Peacetime Service and Sacrifice Memorial Day Act

Loading versions…Read this official publication

Summary matches the latest captured text

Summary version: First Reading · 2025-10-22

Last source check:

Read the latest official text

Summary#

Bill C-252, the Peacetime Service and Sacrifice Memorial Day Act, would create a new standalone Act. It would name October 22 each year “Peacetime Service and Sacrifice Memorial Day” and require the national flag on the Peace Tower to be lowered to half-mast that day. Its stated goal is to encourage Canadians to remember and honour Canadian Armed Forces members who died on Canadian soil during peacetime. These are proposed provisions, not provisions in force.

  • The date would be designated throughout Canada, but the bill does not require ceremonies or other public observances.
  • The national flag on the Peace Tower would have to be lowered to half-mast on that date.
  • The bill does not require other flags to be lowered or create a public holiday.

What it means for you#

  • Members of the public: The Act would encourage remembrance, but would not require you to take part in any observance.
  • Federal government: The national flag on the Peace Tower would have to be lowered to half-mast on October 22. The bill does not require other federal offices or sites to hold events.
  • Workers, students and businesses: The bill does not change work or school schedules, or require businesses to close.

Money#

No cost information is in the available material.

  • The bill requires the Peace Tower flag to be lowered, but gives no cost estimate and does not authorize specific spending.

What is unclear#

  • The bill does not define “peacetime” or set out which deaths fall within its stated purpose.
  • It does not explain how the government would decide whether a particular death fits that purpose. The date is fixed, and there is no application or review process in the bill.
  • The text gives no start date.
  • The text does not say whether the day would overlap with or change any existing remembrance observances.

Case for#

  • The preamble notes that Canadian Armed Forces members have died in non-combat roles on Canadian soil. A designated day could give public recognition to losses that may receive less attention than deaths in war.
  • October 22 is the anniversary of Corporal Nathan Cirillo’s death at the National War Memorial. A recurring date and a half-mast flag would provide a visible way to mark the day.
  • The bill sets a national date without requiring people or organizations to hold events.

Case against#

  • The bill’s main required action is lowering the Peace Tower flag. It does not provide for ceremonies, education or other forms of remembrance, so the practical scope of the observance is limited.
  • The terms describing the losses the day is meant to honour are not defined. That leaves unclear which deaths the stated purpose covers.
  • The bill does not specify who would oversee implementation or when the designation would begin.

How the text changed

Loading versions…