Back to Bills

Neighborhood Homes Tax Credit

Full Title:
Neighborhood Homes Investment Act

Summary#

This bill creates a new federal tax credit called the Neighborhood Homes Credit. The credit is aimed at encouraging the building or substantial rehabilitation of owner-occupied homes in low-income or distressed census tracts. The goal is to close the “value gap” (when building costs exceed sale price) and increase affordable starter-home supply and homeownership in those neighborhoods.

Key changes:

  • New tax credit: Developers, builders, and certain rehabilitators can claim a credit for qualified residences sold at an affordable price or rehabilitated for owner-occupants.
  • Credit size rules: The credit for each home is the smallest of (a) excess development costs over the sale price (or up to 120% of that if the state agency allows), (b) 40% of eligible development costs, or (c) 32% of the national median sale price for new homes.
  • Who decides: State-designated “neighborhood homes credit agencies” allocate the credit amounts to projects, set standards, and must report allocations and project results to the federal government.
  • Price and buyer limits: Homes must be sold at capped “affordable” prices tied to area median family income (generally up to 4× area median family income, with higher caps for multi-unit homes). Buyers’ family income must be at or below 140% of area median income (adjusted in special cases).
  • Repayment rule and lien: If the home is resold within 5 years, the seller must repay part of the gain to the state agency on a sliding scale; agencies place liens and may waive repayment for hardship.
  • Effective date: Applies to tax years beginning after December 31, 2025.

What it means for you#

  • Small residential builders and developers

    • Could receive a federal tax credit to cover part of the gap between building or rehab costs and the required affordable sale price.
    • Must apply to their state’s neighborhood homes credit agency and receive an allocation before most construction costs count for the credit.
    • Face reporting and compliance requirements from the state agency.

  • Homeowners and prospective buyers in qualifying neighborhoods

    • More starter homes or rehabilitated owner-occupied homes may be built or sold at lower prices in qualified census tracts.
    • To buy an “affordable sale” home under this program, a buyer’s family income generally must be 140% of area median income or less.
    • If you buy a subsidized home and then sell it within 5 years, the seller (you) may need to repay a portion of any gain, subject to lien and possible hardship waiver.

  • Nonprofit developers

    • Eligible for allocations under special set-asides similar to rules used in other housing credit programs.
    • Agencies must consider nonprofit involvement when allocating some credits.

  • State housing agencies (the neighborhood homes credit agency)

    • Must create a qualified allocation plan, set standards for reasonable costs and construction quality, limit certain allocations to specified types of tracts, report annually to the U.S. Treasury, and do public outreach.
    • Receive an annual state dollar cap for allocations equal to the greater of $9 per resident or $12 million (with a 3-year carryforward for unused amounts).

  • Taxpayers claiming the credit

    • The credit becomes part of the general business credit for income tax purposes and is allowed against the alternative minimum tax.
    • Builders or rehabilitators claim the credit in the taxable year of sale (or in some owner-occupied rehab cases, when rehab completes).

  • Contractors and small remodelers

    • Could benefit indirectly if state plans are written to reduce application barriers for small builders, but must meet documentation and standards set by the state agency.

Expenses#

No publicly available fiscal estimate or cost projection is provided in the bill text or materials you supplied.

Likely types of expense or trade-offs (based on the bill text):

  • The credit would reduce federal tax revenue (a tax expenditure), though the bill gives no dollar estimate.
  • State agencies will incur administrative costs for allocation, oversight, reporting, outreach, and placing liens.
  • Developers and builders will face compliance costs to document eligible costs and meet agency standards.
  • The bill allows exclusion from gross income for state energy subsidies to qualified residences, which could slightly affect federal tax receipts for some homeowners.

Proponents' View#

The bill appears intended to address these problems:

  • Close the “value gap” that prevents building affordable owner-occupied homes in distressed areas.
  • Increase homeownership and neighborhood stability in low-income and distressed communities.
  • Encourage new construction and substantial rehabilitation of small owner-occupied homes (single-family, condos, 2–4 unit homes).
  • Use state agencies’ local knowledge to target allocations where starter homes are most needed, while setting standards and reporting to ensure accountability.
  • Promote energy improvements by excluding state energy subsidies for qualified residences from federal gross income.

Possible benefits supporters may argue:

  • This could make more starter homes financially feasible for builders.
  • It could direct subsidies to owner-occupied housing rather than rental properties.
  • The required state plans and reporting aim to focus investments on neighborhoods with real need and produce public data on outcomes.

Opponents' View#

Possible concerns and trade-offs that follow from the bill text:

  • The bill does not include a federal cost estimate in the text supplied, so the total revenue loss to the Treasury is unknown.
  • The credit relies heavily on state agency discretion to define “reasonable development costs,” select tracts, and allow up to 120% of cost-gap relief in some cases. That discretion could lead to uneven application across states.
  • Administrative burden: states must run allocation programs, monitor projects, place liens, and report outcomes. Those costs are not quantified.
  • Enforcement and repayment complexity: collecting a share of gains on early resales, enforcing liens, and assessing hardship waivers could be administratively difficult.
  • The program’s rules are complex (multiple caps, definitions, allocation limits), which may increase compliance costs and favor larger or more experienced sponsors unless state plans successfully reduce application barriers for small builders.
  • It is unclear how the program will interact with other federal, state, and local housing subsidies or whether it might incentivize keeping sale prices low in ways that affect neighborhood market dynamics.

What is unclear from the bill text:

  • Exact federal budget impact (no score or fiscal note provided in the materials you gave).
  • How aggressively state agencies will set standards and approve costs, and how consistently they will apply the rules across states.
  • How the program will interact with other housing programs in practice and how much additional housing it will create.