First Nations borrowing and debt fund rules
Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act: SOR/2024-255
Final regulations amend rules under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to clarify how the combined debt reserve fund is measured, how borrowing members are notified and billed to replenish it, and to set a formula for each member’s share. They also repeal the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations (integrating that content into the Act and the Revenue Management Implementation Regulations) and clarify co‑management/third‑party intervention powers and how intervention costs may be recovered.
- Published
- December 18, 2024
- Department
- Unavailable
- Section
- Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act
- Comment deadline
- Unavailable
- Effective date
- January 6, 2025
- Publication part
- Part II
Summary
Summary#
These are the final regulations titled Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act: SOR/2024-255. They update how pooled borrowing and emergency interventions work under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act and fold an older regulation about “other revenues” into the main rules. The changes take effect when the linked law comes into force (targeted for January 6, 2025).
What it does#
-
Changes the rules about the debt reserve fund (the pot of money that protects pooled borrowing):
- Defines how a reduction in the fund is measured (based on the balance just before the first payment that used the fund).
- Requires the First Nations Finance Authority to give borrowing First Nations at least 90 days notice before asking them to replenish the fund.
- Sets a clear formula so each borrowing member with an unpaid loan pays a share that is proportionate to its outstanding loan. Defaulting members can still be billed separately for what they owe.
-
Repeals the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations and moves their main ideas into the Revenue Management Implementation Regulations and the Act itself. That integrates rules about using non‑tax revenues (like leases or royalties) as security for borrowing.
-
Updates the Revenue Management Implementation Regulations to reflect modern practice:
- Replaces “local services capital infrastructure” with local services capital assets and adds other revenues capital assets.
- Expands what records and explanations the First Nations Financial Management Board (the Board) can request if it steps in to co-manage or take over some financial functions.
- Requires the Board to prepare a remedial plan within 60 days after an intervention starts.
- Clarifies how notices, orders and copies of documents are shared with financial institutions and the relevant institutions.
-
Clarifies how an intervention can be paid for:
- If both the First Nation and the Board cannot pay the Board’s fees for an intervention, the Board may notify and then invoice the First Nations Finance Authority. The Authority must pay such invoices within 30 days unless circumstances change.
-
Makes technical and bilingual (bijural) drafting fixes:
- Small wording, capitalization, and legal‑term changes to make the rules work the same in all provinces and in both English and French.
Who's affected#
- First Nations that are signed up to the regime — currently 350+ First Nations are part of the Act’s system and those with outstanding loans will be most directly affected.
- The four institutions that run the system:
- First Nations Financial Management Board (the Board)
- First Nations Finance Authority
- First Nations Tax Commission
- First Nations Infrastructure Institute
- Councils, tax administrators, law‑making delegates, managers, auditors and staff of participating First Nations who handle local revenues, loans, records and reporting.
- Financial institutions (banks, credit unions, trustees) that hold or manage First Nation revenue accounts or investments.
- First Nations community members may notice effects indirectly if local borrowing, taxes or services are changed.
Why it matters#
- It makes replenishment of the debt reserve fund more predictable. Only First Nations with an outstanding loan will be asked to top up the fund, and the notice and formula aim to reduce surprise bills.
- It integrates rules for using a wider range of First Nation revenues as security for borrowing. That can make it easier for communities to use leases, royalties or other revenues to access capital.
- It gives the Board clearer powers and access to records during a co‑management or third‑party management intervention. That should make interventions faster and more effective if ever needed.
- It sets a back‑stop for paying intervention costs by allowing the First Nations Finance Authority to be invoiced if the Board and the First Nation can’t pay. The government and institutions expect this billing option to be used rarely; to date, no First Nation has defaulted on a pooled loan and the fund has never had to be replenished because of a default.
- The changes are expected to have modest costs for the institutions to update materials. Combined impacts on institutions and First Nations are estimated to be under $1 million annually and under $10 million over 10 years.
- The amendments support First Nations’ capacity to raise and use local revenues for infrastructure and services. Since 2008, taxing under the Act has raised about $645.9 million for local services. The broader context includes a noted infrastructure deficit on reserve estimated between $30 billion and $349.2 billion, so clearer borrowing rules can matter for community projects.
Key topics
Source: Canada Gazette