AML rules for MSBs, WLATMs, real estate
Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 158, Number 27: Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Money Services Business Registration)
Proposed amendments (published 2024-07-06) would add new anti‑money‑laundering and counter‑terrorist‑financing obligations: a sanctioned‑property report to FINTRAC, tighter registration and criminal‑record checks for money services businesses (MSBs), AML rules for white‑label ATMs (WLATMs), new obligations for title insurers and real‑estate transactions, and expanded casino disbursement reporting. The government estimates about $17 million in costs over 10 years; this is a proposal and comments were invited within 30 days of publication.
Summary
Summary#
This is a proposed set of regulatory changes from the Department of Finance published in the Canada Gazette on July 6, 2024. It would add new anti‑money‑laundering and counter‑terrorist‑financing rules — for example, a new sanctioned‑property report, tighter checks on certain money services businesses, rules for white‑label ATMs, new obligations for title insurers and real estate transactions, and a change to casino reporting. The government estimates the package would cost about $17 million over a 10‑year period. This is a proposal (not law); comments were invited within 30 days of publication.
What it does#
- Creates a new sanctioned‑property report to be sent to FINTRAC when reporting entities hold assets covered by sanctions.
- Strengthens the registration rules for money services businesses (MSBs) by requiring criminal record checks for domestic MSBs’ senior officers and for MSB agents, with checks submitted at registration and reregistration every 2 years and kept for 5 years.
- Brings acquirers that connect and service private or “white‑label” ATMs into the AML framework. Those acquirers would have to register with FINTRAC, verify the identity of owners/operators, keep records, run a compliance program and report suspicious transactions.
- Makes title insurers reporting entities under the AML rules and requires real estate representatives to identify unrepresented parties and any third parties in a transaction (and keep the related records).
- Requires casinos to report the ultimate beneficiary of cash disbursements of $10,000 or more on an updated casino disbursement form.
Who's affected#
- Financial institutions and other existing reporting entities (banks, insurers, accountants, securities dealers, BC notaries, etc.).
- Money services businesses (MSBs) — both domestic and foreign, plus their agents. (There are about 2,566 MSBs on record.)
- White‑label ATM acquirers (estimated 5 acquirers) and WLATM owners (estimated 10,000).
- Title insurers (about 4) and real estate agents and brokers — plus unrepresented buyers/sellers in property deals (estimates in the analysis point to tens of thousands of affected transactions).
- Casinos (estimated 18) and individuals who collect casino disbursements on behalf of others.
- FINTRAC (the federal financial intelligence unit) will implement and supervise the new reporting and registration requirements.
If any part of the source is unclear about who exactly will be affected, the proposal notes that some numbers are estimates and that certain details would be worked out in guidance.
Why it matters#
- The package is meant to close gaps that regulators say let criminals evade sanctions or hide illicit funds — especially in real estate, MSBs and private ATMs. That can protect ordinary Canadians, housing markets, and the financial system.
- It moves Canada closer to international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) ahead of Canada’s next FATF evaluation (2025–26). Meeting those standards helps avoid international reputational or economic costs.
- Businesses will face compliance costs (the government estimates about $17 million total over 10 years). Small businesses and service providers may need new processes, record storage, and staff time. Some costs could be passed on to consumers.
- For the public, the practical effects include slightly more identity checks in certain real‑estate and casino transactions, and stricter oversight of some payment‑service and private‑ATM activities — all aimed at reducing money laundering and sanction‑evasion risks.
Key topics
Source: Canada Gazette