Summary#

This bill changes the federal Impact Assessment Act to let the federal government and a province sign an agreement so certain projects use the province’s assessment instead of the federal one. If an agreement and a federal order are in place, the federal Act will not apply to those projects. The bill sets rules for publishing draft agreements, taking public comments, how long agreements last, and how they can end (Bill, subsections (1)–(9)).

• Exempts “designated projects” from the federal Act when they are assessed under a province’s process and a federal order covers that province (Bill, subsection (1)).
• Requires a written federal–provincial agreement that says the province’s process is designed to assess likely effects, including effects under federal jurisdiction, and to identify mitigation measures (Bill, subsection (2)(a)-(b)).
• Publishes draft agreements and allows a 60‑day period for anyone to comment or object; publishes a summary of how comments were handled (Bill, subsections (3)–(5)).
• Publishes final agreements (Bill, subsection (6)).
• Limits agreements to 5 years unless renewed; either party can end an agreement with 3 months’ notice; the federal order may be revoked if the agreement ends (Bill, subsections (7)–(9)).

What it means for you#

• Households and community members
  • For covered provinces, public input on specific projects will occur through the province’s assessment process, not the federal one (Bill, subsection (1)).
  • You can comment on a draft federal–provincial agreement during a 60‑day window before it is signed; the Minister must publish how comments or objections were handled (Bill, subsections (3)–(5)).
• Workers and project proponents
  • Where an agreement and order are in place, a designated project that is subject to the province’s assessment will not go through a separate federal assessment under the Impact Assessment Act (Bill, subsection (1)).
  • You will need to follow the province’s assessment rules and timelines for those projects. The bill does not set new timelines or standards beyond the two minimum design features in subsection (2) (Bill, subsection (2)).
• Businesses
  • Potentially one assessment process instead of two, if your project is designated and also subject to the province’s process in a covered province (Bill, subsection (1)).
  • Agreements can expire after 5 years or be ended on 3 months’ notice. The bill does not state transition rules for projects that are mid‑assessment if an agreement ends (Bill, subsections (7)–(8)).
• Indigenous governments and communities
  • For covered provinces, federal project‑level assessment steps under the Impact Assessment Act would not apply to designated projects assessed by the province. Participation would occur under the province’s system and any terms in the agreement. The bill does not mention Indigenous consultation or rights (Bill, subsections (1)–(2)).
• Local governments and NGOs
  • Engagement for designated projects will shift to the province’s process in covered provinces. There is a single federal 60‑day comment period at the agreement stage, not for each project (Bill, subsections (3)–(5)).
• Geographic scope
  • The bill applies to provinces. It does not mention territories (Bill, subsection (2)).

Expenses#

• Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.
• The bill creates no direct appropriations, taxes, or fees in the text. It adds administrative duties to publish agreements, accept and summarize comments, and manage orders and renewals (Bill, subsections (3)–(6), (9)). Data unavailable on federal or provincial implementation costs.

Proponents' View#

• Reduces duplication by allowing one assessment process when a province’s process is used and a federal order is in place (Bill, subsection (1)).
• Maintains attention to federal matters because the provincial process must be designed to assess effects within federal jurisdiction and identify mitigation measures (Bill, subsection (2)(a)-(b)).
• Improves transparency by requiring publication of draft and final agreements and a 60‑day public comment or objection period, with a published summary of how input was handled (Bill, subsections (3)–(6)).
• Adds flexibility and accountability through 5‑year terms, renewal options, and the ability for either party to end an agreement on notice; orders can be revoked if an agreement ends (Bill, subsections (7)–(9)).
• Respects provincial processes by recognizing provincial assessment systems that meet the stated design features (Bill, subsection (2)).

Opponents' View#

• Sets minimal statutory criteria. It does not require the provincial process to match all factors or procedures in the federal Act beyond assessing likely effects (including federal‑jurisdiction effects) and identifying mitigation. This may allow uneven standards across provinces (Bill, subsection (2)(a)-(b)).
• Shifts project‑level participation to provincial systems. Federal public participation requirements under the Impact Assessment Act would not apply to exempted projects, which could reduce or change public input depending on the province (Bill, subsection (1)).
• Creates uncertainty. Agreements can end on 3 months’ notice and expire after 5 years. The bill does not state how projects already underway would be handled if an agreement ends (Bill, subsections (7)–(8)).
• Limits federal oversight. The federal order is revoked at the Minister’s recommendation and is not automatically revoked when an agreement ends, which could create gaps or confusion (Bill, subsection (9)).
• Omits explicit provisions on Indigenous consultation or rights, leaving those matters to provincial processes or the terms of each agreement (Bill, subsections (1)–(2)).