Part INoticePublished: May 9, 2020

Trade Tribunal finds DND hotel complaints valid

Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 154, Number 19: COMMISSIONS

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal determined on April 29, 2020 that two complaints by Newland Canada Corporation about Department of National Defence hotel procurements in Cologne, Germany were valid. The Tribunal also decided on April 21, 2020 to open an inquiry into a complaint from Hakson Gloves and Safety Wears Inc. about an RCMP solicitation for slash-resistant gloves, which could lead to review or re-running of those procurements.

Published
May 9, 2020
Department
Unavailable
Section
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
Comment deadline
Unavailable
Effective date
April 29, 2020
Publication part
Part I

Summary

Summary#

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal made a final finding on April 29, 2020 that two complaints by Newland Canada Corporation about Defence procurement for hotel rooms in Cologne, Germany were valid. Separately, on April 21, 2020 the Tribunal decided to open an inquiry after a complaint from Hakson Gloves and Safety Wears Inc. about an RCMP procurement for slash‑resistant gloves.

What it does#

  • The Tribunal found complaints by Newland Canada Corporation (Calgary) concerning two Department of National Defence hotel contracts (for Canadian Armed Forces personnel in Cologne) to be valid. This follows complaints that Newland had submitted the lowest-priced compliant bids but was not awarded the contracts.
  • The Tribunal decided to conduct an inquiry into a complaint by Hakson Gloves and Safety Wears Inc. (Mississauga) about a Royal Canadian Mounted Police procurement for slash‑resistant gloves (Solicitation No. 202005604). Hakson says the limited tender process excluded them, was unjustified, and favoured a vendor in the National Capital Region.

Who's affected#

  • Newland Canada Corporation and other bidders for the two hotel contracts in Cologne.
  • The Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces personnel who would use those accommodations.
  • Hakson Gloves and Safety Wears Inc., the vendor that filed the glove complaint.
  • Suppliers of slash‑resistant gloves competing for the RCMP contract, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police procurement staff.
  • More broadly, companies that bid on federal procurements may be affected because the Tribunal’s decisions can lead to contract awards being reconsidered or procurement processes being reviewed.

Why it matters#

  • These actions affect who wins government contracts. A valid complaint can lead to a contract being re-awarded or a procurement being re-run, which matters to businesses competing for public contracts.
  • For the public and for affected personnel, the outcome could change which hotels are used for Canadian Armed Forces members overseas and which companies supply safety gear to the RCMP.
  • The cases show the Tribunal is active in reviewing federal procurement fairness. If you bid on government work, these decisions show there is a route to challenge procurement processes.

Key topics

Canadian International Trade Tribunal ActCanadian International Trade TribunalDepartment of National DefenceRoyal Canadian Mounted PoliceNewland Canada CorporationHakson Gloves and Safety Wears Inc.hotel accommodation servicesslash-resistant glovesfederal procurementCologne, Germanyprocurement inquirySolicitation No. 202005604Canadian Armed Forces

Source: Canada Gazette

Official source