#

  • The resolution does not say whether or how any public awareness activities will be organized.
  • It encourages routine screenings but does not specify what screenings it means; it also states that there is no simple and reliable way to screen for ovarian cancer.

Case for#

  • A possible argument for the resolution is that formally recognizing the month can draw attention to a cancer the resolution says is often diagnosed at a late stage.
  • The recognition can honor people affected by ovarian cancer and acknowledge work on research, advocacy, and care.

Case against#

  • One concern is that the resolution does not fund or require awareness, research, or care activities; its practical effect is mainly recognition.
  • Its call for routine screenings is not specific, even though the resolution says there is no simple and reliable screening method.

Votes

Senate 3rd Reading SR124 Weber Pierson et al

For (98%)
Paired (3%)