Back to Bills

Block Under-16s From Certain Social Apps

Full Title:
Social Media Responsibility Act

Summary#

This bill would require certain social media platforms to block children under 16 in Nova Scotia. Its goal is to reduce harms linked to school, like distraction or sleep loss, that may come from social media use.

  • Applies to “age‑restricted social media platforms,” meaning online services mainly used for social interaction where users can post and connect. Business‑only tools are not included.
  • Platforms must take reasonable steps to stop users under 16 from using their service and from having accounts.
  • A court can fine a platform up to $250,000 for breaking the rules. If the company made money from the violation, the court can add an extra fine equal to those gains.
  • Each day a violation continues can count as a separate offence.
  • The provincial cabinet will set the detailed rules by regulation, including which services are covered, what steps are required, and any exemptions. Services not accessible in Nova Scotia are not covered.

What it means for you#

  • Youth under 16
    • You may not be able to sign up for, or keep using, some social media apps or sites.
    • You may be asked to prove your age before you can access a covered platform.
  • Parents and guardians
    • Your child under 16 may lose access to certain social media accounts.
    • You may be asked to help with age checks (for example, confirming a child’s age).
  • People 16 and older
    • No direct change to your access from this bill.
  • Schools and teachers
    • Fewer classroom disruptions from social media use may result over time.
    • Enforcement falls on platforms, not schools.
  • Online platforms and app stores
    • Must put in place age‑gating and other measures for Nova Scotia users if covered.
    • Risk of fines up to $250,000 per offence, with possible extra fines equal to any profits gained. Each day out of compliance can count as a new offence.
  • Community groups and small sites with social features
    • If a service fits the definition of a covered platform, it would need to follow the same under‑16 restrictions unless exempted by regulation.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Limiting under‑16 access to certain social apps can reduce distraction and help students focus on school.
  • May cut exposure to bullying, harmful content, and late‑night scrolling that can hurt sleep and grades.
  • Pushes large platforms to take age checks and youth safety more seriously.
  • Flexible regulations let the government target specific platforms and update rules as technology changes.
  • Meaningful fines give the law real teeth and encourage compliance.

Opponents' View#

  • Bans under‑16s from many social platforms, which some see as overreach into parenting and young people’s ability to connect and learn online.
  • Age checks may require IDs or other data, raising privacy and data‑security concerns.
  • Enforcement could be hard; teens might still bypass age gates or misstate their age.
  • Unclear which sites will be covered until regulations are set, creating uncertainty for users and smaller services.
  • Could burden small or niche platforms with compliance costs, or lead them to limit features for Nova Scotia users.