Part INoticePublished: January 15, 2022

Witness Fee Rules Clarified for Tribunal

Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 156, Number 3: Rules Amending the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal Rules of Procedure

A proposed amendment clarifies when witnesses must be paid before attending hearings of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal by aligning the Tribunal rules with the Federal Courts Rules (including amounts in Tariff A). The proposal was published on 2022-01-15 and invited comments within 30 days (deadline 2022-02-14).

Published
January 15, 2022
Department
Unavailable
Section
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
Comment deadline
February 14, 2022
Effective date
Unavailable
Publication part
Part I

Summary

Summary#

This is a proposed small change to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal Rules of Procedure that would make it clear when witnesses must be paid before attending a Tribunal hearing. The proposal was published on January 15, 2022 and interested people were invited to comment within 30 days (deadline February 14, 2022).

What it does#

  • Clarifies how the Tribunal handles witness fees by aligning the rules with the Federal Courts Rules and the reference in subsection 21.2(3) of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.
  • Adds a new subrule (renumbering Rule 35 to include subrule 35(1) and adding subrule 35(2)) that says a witness does not have to attend a hearing unless any fees and allowances the member or panel has decided the witness should get under subsection 21.2(3) have been paid or at least offered to the witness.
  • Restates that the Tribunal intends to use the same fee and travel-allowance approach found in the Federal Courts Rules (including amounts set out in Tariff A).

Who's affected#

  • Witnesses called to appear before the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal are the main group affected.
  • Parties involved in Tribunal hearings (the person making a disclosure, the person accused, their representatives) will also notice the change because it clarifies who must arrange payment of witness fees.
  • The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) was consulted and agreed with the proposal; they are relevant because the Tribunal must consider RCMP security and confidentiality needs.

Why it matters#

  • It removes confusion about whether witnesses must be paid before attending. That can prevent last-minute delays in hearings.
  • It makes the Tribunal’s practice consistent with the federal court system, so tribunals, parties, and witnesses know what fee amounts and conditions apply (for example the amounts set out in Tariff A of the Federal Courts Rules).
  • This is mainly an administrative clarification rather than a policy change; it should make hearings run more smoothly and reduce uncertainty about who pays and when.

Key topics

Public Servants Disclosure Protection ActPublic Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal Rules of ProcedurePublic Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunalsubsection 21.2(3)Federal Courts RulesTariff Awitness feestravel expensestribunal procedureRoyal Canadian Mounted Policeadministrative lawhearing attendance

Source: Canada Gazette

Official source