Back to Bills

Supplementary Appropriation Act, (Operations Expenditures), No. 2, 2025-2026.

Full Title:
Supplementary Appropriation Act, (Operations Expenditures), No. 2, 2025-2026.

Summary#

This bill adds more operating money to the Northwest Territories government’s 2025–26 budget. It authorizes departments to spend up to an extra $86,866,000 for day‑to‑day operations (not capital projects). The goal is to cover government expenses for the rest of the fiscal year.

  • Main change: Approves $86,866,000 in supplementary operating funds for 2025–26, drawn from the Consolidated Revenue Fund (the GNWT’s main bank account), under existing financial rules.
  • Timing: Applies to the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, and is deemed to start April 1, 2025. Any unused authority expires March 31, 2026.
  • Departments receiving added funds:
    • Environment and Climate Change: $46,847,000
    • Finance: $12,000,000
    • Education, Culture and Employment: $15,807,000
    • Health and Social Services: $3,503,000
    • Industry, Tourism and Investment: $2,871,000
    • Municipal and Community Affairs: $5,465,000
    • Executive and Indigenous Affairs: $373,000
  • The bill does not include amortization (depreciation) or capital spending.

What it means for you#

  • Most residents: This bill does not change taxes, eligibility rules, or create new programs. It is an internal funding top‑up so departments can continue services this year.
  • People using programs in these areas:
    • Environment and climate programs: With the largest increase to Environment and Climate Change, services in this area could be maintained or expanded. The bill does not specify which activities.
    • Education, culture, and employment programs: Added funds could support ongoing services. The bill does not specify which programs.
    • Health and social services: The increase could help sustain current health or social programs. Details are not provided.
    • Municipal and community supports: More funds for Municipal and Community Affairs could support community services. Exact uses are not listed.
    • Business, tourism, and investment supports: Extra funding to Industry, Tourism and Investment could support ongoing programs. Specific uses are not stated.
    • Indigenous relations and intergovernmental work: A small increase to Executive and Indigenous Affairs could support engagement or coordination. The bill does not give details.
  • What is unclear: The bill does not explain the reasons for each increase or which specific programs will receive the money.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: about $86,866,000 in additional operating spending for 2025–26.

  • By department:
    • Environment and Climate Change: $46,847,000
    • Finance: $12,000,000
    • Education, Culture and Employment: $15,807,000
    • Health and Social Services: $3,503,000
    • Industry, Tourism and Investment: $2,871,000
    • Municipal and Community Affairs: $5,465,000
    • Executive and Indigenous Affairs: $373,000
  • The bill does not state funding sources or offsets (for example, whether this is covered by existing revenues, reserves, or will affect deficits or debt).
  • No new fees, fines, or taxes are created in this bill.
  • Unused spending authority lapses on March 31, 2026, and spending must be reported in the Public Accounts under the Financial Administration Act.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to ensure departments have enough money to keep programs and services running when original budgets are not sufficient.
  • Supplementary appropriations can address in‑year cost pressures and urgent needs without disrupting services.
  • Funds are time‑limited (lapse at year‑end) and must be accounted for in the Public Accounts, which could be seen as maintaining financial control and transparency.
  • Concentrating the largest share in Environment and Climate Change could be seen as prioritizing operational needs in that area this year.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the bill gives only department totals and no program‑level details, which may limit public transparency about how the money will be used.
  • It is unclear whether this added spending is offset by savings elsewhere or how it affects the overall budget balance, debt, or future budgets.
  • Relying on supplementary appropriations rather than the main budget could be seen as reducing predictability and long‑term planning.
  • There may be questions about whether departments can deploy the added funds effectively before the March 31, 2026 deadline, given the short remaining time in the fiscal year.