Mercury in Lamps: New Phase-Out Rules
Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 156, Number 52: Regulations Amending the Products Containing Mercury Regulations
Proposed amendments would lower allowable mercury in several lamp types, set phase-out dates for most mercury-containing lighting, and tighten labelling, testing and reporting requirements. The changes are intended to align Canada with the Minamata Convention and accelerate the switch to mercury-free, energy-efficient LED alternatives.
- Published
- December 24, 2022
- Department
- Unavailable
- Section
- REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
- Comment deadline
- March 9, 2023
- Effective date
- Unavailable
- Publication part
- Part I
Summary
Summary#
The government published proposed changes to the Products Containing Mercury Regulations. The amendments would lower allowed mercury in some lamps, phase out many mercury-containing lighting products on set dates, and tighten rules on labelling, testing and reporting. This is a proposal (not law yet) meant to align Canada with the Minamata Convention and reduce mercury releases.
What it does#
- Lowers the mercury limits for some fluorescent lamps — for example, some cold cathode lamps would be limited to 3.5 mg of mercury per lamp (previously higher).
- Phases out most mercury-containing lamps for general lighting:
- Most general lighting lamps would be prohibited from being made or imported after January 1, 2024.
- High-pressure sodium vapour lamps for general lighting would be phased out by January 1, 2029.
- Sets an end date for mercury-containing catalysts used in making polyurethane: prohibited after January 1, 2028.
- Creates a short transition period for replacement lamps: many replacement lamps could be made or imported between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2026, after which their sale would be more restricted.
- Carves out specific exemptions and new lamp categories (e.g., lamps for growing plants, air treatment, water treatment), with a phase-out planned for plant-growing lamps by December 31, 2028.
- Clarifies labelling, testing and record-keeping rules:
- Broadens which accreditation bodies are accepted.
- Requires electronic reporting in specified formats and allows electronic record-keeping.
- Requires manufacturers and importers to report exports of mercury-containing products.
- Adds a duty for anyone who manufactures or imports a product in breach of the ban to ensure it is sent for authorized disposal or returned to source.
- Administrative updates to align reporting schedules with international practices and to remove exemptions for products no longer in use.
Who's affected#
- Consumers who buy lighting: especially buyers of fluorescent, HID and specialty lamps. Many households and businesses will switch to LED alternatives.
- Lamp manufacturers, importers and retailers: they must comply with new mercury limits, different reporting dates, and new labelling rules.
- Small businesses involved with certain lamp types, measuring instruments, reference materials or catalysts — the government estimates about 30 small businesses would be affected among roughly 110 regulated parties.
- Health and environmental stakeholders and communities that rely on fish (including some Indigenous communities) are indirect beneficiaries because reduced mercury in the environment lowers exposure risks.
- Dental and laboratory sectors: the proposed amendments keep existing exemptions for encapsulated dental amalgam and clarify that lab reference materials can still be used; some stakeholders asked for stricter rules but the proposal does not ban amalgam.
Why it matters#
- Reduces mercury entering the environment: the government estimates avoided mercury releases of about 775 kg over 2024–2033, including 120 kg avoided to air (about 85% of avoided releases would otherwise go to landfill or land).
- Big expected net benefits: the analysis projects monetized benefits of $4.11 billion versus costs of $353 million, for net benefits of about $3.76 billion over 2024–2033. Much of the benefit comes from energy savings as lamps switch to more efficient LEDs ($3.87 billion estimated energy savings) and reduced greenhouse gases (4.7 Mt avoided emissions).
- Upfront costs and transitions: consumers may pay more up front for LEDs (the analysis estimates an additional $353 million in the first 10 years), but LEDs last longer and use less energy. Some fixtures might need replacement; those fixture costs were not fully estimated.
- Health and ecological reasons: lowering mercury in products helps reduce contamination of fish and wildlife, which matters for food safety and for communities (including Indigenous Peoples) who rely on traditional foods.
- International alignment: the changes help Canada meet obligations under the Minamata Convention and align with regulatory moves in the EU and some U.S. states to phase out mercury in lamps.
Key topics
Source: Canada Gazette