Back to Bills

Boosting Community Behavioral Health Funding

Full Title:
Ensuring Excellence in Mental Health Act

Summary#

This bill expands how certified community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs) are paid and supported under Medicaid and creates a new CCBHC benefit in Medicare. It sets up cost-related, prospective payment systems (PPS) for CCBHCs in both programs, creates federal grants and data/technical support, and gives certain legal protections to clinic clinicians. The broad goal is to raise and stabilize funding for community mental health and substance use services and to expand access.

Key changes:

  • Gives States the option to accept third‑party accreditation for Medicaid CCBHCs starting Jan 1, 2026.
  • Requires or allows States to pay Medicaid CCBHCs under a prospective payment system tied to clinic costs, with rules for units of payment, outlier payments, rebasing, and managed care supplemental payments.
  • Adds CCBHC services as a covered benefit under Medicare and directs the Secretary to create a Medicare PPS for CCBHCs; sets Medicare payment mechanics (80% of allowed amount).
  • Creates federal operating grants, technical assistance, and a data system for CCBHCs, with specific annual funding authorizations for FY2026–2030.
  • Extends Federal Tort Claims Act liability protection to clinicians in CCBHCs and extends an Anti‑Kickback safe harbor for coinsurance waivers to these clinics.

What it means for you#

  • Patients (Medicaid enrollees and Medicare beneficiaries):

    • More access could come from expanded CCBHC services, including additional services clinics choose to offer (which may include some primary care services).
    • Medicare beneficiaries receiving CCBHC services would not owe the Medicare Part B deductible for those services (similar to Federally Qualified Health Centers).
    • Clinics may be able to waive patient coinsurance without triggering certain Anti‑Kickback rules.

  • Community behavioral health clinics (CCBHCs):

    • Can be paid under cost‑based prospective payment systems in Medicaid and Medicare, which aims to make payments more predictable and tied to clinic costs.
    • Eligible for federal operating grants to help start, expand, or modernize services.
    • May seek accreditation from approved private bodies as a pathway to meet program criteria.
    • Clinic clinicians would gain FTCA liability protection (federal tort claims coverage).

  • States and Medicaid programs:

    • May adopt a PPS for CCBHCs and must include payment rules if they enroll people with benchmark coverage.
    • If clinics contract with managed care plans, States generally must pay supplemental amounts so clinics receive their PPS rates, or they may delegate payment responsibility to managed care plans while ensuring clinics still receive required amounts.
    • States will carry out rate setting, rebasing (at least every three years), and oversight of payments.

  • Managed care organizations:

    • May be required to contract with clinics but States must ensure clinics receive PPS amounts; alternative payment approaches are allowed if they meet minimum payment requirements.

  • Accreditation bodies and data vendors:

    • Can apply to be approved to accredit clinics and must meet oversight standards. A new federal data system will require reporting and analysis.

  • Clinicians and staff:

    • Gain potential FTCA liability protection if working in CCBHCs recognized under the law.
    • May see more funding available for training, technology, and infrastructure via grants.

Expenses#

No overall federal cost estimate is provided in the bill text or accompanying materials. The bill does, however, authorize specific appropriations:

  • Operating grants: $552,500,000 per year for each fiscal year 2026 through 2030.
  • Technical assistance: $8,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
  • Data infrastructure: $51,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

Other cost implications noted in the bill but without dollar estimates:

  • Higher Medicaid and Medicare payments to clinics under new PPS rules would increase federal and state spending, but the bill does not include a fiscal estimate of those amounts.
  • Administrative costs for States to design and run PPS, oversee managed care payments, and set up reporting requirements.
  • Costs to approve and oversee accrediting bodies and to implement FTCA protections administratively.

Proponents' View#

The bill appears intended to:

  • Strengthen and stabilize payment for community mental health and addiction services by tying clinic payments to reasonable, cost‑based rates.
  • Expand access to comprehensive behavioral health services by adding CCBHC coverage to Medicare and expanding the scope of services under Medicaid.
  • Support clinic capacity through multi‑year operating grants, technical assistance, and funding for data systems to monitor and improve services.
  • Promote quality and consistency through an accreditation option and federal oversight of accrediting bodies.
  • Protect clinicians with FTCA coverage, which could help clinics recruit and retain staff.

Opponents' View#

One concern is that the bill does not provide a full fiscal estimate for the Medicaid and Medicare payment changes. Other potential issues and trade-offs include:

  • The new payment systems could increase federal and state spending substantially; the bill sets some grant authorizations but gives no overall cost estimate for expanded reimbursement.
  • States must build payment systems and oversight capacity; that creates administrative work and costs for state Medicaid agencies.
  • In managed care settings, the requirement for supplemental payments or delegation to plans raises questions about whether clinics will reliably receive intended amounts and how oversight will ensure compliance.
  • The bill allows clinics to offer additional services (including primary care) but leaves it to clinics and States to decide which; this could create uneven service availability across areas.
  • There is an unclear timing issue in the bill: one section adds Medicare coverage effective January 1, 2027, while another provision says the title’s amendments apply to services furnished on or after January 1, 2026. The text does not clearly resolve this date mismatch.
  • The creation and oversight of approved accrediting bodies add new responsibilities and potential costs, and the practical effects depend on how the Secretary implements the approval and oversight processes.