Back to Bills

Strengthen Global Health Workforce Strategy

Full Title:
SECURE Health Act

Summary#

This bill, the SECURE Health Act, directs the federal government to focus more U.S. foreign aid on strengthening frontline health workers around the world. It creates a 5-year global health workforce strategy, a presidentially appointed Global Health Workforce Coordinator in the State Department, and an interagency task force inside the National Security Council to align U.S. programs. The bill also requires annual U.S. reporting on workforce spending and seeks a regular independent global report on health workers.

  • Main change: Requires a coordinated U.S. strategy and oversight for global health workforce investments.
  • New offices: Creates a Global Health Workforce Coordinator post and an interagency task force.
  • Reporting: Mandates an annual U.S. report on how funds support different health worker roles, training, salaries, and protection measures.
  • Funding rules: Directs that U.S. salary support include host organization contributions and plans to transition salaries to domestic funding.
  • Global report: Instructs the U.S. to seek a biennial independent global report on health workforce status.

What it means for you#

  • Frontline health workers in low- and middle-income countries: The bill aims to increase attention and coordinated funding for training, pay, and protections for health workers. It could lead to more integrated support rather than funds tied to a single disease.
  • Host organizations (hospitals, clinics, ministries of health): Any U.S. salary support for health workers must include contributions from the host organization and plans to move pay to local funding over time. This may change how organizations receive and budget for U.S. funds.
  • Federal departments and agencies that fund global health (for example, State, USAID, HHS): Agencies must align their policies with a central 5-year strategy and report spending on workforce support. They may need to change how they plan and track programs.
  • President and National Security Council: The President must appoint a Global Health Workforce Coordinator and set up a task force co-chaired by that coordinator and an NSC senior director.
  • General public / taxpayers: The bill increases federal planning and reporting on global health workforce support. The bill text does not include specific new spending levels.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

  • The bill does not include a fiscal note or specific funding amounts in the text provided.
  • Implementing the strategy, the coordinator's office, the interagency task force, and annual reporting could create administrative costs for federal agencies.
  • Requiring host organization contributions and transition plans could change funding flows in recipient countries; the bill does not specify who pays for transition periods.
  • The plan to seek an independent global biennial report could involve support or funding commitments, but the bill gives no dollar amounts.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to make U.S. global health aid more effective by focusing on the people who deliver care—frontline health workers.
  • A possible argument for the bill is that better coordination across agencies can reduce duplication and make investments work across multiple diseases and services.
  • The bill could support sustainability by requiring host contributions and transition plans for worker salaries, encouraging domestic financing over time.
  • More detailed annual reporting would likely increase transparency about how U.S. funds support training, salaries, and protections for health workers.
  • Supporting an independent global report could help track worldwide progress and encourage more international and domestic investment in health workers.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the bill gives few details about new funding or budgets. It is unclear how the coordinator’s office and task force would be funded and staffed.
  • The requirement that host organizations contribute to salaries and plan for transition to domestic financing may be hard to meet in low-income or crisis-affected countries. This could limit salary support where local finances are weak.
  • The bill does not clearly define the coordinator’s authority to direct or reallocate funds across multiple federal agencies. This could raise coordination or implementation challenges.
  • The added reporting and planning requirements may increase administrative work for agencies and partners without clear measures of program impact.
  • It is unclear how protections for health workers (during conflicts or outbreaks) would be enforced or funded under the bill.