Congressional Record

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Vol. 172, No. 85 · 119th Congress, 2nd session

House of Representatives

Page H3553 · Official text

The House met at noon and was called to order by the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Fine).

Designation of Speaker Pro Tempore

Page H3553 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following communication from the Speaker:

Text printed in the Record (155 characters)
May 19, 2026. I hereby appoint the Honorable Randy Fine to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day. Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Morning-Hour Debate

Page H3553 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the order of the House of January 6, 2026, the Chair will now recognize Members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning-hour debate. The Chair will alternate recognition between the parties, with time equally allocated between the parties and each Member other than the majority and minority leaders and the minority whip limited to 5 minutes, but in no event shall debate continue beyond 1:50 p.m.

Recognizing Falcons Landing 30th Anniversary

Pages H3553–H3554 · Official text

(Mr. Subramanyam of Virginia was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the 30th anniversary of Falcons Landing, which has served as a home for veterans and families in our community. Located in Potomac Falls, Falcons Landing was founded with a simple but important mission: to provide a strong community, quality care, and dignity for those who spent their lives in service to others. Over the last three decades that mission has never changed, and today, hundreds of residents call Falcons Landing home. Every day, the staff and caregivers at Falcons Landing continue that tradition of service through the care and support they provide to residents and families. What makes Falcons Landing so special is not just the campus itself, which is beautiful, but the sense of community, respect, and purpose that exists there every single day. Communities like Falcons Landing remind us of the importance of taking care of our veterans and their families. Congratulations to Falcons Landing on this milestone. I hear that they are tuning in live today, so hello to everyone at Falcons Landing. Mr. Speaker, I thank the staff, caregivers, and leadership for their 30 years of service to Loudoun County and our veterans community.

Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA)

Mr. Speaker, more than 30,000 patients and their families live with progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration, PSP and CBD. Patients with PSP and CBD may lose the ability to control their speech, balance, coordination, and eye movements. Quality of life can deteriorate quickly, and most people who suffer from PSP and CBD will become dependent on care in just 3 to 4 years. These neurodegenerative diseases are as common as ALS, but most people have never heard of them. They received more attention recently when my predecessor, Jennifer Wexton, was diagnosed with PSP herself and worked tirelessly in this body to spread awareness about the condition. However, PSP and CBD still don't get the same type of recognition or funding for research, and there are currently no cures. That is why I am introducing a resolution to designate May as PSP and CBD awareness month. We must dedicate more resources to finding treatments and cures for these neurodegenerative diseases, and we must also recognize the courage and the struggles of those who have PSP and CBD and build awareness and understanding of the impact on their lives and their families' lives. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in recognizing May as PSP and CBD awareness month by cosponsoring this resolution.

Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA)

Mr. Speaker, I have heard directly from several constituents that their green cards and USCIS applications have been put on hold, creating major disruptions for families across the country. This means no work authorizations being issued, jobs lost, college admissions denied, and families kept apart, not to mention the impact on our economy. USCIS has already faced the largest backlog in history with over 11.5 million cases pending, but USCIS adjudications are now being placed on hold. Why is that? Because a new policy requires USCIS officers to resubmit fingerprint information for most pending cases dated before April 27. This creates delays across the agency, and there was no warning of this change to applicants. No leeway or flexibility was given to those affected, and we have received no explanation of how the resubmission process is actually going to improve public safety. That is why I am leading a letter to USCIS with Representative Krishnamoorthi demanding answers and accountability over these adjudication holds. USCIS needs the resources to efficiently process applications, not additional delays and security theater.

Recognizing Chief Jim Meek for 50 Years of Service

Page H3554 · Official text

(Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

John Joyce (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize Jim Meek for 50 years of dedicated service as a volunteer with the Blue Ridge Fire and Rescue Company in Blue Ridge Summit, Pennsylvania. Over the years, Chief Meek has served the fire department in multiple active service and administrative roles, including fire chief for 25 years. Chief Meek has been praised as a significant role model and mentor for the department's first responders. His 50-year commitment to public safety and the protection of property is an inspiration to constituents throughout the 13th Congressional District. For his bravery and selfless service, I express gratitude to Chief Meek for his enduring commitment to protecting communities, and I extend my best wishes to him in all future endeavors.

John Joyce (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize the Blair County Conservation District for 60 years of service as an advocate for natural resources and the county's agricultural community. Established in 1966, the Conservation District focuses on the protection and the preservation of Blair County's natural resources. With pride, I join in a yearlong commemoration of the Conservation District's milestone anniversary. For six decades, the district has played an essential role in supporting our communities through conservation programs that help to preserve Blair County's rich natural heritage for future generations. Mr. Speaker, I express gratitude to Conservation District Manager Donna Fisher, her board of directors, and the professional staff for expanding upon their distinguished legacy.

John Joyce (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Brechbill & Helman Construction Company of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, for 60 years of success as an industry leader. Founded in 1966 by Darrell Brechbill and John Helman, the company originated with three employees but possessed a vision that transformed them into a thriving construction business. Over the past six decades, the company has expanded its expertise across a wide range of projects. Brechbill & Helman have created a legacy of spaces that are created to strengthen the community and support businesses. Join me in congratulating company founders Darrell Brechbill and John Helman, Barb Runyon, and Matt Dice on this milestone anniversary.

John Joyce (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the life and public service of Joe Metzgar, who recently passed away in Altoona, Pennsylvania. For over 20 years, Joe served as Logan Township supervisor. Many have noted that Joe could put a smile on your face even during intense discussions at meetings. A proud United States Air Force veteran, Joe has been described as an honest and fair supervisor who took a commonsense approach to all issues. In addition, Joe was a field auditor for the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. Mr. Speaker, as we pause to remember Joe's legacy of service, we also keep his entire family in our prayers. Join me in honoring the life of Joe Metzgar, a dedicated husband, father, and grandfather, who always had the best interests of Logan Township in his heart.

Honoring the Life and Legacy of Linda Salley

Page H3554 · Official text

(Mr. Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

Brian K. Fitzpatrick (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor a woman whose life was a gift to Bucks County, Pennsylvania, and whose legacy will live far beyond the years she walked among us, Linda Salley of Levittown. Linda was a visionary leader, a gifted educator, a keeper of history, a builder of bridges, and a trusted partner in service. Above all, she was a dear friend. Mr. Speaker, there are some people who do not simply pass through a community. They enlarge it. They deepen its memory. They strengthen its character and strengthen its conscience. They leave behind a light by which others may find their way. Linda Salley was such a person. Her life was rooted in faith, expressed in service, kindness, courage, and that steady belief that every person carries a story worthy of being heard. Linda once reflected that every joy and sorrow, every frustration and hope, every human encounter becomes part of one exquisite quilt. In many ways, that was the work of her life. She took the scattered pieces of memory, stories that were neglected, voices that were overlooked, chapters left out of our common telling, and she stitched them into something whole, something beautiful, and something enduring. As a teacher and administrator, Linda shaped young minds. As a founding member, president, and executive director of the African American Museum of Bucks County, she shaped the soul of our community. It was the honor of my life to work alongside Linda over the years and to see up close the depth of her conviction and the power of her vision. One of my greatest honors, Mr. Speaker, has been helping Linda and the African American Museum of Bucks County secure a permanent home at the historic Boone Farm in Middletown Township. For years, the African American Museum of Bucks County carried its mission across our region, into schools, museums, churches, civic spaces, and community gatherings, bringing stories too often left untold into the light. For Linda, Boone Farm was never just a location. It was a fulfillment of a promise that the history she worked so faithfully to preserve would finally have a place to stand, a place to teach, and a place to endure. Long after today, children will walk through those doors. Families will see themselves in the story, and neighbors will learn, remember, and understand. In that sacred work and memory, Linda's hand will still be guiding us. Mr. Speaker, Linda Salley understood a truth our Nation must never forget: History is not merely what we inherit. It is what we are brave enough to preserve, honest enough to tell, and faithful enough to pass on. Bucks County is a better place because Linda Salley lived. Our children are wiser. Our history is richer, and our community is more whole. Mr. Speaker, we mourn Linda's passing, but we will always celebrate the extraordinary life she lived and the work that she will pass on to others. The light that she lit is now ours to carry.

Rising Costs of Healthcare

Pages H3554–H3555 · Official text

(Mr. Johnson of Georgia was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr. (D-GA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to sound the alarm on skyrocketing healthcare costs in this country. Americans all across the country, including Georgia's Fourth Congressional District, are having a hard time and making very difficult decisions. They have to decide whether it is more important to pay for their groceries--and don't get me started on the cost of gas to go to work--or to provide their family with healthcare. It is estimated that healthcare will cost more than $26 trillion through the year 2036, making healthcare the largest category of Federal spending. This Republican rubber-stamped Congress has failed to advance extensions to the enhanced premium tax credits, causing more families to have to make these difficult decisions--decisions we should not have to make in a country like this, but don't take my word for it. For example, my constituent, Julia has a 34-year-old son that has a brain condition that makes it difficult for him to work. He needs brain specialists and prescriptions to prevent him from having seizures, debilitating headaches, and memory loss, but without healthcare subsidies, his health insurance costs rose 400 percent this year. Because of the high cost of healthcare for her son, Julia, who is responsible for paying all of the bills, has no savings. Extending the subsidies would have helped her put food on the table and make ends meet. Another example is my constituent, Vivian from Tucker, who lives with chronic psoriatic arthritis and suffers from vision problems. Her medication costs $4,000 a month. Without extensions of the subsidies, she and her husband's healthcare premiums skyrocketed from $50 to $1,300 a month, a 2,400 percent increase. That is a cost they simply cannot afford. Vivian said ObamaCare saved their lives. Lastly, I would like to recognize a student at Georgia State University named Melani, whose parents' monthly premiums went from $250 to $850 a month, a 250 percent increase. As a student, she receives health insurance through her school, but her family's premiums tripled, making their coverage financially impossible. Her parents, who are in their late fifties and early sixties, had to cancel their insurance because the costs are simply too high. The current tax credits are no longer sufficient to meaningfully offset rising insurance prices she told me. Without adequate support, Melani's parents are forced to go uninsured and face the tax penalty, despite desperately wanting to keep their coverage. Mr. Speaker, with Trump's war of choice in the Middle East and rising prices at home, Republicans have turned their backs on the very people who sent them to the Halls of Congress. I believe that healthcare is a fundamental human right. When a loved one is in the hospital, the only question that should be asked is: "How do we get them better?" not, "How much is it going to cost?" I will continue to speak up and speak out about these issues and fight for the people of Georgia's Fourth Congressional District.

Friends of National Service

Page H3555 · Official text

(Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

Glenn Thompson (R-PA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to highlight the power of civic engagement and the profound impact volunteering has on all of our communities. To champion the vital work of service clubs and their volunteers, I founded the Congressional Service Organization Caucus in 2019 with my friend Congressman Jimmy Panetta of California. Volunteer service is a cornerstone of a successful and strong community. The relationships we create through service often give people the courage to take the next steps in life. My journey in service began as a Scout washing local fire trucks, an experience I will always remember. Over the years, I have been proud to continue serving my community, first as an Eagle Scout, later as a volunteer firefighter and a school board member. Volunteering and dedicating my life to public service is a part of a greater calling to make a difference in people's lives, and it is a priority I will always uphold. Through my own personal experiences, I have learned that volunteering allows people to connect with others, learn new skills, build relationships, and, most importantly, brings people a sense of purpose. As a senior member of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, I know volunteering can help people build lasting careers. This is one of the many reasons why I support legislation that brings volunteer opportunities to schools, colleges, and to workforce sites. Mr. Speaker, I highlight the many notable service organizations across the United States, including Kiwanis, the Lions Club, Optimists, the Rotary Club, and AmeriCorps, among many more. These organizations share the same goal of making a positive impact on others' lives. Last week, I was honored to receive the National Service Champion Award from Voices for National Service, a coalition of organizations that prioritize service opportunities. I applaud Voices for National Service for their continued support of AmeriCorps. Programs through AmeriCorps create meaningful opportunities for people to serve, respond to local needs, and make a tangible difference in people's lives. I thank the thousands of volunteers at AmeriCorps who give back to others. Your goodwill touches the lives of real Americans and is an essential part of the fabric of our communities. I look forward to continuing to work in Congress to ensure volunteering and service programs receive the recognition that they deserve.

CELEBRATING THE 30th ANNIVERSARY OF SIERRA COLLEGE NEVADA COUNTY CAMPUS

Pages H3555–H3556 · Official text

(Mr. Kiley of California was recognized to address the House for 5 minutes.)

Kevin Kiley (I-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I will take a moment to recognize and celebrate the 30th anniversary of the Sierra College Nevada County Campus. First opening its doors to the Nevada County community in 1996, Sierra College has remained dedicated to cultivating students' success by empowering them to achieve their goals and support them in their academic endeavors. This institution provides access to a high-quality education among a diverse student population, while striving to meet the unique needs of its large student body. I thank Sierra College for their invaluable service to our community as they work tirelessly to prepare the next generation for what lies ahead in their academic and professional journeys. The Sierra College Nevada County Campus celebrated this milestone on Saturday, April 25, and unveiled a time capsule that was sealed in 1996 when the campus first opened its doors to the community. On behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I am honored to recognize the Sierra College Nevada County campus for their three decades of outstanding commitment to the education of our communities.

Kevin Kiley (I-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to take a moment to honor and congratulate Chief Troy Bergstrom of the Roseville Police Department, who retired at the end of April following 31 years of exceptional public service. Holding a bachelor's and master's degree in criminal justice from California State University, Sacramento, Chief Bergstrom began his career with the San Mateo Police Department in 1995, prior to transferring to the Roseville Police Department in 2000 where he then served for the remainder of his illustrious career. Following his start at the Roseville Police Department, Chief Bergstrom was promoted to sergeant in 2000, lieutenant in 2010, captain in 2016, and then finally as Roseville's 19th police chief in 2021. During his time of service, he worked in varying units of the police department, including patrol, the K9 unit, the crime suppression unit, EOD commander, SWAT, and professional standards and training, all of which contributed to creating a safer community for the residents of Roseville. Throughout his distinguished tenure as chief of police, he led a 240-member department and directed an annual operating budget of $68 million with skill and integrity. To reduce crime in the community, Chief Bergstrom built the Crime Suppression Unit and the Real Time Crime Center, both of which aided in improving call response time, officer safety, and investigative abilities. These initiatives and his leadership contributed to a decrease in crime throughout the years, reaching an 8 percent decrease in 2025, and setting a high standard for public safety. In addition to his police service, he also serves on the board of directors for the Roseville Police Athletics League and the California Chiefs of Police Association and is a member of many organizations such as the FBI National Academy Associates. His compassion for the community is demonstrated through these roles, as well as by his commitment to expanding city services to assist unsheltered veterans and introduce a crisis care K9, Butter, to serve those in need. Chief Bergstrom is highly valued by the Roseville community for his leadership, guidance, and dedication to public safety. He will be leaving a lasting impact on the department as his knowledge, strength, and care have shaped not only his team, but the Roseville community as a whole. His active engagement and dedication to his role have made him a pillar of inspiration in the public, and it has been an honor to be part of the community that he serves. Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives and California's Third Congressional District, I wish Chief Troy Bergstrom an exciting retirement and thank him for his more than three decades of exceptional service.

Recess

Page H3556 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess until 2 p.m. today.

Accordingly (at 12 o'clock and 24 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.

After Recess

Page H3556 · Official text

The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. LaHood) at 2 p.m.

Prayer

Page H3556 · Official text

The Chaplain, the Reverend Margaret Grun Kibben, offered the following prayer: God of all blessings and giver of every good gift, You need nothing from us, yet You desire that, in receiving the bounty of Your grace, we would want to give back to You and to Your creation out of our genuine love and appreciation that we have for You. In some ways, our gifts seem so small, even inconsequential, when compared to the vastness of Your boundless generosity. Give us confidence that You know our hearts and that You desire that we give from the pureness within us, whatever we have, no matter how insignificant it may feel. May anything we present to You reflect our best selves. When we use our gifts of time, energy, and talents here in this place, keep us from seeing them as a means to garner Your favor. Break the spirit of competition within us that feeds our pride and causes us to seek the enhancement of our reputation vice the benefit of those around us. May we set aside our short-sighted ambitions, and instead look for ways to work together to invest all that we value into the advancement of Your eternal kingdom. Holy Lord, receive these our gifts and use them according to Your will. We pray because of all that is ours when we do so in Your name. Amen.

The Journal

Page H3556 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

The Chair has examined the Journal of the last day's proceedings and announces to the House the approval thereof. Pursuant to clause 1 of rule I, the Journal stands approved.

Pledge of Allegiance

Page H3556 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Will the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Menefee) come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Mr. MENEFEE led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

Text printed in the Record (174 characters)
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

(Mr. MENEFEE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)

Christian D. Menefee (D-TX)

Mr. Speaker, grocery prices are up. Gas prices are up. Families across this country are choosing between rent and food. What does this administration do? They just created a $1.7 billion fund, not for working people, but for the President's people. The President confirmed it himself. January 6 insurrectionists, who stormed this very building, can apply. These are the same people he already pardoned. Now, they get a payout as well using taxpayer dollars with no court, no judge, just a commission that the President controls, writing checks to whomever this administration decides deserves one. It amazes me that this President, who has said that we don't have money to provide people with childcare, a President who has said we don't have money to provide people with healthcare, that this President and his administration could somehow find $1.7 billion for compensation for criminals, $1.7 billion in reparations for rioters, $1.7 billion in income for insurrectionists. This is corruption, and the American taxpayer is footing the bill. The American people deserve better.

Celebrating the Life of Marilyn Mosley

Page H3556 · Official text

(Mr. JEFFRIES asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute.)

Hakeem S. Jeffries (D-NY)

Mr. Speaker, it is with a heavy heart that I rise today to pay tribute to the life, leadership, and legacy of an incredible mentor, a Clinton Hill legend and someone who provided tremendous support to me throughout the entirety of my public service journey, the iconic Marilyn D. Mosley. Marilyn was born and raised in Brooklyn. She is a proud graduate of New York City Public Schools, including Girls High, where she was voted in 1959 "Most Likely to Succeed." That proved to be a prophetic observation. Marilyn went on to obtain a bachelor's degree from Morgan State University, where she became a proud member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated. She then returned home to City College, where she received two master's degrees in education and went on to serve for over 25 years as a transformational public school teacher and public school administrator. She also held a variety of positions throughout local government, serving with distinction in the Brooklyn Borough President's Office, the City Comptroller's Office, and as a special adviser to the New York City Council Speaker. Though she never served as a legislator herself, she founded the Progressive Association for Political Action and was responsible for the election of political giants decade after decade after decade, including former Congressman Ed Towns, Assemblyman Roger Green, State Senator Velmanette Montgomery, City Comptroller Bill Thompson, and New York State Attorney General Tish James. Her work was instrumental in making sure that Mary Pinkett in 1973 became the first African-American woman ever elected to the New York City Council and opened the door for future generations of Black women, 12 of whom now serve in the 51-member body that is the city council. I can unequivocally say that the people of New York City are better off because of decades of Mama Mosley laboring in the vineyards of our community. I would not be standing here today as a Member of Congress or as House Democratic leader without her love, mentorship, and support. I am so thankful for all of her wisdom, her guidance, her friendship, her mentorship, and her leadership throughout her incredible journey. It is a classic Brooklyn story, and we are eternally grateful for all that she has done. May Mama Mosley forever rest in power.

Honoring Dr. Mariah Walker

Pages H3556–H3557 · Official text

(Ms. ROSS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)

Deborah K. Ross (D-NC)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor North Carolina's new Principal of the Year, Wake County's own Dr. Mariah Walker. As the principal of the Wake Young Women's Leadership Academy, Dr. Walker has dedicated her career to ensuring her students are supported and empowered. She has strengthened academic excellence, expanded postsecondary opportunities, and consistently uplifted her students' achievements. What makes Dr. Walker exceptional is that she believes every student deserves someone who ridiculously believes in their potential. That belief can truly change lives. On the heels of Teacher Appreciation Week, the North Carolina General Assembly is finally considering increasing teacher salaries. Our State ranks 46th in the Nation for teacher pay. That is simply unacceptable. Mr. Speaker, educators, like Dr. Walker, give their all to the next generation. They deserve fair pay.

Recognizing Mental Health Awareness Month

Page H3557 · Official text

(Ms. PLASKETT asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)

Stacey E. Plaskett (D-VI)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in recognition of Mental Health Awareness Month. In the Virgin Islands and across this Nation, too many suffer in silence, carrying the weight of depression, anxiety, trauma, and grief, without access to care. I fought to bring real resources to my home, including $2.7 million in mental health and wellness funding for health recovery services, wellness programming, emergency shelter, and victim services for St. Thomas and St. John. For St. Croix, I have secured another $2 million for community wellness expansion, youth violence intervention, and hurricane recovery for our boys' and girls' centers. Mental illness is not a weakness, and mental health is not a luxury. Natural disasters, economic strain, and geographic isolation have compounded the mental health crisis in the Virgin Islands, which we cannot afford to ignore. Mr. Speaker, access to quality mental health care must be treated as a right and not a privilege, and as an imperative to our entire community. To anyone struggling, you are not alone. Asking for help is an act of courage.

Recognizing Marshall Paige Valentine

Page H3557 · Official text

(Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)

Donald G. Davis (D-NC)

Mr. Speaker, Marshall Paige Valentine is a devoted community, civic, and church leader, whose service and leadership have had a lasting impact across eastern North Carolina and beyond. She has dedicated decades to mentoring, faith-based service, civic engagement, uplifting individuals, and strengthening communities throughout our region, State, Nation, and the entire world. She served as the 25th Grand Worthy Matron for the Grand Chapter of North Carolina and the first from Greene County, focusing on charity, loving-kindness, and fellowship. Her legacy is truly remarkable. Mr. Speaker, she is a shining star from Greene County. It is an honor to recognize such an extraordinary daughter of eastern North Carolina and a great American.

Communication from the Clerk of the House

Page H3557 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

Text printed in the Record (432 characters)
Washington, DC, May 18, 2026. Hon. Mike Johnson, Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Clerk received the following message from the Secretary of the Senate on May 18, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.: That the Senate passed S. 4530. With best wishes, I am, Sincerely, Kevin F. McCumber, Clerk.

Recess

Page H3557 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess for a period of less than 15 minutes.

Accordingly (at 2 o'clock and 16 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.

After Recess

Page H3557 · Official text

The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Goldman of Texas) at 2 o'clock and 30 minutes p.m.

Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore

Page H3557 · Official text

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, the Chair will postpone further proceedings today on motions to suspend the rules on which a recorded vote or the yeas and nays are ordered, or votes objected to under clause 6 of rule XX. The House will resume proceedings on postponed questions at a later time.

Authorization to Increase Retirement Age for Member of the Capitol Police

Pages H3557–H3558 · Official text

AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE RETIREMENT AGE FOR MEMBER OF THE CAPITOL POLICE

Bryan Steil (R-WI)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 4530) to amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize an increase of the retirement age for members of the Capitol Police.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (748 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE RETIREMENT AGE FOR MEMBER OF THE CAPITOL POLICE. (a) Civil Service Retirement System.--Section 8335(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking "becomes 60 years of age" and inserting "attains an age determined by the Board, which shall be not less than 57 years of age and not more than 62 years of age". (b) Federal Employees' Retirement System.--Section 8425(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking "becomes 60 years of age" and inserting "attains an age determined by the Board, which shall be not less than 57 years of age and not more than 62 years of age".

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil) and the gentleman from New York (Mr. Morelle) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Wisconsin.

Bryan Steil (R-WI)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this bill.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Wisconsin?

There was no objection.

Bryan Steil (R-WI)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, the bill before us today was drafted to address staffing shortages with the United States Capitol Police. Currently, officers are forced to retire at age 57, unless they receive a waiver from the Capitol Police Board. With a waiver, an officer may continue working until they are age 60. S. 4530 extends the waiver timeline. Under this bill, the Capitol Police Board will have the authority to grant waivers to sworn officers until they turn 62. Right now, nearly 60 sworn officers are working with a waiver. Unless we pass this statutory change, each of these officers will be forced to retire within the next few years. These forced retirements will only compound the staffing shortage issue that we are facing within the Capitol Police force. Notably, there is past precedent for this policy change. On two occasions, Congress has temporarily raised the mandatory Federal law enforcement retirement age to 65 to address staffing issues at the FBI. I will also note that this bill gives the Capitol Police Board discretion when deciding who is still fit for the job. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Joseph D. Morelle (D-NY)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of S. 4530, a bill that would increase the age to which Capitol Police officers may continue to serve from 60 to 62 when granted a retirement age waiver by the Capitol Police Board. Importantly, this bill does not change the statutory retirement age. Rather, it gives the Capitol Police Board flexibility to allow willing and able officers to remain with the force. I said it when the House recently passed its version of the legislation, and I want to reiterate that the officers of the United States Capitol Police have one of the most critical and demanding jobs in the legislative branch. Last week, we celebrated Police Week here in Washington. At a time when payouts and pardons are being handed to the people who savagely attacked the Capitol Police in this very building just 5 years ago, they need to know we have their backs; not just with words, but with actions. The force has come a long way since then, and I commend Chief Sullivan and former Chief Manger for working to rebuild the force and grow its ranks. We cannot stand in the way of that progress. Threats against Members, our families, staff, people who visit here, and threats against our democratic institutions are growing by the day, and they show no signs of relenting, so we must confront this scourge head-on. We can do that by helping to advance the interests that Capitol Police continue to deal with the challenges they have in terms of recruitment, and we can do it by passing this bill. I thank Chairman Steil, my colleague and friend, and all those members of the Committee on House Administration for making sure that we are able to get this passed. I also thank our colleagues in the Senate for giving us the chance to do this a second time, but I very much appreciate it. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Bryan Steil (R-WI)

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Scalise), the leader of the Republican Conference.

Steve Scalise (R-LA)

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil), the chairman of the committee and my friend, for yielding. I thank him for the hard work he has put in to first passing an important bill over to the Senate, and now seeing this bill come back to address an important issue, and that is to make sure that we give the Capitol Police Board the flexibility so that we don't have to lose more good officers on the Capitol Police force. I know personally the heroism and bravery of the great men and women in the United States Capitol Police. I would not be here without their heroism and bravery. We have some of them who are in the prime of their career who would be forced to retire if we don't pass this legislation. At a time, as was brought up, where we have shortages, we need to make sure that we not only can keep attracting new officers to the force, but when you have officers in the prime of their career that everybody agrees are worthy of keeping on, that they have that flexibility. That is what this bill does, gives the Capitol Police Board that flexibility. Mr. Speaker, I strongly urge the adoption of the legislation and urge all my colleagues to do the same.

Joseph D. Morelle (D-NY)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I thank the majority leader for sharing his tragic experience. I am grateful to him for his leadership on these important issues. Again, this is, in my mind, a commonsense way to make sure that we continue to have the backs of the members of the Capitol Police who do such an extraordinary job protecting this entire Capitol complex, the men and women who serve here, our staffs, our families, and all the American citizens who get to come and participate in this great democracy. I urge the passage of the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Bryan Steil (R-WI)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. I just thank my colleague, Mr. Morelle, for his work in moving this bill through quickly as well as the leadership of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration for also engaging this, as well as Leader Scalise. I think we all recognize the hard work that the men and women of the United States Capitol Police force do day in and day out to make sure that this institution is open and accessible to the people and those who visit here, as well as staff and Members are kept safe. This bill is a real opportunity to make sure that those individuals who have crossed the age of 60 but still are ready, prepared, and able to serve in the United States Capitol Police are able to do that. I appreciate the work of all of my colleagues in moving this through. I encourage all of our colleagues to vote in favor of this legislation. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, S. 4530.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Fostering the Future Act

Pages H3558–H3564 · Official text

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 7432) to amend section 477 of the Social Security Act to improve coordination with Federal housing assistance programs for youth who have experienced foster care, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (11,655 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Fostering the Future Act". SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUTH WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED FOSTER CARE. Section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking "aged out of foster care" and inserting "experienced foster care at age 14 or older"; (2) in subsection (h)(2), by striking "age out of foster care" and inserting "experience foster care at age 14 or older"; (3) in each of subsections (a)(6) and (i)(2), by striking "16" and inserting "14"; (4) in subsection (i)(3), by striking "in no event may a youth participate in the program for more than 5 years (whether or not consecutive)" and inserting "may not allow a youth to participate in the program for more than 5 years (or, in the case of a youth who was involved in a remedial education activity referred to in paragraph (4)(B), for more than 6 years), whether or not consecutive"; (5) in subsection (i)(4)-- (A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: "(A) may be available for the cost of attendance-- "(i) at an institution of higher education, as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, including a community college or postsecondary vocational institution; or "(ii) at a short-term training program that is eligible for the Workforce Pell program under section 401(k), as described in section 481(b)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(b)(3)), as added by section 83002(b) of Public Law 119-21;"; (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A), as so amended, the following: "(B) may be available for costs-- "(i) associated with participation in an apprenticeship program; "(ii) to obtain a general equivalency degree; or "(iii) to receive remedial education; and"; and (6) in subsection (i), by adding at the end the following: "(7) In this section, the term `remedial education' means education or skill training needed to support obtaining a high school diploma or qualifying for postsecondary education, training, or an apprenticeship that is-- "(A) not already available through the school district of the student or another free local, State, or Federal program; and "(B) is provided by an instructor with credentials relevant to the subject area of instruction, as determined by the State.". SEC. 3. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM EDUCATION AND TRAINING VOUCHER AMOUNT AND PROVISION OF GREATER SUPPORT FOR FOSTER YOUTH PURSUING POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION. (a) In General.--Section 477(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(i)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (3)-- (A) by striking "that program" and inserting "that education or training program, (except that the State may establish a grace period to allow a youth to continue participation in activities described in paragraph (4)(A), after an assessment and consultation with the youth, if the State determines that reasonable circumstances warrant the grace period)"; and (B) by striking "the program" and inserting "the voucher program"; and (2) in paragraph (4)(C) (as so redesignated by section 2(5)(C) of this Act), by striking "$5,000" and inserting "$12,000". (b) Guidance.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with youth who have experienced foster care, shall develop and issue model guidance to States and jurisdictions receiving allotments under section 477(c) of the Social Security Act for implementation of the amendment made by subsection (a)(1) of this section. SEC. 4. IMPROVING ACCESSIBILITY AND YOUTH AWARENESS OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING VOUCHERS. (a) In General.--Section 477(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(i)), as amended by section 2(6) of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following: "(8) The State shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that eligible youth are aware of potential benefits provided under this subsection, including by coordinating with programs funded under subsection (h)(1). "(9) The program shall include a simplified, user-tested, and standard form for youth to use to apply for vouchers under the program, using standard terminology, that is easily accessible and available electronically.". (b) Use of Funds.--Section 477(d)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 677(d)(1)) is amended to read as follows: "(1) In general.--A State to which an amount is paid from its allotment under subsection (c)(1) may use the amount in any manner that is reasonably calculated to accomplish the purposes of this section, including outreach related to subsection (i)(8). A State to which an amount is paid from its allotment under subsection (c)(3) may use the amount for any purpose related to the program described in subsection (i)(8).". SEC. 5. IMPROVING ACCESS TO HOUSING FOR FOSTER YOUTH. Section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)(1)-- (A) by striking "and preventive" and inserting "preventive"; and (B) by inserting ", and access to housing for youth age 18 or older" before the semicolon; (2) in subsection (a)(4), by inserting "current and" before "former"; (3) in subsection (b)(2)(D), by inserting ", including by collaborating with public housing agencies that administer Federal housing programs serving foster youth under section 8(x)(2)(B) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 and receive funding to partner with public child welfare agencies to serve youth who have experienced foster care" before the period; (4) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking "not more than 30 percent of the amounts paid to the State from its allotment under subsection (c) for a fiscal year" and inserting "an average of not more than 30 percent of the amounts paid to the State from its allotment under subsection (c) for the 5 fiscal years covered by the application submitted by the State pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection"; (5) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following: "(6) Housing supportive services.-- "(A) In general.--A State may use amounts from its allotment under subsection (c) to provide supportive services to assist eligible youth who experienced foster care to obtain or retain suitable housing. "(B) Definitions.-- "(i) Eligible youth.--In this subsection, the term `eligible youth' means an individual who receives assistance provided under section 8(x) of the United States Housing Act of 1937. "(ii) Supportive services.--The term `supportive services' may include-- "(I) basic life skills information and counseling on financial literacy, use of credit, and money management; "(II) counseling on rental lease contracts and assistance with rental insurance; and "(III) assistance with security deposits, utility connection fees, moving costs, and other fees associated with establishing tenancy. "(C) Exception.--Expenditures in accordance with this paragraph shall not be considered expenditures for room and board for purposes of subsection (b)(3)(B). "(D) Aligning age eligibility.--Notwithstanding subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii), a State may use funds from its allotment under subsection (c) to provide supportive services to eligible youth who have not attained 26 years of age for the purpose of supporting continued access to housing."; and (6) in subsection (g)(1), by inserting "access to housing," before "and personal". SEC. 6. JOINT AGENCY GUIDANCE. (a) In General.--Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, shall develop and issue joint guidance to State public child welfare agencies and public housing authorities to improve alignment and coordination of housing supportive services provided under section 477 of the Social Security Act and housing assistance provided under section 8(x) of the United States Housing Act of 1937. (b) Contents.--The joint guidance shall include the following: (1) Clarification and alignment of Federal policies to improve access to housing for youth who have experienced foster care, including youth who are in independent living arrangements while in extended foster care. (2) Guidance on State use of funds provided under section 477 of the Social Security Act for supportive services (as defined in subsection (d)(6) of such section) to improve access to housing programs administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (3) Best practices for building partnerships between public child welfare agencies and public housing authorities, including ways to improve access to supportive services. (4) Additional information the Secretaries deem necessary to effectively coordinate Federal programs serving current and former foster youth. (c) Production.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall designate an official of the Department of Health and Human Services to lead development of the joint guidance in collaboration with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. SEC. 7. REPORT TO CONGRESS. Within 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall submit to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Finance and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report that sets forth-- (1) aggregate data on the number of eligible youth who have experienced foster care who are receiving Federal housing assistance; (2) a description of the outcomes for the youth, including the extent to which youth are able to access stable housing and rates of homelessness; (3) the findings from any evaluations of State programs conducted pursuant to section 477(g)(1) of the Social Security Act; and (4) statutory recommendations for improving coordination between public child welfare agencies and Federal housing programs. SEC. 8. LEGAL CONSULTING AND ACCESS UNDER THE JOHN H. CHAFEE FOSTER CARE PROGRAM FOR SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD. Section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)(4), by inserting "legal counseling access," after "education,"; and (2) in subsection (b)(3), by adding at the end the following: "(L) A certification by the chief executive officer of the State that the relevant case planning and other processes employed by the State take into consideration certain legal issues affecting housing, education, entry into employment, and family connections of current and former foster youth and the efforts required to address the issues, including with respect to State court records, legal recognition of family relationships, and matters relating to custody and permanency.". SEC. 9. ENSURING EXPECTANT AND PARENTING YOUTH HAVE ACCESS TO SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH THE MATERNAL, INFANT, AND EARLY CHILDHOOD HOME VISITING PROGRAM. (a) Purpose.--Section 477(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(a)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (6), by striking "and"; (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period and inserting "; and"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(8) to connect foster youth in eligible families (as such term is defined in section 511) who receive services under this part with evidence-based home visiting and support services provided under section 511.". (b) Applications.--Section 477(b)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (5,109 characters)
677(b)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(M) A certification by the chief executive officer of the State that the State has processes in place to ensure that a youth participating in the program under this section who is in an eligible family (as such term is defined in section 511) is provided with information regarding evidence-based home visiting and support services provided in the State under section 511.". SEC. 10. TAILORED CASE MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE COORDINATION SERVICES FOR PARENTING AND EXPECTANT YOUTH WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED FOSTER CARE. Section 477(d)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(d)(1)) is amended to read as follows: "(1) In general.--A State to which an amount is paid from its allotment under subsection (c)(1) may use the amount-- "(A) to provide tailored case management and resource coordination services to youth otherwise eligible for services under the State program under this section who are expectant or parenting; or "(B) in any manner that is reasonably calculated to accomplish the purposes of this section.". SEC. 11. UPDATING THE PURPOSES OF THE JOHN H. CHAFEE FOSTER CARE PROGRAM FOR SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD. (a) Updating of Purposes.--Section 477(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677(a)), as amended by section 9(a)(3) of this Act, is amended-- (1) by striking paragraph (2); (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (3) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (9), respectively; and (3) by inserting after "conducted--" the following: "(1) to help children who have experienced foster care at age 14 or older to develop and maintain sustained, supportive relationships with adults (including kin or fictive kin who are not serving as placement), mentors, and peers (including peers who have experienced foster care), with a goal of providing multiple and varied paths to reduce isolation and ensuring that the youth develop lifelong connections and support networks; "(2) to support youth still in foster care who have experienced foster care at age 14 or older in exercising the rights referred to in section 475A to participate in developing their permanency plan and receive written information about available services and steps the agency is taking to support the plan, as well as to facilitate pre- and post-permanency peer support, mentoring, connections with kin, and referrals to additional appropriate programs and services to help youth achieve their permanency goals;". (b) Guidance.--Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act and after consulting with youth with lived experience in foster care, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue guidance to States and Tribal child welfare agencies regarding the purposes set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 477(a) of the Social Security Act, that includes, at a minimum-- (1) examples of services and support eligible for Federal funding under part B of title IV of such Act, under part E of such title as part of completing and following the case plan requirements provided for in section 475A of such Act, or under section 477 of such Act, including individual youth support, family support, and peer support to engage youth during reunification, guardianship, or adoption proceedings; (2) best practices for facilitating peer support, mentoring, and the development and maintenance of lifelong connections, including practices that support sibling, tribal, and community connections, including minimum qualifications and training for persons providing mentoring and peer support; (3) standards of outreach to and notification of eligible youth, including youth with a planned permanent living arrangement, to ensure referrals to appropriate programs and services; and (4) protocols for documentation of support and relationship-building activities under section 477 of such Act that are required by section 475A of such Act to be included in a child's case plan, sufficient to permit review under the case review system described in section 475(5) of such Act. SEC. 12. EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided in this Act, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Delayed Permitted if State Legislation Required.--If the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that State legislation (other than legislation appropriating funds) is required in order for a State plan under section 477 of the Social Security Act to meet the additional requirements imposed by the amendments made by sections 5(3), 5(4), 8(2), and 9(b) of this Act, the plan shall not be regarded as failing to meet any of the additional requirements before the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter beginning after the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. For purposes of the preceding sentence, if the State has a 2-year legislative session, each year of the session is deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legislature.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Missouri.

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and submit extraneous material on this bill under consideration.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Missouri?

There was no objection.

Jason Smith (R-MO)2:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act, bipartisan legislation led by my Ways and Means Committee colleagues, Work and Welfare Subcommittee Chairman Darin LaHood, and Congresswoman Gwen Moore. This is a historic moment for this committee and this House. What we have before us is the first comprehensive modernization of the John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood since its creation in 1999, nearly three decades ago. Foster youth are one of the most vulnerable populations in our country. Before I came to Congress, I served as an attorney for neglected and abused children and have seen firsthand the challenges so many of these youth face. Every year, nearly 16,000 foster youth age out of the system. Nearly 35 percent experience homelessness by age 21, and 70 percent are expectant or parenting by age 21, double the national average. Only 56 percent obtain full- or part-time employment, and possibly as few as 69 percent earn a high school diploma or GED. This is a system in desperate need of attention and reform. Today, we are giving our Nation's foster youth a fighting chance at independence in adulthood. Following committee hearings and direct consultation with youth who spoke about their personal and real-world experiences, the Ways and Means Committee thoughtfully wrote these reforms designed to improve outcomes for our Nation's transitioning foster youth. I want to give special thanks to our Nation's First Lady, Melania Trump, who has been an outstanding champion for foster youth through her Fostering the Future initiative. Truly, she is a voice for the voiceless. Last month, our committee sat down for a roundtable with the First Lady and foster youth leaders who have actually lived through this system. I am proud that this bill codifies key priorities from the Fostering the Future of American Children and Families executive order championed by the First Lady, ensuring that these reforms are here to stay. In direct response to the feedback raised by foster youth, including Seth, a 21-year-old from my district in Missouri, this bill improves connections to housing programs so foster youth aren't left to age out onto the streets. Chairman LaHood, a longtime leader on expanding access to housing, and Representative Gwen Moore championed this provision to ensure housing stability remains in reach for young adults during a very vulnerable time as they transition to independence. We also incorporated the feedback of Jaydan, a former foster youth from Texas, who spoke at our roundtable about the importance of increasing the value of the education and training voucher. Thanks to the leadership of another Texan, Representative Moran, and Representative Chu, foster youth will now have greater academic support when pursuing a postsecondary education. The Fostering the Future Act expands flexibility in Chafee's education and training voucher program, with feedback from youth like Kimberley in Missouri and Raven in Ohio, so young people can pursue short-term workforce programs and apprenticeship opportunities to earn a high-paying job or receive remedial education to earn their high school diploma, reforms prioritized by Representatives Max Miller from Ohio and Dwight Evans from Pennsylvania. Youth who age out of the child welfare system often lack permanent connections to family and face unique barriers that can make transitioning into independence difficult. We heard directly from a foster youth from Chairman LaHood and Ranking Member Davis' home State of Illinois, Jocelyn Fettering, who shared with us at our roundtable the importance of improving access to legal services. To break down further barriers, we have included a thoughtful initiative from Representatives Yakym and Davis to connect expectant and parenting foster youth with evidence-based maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting services. Representative Yakym is building directly upon the great work of his predecessor, the late Jackie Walorski, leveraging existing resources to help these young adults build healthy, stable families. Finally, a provision led by Representatives Mike Carey and Gwen Moore updates the core mission of the Chafee program to prioritize lifelong connections, mentors, and permanent support networks. Representative Carey has been incredibly outspoken about the importance of mentorship, and this step ensures these young people have real-world relationships to help them achieve lasting independence. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)2:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act, which includes six separate pieces of legislation that were unanimously passed by the Ways and Means Committee. Removing a child from their family and placing them in foster care is a last resort, something we should only do at times when there is no way to keep a child safe at home. Youth who must enter foster care have already experienced significant trauma, and to our shame, many experience additional trauma while in our care. One of the greatest honors and greatest challenges of my service in Congress has been listening to youth who experienced foster care, learning from them, and trying to make sure we do better in the future. Over the years, older youth who experienced foster care have helped us enact historic legislation to improve foster care for those who come after them. Former foster youth informed and supported our work to help more children leave foster care to live with their grandparents and other family members, and with the supports they needed in the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act. Older youth said it would help them if we helped their parents address substance use disorders and mental health challenges. So, first, we created regional partnerships grants to bring child welfare, substance abuse treatment providers, and law enforcement together. Then, youth helped us enact the landmark Family First Prevention Services Act, which made Federal funding just as available to stabilize families as it is to separate them. Older youth, especially those who are LGBTQ, continue to warn us that children are being harmed in group homes and inappropriate placements, so that we can improve our enforcement of laws that are supposed to protect them. In all those efforts, older youth who were in foster care and young adults who recently left it helped make foster care better for others. Today's bill would directly address the specific challenges older youth themselves experienced. Every year, about 20,000 young people age out of foster care, never having found a permanent family. Other older youth do exit to live safely with their parents or in loving kinship or adoptive homes, but the trauma and disruption they experienced still puts them at a significant disadvantage compared to their peers. Older youth who experienced foster care are less likely to finish school or pursue higher education, more likely to struggle with untreated mental health issues and trauma, more likely to experience homelessness, more likely to become young parents, and more likely to face legal challenges. The Chafee program, which was renamed to honor foster youth champion Senator John Chafee after his death, was created to help current and former foster youth transition to successful adulthood. Unfortunately, its funding has never been significantly adjusted to keep up with inflation, and its purposes and rules for States have only been sporadically updated to keep pace with our understanding of adolescent brain development, fix policies that don't work well, and make sure that former foster youth navigate adulthood with the help of people who love them. Despite the Chafee program's many successes, only about 35 percent of youth who are eligible for Chafee services receive any help, and many of the services youth need the most are not available, don't work well with other sources of help, or are hard to access. Over the past 6 months, Chairman LaHood and I have worked with our colleagues on Ways and Means to find true common ground on policies affecting older youth who are, or were, in foster care. I commend my friend, Mr. LaHood, for a bipartisan process that should be a model for all of our work, a sincere, thoughtful collaboration where we both talked and listened. This collaborative process yielded six separate pieces of legislation that reflect real agreement about steps that will help youth. Our work was further strengthened by support from First Lady Melania Trump, who has also been listening carefully to youth about what they need. I will briefly recognize my colleagues that authored the bills that were passed by Ways and Means and then combined into one bill for consideration today. Their thoughtful proposals generated hundreds of endorsements by organizations representing foster youth, families, child welfare agencies, and experts like pediatricians and family law practitioners. Chairman LaHood and Congresswoman Gwen Moore led the Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act, which would improve foster youth access to section 8 housing vouchers and make it easier for Chafee programs to provide housing support to foster youth. Housing is a foundation of stable adult life, and our current policies are preventing the Chafee program from doing as much as it can and should. Congresswoman Judy Chu and Congressman Nathaniel Moran led the Foster Youth Postsecondary Education Access and Success Act, which would increase the potential amount of Chafee education and training vouchers from $5,000 to $12,000, provide better opportunities for youth who are struggling to retain their vouchers, and provide more financing options for Chafee voucher outreach. At our committee hearings, some youth told us they didn't even know that Chafee would help them pay for college until it was too late, and others told us that the way the vouchers were limited made them almost impossible to use. Representatives Chu and Moran's bill lays the foundation for a bigger, more effective effort to help foster youth go to college and build careers in the future. Representative Max Miller and Representative Dwight Evans led the Foster Youth Workforce Opportunity Act, which would ensure that foster youth could use Chafee education vouchers for high quality training programs and apprenticeships, as well as college, and would ensure that they have the skills and qualifications to be accepted into the colleges or training programs they choose. I led the Fresh Start for Foster Youth Act, together with Chairman LaHood. It would help foster youth transition to adulthood by providing better access to resources to address legal challenges affecting housing, education, employment, and family conditions. Since launching its virtual support services program for foster youth in 2021, Think of Us reports that 18 percent of all requests from transition-age youth are for help with legal services. A few of the issues include: housing stability and eviction defense; guardianship and custody, especially for youth informally caring for relatives; needs of expectant and parenting youth; reentry into extended care; legal issues; and education and disability advocacy. I thank Nikolas Hughey, a former foster youth intern with the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute, for raising the issue of urgent legal issues. I was also pleased to work with Congressman Rudy Yakym on the Support for Expectant and Parenting Foster Youth Act, which requires States to refer expectant and parenting foster youth for Maternal Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting, or MIECHV, home visiting services and consider parenting status in case planning, building on the success Illinois and Indiana have had using targeted, intensive services to support young families. Last, but definitely not least, in her dual role as a key member of the Worker and Family Support Subcommittee and as co-chair of the Congressional Foster Youth Caucus, Congresswoman Gwen Moore worked with Congressman Mike Carey on the CONNECT Act. Their bill updates the purposes of the Chafee program to help youth form and preserve meaningful, supportive, long-term relationships, which both youth and experts have identified as the key to a successful transition to adulthood. This change is something youth have been telling us for a long time, that all of the challenges they face are surmountable if they have a family, a loving and trustworthy network of adults and peers that advises them, believes in them, and catches them when they stumble. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 7432 and also to make voting for this bill just the first step in their efforts to help older youth who experienced foster care. Notably, there is a critical need for more investment. Aside from during the pandemic, Congress has only increased Chafee funding by $3 million since its creation in 1999. The amount of money needed would be tiny and insignificant compared to the fiscal impact of many of the bills we have considered in the House this Congress or a day at the Defense Department; yet, such funding could be life-changing for foster youth. Mr. Speaker, I urge support of these six bills, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)2:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood), who is the sponsor of this legislation. Mr. LaHood, as the chairman of our Work and Welfare Subcommittee, has been a tireless champion for America's foster youth and a leader in advancing these long overdue reforms.

Darin LaHood (R-IL)3:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, as we celebrate National Foster Care Month, I rise in strong support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act, a bill that would empower America's foster youth transitioning to adulthood. I thank Chairman Smith for his leadership and attention to these six bills. We would not be debating these bills today if it wasn't for him and his work. Each year, nearly 16,000 foster youth age out of the child welfare system, often without permanent connections to families. This needs to be fixed. As chairman of the Work and Welfare Subcommittee, one of my priorities has been to modernize the Chafee Foster Care Program, which exclusively supports foster youth as they transition to adulthood. Last January, GAO, the Government Accountability Office, published a report which found States have been returning millions of dollars of unused Chafee funds since 2007, despite the need from foster youth. In response, a bipartisan group of Ways and Means Committee members participated in hearings and listened to the youth with lived experience to develop proposals and ideas to modernize Chafee. I thank Ranking Member Danny Davis for his lifetime of work when it comes to foster care and his legacy in this space. In addition, First Lady Melania Trump's unwavering commitment to elevating America's foster youth through the Fostering the Future initiative has elevated these issues to the highest level of government. I commend the First Lady for her dedication and passion to these issues. There are many issues she could have championed, but she chose helping foster youth, and our country is better off because of it. Last November, I was honored to join President Trump and Mrs. Trump as part of the signing of that historic executive order at the White House regarding fostering our future. Mrs. Trump also graciously joined a bipartisan group of Ways and Means members for a roundtable as we worked to develop these proposals. The Fostering the Future Act represents the most significant reforms to Chafee since its creation in 1999. It is comprised of six bills that together will improve access to stable housing, educational support, workforce training, legal services, and home visiting programs for expectant and parenting foster youth. Specifically, this bill includes the Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act, which I introduced with my Democrat colleague, Gwen Moore of Wisconsin. Thirty-five percent of foster youth experience homelessness compared to just 4 percent of the general population. This bill improves coordination between Chafee and Federal housing programs to expand access to vouchers. This bill also includes the Fresh Starts for Foster Youth Act, which I joined with my friend Danny Davis in introducing, to improve access to legal services for foster youth. A history of being in foster care should not limit potential for future success. These two specific bills will help our foster youth with future success. By passing the Fostering the Future Act, Congress can ensure that foster youth have the tools they need to achieve economic independence and long-term stability and success. In closing, I again thank Chairman Smith, Mrs. Trump, and the bipartisan group of Ways and Means Committee members for their steadfast bipartisan collaboration in developing meaningful proposals to support America's foster youth. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentlewoman from Wisconsin (Ms. Moore).

Gwen Moore (D-WI)3:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Illinois for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I am so excited to join all of my colleagues on the floor today in support of Fostering the Future Act, the Chafee bill package that is the first modern improvement of the Chafee Act, as my colleagues have indicated, since 1999 when the program was created. Before I talk specifically about the bill, I lift up Representative Dr. Danny Davis who will be retiring after this term. I thank him for his lifetime career of standing up for youth as a professional social worker and as a county board commissioner in Illinois. Dr. Davis has been a longstanding leader, serving as both chair and ranking member of the subcommittee that deals with foster youth issues on Ways and Means. He has brought so much wisdom because of his long career to this that we are able to bring these bills to the floor. None of this would be possible without him. He is very humble, but I lift him up and thank him today. Mr. Speaker, I also thank Chairman Jason Smith from Missouri and Ranking Member Neal. I really appreciate that Chairman Smith has really dug in deep representing these foster kids. I heard him today share with us that he, as a lawyer in Missouri, represented foster kids. I said to myself, aha, there it is. I knew it was something. This is completing a circle, and we appreciate his leadership at this time. Likewise, Chairman LaHood of our subcommittee and Representative Carey have been great partners on the two bills that we have included in this package naming the Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act and the CONNECT Act. I would be remiss if I didn't mention that the First Lady of the United States has leaned into supporting our foster youth, how prescient and how purposeful is that. Hopefully, that will enable us to really fund these fantastic ideas that we are authorizing today. Mr. Speaker, I am so proud to be a co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Caucus on Foster Youth. We are going to have shadow day on June 10, so I am hoping that everyone will get their foster youth, and you will be surprised as you guide these foster youth through your day, in that you will learn more from them or as much from them as you may have to share with them. I am so privileged to be able to fight for foster youth, including meeting youth who have lived experience in the foster care system. So often I hear from these youth about their experiences in foster care, and although they are very resilient, the ones we get to talk to, they will tell you that as they age out of foster care, the likelihood of them becoming homeless and feeling abandoned is disproportionately great for this cohort. Approximately 20,000 youth age out of foster care each year, and of that, approximately 25 percent of them experience homelessness. Mr. Speaker, many report that they can't achieve permanency with an adoptive, foster, or kinship family. They don't feel like they have a trusted adult in their family to help them navigate the complexities of transitioning to adulthood. It is difficult enough for a youth to transition into adulthood even when they are privileged, but imagine that you have been a foster youth trying to navigate the great big world all alone. This package aims to address some of the challenges that we know our foster youth are facing, and I hope we can move forward in the future to help provide the funding again that will be needed. The two bills in this package, the Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act and the CONNECT Act, aim to provide more tools and resources.

The SPEAKER pro tempore3:00 p.m.

The time of the gentlewoman has expired.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from Wisconsin.

Gwen Moore (D-WI)3:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, the Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act, which I co-lead with Chairman LaHood, would exempt housing supportive services, such as security deposits and utility connection fees, from the 30 percent housing cap under Chafee. This will allow States the opportunity to provide more youth with rental and housing assistance. Mr. Speaker, I also lift up the bill that I have with Mr. Carey called the CONNECT Act. It amends the statutory purposes of the Chafee program to help youth create meaningful connections with adults and build a lifelong support network as a core purpose of the Chafee program.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Yakym).

Rudy Yakym III (R-IN)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Missouri for yielding me the time. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to support the Fostering the Future Act, which will make meaningful changes to the Chafee program to better support foster youth and alleviate unnecessary challenges. This bill includes the Support for Expectant and Parenting Foster Youth Act, which I was proud to introduce with the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis), my friend and the ranking member. This bill strengthens the coordination between the Chafee program and the Maternal Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting program, or MIECHV. Foster youth are more likely to become parents earlier compared to their peers. Navigating the foster youth system can be difficult enough, but adding the demands of parenting presents a special challenge for older foster youth who are also parents. My bill will help more parenting and expectant foster youth access evidence-based home visiting services by improving program coordination and allowing for specialized case management. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill. I thank the ranking member, as well as Chairman LaHood for their support.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Miller).

Max L. Miller (R-OH)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act, a critical child welfare bill that will set foster youth up for success. This legislation includes the Foster Youth Workforce Opportunity Act, which I introduced to codify First Lady Melania Trump's Fostering the Future for America Children and Families executive order. Unfortunately, only 35 percent of foster youth secure full-time employment in adulthood. People would think that the severity of this crisis would mean that the Federal programming designed to support foster youth would actually give this group of individuals lots of pathways to success, but they would be wrong. Under current law, the Chafee Education and Training Vouchers can only be used for 4-year degrees. I have heard from foster youths who want to pursue trade schools or certifications instead, and my bill expands the career options available to them under this program. This will open doors to in-demand, high-paying jobs and give foster youth the tools they need to become self-sufficient and build a stable future. My bill expands the Chafee Education and Training Vouchers for short-term workforce training programs, as well as apprenticeships and remedial education activities needed to help foster youth earn a high school diploma or even a GED. This bill also addresses the chronic underutilization of the Chafee program funds since 2007. Over the past few years, my home State of Ohio has returned more than $1.6 million in unused funds due to statutory barriers--funds that could have helped foster youth. The Fostering the Future Act will help States like Ohio use their full Chafee allotments to ensure foster youth receive the critical support that they need. Importantly, this legislation has been endorsed by ACTION Ohio, the Public Children Services Association of Ohio, the Ohio Youth Advisory Board, and hundreds of current and former foster youths across the country. For all of these reasons, I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan bill that will deliver for our Nation's foster youth and set them up for a successful and a self-sufficient future.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Moran).

Nathaniel Moran (R-TX)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act. This important piece of legislation is a reflection of months of hard work by the members of the Committee on Ways and Means and staff. These much-needed reforms to the Chafee program in this bill will empower current and former foster youth as they transition into adulthood. At a recent Committee on Ways and Means roundtable with First Lady Melania Trump focused on foster care, I had the privilege of hearing from Jayden Martinez, a student at Stephen F. Austin State University who came out of the foster care system. Hearing directly from Jayden reinforced something many of us already know: These young Americans are capable of extraordinary things when they are given the tools and the support they need to succeed. The Fostering the Future Act makes several significant reforms. First, it includes the Foster Youth Postsecondary Education Access and Success Act, legislation I co-lead with Congressman Judy Chu. This will increase the maximum Education and Training Voucher amount from $5,000 to $12,000, which will allow foster youth to access education and skilled programs. It helps provide grace periods when foster youth are struggling at the collegiate level. Right now, States like Texas are returning more than a million dollars each year of unused funds intended for foster youth in this program. Second, the Fostering the Future Act broadens use of Education and Training Vouchers to apprenticeships, workforce credential programs, and remedial education. Third, it also simplifies the application process so that foster youth can more easily access the resources that Congress has already made available. Last, the Fostering the Future Act codifies several priorities included in the President's executive order Fostering the Future for American Children and Families. Championed by First Lady Melania Trump, as President Reagan often reminded this Nation, America's strength is found in the promise of opportunity. This legislation will allow current and former foster youth the opportunity to pursue education, meaningful work, and the American Dream. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the Fostering the Future Act.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Carey).

Mike Carey (R-OH)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 7432, the Fostering the Future Act, which is made up of six bipartisan bills that passed the Committee on Ways and Means last month. These bills collectively modernize the John H. Chafee Foster Care Program from successful transition to adulthood and are part of First Lady Melania Trump's Fostering the Future initiative. I led one of these bills with the gentlewoman from Wisconsin (Ms. Moore), my friend. The Chafee Opportunities for New Network and Existing Connection Trust Act, or the CONNECT Act, clarifies the goal for supporting foster youth developing meaningful relationships with adults, including kin and peers, as well as building those supportive networks. The CONNECT Act also empowers foster youth to take charge of their own permanency plans and ensures that foster youth understand in writing the suite of services that the programs are qualified for. With this legislation, we are setting up the next generation of America's youth to transition to a more successful adulthood. Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Smith, as well as our Ranking Member Neal, as well as Subcommittee on Work and Welfare Chairman LaHood and Ranking Member Davis for their leadership on this. I encourage all of my colleagues to support this legislation.

Danny K. Davis (D-IL)3:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I thank Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Neal, and all members of the subcommittee. I certainly want to thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood), my dear friend, for his leadership. I also thank all of those witnesses who shared their stories with us, all of the youth who shared their lives and their lifetimes. I thank our outstanding committee staff led by Morna Miller, Kimberley Meinert, Cheryl Freiman, Keval Sojitara, and my primary Ways and Means staffer, Dr. Jill Hunter-Williams. Today is a good day for foster youth, but it is also a good day for America. It is a good day when we say to the young people of our country that we care about you, we love you, and we recognize your needs. Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to vote to pass this legislation as quickly as we can get it enacted so that America will be the land of youth. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, aging out is not a plan. Every young person who has experienced foster care deserves a real shot at the American Dream, and they should not be left without any support at a very vulnerable time. I am very proud of the years of work that went into this legislation: from all the Members of the Ways and Means Committee; from Mr. Davis, who has shown his passion and love for the foster youth; to Darin LaHood, the chair of the Work and Welfare Subcommittee; and all the different Members who had different pieces of legislation within this one bill. The Fostering the Future Act is built on the direct feedback of foster youth, caregivers, and community organizations on the ground. The stories we heard at our roundtable with our First Lady and at committee hearings from courageous leaders like Seth, Kimberley, Jaydan, and Jocelyn were the key drivers behind these successful reforms. I also applaud the First Lady for her relentless focus on advocating for the most vulnerable and propelling these reforms forward. This entire effort earned the endorsement of over 150 national, State, and local organizations, alongside hundreds of foster youth and caregivers. It passed the Ways and Means Committee with a unanimous, bipartisan vote. Supporting our foster youth is not a partisan issue. It is an American responsibility. Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore3:20 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 7432, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. The title of the bill was amended so as to read: "A bill to modernize section 477 of part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to improve connections to housing, expand education and training opportunities, and modernize services to improve outcomes for foster youth transitioning into adulthood.". A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

Pages H3564–H3567 · Official text

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6506) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund during collection action proceedings, to prohibit the crediting of overpayments against disputed tax liability during such proceedings, and to expand the jurisdiction of the Tax Court, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (4,721 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act". SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS ON FILING A CLAIM FOR CREDIT OR REFUND DURING COLLECTION ACTION PROCEEDINGS. (a) In General.--Section 6330(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting "subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 6511 (relating to limitations on credit or refund)," after "section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment),". (b) Period of Limitations on Filing a Claim for Credit or Refund.--Section 6330(e) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: "(3) Period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund.--In the case of the running of any period of limitations under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 6511 with respect to the filing of any claim for credit or refund, paragraph (1)-- "(A) shall apply only to the extent that such credit or refund relates to an underlying tax liability properly disputed at the hearing requested under this section, and "(B) shall not result in a suspension of the running of such period of limitations after any date on which a lapse of a deadline, a court filing, or a court order establishes that the taxpayer has forfeited or otherwise lost the right to pursue such dispute.". (c) Cross Reference.--Section 6511(i) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: "(8) For limitations in case of collection action proceedings, see section 6330(e).". (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to the running of any period of limitations if such period (determined without regard to the amendments made by this section) ends on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON CREDITING OF OVERPAYMENTS AGAINST DISPUTED TAX LIABILITY DURING COLLECTION ACTION PROCEEDINGS. (a) In General.--Section 6402 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: "(o) Prohibition on Crediting of Overpayments Against Disputed Tax Liability During Collection Action Proceedings.--If a hearing is properly requested under section 6320(a)(3)(B) or 6330(a)(3)(B), and an underlying tax liability referred to in section 6330(c)(2)(B) is properly disputed at such hearing, such tax liability shall not, except with the consent of the taxpayer, be taken into account under subsection (a) for the period during which the period of limitations for filing a claim for credit or refund relating to such tax liability is suspended by reason of section 6330(e).". (b) Clarification of Application of Certain Levy Hearing Rules to Lien Hearings.--Section 6330(c)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by striking "unpaid tax or the proposed levy" and inserting "unpaid tax, collection action, or proposed collection action". (c) Effective Dates.-- (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any period described in section 6402(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section) if any portion of such period is after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Clarification of application of certain levy hearing rules to lien hearings.--The amendment made by subsection (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 4. EXPANSION OF JURISDICTION OF TAX COURT. (a) In General.--Section 6330(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: "(1) Petition for review by tax court.-- "(A) In general.--In the case of a determination under this section, the person may, within 30 days of such determination, petition the Tax Court for review of-- "(i) such determination, and "(ii) any underlying tax liability referred to in subsection (c)(2)(B) which is properly disputed at the hearing in which such determination is made. "(B) Jurisdiction of tax court.--Upon the filing of a petition, the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to-- "(i) the determination referred to in subparagraph (A)(i), "(ii) any underlying tax liability referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii), and "(iii) any equitable tolling of the 30-day deadline referred to in subparagraph (A). "(C) Retention of jurisdiction.--Upon a determination being made under this section, subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply whether or not the Secretary abandons the collection action or proposed collection action at issue in such determination.". (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to petitions filed after the date of the enactment of this Act.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) and the gentlewoman from Alabama (Ms. Sewell) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Missouri.

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and submit extraneous material on this bill under consideration.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Missouri?

There was no objection.

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6506, the Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act, bipartisan legislation introduced by my Ways and Means colleagues, Representatives Nathaniel Moran and Terri Sewell. A recent Supreme Court decision will make it more difficult for American taxpayers to challenge the IRS in court when the agency seeks to impose levies over an alleged tax liability. Right now, the taxpayer can lose the opportunity to dispute the agency's actions simply by procedural technicalities. This bill enhances taxpayer rights by making collection proceedings more taxpayer-friendly. By protecting deadlines, safeguarding refunds, and ensuring fair judicial review, these changes are all for the benefit of the taxpayer. Mr. Speaker, as a former county judge, Representative Moran is leading the charge through this legislation to restore taxpayer rights and ensure that Americans can have their day in court. I reserve the balance of my time.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in great support of H.R. 6506, the Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act. Before I address this bill, I would like to take a moment to discuss the President's $1.8 billion slush fund, which was created by using money from American taxpayers, a fund based on a meritless lawsuit that will be used to pay his friends and allies. Yet, the Republican House remains silent. Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record an amicus brief filed on Monday by me, my colleagues on the Ways and Means Committee, and the Litigation Task Force, the link which can be found at:
Text printed in the Record (124 characters)
Https://litigationtaskforce.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/ litigationandresponse.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/54-1.pdf.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Text printed in the Record (95 characters)
President Donald J. Trump, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Internal Revenue Service, et al., Defendants.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)

Motion For Leave To File Brief As Amici Curiae By 93 Members of the United States House of Representatives
Text printed in the Record (8,659 characters)
Ninety-three Members of the United States House of Representatives respectfully submit this motion for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in support of neither party to assist this Court in scrutinizing the unprecedented circumstances that have given rise to the Court's "concerns about whether it has subject matter jurisdiction in this case." ECF No. 43. President Trump's action against the federal government he currently leads is a collusive lawsuit that undermines the separation of powers, frustrates Congress' lawmaking prerogative, and--unless rightfully dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction--could siphon billions of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the President, his family, and his allies. As Members of Congress, the proposed amici have a direct and substantial interest in ensuring that Article III's case or controversy requirement is enforced and that acts of Congress are faithfully executed by the Executive Branch. The proposed amici respectfully submit this brief, attached as Exhibit A, to present critical arguments regarding this Court's jurisdiction and, among other things, the constitutional and statutory limits on the Department of Justice's ("DOJ's") settlement authority that have not been--and will not be--advanced by any party in the litigation. Movants are 93 Members of the United States House of Representatives. Movants are interested in this case because they took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. They also have a strong interest in ensuring that acts of Congress are faithfully executed by the Executive Branch. The President is attempting to undermine the Constitution by bringing this collusive suit against the federal government contrary to the requirement that federal courts may only hear "Cases" or "Controversies." U.S. Const. art. III, Sec. 2, cl. 1. Congress has enacted laws governing the specific circumstances under which individuals and entities may sue the United States for unauthorized disclosure of their tax return information. The DOJ is entrusted with defending the United States against claims under these laws and ensuring that the statutory requirements are met before money is paid pursuant to the statutes. Here, however, the DOJ has colluded with President Trump and his allies and, in so doing, abdicated these responsibilities. The parties' actions, therefore, have frustrated Congress' purpose in enacting these laws. Moreover, Congress has a strong interest in ensuring that the Executive Branch properly guards the public fisc. That includes complying with the Constitution's commands that "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives." U.S. Const. art. I, Sec. 7, cl. 1, "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law," id. art. I, Sec. 9, cl. 7, and forbidding the President from "receiv[ing] within [his term] any other Emolument from the United States" than compensation approved by Congress, id art. II, Sec. I, cl. 7. Should this lawsuit achieve Plaintiffs' desired ends, it would result in the improper and unconstitutional transfer of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the President, his family, and his allies. Having taken oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution, the movants cannot stand by and let the Constitution's provisions and prohibitions, including the express bar on Presidential profiteering, go ignored. District courts possess the inherent authority to allow amici to assist in their proceedings. In re Bayshore Ford Trucks Sales, Inc., 471 F.3d 1233, 1249 n.34 (11th Cir. 2006); Resort Timeshare Resales, Inc. v. Stuart, 764 F. Supp. 1495, 1500-01 (S.D. Fla. 1991). Because an amicus "participates only for the benefit of the court, it is solely within the discretion of the court to determine the fact, extent, and manner of participation by the amicus." Id. at 1501 (quotation omitted). This Court should grant this motion for leave to file an amicus brief by 93 Members of the House of Representatives because President Trump's presence on both sides of the litigation, and his own blunt statements about his ability to control the case, show that Plaintiffs and Defendants are not adversaries. As such, the DOJ has failed to raise numerous, clearly meritorious arguments for dismissal that it has raised in other cases involving essentially identical facts. The Court should allow the proposed amici to participate in the litigation in order to equip the Court with these and other critical considerations that will assist it in conducting its analysis, including arguments regarding this Court's Article III jurisdiction and the constitutional and statutory limits on the DOJ's settlement authority. Courts routinely grant leave to file an amicus brief where the amicus " `contributes to the court's understanding of the matter in question' by proffering timely and useful information." United States v. Santiago-Ruiz, No. 17-60022-Crim-BLOOM, 2017 WL 11454398, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2017) (quoting Conservancy of Sw. Fla. v U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 3603276. at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 9, 2010)). Courts also grant amicus status where "[p]articipation as amicus curiae will alert the court to the legal contentions of concerned bystanders . . . ." Resort Timeshare, 764 F. Supp. at 1500-01 (citation omitted). Here, the proposed amici bring the unique perspective of current Members of Congress in a lawsuit that raises serious questions about the separation of powers. the Origination Clause, the Appropriations Clause, and the Emoluments Clause. These issues are of critical importance to the proposed amici, given their legislative and oversight roles, their oaths, and their duties as constitutional stewards of the federal treasury. The brief by the proposed amici timely, as the Court has indicated that it is currently analyzing whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over the case. ECF No. 43. For the foregoing reasons, movants respectfully request that the Court grant their motion for leave to file their proposed amicus brief. Counsel for movants have made reasonable efforts to confer with all parties regarding their positions with respect to this motion but have been unable to do so. There have been public reports that the parties are preparing to announce a collusive settlement as early as today, May 18, 2026. Thus, to ensure the Court has the benefit of amici's briefing before such a settlement is announced, amici is filing this motion and accompanying brief now. Nevertheless, counsel for movants still sought the consent of the parties. Movants' counsel emailed counsel for Plaintiffs on Sunday, May 17, 2026, around 9:45 p.m. ET. Plaintiffs' counsel has not yet responded to the request for Plaintiffs' position on this motion. And although the government has not yet entered an appearance in this matter, counsel for movants emailed Matthew Feeley, Chief of the Civil Division for the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida on Sunday, May 17, 2026, around 9:45 p.m. ET. Mr. Feeley has not yet responded to the request for the government's position on this motion. Dated: May 18, 2026 Respectfully submitted, Matthew J. Platkin, Angela Cai, Ravi Ramanathan, Aaron E. Haier, Conor Bradley, Platkin LLP, 413 Washington Ave., Unit 174, Belleville. NJ 07109. Norman L. Eisen, David W. Ogden, Stephen A. Jonas, Democracy Defenders Action, 600 Pennsylvania Ave. SE #15180, Washington, D.C. 20003. Rivero Mestre LLP, 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 1000, Miami, Florida 33134. Andres Rivero, Florida Bar No. 613819, Daniela Tenjido-Eljaiek, Florida Bar No. 1031531. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 18th day of May 2026, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system, which automatically serves all counsel of record for the parties who have appeared. Pursuant to Southern District of Florida Local Rule 5.2(a), I further certify that I caused the foregoing to be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, on the following governmental entities who are defendants in this action or act as an entity which accepts service on behalf of the defendants in this action: (1) Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20224; (2) United States Office of the Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20530; and (3) Southern District of Florida United States Attorney's Office, 99 N.E. 4th Street, Miami, FL 33131. Service to these entities was made via mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(C). Andres Rivero.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)

Mr. Speaker, the Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act will strengthen taxpayers' rights when the IRS uses a levy to collect unpaid taxes by making technical fixes to the Tax Court's jurisdiction. In the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, language was added to give taxpayers due process and an opportunity for review of IRS collection cases involving levies. However, a recent U.S. Supreme Court case has highlighted the need to revisit this section. In this recent case, a taxpayer paid estimated taxes that were applied to her ex-husband's account instead of her own account. The IRS then proceeded to levy her property for the unpaid taxes. She challenged this action in court, but while the case was pending, the IRS offset her later-year refund against the unpaid taxes until it eventually reached zero. At that point, the IRS sought to dismiss the case and won. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The Court held that the current statute limits the Tax Court's jurisdiction to only reviewing whether a levy should proceed. Since there was no longer a levy, she lost her ability to argue about the underlying taxes. Worse, she also lost her later-year refunds because of the statute of limitations being expired. At every step of the process, Mr. Speaker, the system failed this taxpayer. Our bill will fix this problem. First, while disputing a levied case in the Tax Court, our bill tolls the statute of limitations for filing refund claims. Second, while the case is pending, the IRS is prohibited from using later-year refunds to offset the taxpayer's liability without the individual's consent. Finally, this bill will give the Tax Court jurisdiction over the levy and the underlying tax liability. The bill also would allow the Tax Court to retain jurisdiction even if the IRS abandons the levy. I thank my colleague, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Moran), for his steadfast leadership in this area. I thank him for his generous support, and I thank both of our staff for their hard work on this bill. We must work together to ensure that the IRS does not abuse its levy authority and that taxpayer rights are clearly defined and protected. I think it is very important that we make commonsense reforms like this, and I am happy that they are bipartisan. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote "yes" on this bill. I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Moran), the sponsor of this legislation.

Nathaniel Moran (R-TX)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 6506, the Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act, bipartisan legislation introduced alongside my colleague Congresswoman Terri Sewell to strengthen procedural protections for the American taxpayer. This bill addresses a simple problem. Under current law, taxpayers who challenge an IRS collection action can lose important other rights and remedies simply because that process takes too long. That is not the result we want for taxpayers. Congress has a duty to ensure that when Americans dispute a tax liability, the rules are clear, consistent, and taxpayer-friendly. H.R. 6506 makes three important reforms to do just that. First, it suspends the statute of limitations on refund claims while collection disputes are pending. Under current law, a taxpayer can spend years pursuing a legitimate challenge at Tax Court only to discover the clock ran out on their ability to recover an overpayment. This legislation will fix that. Second, the bill prevents the IRS from automatically applying taxpayer overpayments against disputed liabilities during collection proceedings without the taxpayer's consent. Americans should not lose access to their own funds before receiving a full and fair review of the dispute and having that dispute settled. Third, H.R. 6506 expands the jurisdiction of the Tax Court to ensure that taxpayers can obtain judicial review, even if the IRS later abandons the collection action. The courthouse doors should not shut out taxpayers because of procedural maneuvering and gamesmanship by the IRS. Mr. Speaker, this legislation was reported out unanimously from the Ways and Means Committee by a vote of 41-0, proving that Members on both sides of the aisle agree that taxpayers deserve due process and fair judicial proceedings when dealing with the IRS. For hardworking families and small business owners across east Texas and across this Nation, dealing with the IRS can already be intimidating enough. They deserve a system that is transparent, accountable, and just. They deserve someone who will stand in their corner, and this bill does just that. No taxpayer should be at the whim of the IRS or deprived of important remedies when they have successfully disputed their case. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand with the taxpayers today and support H.R. 6506.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)3:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Grothman).

Glenn Grothman (R-WI)3:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, hearing the comments from a lot of my colleagues here, I will repeat a quote that has been put over and over again on the news the last couple of days. It is a Ronald Reagan quote: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help." That is never going to happen. Okay. Now I am here to support the Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act. It is a bipartisan bill that strengthens taxpayer protections and restores fairness to disputes with the IRS. Prior to my time in elected office, I dealt with a law firm that did hundreds of tax returns every year. I dealt with everyday Americans as they brought their records, receipts, W-2s, 1099s, and whatever paperwork they had received from the IRS. Many were not experts, and I am talking about the people who work for the IRS, because they are frequently wrong. Our clients were workers, retirees, small business owners, and families trying to do the right thing. I saw how easy it is for honest taxpayers to become overwhelmed with our overcomplicated tax law and, therefore, wind up confused with all of their notices and rules that seemed to change from year to year, and they sometimes did. Those are the people I came to Congress to help, and those are the people this bill is meant to protect. They should not be at the mercy of a Federal agency that can use procedural loopholes to avoid review or pressure them into giving up a legitimate challenge. Most taxpayers are not trying to cheat the system. They are just trying to file correctly, correct honest mistakes, and make sure they are treated fairly. When a dispute arises, the IRS often has the advantage. It has more resources, more lawyers, and a much better understanding of the system than the average American. As I pointed out, frequently the IRS agents themselves don't know the law. This is why due process matters. Every American deserves the right to challenge the IRS without worrying that the government will change the rules. Unfortunately, current law allows that to happen. The IRS can effectively sidestep Tax Court review by applying refunds or disputed tax liabilities or withdrawing collection actions before the court can fully rule on the merits of the case. That is not how due process should work in this country. This legislation protects taxpayers by preserving refund rights during disputes, preventing the IRS from taking refunds without consent, and ensuring that taxpayers receive a full review before the Tax Court. These are straightforward reforms rooted in fairness and accountability. The IRS should not be allowed to use procedural loopholes to pressure taxpayers or avoid review. This bill is especially important for small businesses, working families, and individuals, who don't have a team of lawyers or accountants at their disposal. Americans should be able to challenge the IRS on equal footing and trust that the system will treat them fairly. Mr. Speaker, I commend Representatives Moran and Sewell for advancing this bipartisan legislation, and I urge my colleagues to support it.

Terri A. Sewell (D-AL)3:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time for the purposes of closing. Mr. Speaker, I thank my amazing, good friend, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, Jason Smith, for his leadership, and Ranking Member Neal, who has always shown his support for the American people. It is an honor to sit on a committee that can come together with bipartisan legislation like this. H.R. 6506 is a commonsense bill that will help taxpayers and the courts. The bill passed 41-0 in the Ways and Means Committee, showing bipartisan support for protecting the due process rights of taxpayers. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this bill and pass this bill into law, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Jason Smith (R-MO)3:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, every taxpayer deserves the right to dispute IRS actions taken against them. We have a judicial system in place that exists to protect that right. Unfortunately, as the system stands today, the IRS can circumvent taxpayer rights, abandon judicial review, and impose penalties on individuals who will have no real way to challenge what the government claims. Due process must be protected for all Americans, particularly for those who are facing down a powerful government agency like the IRS. Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore3:30 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 6506, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2026

Pages H3567–H3570 · Official text

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2252) to authorize the relinquishment and in lieu selection of land and minerals in the State of North Dakota, to restore land and minerals to Indian Tribes within the State of North Dakota, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (8,290 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2026". SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) North dakota enabling act.--The term "North Dakota Enabling Act" means the Act of February 22, 1889 (25 Stat. 676, chapter 180). (2) Reservation.--The term "reservation" means any Indian reservation located wholly or partially within the State of North Dakota and recognized under United States treaty, Executive order, or Act of Congress. (3) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior. (4) State.--The term "State" means the State of North Dakota, acting through the North Dakota Board of University and School Lands and its agent, the Department of Trust Lands. (5) State land grant parcel.--The term "State land grant parcel" means-- (A) a parcel of land granted to the State of North Dakota by Congress-- (i) on statehood; or (ii) through a grant pursuant to the North Dakota Enabling Act; (B) a section of land numbered 16 or 36 granted to the State of North Dakota by Congress for school purposes; (C) a parcel of land selected by the State of North Dakota as indemnity for any section of land numbered 16 or 36; and (D) a parcel of land other than a parcel of land described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) obtained by the State after statehood. (6) Unappropriated federal land.-- (A) In general.--The term "unappropriated Federal land" means public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management located within the State of North Dakota, including public land that is mineral in character. (B) Exclusions.--The term "unappropriated Federal land" does not include-- (i) land (including an interest in land) acquired by the Bureau of Land Management; (ii) any area of critical environmental concern established pursuant to section 202(c)(3) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712(c)(3)); or (iii) land that is-- (I) withdrawn from-- (aa) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws; (bb) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; or (cc) disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral materials; (II) located within a component of the National Landscape Conservation System; (III) designated as a Research Natural Area; (IV) located within any reservation; (V) located within-- (aa) T. 147 N., R. 95 W.; (bb) T. 148 N., R. 95 W.; (cc) T. 148 N., R. 96 W.; or (dd) T. 149 N., R. 95 W.; (VI) located within a United States military reservation; or (VII) designated by Congress or the President for conservation purposes. SEC. 3. RELINQUISHMENT AND SELECTION; CONVEYANCE. (a) Relinquishment and Selection.-- (1) In general.--Subject to valid existing rights, if the State elects to relinquish all right, title, and interest of the State in and to a State land grant parcel located wholly or partially within the boundaries of any reservation, the Secretary shall authorize the State to select in accordance with this Act 1 or more parcels of unappropriated Federal land of substantially equivalent value. (2) Selection.-- (A) In general.--Subject to a mutual agreement between the State and the Secretary, the land exchange authorized under paragraph (1) may be carried out in a single phase or multiple phases. (B) List.--For each phase of the land exchange, the State shall provide to the Secretary a selection list in accordance with this Act, including all selected parcels of unappropriated Federal land of substantially equivalent value. (C) Adjustments.--Adjustments to parcels included in the selection list for each phase may be made as necessary, not later than 120 days of delivery of the list to the Secretary, to equalize the value of State land grant parcels and the overall value of the parcels of unappropriated Federal land selected. (3) Approval.--Not later than 180 days after the date on which the State makes a selection for each phase under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall approve or reject, in whole or in part, the selection for that phase. (4) Review.--Nothing in this subsection precludes the Secretary from conducting an environmental review of any parcel proposed for relinquishment under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that an environmental review is appropriate. (b) Conveyance.-- (1) Conveyance by secretary.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary approves a State selection of unappropriated Federal land under subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall initiate the actions necessary to convey to the State the unappropriated Federal land. (B) Requirements.--Conveyance of unappropriated Federal land by the Secretary under this Act-- (i) shall be by patent or deed in a form acceptable to the State and the Secretary; and (ii) shall not be considered a sale, exchange, or conveyance for purposes of section 203, 205, 206, or 209 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1713, 1715, 1716, 1719). (2) Relinquishment and conveyance by state.-- (A) In general.--As consideration for the conveyance of unappropriated Federal land under paragraph (1), on the date on which the unappropriated Federal land is conveyed to the State, the State shall concurrently relinquish and convey to the Secretary all right, title, and interest of the State in and to the State land grant parcel identified for relinquishment under subsection (a)(1). (B) Title.--The State shall convey to the Secretary title, free of any financial claims, liabilities, or other financial encumbrances, to all parcels relinquished under subparagraph (A). (C) Limitation.--Relinquishment and conveyance by the State of a State land grant parcel under this Act shall not be considered an exchange or acquisition for purposes of section 205 or 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1715, 1716). (c) Succession to Rights and Obligations.--Each party to which land is conveyed under this Act shall, to the fullest extent allowable under Federal and State law, succeed to the rights and obligations of the conveying party with respect to any lease, right-of-way, permit, or other valid existing right to which the land is subject. (d) Management After Relinquishment.-- (1) Reservation.--If a State land grant parcel relinquished by the State and conveyed to the Secretary under this Act is located wholly or partially within the boundaries of any reservation, on request of the applicable Indian Tribe, the portion of the State land grant parcel located within the boundaries of the reservation shall be-- (A) taken into trust by the Secretary on behalf of, and for the benefit of, the Indian Tribe on the date of the conveyance; and (B) considered to be a part of the reservation of the Indian Tribe. (2) Consultation required.--Prior to the conveyance of a State land grant parcel located wholly or partially within the boundaries of any reservation, the State and the Secretary shall consult with affected Indian Tribes, including the Indian Tribe the land of which is subject to conveyance in accordance with Executive Order 13175 (25 U.S.C. 5301 note; relating to consultation and coordination with Indian tribal governments) and other applicable laws. (e) Withdrawal.-- (1) In general.--Subject to valid rights in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, all unappropriated Federal land selected by the State for conveyance under this Act, effective beginning on the date on which the State makes the selection for such Federal land and ending on the date described in paragraph (2), is withdrawn from all forms of-- (A) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws; (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and (C) disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral materials. (2) Date described.--The date referred to in paragraph (1) is the date on which, as applicable-- (A) the unappropriated Federal land is conveyed by the Secretary to the State; (B) the Secretary rejects the selection under subsection (a)(3); or (C) the State withdraws the selection. SEC. 4.
Text printed in the Record (8,220 characters)
VALUATION. (a) Equal Value.--With respect to a State land grant parcel conveyed under this Act in consideration for a parcel of unappropriated Federal land selected in accordance with this Act-- (1) the overall value of the State land grant parcel and the overall value of the parcel of unappropriated Federal land shall be substantially equal; or (2) subject to subsection (c), if the overall value of the parcels is not equal, the party conveying the parcel of lesser value shall-- (A) equalize the value by the payment of funds to the other party; or (B) enter the imbalance in value on a ledger account in accordance with subsection (e). (b) Appraisal Required.-- (1) In general.--Except as provided in subsection (d), the value of the unappropriated Federal land selected in accordance with this Act and the value of a State land grant parcel conveyed under this Act shall be determined by appraisals conducted by 1 or more independent appraisers selected jointly by the Secretary and the State. (2) Requirements.--An appraisal under paragraph (1) shall be completed in accordance with-- (A) the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions; or (B) subject to subsection (d)(1), the Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice. (c) Equalization.--With respect to a conveyance to the Secretary of a State land grant parcel of lesser value than the parcel of unappropriated Federal land to be conveyed to the State under this Act, the total value of the equalization payment described in subsection (a)(2)(A) or the ledger entry described in subsection (e), as applicable, may not exceed 25 percent of the total value of the parcel of unappropriated Federal land. (d) Low Value Parcels.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary, with the consent of the State, may use mass appraisals, a summary appraisal, or a statement of value made by a qualified appraiser carried out in accordance with the Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice to determine the value of a State land grant parcel or a parcel of unappropriated Federal land to be conveyed under this Act instead of an appraisal that complies with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions if the State and the Secretary agree that market value of the State land grant parcel or parcel of unappropriated Federal land, as applicable, is-- (A) less than $500,000; and (B) less than $500 per acre. (2) Division.--A State land grant parcel or a parcel of unappropriated Federal land may not be artificially divided in order to qualify for a summary appraisal, mass appraisal, or statement of value under paragraph (1). (e) Ledger Accounts.-- (1) In general.--With respect to a State land grant parcel conveyed under this Act in consideration for a parcel of unappropriated Federal land, if the overall value of the parcels is not equal, the Secretary and the State may agree to use a ledger account to make equal the value. (2) Imbalances.--A ledger account described in paragraph (1) shall reflect imbalances in value to be reconciled in a subsequent transaction. (3) Account balancing.--Each ledger account described in paragraph (1) shall be-- (A) balanced not later than 3 years after the date on which the ledger account is established; and (B) closed not later than 5 years after the date of the last conveyance of land under this Act. (4) Costs.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary or the State may assume costs or other responsibilities or requirements for conveying land under this Act that ordinarily are borne by the other party. (B) Adjustment.--If the Secretary or the State assume costs or other responsibilities under subparagraph (A), the Secretary or the State shall make adjustments to the value of the unappropriated Federal land conveyed to the State to compensate the Secretary or the State, as applicable, for assuming the costs or other responsibilities. (5) Mineral land.--If value is attributed to any parcel of unappropriated Federal land that has been selected by the State because of the presence of minerals under a lease entered into under the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) that is in a producing or producible status, and the lease is to be conveyed under this Act, the value of the parcel shall be reduced by the amount that represents the likely Federal revenue sharing obligation under the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) with the State, but the adjustment shall not be considered as reflecting a property right of the State. (6) Public inspection and notice.-- (A) Public inspection.--Not later than 30 days before the date of any exchange of Federal land and non-Federal land under this act, all final appraisals and appraisal reviews for the land to be exchanged shall be available for public review at the office of the State Director of the Bureau of Land Management in the Montana-Dakotas State Office. (B) Notice.--The Secretary shall make available on the public website of the Secretary, and the Secretary or the State, as applicable, shall publish in a newspaper of general circulation in North Dakota, a notice that the appraisals conducted under subsection (b) are available for public inspection. SEC. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. (a) In General.--Land or minerals conveyed under this Act shall be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and Tribal law. (b) Protection of Indian Rights.-- (1) Treaty rights.--Nothing in this Act modifies, limits, expands, or otherwise affects any treaty-reserved right or other right of any Indian Tribe recognized by any other means, including treaties or agreements with the United States, Executive orders, statutes, regulations, or case law. (2) Land or minerals held in trust.--Nothing in this Act affects-- (A) land or minerals held in trust by the United States as of the date of enactment of this Act on behalf of, and for the benefit of, any Indian Tribe; or (B) any individual Indian allotment. (c) Hazardous Materials.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary and the State shall make available for review and inspection any record relating to hazardous materials on land to be conveyed under this Act. (2) Certification.-- (A) In general.--Prior to completing a conveyance of unappropriated Federal land under this Act, the Secretary shall complete an inspection and a hazardous materials certification of the land to be conveyed. (B) State land grant parcels.--Prior to completing a conveyance of a State land grant parcel under this Act, the State shall complete an inspection and a hazardous materials certification of the land to be conveyed. (d) Grazing Permits.-- (1) In general.--If land conveyed under this Act is subject to a lease, permit, or contract for the grazing of domestic livestock in effect on the date of the conveyance, the Secretary or the State, as applicable, shall allow the grazing to continue for the remainder of the term of the lease, permit, or contract, subject to the related terms and conditions of the user agreements, including permitted stocking rates, grazing fee levels, access, and ownership and use of range improvements. (2) Cancellation.-- (A) In general.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary or the State from canceling or modifying a grazing permit, lease, or contract if the land subject to the permit, lease, or contract is sold, conveyed, transferred, or leased for nongrazing purposes. (B) Base properties.--If land conveyed by the State under this Act is used by a grazing permittee or lessee to meet the base property requirements for a Federal grazing permit or lease, the land shall continue to qualify as a base property for the remaining term of the lease or permit and the term of any renewal or extension of the lease or permit. (C) Range improvements.--Nothing in this Act prohibits a holder of a grazing lease, permit, or contract from being compensated for range improvements pursuant to the terms of the lease, permit, or contract under existing Federal or State laws. SEC. 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Nothing in this Act applies to or affects litigation or disputes pending on the date of enactment of this Act regarding the ownership of any land or mineral resources located within the State of North Dakota.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Maryland (Ms. Elfreth) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 2252, the bill now under consideration.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2252, the North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2026, introduced by the gentlewoman from North Dakota (Mrs. Fedorchak). This bill addresses a land management issue that dates back to North Dakota's admission to the Union. At statehood, Congress granted lands to North Dakota to help support public institutions, including schools and universities, through responsible land and resource management. For more than a century, the State has used those lands to generate revenue for education and for other public purposes. Today, North Dakota continues to manage hundreds of thousands of acres of surface estate and millions of acres of mineral estate known as State trust lands. However, approximately 31,000 of these surface acres and roughly 130,000 acres of the State trust minerals are located within the boundaries of Tribal reservations. This has created overlapping jurisdictional challenges and fragmented, checkerboard ownership patterns that are burdensome to all parties. Furthermore, these stranded State trust lands are unable to generate revenue for the benefit of North Dakota's citizens and public schoolchildren. H.R. 2252 provides a better path forward that is a win-win for everyone involved. The bill allows North Dakota to relinquish certain trust lands located within reservation boundaries and select equal-value Bureau of Land Management lands elsewhere in the State that they can utilize to generate millions of dollars in new revenue. In return, the relinquished lands from the State within reservation boundaries will be taken into trust for the benefit of North Dakota's Tribes. Importantly, this legislation protects taxpayers by requiring independent appraisals, equal-value exchanges, and protection for valid existing rights. This logical fix helps North Dakotans better manage their trust land, provides long-term funding for education, supports Tribes, and consolidates fragmented land ownership to reduce the burden on Federal land management agencies. This is truly a win-win across the board. I commend the leadership of Representative Fedorchak in advancing this bill. I also commend Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, who has supported this legislation since his time as North Dakota's Governor. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 2252, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2252 would allow the State of North Dakota to relinquish parcels of State land within the boundaries of a Tribal reservation in exchange for one or more parcels of unappropriated Bureau of Land Management land of substantially equivalent value. All relinquished State lands will be held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Tribe whose reservation includes those lands. The process established by this legislation will help make reservations whole and fulfill obligations made to the State of North Dakota when it was entered into the Union in 1889. The chair mentioned a win-win, and I want to reemphasize that here. This bill will help fulfill our Tribal treaty responsibilities and will benefit North Dakota schools, with the land acquired managed as school trust lands. I commend and thank my friend, Representative Fedorchak, for her work on this bill, which includes updates to ensure that the land exchanges are transparent and fair. The bill also includes important safeguards for land with wilderness characteristics and other important conservation designations. Most importantly, Mr. Speaker, this bill is supported by the impacted Tribes, including the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this bill. I reserve the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from North Dakota (Mrs. Fedorchak), the lead sponsor of the bill.

Julie Fedorchak (R-ND)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my bill, the North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act. I thank the gentlewoman from Maryland and our chairman for his leadership, especially for getting it through the House Natural Resources Committee with unanimous support. I can't thank him enough for that. As both have stated, this bill provides some important new changes for my State and addresses a unique land management challenge that dates back to North Dakota's statehood. They have both expressed it well, but let me reinforce what has already been said. When North Dakota became a State, the Federal Government granted 2.6 million acres of Federal land to support schools and other public needs. Specifically, the State received sections 16 and 36 of every township. As a result, North Dakota holds more than 31,000 surface acres and 130,000 acres of mineral rights inside Tribal reservation boundaries. This created a checkerboard pattern of ownership that makes land management and development difficult for everyone. The chart beside me shows the patchwork of State trust land on the Standing Rock Reservation. All the green land, green checks, squares, in this are land owned within the Tribal reservation by the State of North Dakota. This is just one of five reservations in our State. The Tribes struggle to efficiently develop land within their own reservation boundaries because of this fragmented ownership, and there is currently no pathway for the State and Federal government to exchange these lands. My legislation solves this problem. H.R. 2252 authorizes equal-value land exchanges between the State of North Dakota and the Department of the Interior. This allows the State to exchange scattered trust lands within reservation boundaries like this for Federal lands of equivalent values elsewhere in the State. Importantly, this bill does not automatically exchange a single acre of land. It simply creates a process that can be used if all parties choose to move forward. The legislation includes multiple safeguards and transparency requirements; specifically, consultation with affected Tribal Governments prior to any conveyance, environmental review authority for the Secretary of the Interior, independent appraisals using Federal appraisal standards to ensure substantially equal value, public inspection of final appraisals at least 30 days before any exchange, and public notice online and in North Dakota newspapers before exchanges occur. Upon exchange, State land located within reservation boundaries is immediately transferred to the BIA to be held in trust for the benefit of the Tribe. The State will manage the exchanged Federal acres for North Dakotans and public schools. The result is less fragmentation, clear ownership boundaries, and a greater ability for both Tribal and State governments to manage the land for the benefit of their people. Mr. Speaker, I also want to be clear about what this bill does not do. This bill does not reduce public access. It does not close hunting land. It does not impact recreation. Existing grazing permits and leases are protected throughout the exchange process, and every exchange must meet rigorous Federal appraisal standards to ensure equal value. The bill also includes significant protections for wildlife habitat, conservation lands, public access, and existing land uses. Federal lands specifically excluded include: areas of critical environmental concern, National Landscape Conservation System lands, research natural areas, military reservations, and lands designated for conservation purposes by Congress or the President. Protected conservation areas and specially managed wildlife landscapes are not eligible for exchange under this legislation. To be absolutely clear, the bill explicitly preserves all Indian treaty rights. In fact, this bill was shaped in consultation with Tribal leaders. It has strong support from Tribal nations in North Dakota. Steve Sitting Bear is chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. He has plans to grow beef and bison production for Standing Rock, and what a great opportunity that is. They reside on the rolling prairies along the Missouri River in southwestern North Dakota, perfect for grazing cattle and bison. This legislation would help correct this scattered ownership pattern that challenges Chairman Sitting Bear's vision. In his words, the current situation has made effective land management difficult for all parties. Mark Fox, who is chairman of the Three Affiliated Tribes, says his nation was glad to help shape the legislation and supports restoring reservation land while preserving treaty rights. Due to this collaboration and broad support, this legislation passed the United States Senate unanimously in the last Congress. It passed unanimously out of the House Committee on Natural Resources earlier this year. Mr. Speaker, this is a practical, commonsense solution that benefits Tribes, benefits North Dakota, and improves land management for future generations. I urge my colleagues to support the North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I again commend the gentlewoman for this legislation and thank my colleagues in the minority for helping us work on something that we could bring to the floor that is a commonsense bill that benefits all those involved. I think this is a good example of Congress doing what we should do, bringing forth commonsense legislation. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time. I am prepared to close and reserve the balance of my time.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)3:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, again, H.R. 2252 is a practical and balanced approach to resolving a longstanding land management challenge in North Dakota. This legislation helps the State better manage trust lands that support schools and public institutions while also creating a pathway for greater Tribal land consolidation within reservation boundaries. I thank Representative Fedorchak for her leadership on this issue. I urge my colleagues to support the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore3:40 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 2252, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2026

Pages H3570–H3572 · Official text

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4684) to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to issue a special use permit with respect to the maintaining of a flagpole bearing the flag of the United States at Kyhv Peak Lookout Point, Utah, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (4,645 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2026". SEC. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF COVERED FLAGPOLE AT KYHV PEAK LOOKOUT POINT. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Covered flagpole.--The term "covered flagpole" means a flagpole bearing the flag of the United States. (2) Kyhv peak lookout point.--The term "Kyhv Peak Lookout Point" means the peak within the Uinta National Forest overlooking Utah Valley and located approximately at latitude 4016'18.14" N, longitude 11136'58.57" W. (3) Qualified person.--The term "qualified person" means an individual that resides in, or a nonprofit entity or volunteer organization that carries out operations of the entity or organization in, Utah County, Utah, that has-- (A) experience placing, maintaining, or otherwise caring for a covered flagpole; and (B) any other experience determined relevant by the Secretary. (4) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service. (b) Special Use Permit.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall issue a special use permit for a period of 10 years for the installation, operation, maintenance, and removal, if necessary, of a covered flagpole at Kyhv Peak Lookout Point to-- (1) an individual who has submitted a special use permit application to display the flag of the United States seasonally on Kyhv Peak prior to March 5, 2026; (2) an individual who has placed or displayed the flag of the United States at Kyhv Peak Lookout Point as part of a longstanding seasonal practice prior to the date of enactment of this Act; or (3) if an individual described in paragraphs (1) and (2) declines such permit, to a qualified person in accordance with this section. (c) Selection and Issuance.-- (1) Application.--Except as provided in subsection (b), to be eligible to be selected for a special use permit under this section, a qualified person shall submit to the Secretary a proposal and application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require. (2) Terms and conditions.--The Secretary may impose such terms and conditions on a holder of a special use permit under this section as the Secretary determines necessary to ensure the proper care and maintenance of a covered flagpole. (3) Land use fee exemption.--The Secretary shall not assess any land use fees with respect to a special use permit issued under this section. (4) Notice of application.--The Secretary shall publish notice of the availability of any special use permit under this section on the website of the Forest Service and in a local Utah County, Utah, newspaper of record. (d) Subsequent Special Use Permits.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall renew or issue a new 10-year special use permit not later than 180 days after the date that is the earliest of the following: (A) The date that is 10 years after the date on which the Secretary issued the preceding permit. (B) The date on which the holder of the current special use permit requests revocation of such permit. (C) The date on which a special use permit is subject to early termination under paragraph (2). (2) Revocation.--If the Secretary determines that the holder of a special use permit under this section is not in compliance with the terms and conditions relating to such permit under subsection (c)(3), the Secretary may revoke the special use permit. (e) Exemption From Cost Recovery Fees.--A holder of a special use permit under this section shall be exempt from any cost recovery fee under section 251.58 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations. (f) Applicability of NEPA.--The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to the issuance, renewal, or administration of a special use permit under this section, including any activities associated with the placing, maintenance, or removal of a covered flagpole at Kyhv Peak Lookout Point. (g) Access.--The Secretary may authorize reasonable access to Kyhv Peak Lookout Point for the purpose of exercising rights under a special use permit issued under this section, subject to conditions necessary to protect public safety and natural resources. (h) Limitation.--The Secretary shall ensure the activities and access authorized by this section are limited to the smallest practicable area.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Maryland (Ms. Elfreth) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 4684, the bill now under consideration.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise today in support of H.R. 4684, the Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2026, introduced by Representative Kennedy from Utah. This bill provides a simple, commonsense, and long-overdue fix that restores a longstanding patriotic tradition in Utah for generations to come. For more than two decades, a Scoutmaster named Robert Collins and his local Boy Scout troop hiked to the summit of Kyhv Peak Lookout Point to raise the American flag above the city of Provo, Utah. What began as a simple, patriotic gesture grew into a cherished community event. The annual raising of the American flag on this mountaintop has become not only a symbol of local pride for the Provo area but also a meaningful rite of passage for many young people in the community. Unfortunately, that tradition came to an abrupt end in 2022 when the U.S. Forest Service ordered the flag's prompt removal due to the absence of a special use permit for the flagpole. Overnight, a patriotic tradition that had brought a community together for 20 years was snuffed out by bureaucratic process. Since then, efforts to restore the tradition through administrative channels have moved slowly and without resolution. H.R. 4684 provides a straightforward solution. The bill directs the Forest Service to issue a 10-year special use permit for the seasonal placement of the American flag at Kyhv Peak and establishes a clear framework to allow the tradition to continue in perpetuity. Importantly, the legislation also waives all fees associated with the permit because you shouldn't have to pay to be patriotic. As our Nation celebrates 250 years of American independence, Congress should be encouraging patriotism and uplifting local traditions that bring communities together. This thoughtful legislation ensures that the Federal Government will no longer stand in the way of volunteers seeking to honor the American flag and show their love of country. I thank Representative Kennedy for his leadership on this effort and for his diligent work on the Committee on Natural Resources on behalf of his constituents. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting H.R. 4684, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. H.R. 4684 would authorize the Forest Service to issue a permit authorizing the maintenance of a flagpole at Kyhv Peak Lookout Point in Utah. This peak is located near Provo, Utah, in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. It is a popular hiking destination that is used to feature the prominent flagpole displaying the American flag, which was first installed in 2000 by a Boy Scout troop. However, U.S. Forest Service regulations prohibit the construction, placing, or maintaining of any structure on National Forest System land. The initial placement of this flagpole did not receive a permit, and consequently, the agency ordered the removal of the flagpole. These agency policies are vital for the proper stewardship of our resources, and the support for this bill should in no way be seen as an attempt to undermine or weaken that very crucial standard. We must continue to promote the simple but important principle of "leave no trace" to continue to minimize the impact of our visits on the plants, animals, and ecosystems we all hold dear. To be clear, the agency should be able to resolve this situation on their own. The Forest Service has testified before the Committee on Natural Resources that they are working to issue the necessary permit without congressional action. However, this patriotic display, especially in our 250th year, as the chair said, is important to the local community and visitors alike. I support the moving of this legislation today to resolve this issue promptly and return the flag to Kyhv Peak. Mr. Speaker, I urge support of this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Kennedy), the lead sponsor of this bill.

Mike Kennedy (R-UT)

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chair Westerman for the opportunity to speak on this bill, and I also thank Ranking Member Huffman and my colleague Congresswoman Elfreth for their willingness to hear this bill on the House floor today. Mr. Speaker, it should not take an act of Congress to fly an American flag on a mountain, but here we are, as we often are, in Congress. In 2000, a constituent of mine, Scoutmaster Robert Collins, led a Scout troop on a hike to Kyhv Peak above Utah Valley in Provo to raise the American flag at its summit. What began as a patriotic gesture by the Scouts evolved into an annual tradition. Each year, for over two decades, Robert Collins, joined by relatives, friends, and community members, hiked to the summit to continue the tradition. The flag standing at the peak became a symbol of local pride and a recognizable landmark in my district. However, in 2022, the U.S. Forest Service restricted the display. An act of patriotism, one that asked nothing of the Federal Government and cost the taxpayer nothing, was shut down by Washington bureaucracy. For years, my community waited for answers, but the Forest Service was never able to remediate the situation. That is why I introduced the Star-Spangled Summit Act. This bill directs the Forest Service to issue the permit. In short, it is simple. It does one thing well: lets Mr. Collins carry our flag up that mountain again. Mr. Speaker, in the grand scheme of issues this body confronts, this may seem like a small fix, but I believe this bill represents a larger challenge. This story reflects the challenge familiar to Utah and to communities across the West. In Utah, two-thirds of our land is managed from Washington, and too often, the decisions made about that land are disconnected from the people who actually live there. Local traditions get tangled in Federal processes. Common sense gives way to bureaucracy. Good people doing good things are left waiting for years. Utahns know our lands, and we know our communities. It is my belief that Utahns should not be buried under layers of bureaucracy when making decisions about the place that they call home. For 250 years, Americans have raised our flag. We have raised it at Yorktown and at Gettysburg. We have raised it at Iwo Jima and on the surface of the Moon. Yes, we even raised it over the mountain peaks of Provo. We raise the flag because it stands for something larger than any one of us: the idea that a free people can govern themselves. As we mark 250 years of American self-governance, we owe our communities a government that works with them. The Star-Spangled Summit Act restores a measure of balance that returns a small piece of decisionmaking to the community it belongs to, and it ensures the American flag can continue to wave. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting H.R. 4684, the Star-Spangled Summit Act.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I once again thank Representative Kennedy for his leadership on the Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2026. This bill restores a meaningful community tradition, cuts through unnecessary red tape, and ensures that the American flag can continue flying over Provo in a way that respects both patriotism and responsible stewardship of our public lands. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 4684, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 4684, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Establishment of the General George C. Marshall House as an Affiliated Area

Pages H3572–H3573 · Official text

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1352) to designate the General George C. Marshall House, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, as an affiliated area of the National Park System, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (2,723 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GENERAL GEORGE C. MARSHALL HOUSE AS AN AFFILIATED AREA. (a) In General.--The General George C. Marshall House, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, is established as an affiliated area of the National Park System. (b) Description of Affiliated Area.--The affiliated area shall consist of the area generally depicted as the "General George C. Marshall House Property, Leesburg, Virginia" on the map titled "General George C. Marshall House, Proposed Affiliated Area", numbered 999/189,974, and dated September 2023. (c) Administration.--The affiliated area shall be managed in a manner consistent with-- (1) this Act; and (2) any law generally applicable to units of the National Park System. (d) Management Entity.--The George C. Marshall International Center shall be the management entity for the affiliated area. (e) Agreements.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the "Secretary")-- (1) may provide technical assistance and enter into cooperative agreements with the management entity for the purpose of providing financial assistance for the marketing, marking, interpretation, and preservation of the affiliated area; and (2) shall enter into an agreement with the management entity that delineates the roles and responsibilities for the management of the area consistent with the policies and standards that apply to units of the National Park System. (f) Limited Role of the Secretary.--Nothing in this Act authorizes the Secretary to acquire property at the affiliated area or to assume managerial or financial responsibility for the operation, maintenance, or management of the affiliated area. (g) Private Property Protection.--Nothing in this Act affects the land use rights of private property owners adjacent to the General George C. Marshall House. (h) No Buffer Zones.-- (1) In general.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to create buffer zones outside of the General George C. Marshall House. (2) Activity or use outside the general george c. marshall house.--The fact that an activity or use can be seen, heard, or detected from within the George C. Marshall House shall not preclude, limit, control, regulate, or determine the conduct or management of activities or uses outside of the George C. Marshall House. (i) Management Plan.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary, in consultation with the management entity, shall complete a management plan for the affiliated area in accordance with section 100502 of title 54, United States Code.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Maryland (Ms. Elfreth) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 1352, the bill now under consideration.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 1352, which would designate the General George C. Marshall House in Virginia as an affiliated area of the National Park System. General George C. Marshall was a war hero, statesman, master strategist, and one of the most important figures in modern American history. From his distinguished service in both World Wars to his prominent role in shaping postwar peace, he was the rare American whose service touched every dimension of national strength. He was immortalized through his namesake Marshall Plan, the monumental recovery effort to rebuild Western Europe after the Second World War, for which he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize. In rare times of quiet during those pivotal years, General Marshall would retire to his home in Leesburg, Virginia, where he could humbly tend his gardens and ease his mind. Today, his estate remains an unusually intact window into his life, with the house and contents still in near-perfect condition. In 2005, the home and its gardens were open to the public as a museum. This bill recognizes George Marshall's legacy and ensures that Americans can continue to draw inspiration from his story by designating his home as an affiliated area of the National Park System. This designation conveys honor and recognition while keeping the management and fiscal responsibilities of the estate with the George C. Marshall International Center. This bill does not put the property under Federal management or add to the Federal estate. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1352 would designate the General George C. Marshall House in Leesburg, Virginia, as an affiliated area of the National Park System. This is a fitting tribute to a man who left an enduring mark on our national and, dare I say it, world history. George Marshall is the namesake of the Marshall Plan, a strategy that helped rebuild Europe after World War II. He understood that American leadership isn't found in the vacuum of isolation. It occurs from the steady, selfless work of building relationships to achieve global stability. He gave us a blueprint for a world held together by shared prosperity and common interests. The Marshall House preserves and celebrates the historic contributions made by George Marshall throughout World War II and during the postwar economic recovery. The property currently holds a collection of over 6,000 objects related to George and Katherine Marshall. It was found to be a worthy site for increased affiliation with the Park Service through a survey completed in 2023. This bill is the next step in that process and will help forever cement the legacy of George Marshall. This preservation of history also stands in stark contrast to the foreign policy of the Trump administration, which, unfortunately, continues to shoot first and aim later at the expense of decades of thoughtful diplomacy and alliances. The bill before us today is also an important reminder of the need to support our national parks and the agencies tasked with protecting them. Affiliated areas are vital public-private partnerships, as this bill establishes between the National Park Service and the George C. Marshall International Center, but they are just one component of our system. They are not a replacement. Real stewardship requires the courage to designate new, fully funded national parks, not just when it is easy or convenient, but where the land and our history demand it. H.R. 1352 ensures that the legacy of George Marshall and his significant contributions to American history are preserved, protected, and publicly accessible for generations to come. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, again, I commend both parties for working together to bring this legislation to the floor. I appreciate the gentleman from Virginia for sponsoring this legislation. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Subramanyam), who is the sponsor of the bill.

Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 1352, which designates the General George C. Marshall House on Dodona Manor in Leesburg as an affiliated area of the National Park System. Many of us know the incredible legacy of General George Marshall, who was Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and Chief of Staff of the Army. He was the only general, and still is the only general, to ever win the Nobel Peace Prize. You also may know the famous Marshall Plan, Mr. Speaker. What you may not know is the incredible work of the George C. Marshall International Center, which operates there in Dodona Manor, and the George C. Marshall House is a part of their mission. The center looks after the property and hosts thousands of visitors every year from around the world. They also have a regular speakers series on the property and lots of programming for children. They do a lot of amazing work in our community, and the property is a testament not just to the legacy of George C. Marshall, but to how he gave back to the community. This official National Park System designation would be a big deal not just for the manor and not just for the center, but for our entire community. It helps preserve the property for generations and allows the center to expand their programs, as well. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote "yes" on H.R. 1352. When it passes, you are all invited to the center as well, Mr. Speaker, and we will have a big party there.

Sarah Elfreth (D-MD)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers. I urge my colleagues to support this critical piece of legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Bruce Westerman (R-AR)4:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, again, H.R. 1352 would designate the General George C. Marshall House as an affiliated area of the National Park System, improving national recognition while keeping the site privately managed without taxpayer support. This is an appropriate bill to consider during our Nation's 250th anniversary celebrations, as it bestows recognition to one of the most hardworking and pivotal Americans of the postwar era. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 1352, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:00 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1352, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act

Pages H3573–H3575 · Official text

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3482) to amend title 38, United States Code, to establish an online program through which an employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs may schedule an appointment for a covered veteran with a non-Department health care provider under the Veterans Community Care Program, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (9,720 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act". SEC. 2. SCHEDULING OF APPOINTMENTS UNDER THE VETERANS COMMUNITY CARE PROGRAM. (a) Electronic Process.--Subsection (d) of section 3101 of the Johnny Isakson and David P. Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020 (Public Law 116-315; 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended to read as follows: "(d) Electronic Process.--(1) The Secretary shall implement an electronic process through which a scheduler of the Department, using an information technology system, may schedule an appointment for health care furnished by the Department or through the Veterans Community Care Program, under section 1703 of this title, by a non-Department health care provider. "(2) The electronic process under this subsection shall allow a scheduler, with regards to appointments described in-- "(A) either clause of subparagraph (A) of subsection (a)(1), to view, search, and sort such appointments by type of care, location, and date; and "(B) clause (ii) of such subparagraph-- "(i) to schedule such an appointment; "(ii) to provide referral and authorization documents directly to a non-Department provider; and "(iii) to perform any other function the Secretary determines necessary. "(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the electronic process allows a scheduler to schedule an appointment for health care furnished by the Secretary through a health care provider of the Department. "(4) The Secretary shall implement the electronic process through an existing agreement if practicable. "(5) The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives the following regarding the electronic process: "(A) Not later than 90 days after the Secretary makes a determination under subparagraph (B)(iii) of paragraph (2), a briefing regarding the functions the Secretary has determined necessary. "(B) Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act, and semiannually thereafter during the following three years, a report regarding operation of the electronic process during both the semiannual period preceding the date of the report and the cumulative period since the date of the enactment of such Act. Such a report shall include the following for each such period: "(i) The number of non-Department health care providers that participated in such electronic process, disaggregated by-- "(I) category of hospital care or medical services provided; and "(II) medical center of the Department; "(ii) The number of appointments scheduled pursuant to the electronic process, disaggregated by-- "(I) category of hospital care or medical services provided; "(II) medical center of the Department; and "(III) month. "(iii) A comparison of the average wait time for appointments scheduled through the electronic process and through non-electronic methods, disaggregated by medical center of the Department. "(iv) The rates at which veterans cancelled appointments scheduled through the electronic process. "(v) The rates at which veterans did not appear for appointments scheduled through the electronic process.". (b) Implementation.-- (1) Date.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall implement the electronic process under subsection (d) of section 1703H of such title, as added by this section, not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Guidelines.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish guidelines. Such guidelines shall include the following: (A) Procedures for schedulers and other employees of the Department involved in the scheduling of appointments described in such section. (B) A directive that employees described in subparagraph (A) use the electronic process to the extent practicable. (C) A directive that employees described in subparagraph (A), when scheduling an appointment for a covered veteran (as such term is used in section 1703 of such title) for health care furnished by the Secretary, inform such covered veteran of available appointments though providers of the Department and through providers under the Veterans Community Care Program when eligible. (D) Procedures for engaging with non-Department health care providers in specialized cases. (E) Standards regarding timeliness and accuracy. (F) Escalation protocols for scheduling failures or delays. (3) Training.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a mandatory training program for employees described in paragraph (2) regarding the guidelines under paragraph (2). (4) Evaluation.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe performance benchmarks and outcome-based metrics for the electronic process under such section, including-- (A) time between a referral and a scheduled appointment; (B) patient satisfaction; and (C) the percentage of appointments scheduled exclusively through the electronic process. (5) Outreach.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall plan and carry out an outreach strategy to encourage non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers that participate in the Veterans Community Care Program to participate in the electronic process under such subsection. Such outreach shall-- (A) include contacting each such provider during such 90 days; (B) include seeking to enter into an agreement with each such provider under which the provider shall participate in the electronic process; (C) include collaborating with State hospital associations and rural health associations to promote such participation; (D) focus on providers in specialties or underserved areas, as determined by the Secretary; and (E) include the publication, on a publicly accessible website of the Department, of information regarding-- (i) details of the electronic process; (ii) how a provider may elect to participate in the electronic process; and (iii) a point of contact in the Department regarding the electronic process. (6) Oversight.--The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives, with regards to the electronic process under such subsection, the following: (A) Not later than 30 days after the Secretary establishes guidelines under paragraph (2) of this subsection, a copy of such guidelines. (B) Not later than 30 days after the Secretary formulates the plan under paragraph (5) of this subsection, a briefing on the outreach strategy under such paragraph. (C) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the benchmarks and metrics prescribed under paragraph (4). (c) Expansion.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a plan to integrate the scheduling of appointments for health care furnished through health care providers of the Department of Veterans Affairs into the electronic process under subsection (d) of section 1703H of such title. Such plan shall include the following elements: (1) A timeline to implement such plan. (2) Estimated costs to carry out such plan. (3) Changes to policies and procedures of the Department the Secretary determines necessary to implement such plan. (d) Codification.-- (1) In general.--Section 3101 of such Act, as amended by subsection (a), is transferred to subchapter I of chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, inserted after section 1703G, and redesignated as section 1703H. (2) Conforming amendments.--Section 1703H of such title, as transferred and redesignated by this subsection, is amended-- (A) by striking any heading that is not a section heading or subsection heading and conforming the margins accordingly; (B) by striking "of title 38, United States Code" both places it appears and inserting "of this title"; (C) in subsection (b)(1), by striking "Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary" and inserting "The Secretary"; (D) in subsection (c)-- (i) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking "Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary" and inserting "The Secretary"; and (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting "The Secretary shall require each medical facility of the Department to use the method or tool described in paragraph (1)."; (E) in the section enumerator, by striking "sec." and inserting "Sec. "; and (F) in the section heading-- (i) by striking "process and requirements for scheduling appointments for health care from department of veterans affairs and non-department health care." and inserting "scheduling of appointments"; and (ii) by conforming the typeface and typestyle, including capitalization, to the typeface and typestyle used in the section heading of section 1703G of such title. (3) Table of sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting, after the item relating to section 1703G, the following new item: "1703H. Scheduling of appointments.". SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN LIMITS ON PAYMENT OF PENSION. Section 5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking "January 31, 2033" and inserting "May 31, 2033".

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Illinois.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on H.R. 3482, as amended.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Illinois?

There was no objection.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3482, as amended, offered by my friend and colleague, Representative Tom Barrett of Michigan. This bill would make much-needed improvements to make community care work better for our veterans. For far too long, the scheduling process has posed structural barriers that delay our veterans from accessing the timely healthcare that they have earned. Veterans often face administrative red tape that makes getting their care difficult when they are trying to see a provider in their own community. This bill would cut through that bureaucracy by bringing the VA's scheduling into the 21st century. This bill would authorize the External Provider Scheduling program across every VA medical center. It would equip VA employees with a modernized system to view, search, and sort real-time availability for both VA and non-VA providers. Under this bill, a VA scheduler could book an appointment and send the referral documents electronically without endless phone calls. This would let veterans across the entire country schedule many of their community care appointments in minutes, instead of waiting days on end. This bill would also include rigorous performance benchmarks to hold VA accountable for achieving real results to deliver better healthcare. VA would be required to track patron satisfaction and wait times so we can ensure taxpayer resources are making a real impact. Finally, thanks to an amendment adopted in committee, the costs associated with this legislation are fully offset. It is our duty to make sure veterans receive timely access to the healthcare they need right in the communities where they live. I also thank the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs, Concerned Veterans for America, the National Rural Health Association, and The American Legion for their support of this truly bipartisan legislation. This is a good, commonsense bill, and I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 3482, as amended. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)4:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3482, the Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act, as amended. One of the biggest concerns I hear from veterans is that it takes too long to get an appointment, whether at VA or through community care. As is the case with many things at VA, outdated and cumbersome technology makes it very difficult to schedule appointments. In addition, there are not enough requirements for community providers to make their schedules available in an electronic format to make it easier for VA schedulers to check availability. The Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act, as amended, is a solid step forward toward fixing issues that have plagued the Veterans Health Administration since before the Phoenix wait-time scandal in 2014. Veterans deserve timely access to care whether that is at VA or in the community, and it is our responsibility to ensure that they get it. The system authorized by H.R. 3482 would leverage technology to allow VA schedulers to see community care providers' schedules and book appointments directly into them, streamlining the process and allowing them to get booked days or weeks faster. The bill also requires that VA use this technology to view VA's direct care appointments as well as the community care, giving veterans an apples-to-apples comparison of first available appointments. This crucial new ability will allow veterans to make an informed choice about where they wish to receive their care. While I believe that the system authorized by this act could have a substantial impact on veterans' access to timely care, I am concerned that it will only be as good as VA's ability to recruit community care providers to participate. I think there should be more requirements in the VA's community care network contracts to mandate community provider participation. The ongoing procurement of the next-generation contract will be an opportunity to do just that. The VA must also ensure that there is buy-in from all levels of the organization because technology is only as good as its implementation and adoption. However, I will say that this is a good first step in that direction. I thank Representative Barrett and Representative Budzinski for their work on this bill, and I urge my colleagues to support it. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Barrett), who is the sponsor of this bill.

Tom Barrett (R-MI)4:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman and the ranking member for their endorsement of this critical piece of legislation. Mr. Speaker, the men and women who served and sacrificed for our Nation deserve the best healthcare that our country can offer, and they certainly shouldn't have to wait weeks or longer just to find out if they can make an appointment to see a doctor. This is an issue that has plagued the VA healthcare system for decades. The good news is that the VA community care program is helping us turn things around by allowing veterans to receive medical services from local healthcare providers outside of the traditional VA hospitals and clinics right in their own communities closer to home. But the system is far from perfect. Veterans across the country will tell you that community care appointments can be harder to schedule and too often are not even offered as an option. This has led to longer wait times, farther drives to appointments, and greater inconvenience. I personally experienced this myself when trying to get scheduled for a routine audiology appointment. I got called by a VA scheduler, then they had to call a number of providers, then they called me back, and when they actually set the appointment, it was on a date that I was here in Washington and not back home in Michigan. I had to reschedule the entire thing and start all over again. Obviously, this isn't what we want for any of our veterans, and that is why I urge my colleagues to support my Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act, the bill before us today. This bill would permanently require VA facilities to use a single digital interface called the External Provider Scheduling system to finally allow VA staff to simultaneously view all available appointments at both VA facilities and those participating in the community care program. It would all be in one centralized interface. The VA has already rolled this out nationwide through internal process as we were working on this bill, and the results speak for themselves. VA employees today can now book as many as 25 appointments each day compared to just a small handful through the manual process they were following before. My legislation simply makes this positive change permanent by requiring the VA to keep this simplified, streamlined system in place beyond the pilot program they have today. Ensuring this progress is not undone by a future administration will give our veterans the access and certainty that they have earned. It may sound simple, but the least we can do for those who served is make sure they can get a doctor's appointment when they need it. I thank Congresswoman Budzinski for working with me on this important legislation to support our Nation's heroes, and I thank Chairman Bost and the full committee for bringing it to the floor. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote "yes."

Mark Takano (D-CA)4:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to vote "yes" on H.R. 3482, the Veterans Community Care Scheduling Improvement Act, as amended, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I encourage all Members to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:10 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3482, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act

Pages H3575–H3576 · Official text

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 2393) to authorize a major medical facility project for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2026 in St. Louis, Missouri, and for other purposes.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (1,026 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act". SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 IN ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI. (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out a major medical facility project in fiscal year 2026 in St. Louis, Missouri, that consists of the construction of a new bed tower, clinical building expansion, consolidated administrative building and warehouse, utility plant, and parking garages, in an amount not to exceed $1,762,668,000. (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2026 or the year in which funds are appropriated for the Construction, Major Projects account, $1,762,668,000 for the project authorized in subsection (a).

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Illinois.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks on S. 2393.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Illinois?

There was no objection.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of S. 2393, the Senate companion to my bill, H.R. 6710, the Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act, offered by Senator Moran. For veterans in southern Illinois, the St. Louis VA Medical Center is an essential part of the VA healthcare network. S. 2393 authorizes up to $1.76 billion to modernize and expand the St. Louis VA, including new clinical space, a bed tower, and a dedicated mental health and substance abuse clinic. Many of the veterans I represent travel there for care, and this bill would help ensure that the campus is prepared to meet the needs of veterans across the region for years to come. This new clinical space would give care teams more room to serve patients, while the mental health and substance abuse clinic would strengthen access to important services for veterans and their families. Campus infrastructure improvements, including parking, utilities, and site work will also help the St. Louis VA operate more efficiently as a regional medical center. The bill also supports the behind-the-scenes infrastructure that makes high-quality care possible, from upgraded utilities and a central utility plant to improved parking, security entrances, water systems, administrative space, and service facilities. These investments would expand capacity, support specialized care, and improve the overall experience for veterans, caregivers, providers, and staff. I am proud to support this bill because it is a practical, forward-looking investment in the veterans who depend on the St. Louis VA. This will help modernize care, improve access, and better serve veterans in my district and veterans across the country. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support S. 2393, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)4:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of S. 2393, the Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act. Although the title says fiscal year 2025, this legislation will actually authorize funding for a major medical facility project in St. Louis, Missouri, for fiscal year 2026. I thank our Senate counterparts for taking the lead on this annual bipartisan, bicameral exercise this year. I understand this project is critical for the veterans of St. Louis and will expand capacity through the addition of a new bed tower, a clinical building expansion, and the construction of several administrative and infrastructure updates. I will continue to strongly support investments in VA's infrastructure. While this project represents only a small fraction of the VA's overall infrastructure investment needs, this is an important project, and I am glad to support it today. I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this legislation to authorize a critical project for veterans, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)4:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I ask all of my colleagues to join me in passing S. 2393, the Fiscal Year 2025 Veterans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act, as amended, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, once again, I encourage all Members to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:20 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, S. 2393.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:20 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:20 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act of 2025

Pages H3576–H3577 · Official text

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2954) to amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to approve multi-State apprenticeship programs for purposes of veterans educational assistance, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (989 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act of 2025". SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO APPROVE MULTI-STATE APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY COMMERCIAL TRUCK DRIVING SCHOOLS FOR PURPOSES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. Section 3672(c)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended-- (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); (2) in subparagraph (A), in the matter before clause (i), by striking "The State" and inserting "Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the State"; and (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph (B): "(B) The Secretary may act in the role of a State approving agency for purposes of approval of a multi-State apprenticeship program provided by a commercial truck driving school.".

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Illinois.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks on H.R. 2954, as amended.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Illinois?

There was no objection.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2954, as amended, offered by my colleagues, the gentleman from New Hampshire (Mr. Pappas) and the gentlewoman from Virginia (Mrs. Kiggans). This bill, as amended, would allow the VA to approve the commercial driver's license apprenticeship program that operates in more than one State. This bill would cut the red tape and stop an interstate company from having to seek approval in every State they operate in. This bill would also allow more veterans to pursue careers in the trucking industry. I come from a trucking family. As a former driver and a manager and operator of the family trucking business, I know how important it is to have qualified drivers. Trust me, I know. The American Trucking Institute publishes a report that shows there is a shortage of 82,000 drivers and an anticipated shortage of 160,000 drivers by 2031. This bill would allow veterans to meet the demand by using their education benefits through the VA apprenticeship programs. I am supportive of the intent of this bill as we must ensure that veterans find meaningful employment, while meeting the demand of an important industry in our Nation's economy. My committee will continue to seek ways to help create meaningful employment for veterans and streamlining veterans' programs. Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support H.R. 2954, as amended, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2954, the Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act. The first year of a servicemember's transition to civilian life is often one of the most stressful. This period is marked by huge shifts in responsibilities, new family duties and new costs, like housing, food, and childcare. Veterans also must navigate finding employment which may involve translating military experience into something civilian employers will understand. The Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act proposes to improve hiring through expediting training programs. By coordinating approvals for training institutions, more veterans can find employment faster. Representative Pappas, a longtime member of our committee, authored this legislation. Trucking is the primary means for moving goods through his State. In New Hampshire, it is not uncommon to see a load of timber or even heating oil moving on the road. His constituents depend on this industry, and veterans seek employment in trucking. While trucking isn't the fit for all veterans, I recognize that veterans who seek a role in the industry shouldn't have to fight to find a training institution. With the price of goods and now fuel skyrocketing in the Trump economy, the last thing we should be doing is making it harder for veterans to find employment in logistics and shipping. I thank Representative Pappas for serving as the ranking member on the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity where he is a strong voice for veteran employment opportunities. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

I have no further speakers, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New Hampshire (Mr. Pappas), my good friend and the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity and the author of this legislation.

Chris Pappas (D-NH)

Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for yielding, and I thank the chairman for his leadership and his endorsement of this commonsense legislation, the Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act, which is a bipartisan bill I introduced last year. I have met too many veterans who struggle to find careers that are aligned with their goals and their skills when their military service ends. We know that we all owe it to our heroes to do everything we can to support their transition to civilian life, including helping them find rewarding jobs and financial security. Trucking is an essential sector of our economy, and they continue to hire more drivers. Through the apprenticeship programs offered by motor carriers, veterans can use GI Bill education benefits to launch a career in trucking. Right now, a patchwork of State laws make it difficult for the VA to approve certain trucking apprenticeships. Some companies opt out of offering apprenticeships due to the bureaucratic hurdles of obtaining approval from more than 20 different State approving agencies. This legislation would allow interstate commercial carriers to obtain a single VA approval for all of their apprenticeships, simplifying program administration for motor carriers and increasing the number of opportunities that are available to veterans. Cutting red tape so trucking companies can employ veterans and help our economy is just common sense. This legislation is bipartisan and also has the support of the Disabled American Veterans and the American Trucking Association. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I couldn't resist saying it, but this legislation will help our veterans keep on trucking. I know the chairman gets the gist of that. Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to vote "yes" on H.R. 2954, the Veterans' Transition to Trucking Act, as amended, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, once again, I encourage all Members to support this legislation. Let the veterans and the truckers roll. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 2954, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. The title of the bill was amended so as to read: "A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veteran Affairs to approve multi-State apprenticeship programs provided by commercial truck driving schools for purposes of Department of Veterans Affairs educational assistance programs, and for other purposes.". A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

Fisher House Availability Act of 2026

Pages H3577–H3579 · Official text

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3726) to amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make temporary lodging facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs available for certain TRICARE beneficiaries on a space-available basis, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (3,371 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Fisher House Availability Act of 2026". SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TEMPORARY LODGING TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS. Section 1708 of title 38, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in subsection (a), by striking "in connection with" and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting "in accordance with this section."; (2) in subsection (b)-- (A) in paragraph (2)-- (i) by inserting "described in paragraph (1)" after "family of a veteran"; and (ii) by inserting "such" after "accompany"; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: "(3) On a space-available basis, a covered beneficiary who must travel a significant distance to receive care or services at a Department or non-Department facility. "(4) On a space-available basis, a member of the family of a covered beneficiary described in paragraph (3) and others who accompany such a covered beneficiary who is receiving care or services and provide the equivalent of familial support for such beneficiary when the covered beneficiary or the family member is traveling to receive care or services at a Department or non-Department facility. "(5) On a space-available basis, a veteran and a member of the family of a veteran and others who must travel a significant distance for a member of the veteran's family to receive care or services at a Department or non-Department facility. "(6) On a space available basis, a covered beneficiary and a member of the family of a covered beneficiary and others who must travel a significant distance for a member of the covered beneficiary's family to receive care or services at a Department or non-Department facility."; (3) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; (4) in subsection (d), as so redesignated-- (A) in paragraph (2), by striking "subsection (d)" and inserting "subsection (c)"; (B) in paragraph (3), by striking "under subsection (b)(2)" and inserting "or a covered beneficiary under subsection (b)"; (C) in paragraph (4), by striking "and" after the semicolon; (D) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and (E) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): "(5) establishing criteria for providing access to temporary lodging facilities on a space-available basis under paragraphs (3) through (6) of subsection (b); and"; and (5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: "(e) In this section: "(1) The term `covered beneficiary' means a member of the uniformed services performing active duty. "(2) The term `Fisher house' means a housing facility that-- "(A) is located at, or in proximity to, a Department medical facility; "(B) is available for residential use on a temporary basis by patients of that facility and others described in subsection (b); and "(C) is constructed by, and donated to the Secretary by, the Zachary and Elizabeth M. Fisher Armed Services Foundation or the Fisher House Foundation, Inc.". SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN LIMITS ON PAYMENTS OF PENSION. Section 5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking "January 31, 2033" and inserting "July 31, 2033".

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Illinois.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on H.R. 3726, as amended.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Illinois?

There was no objection.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3726, the Fisher House Availability Act of 2026, offered by Representative Dr. Miller-Meeks. The Fisher House Foundation has done great work for our military and veteran families by providing a place to stay while their loved one received medical care. Helping to ease the emotional and financial burdens, this bill would further that mission by extending eligibility to servicemembers' families, allowing them to stay in these temporary VA lodging facilities. Simply put, if these homes have space, our military families should be able to use them. Dr. Miller-Meeks' bill would also improve coordination between VA and DOW, so that we can ensure our military families have the best quality of life. This bill would also maximize the use of existing resources and help ensure veterans' families have access to safe and affordable lodging when they need it most. This is a practical solution that makes better use of resources already available to support both those who have served our Nation and their families. I thank my friend, our Health Subcommittee chairwoman, Dr. Miller-Meeks, for her work on expanding healthcare access. Mr. Speaker, our servicemembers, veterans, and their families have sacrificed greatly on behalf of this country. I believe we should ensure they have the support and stability they have earned while receiving medical care. This bill answers the call. Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support H.R. 3726, as amended. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3726, the Fisher House Availability Act of 2026, as amended. Created in 1990, Fisher Houses have provided veteran and military families a cost-free, home-away-from-home environment while their loved ones receive medical care at nearby VA, DOD, and community hospitals. Grounded in the understanding that social support is instrumental to the healing process, families of veterans and Active-Duty servicemembers can access these comfortable and welcoming houses without worry about cost and geographical distance from their loved ones who are receiving care. Regrettably, since the fall of 2024, VA Fisher Houses have been restricted in their ability to serve the entire veteran and military community. VA made guidance changes at that time that altered eligibility and only permitted families of veterans receiving care at a VA facility to stay at Fisher Houses. Military families falling outside of this criteria, specifically, Active-Duty families receiving care at facilities near VA medical centers, have been turned away, even when rooms at Fisher Houses have been available. The bipartisan Fisher House Availability Act of 2026 would restore the flexibility of VA Fisher Houses to not only accommodate veteran families but Active-Duty families on a space-available basis. As veteran families would still receive prioritization, veteran access to VA Fisher Houses will not change. This bill will increase VA Fisher House usage by simply allowing for eligible DOD beneficiaries to be considered for a room when one is available, while also strengthening the partnership between the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. Mr. Speaker, veteran and military caregivers deserve access to VA Fisher Houses. I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 3726, the Fisher House Availability Act. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from Iowa (Mrs. Miller-Meeks), the sponsor of this bill.

Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA)

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chair Bost for yielding time to me. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of my bill, the Fisher House Availability Act. This life-changing bill would ease the burden on the families of veterans staying in Fisher Houses across the country by making lodging more accessible for veterans, servicemembers, and their families during treatment. Thousands of American families travel long distances every year to accompany their veteran loved one so that they can receive serious medical treatment at VA facilities. The Fisher House Foundation provides those families with a helping hand through free, safe lodging. The Fisher House Foundation and their many volunteers make a painful time bearable. Fisher Houses help bridge the gap for veterans and their families when care becomes difficult instead of easy. What better mission than to provide a place to stay while their loved one, servicemember, or veteran receives the medical care they need. The value of these homes can be understood by their numbers. Over the past 30 years, Fisher Houses have served 500,000 people, kept $650 million in people's wallets, and offered 12.5 million nights of lodging. More than the numbers, however, the value can be understood through the stories, as founder Zachary Fisher put it, hardships we helped ease and friendships we helped form. U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe and United States Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom were tragically attacked last year here in D.C. Fisher House provided shelter to the loved ones of Staff Sergeant Wolfe while he received care at a VA-owned home. This is an example of the mission being met. However, this story is an exception, not the standard. Staff Sergeant Wolfe's family required a waiver in order to stay in the lodging due to burdensome regulations. We must do better, and my bill, the Fisher House Availability Act, would make it so that we can do better. Under current law, a VA-owned Fisher House cannot let the family of a servicemember stay, even if there is space available, and veterans and military are used to space available. The family of a veteran cannot stay, either, if the veteran happens to need care from a non-VA medical facility. Mr. Speaker, this interpretation of the law forces the door shut to vacant rooms when space is available that is meant to serve those who serve or who have served. My bill would fix this issue head-on by not displacing veterans or veterans' families. It would only open the door for more of them. Further, the bill simply ensures that servicemembers have access to available lodging. Mr. Speaker, I am grateful to the Fisher House Foundation and to Chairman Bost for supporting this bill, and I am proud to address this issue on behalf of the veteran and military families I know it will help across the country.

Mark Takano (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Michigan (Mrs. Dingell), cosponsor of this legislation.

Debbie Dingell (D-MI)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 3726, the Fisher House Availability Act. I would first like to thank my colleague, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks, for her leadership on this effort. I am very proud to co-lead this bill with her. I thank the chair and ranking member of the Veterans' Affairs Committee for making this happen. This bill will ensure that servicemembers and their families are eligible to stay at VA lodging, the Fisher Houses, as we are discussing, when space allows, regardless of where care is provided. It doesn't matter if they are receiving care at a VA facility, a military hospital, or a civilian provider. Fisher Houses are home away from home near VA and military hospitals. No veteran or servicemember who has served their country should have to face medical care or a hospital stay without the support of their loved ones by their side. Fisher Houses has allowed these families to be where they are needed most, without worrying about whether they can afford a place to stay. This allows veterans and servicemembers to focus on what is important: the healing process. I was with family at a military hospital, sitting in the intensive care waiting room, with a young mother whose husband was in intensive care in a coma, and she had a 3-year-old and a 5-year-old. She had no money for a motel or a hotel. She didn't know how she was feeding her children, and they were sleeping on couches in the intensive care. I was not a Member of Congress then, but I called my friend, Alma Powell, and said that this is unacceptable. No family should not have support. She introduced me to the Fisher family. At that point, there were just a couple of Fisher Houses. There are now more than 100. We have two Fisher Houses in Michigan--yes--at the John D. Dingell Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Detroit and the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, and I visit them often. I know the work that they do and the comfort that they are able to provide to our military and veteran families during some of the most difficult times. We must do the right thing for the families of our servicemembers and veterans, and we must always fight to stand up and support our veterans and those who fought to defend our freedoms. This should never be partisan. It is always important to give bipartisan support to our veterans and to our active military. That is why this matters so much to me, and that is why I strongly support passage of H.R. 3726.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close. I reserve the balance of my time.

Mark Takano (D-CA)4:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the wonderful history of the Fisher Houses and all of the support that my colleague from Michigan (Mrs. Dingell) has given over the years. What a wonderful story about Alma Powell. Mr. Speaker, with all of that, I ask my colleagues to join me in passing H.R. 3726, the Fisher House Availability Act, as amended, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mike Bost (R-IL)4:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, once again, I encourage all Members to support this legislation. This is an opportunity to take advantage of the kindness of family and to continue to do that with everybody who needs this. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:40 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3726, as amended.

The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. The title of the bill was amended so as to read: "A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make temporary lodging facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs available for certain individuals on a space available basis, and for other purposes.". A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act

Pages H3579–H3582 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1993) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint coins in commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and to support programs at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (8,153 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act". SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) On September 11, 2001, the United States suffered the deadliest terrorist attacks on United States soil (referred to in this section as "the attacks"). (2) 2,977 people were killed during the attacks, marking the single worst foreign attack on United States soil since Pearl Harbor in 1941. (3) In New York City, 2 planes hit the Twin Towers during the attacks, causing both 110-story towers to collapse in less than 2 hours, as well as destroying 5 other buildings in the World Trade Center complex, leaving a death toll of 2,753 people, including all passengers and crew members of American Airlines Flight 11 and all passengers and crew members of United Airlines Flight 175. (4) During the attacks, American Airlines Flight 77 struck the side of the Pentagon, killing 184 passengers, crew members, and personnel. (5) In Pennsylvania, during the attacks, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed near Shanksville, killing all 40 passengers and crew members. (6) The attacks took the lives of 441 first responders in New York, specifically 343 firefighters from the New York City Fire Department, 37 officers from the Port Authority Police Department, 23 officers from the New York City Police Department, and 38 individuals from other agencies. (7) The collapse of the towers following the attacks created massive dust clouds that left hundreds of densely populated city blocks covered with harmful contaminants, exposing first responders, local workers, residents, and students. (8) More than 2 decades after these horrific terrorist attacks took place, the ongoing physical and mental health impacts continue to deeply affect tens of thousands of individuals across the country who were in lower Manhattan and the surrounding area following the attacks, as well as those from around the country who participated in the rescue, recovery, and relief efforts, due to their exposure to the dust, smoke, and debris. Thousands of others have died due to illnesses and injuries relating to the attacks. (9) The National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center is continuously dedicated to remembering, reflecting, and educating for many generations to come so that the story of September 11, 2001, is never forgotten. (10) The National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center is committed to supporting family members, survivors, rescue and recovery workers, and military personnel who were affected by the attacks by providing services, education, and programming. SEC. 3. COIN SPECIFICATIONS. (a) Denominations.--The Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in this Act as the "Secretary") shall mint and issue the following coins in commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the establishment of the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center: (1) $5 gold coins.--Not more than 50,000 $5 coins, each of which shall-- (A) weigh 8.359 grams; (B) have a diameter of 0.850 inches; and (C) contain not less than 90 percent gold. (2) $1 silver coins.--Not more than 400,000 $1 coins, each of which shall-- (A) weigh 26.73 grams; (B) have a diameter of 1.500 inches; and (C) contain not less than 90 percent silver. (b) Legal Tender.--The coins minted under this Act shall be legal tender, as provided in section 5103 of title 31, United States Code. (c) Numismatic Items.--For purposes of sections 5134 and 5136 of title 31, United States Code, all coins minted under this Act shall be considered to be numismatic items. SEC. 4. DESIGN OF COINS. (a) Design Requirements.-- (1) In general.--The designs of the coins minted under this Act shall be emblematic of the courage, sacrifice, and strength of those individuals who perished in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the bravery of those who risked their lives to save others that day, and the endurance, resilience, and hope of those who survived. At least 1 such coin shall bear the inscription "Never Forget". (2) Designs and inscriptions.--On each coin minted under this Act, there shall be-- (A) a designation of the value of the coin; (B) inscriptions of the words "Liberty", "In God We Trust", "United States of America", and "E Pluribus Unum"; and (C) an inscription or other design element referencing the 25th Anniversary. (b) Selection.--The designs for the coins minted under this Act shall be-- (1) selected by the Secretary, after consultation with-- (A) the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center; and (B) the Commission of Fine Arts; and (2) reviewed by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee. SEC. 5. ISSUANCE OF COINS. (a) Quality of Coins.--The coins minted under this Act may be issued in uncirculated and proof qualities. (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the coins minted under this Act should be struck at the United States Mint at West Point, New York, to the greatest extent possible. (c) Period for Issuance.--The Secretary may issue coins minted under this Act only during the 1-year period beginning on January 1, 2028. SEC. 6. SALE OF COINS. (a) Sale Price.--The coins issued under this Act shall be sold by the Secretary at the price equal to the sum of-- (1) the face value of the coins; (2) the surcharge provided in section 7(a) with respect to the coins; and (3) the cost of designing and issuing the coins (including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses, marketing, and shipping). (b) Bulk Sales.--The Secretary shall make bulk sales of the coins issued under this Act at a reasonable discount. (c) Prepaid Orders.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accept prepaid orders for the coins minted under this Act before the issuance of the coins. (2) Discount.--Sale prices with respect to prepaid orders under paragraph (1) shall be at a reasonable discount. SEC. 7. SURCHARGES. (a) In General.--All sales of coins issued under this Act shall include a surcharge of-- (1) $35 per coin for the $5 gold coin; and (2) $10 per coin for the $1 silver coin. (b) Distribution.--Subject to section 5134(f)(1) of title 31, United States Code, all surcharges received by the Secretary from the sale of coins issued under this Act shall be promptly paid by the Secretary to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center to support the operations and maintenance of the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center. (c) Audits.--The National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center shall be subject to the audit requirements of section 5134(f)(2) of title 31, United States Code, with regard to the amounts received under subsection (b). (d) Limitation.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), no surcharge may be included with respect to the issuance under this Act of any coin during a calendar year if, as of the time of that issuance, the issuance of that coin would result in the number of commemorative coin programs issued during that year to exceed the annual 2 commemorative coin program issuance limitation under section 5112(m)(1) of title 31, United States Code. (2) Guidance.--The Secretary may issue guidance to carry out this subsection. SEC. 8. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES. The Secretary shall take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that-- (1) minting and issuing coins under this Act result in no net cost to the Federal Government; and (2) no funds, including applicable surcharges, are disbursed to any recipient designated in section 7(b) until the total cost of designing and issuing all of the coins authorized by this Act, including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses, marketing, and shipping, is recovered by the United States Treasury, consistent with sections 5112(m) and 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this bill.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the Congressional Budget Office estimate on this bill. Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives announces bills that will be considered under suspension of the rules in that chamber. Under suspension, floor debate is limited, all floor amendments are prohibited, points of order against the bill are waived, and final passage requires a two-thirds majority vote. At the request of the Majority Leader and the House Committee on the Budget, CBO estimates the effects of those bills on direct spending and revenues. CBO has limited time to review the legislation before consideration. Although it is possible in most cases to determine whether the legislation would affect direct spending or revenues, time may be insufficient to estimate the magnitude of those effects. If CBO has prepared estimates for similar or identical legislation, a more detailed assessment of budgetary effects, including effects on spending subject to appropriation, may be included.
Text printed in the Record (1,300 characters)
EFFECTS ON DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES OF LEGISLATION CONSIDERED UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE RULES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Week of May 18, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Effect on Direct Information on Direct Link to Published Bill Number Title Spending Effect on Revenues Spending and Revenue Estimates Effects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------H.R. 1993.......................... 25th Anniversary of 9/ Would not increase None................. Surcharges (reduction N/A 11 Commemorative Coin direct spending. in direct spending Act, as amended. of $4 million) over 2028-2029 and those surcharges are paid out in 2031 (increase in direct spending), net to zero over the 2026- 2036 period. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 1993, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act. I thank my colleagues, Representatives Garbarino, Lawler, and Goldman, along with every other Member who supported this effort, for introducing this important legislation honoring a pivotal moment in our Nation's history and remembering the lives so tragically lost on that horrific day. Mr. Speaker, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, transformed our country. Nearly 3,000 innocent Americans lost their lives in New York City, at the Pentagon, and in the field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. In the face of unimaginable tragedy, the American people demonstrated extraordinary courage, resilience, and unity. This bill recognizes the importance of preserving the memory of that horrible day and honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice. H.R. 1993 authorizes the creation of a commemorative coin program marking the 25th anniversary of 9/11, giving Americans a meaningful way to participate in remembrance and reflection. Mr. Speaker, the proceeds from this program will support the National 9/11 Memorial & Museum at the World Trade Center in New York City, honoring the memory of the victims and the heroic first responders who ran up those stairwells to try to save their fellow Americans. I especially want to recognize the firefighters, law enforcement officers and emergency personnel, and servicemembers, whose bravery and selflessness embodied the very best of our Nation in one of our most dark hours. The United States Mint has a long history of producing commemorative coins that recognize moments of profound national significance, and this legislation, Mr. Speaker, continues that tradition. As we approach this momentous 25th anniversary of September 11, it is fitting that this House considers legislation that reflects our shared history and reaffirms our commitment to never forget the lessons of that day. I am proud to support this effort. I urge all of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to do the same, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1993, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act, sponsored by Representative Goldman of New York. This bill directs the Treasury Secretary to mint coins in remembrance of the 25th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks. That is a day that deeply transformed our country and persists in the American memory. This legislation is important because it gives us the opportunity to honor the memory of the 2,977 lives that were taken during these attacks; the strength of their families and loved ones; the sacrifices of many others involved in the rescue, recovery, and relief efforts; and the courage of the survivors. Unfortunately, the devastation did not end that day. In the aftermath, countless people across the country continued to suffer from the physical and mental health impacts of this tragedy. Throughout the years, tens of thousands of first responders, construction workers, volunteers, and survivors have been injured or become ill from the toxic dust, smoke, and debris they were exposed to. The data demonstrating these outcomes is heartbreaking. According to the World Trade Center Health Program, over 63,000 registered members have developed one or more medical issues rooted in their exposure to these toxins, and more than 9,000 people have died from 9/11-related illnesses. That is three times the number of people who were killed on September 11 itself. It is necessary that we continue to remember and honor those who have lost their lives, as well as meaningfully support the individuals who continue to battle these health challenges today. The National 9/11 Memorial & Museum at the World Trade Center carries out this important work by providing services and engaging in educational efforts, which is why I am glad that we are supporting this bill today. This legislation also includes a funding structure which would support the operations and maintenance of the memorial and museum so that visitors and future generations continue to learn about these horrific events and the heroic efforts of Americans. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Lawler), who represents that State so ably and who witnessed firsthand the destruction on 9/11. I am grateful for Mr. Lawler's work in promoting this bill on the Republican side of the aisle.

Michael Lawler (R-NY)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong and steadfast support of H.R. 1993, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act. I thank my colleagues from New York, in particular, Congressmen Goldman and Garbarino, as well as 297 other colleagues who have cosponsored this legislation. Almost 25 years ago, for the first time in history, New York stood silent. The City that Never Sleeps came to a halt, and we all went into mourning for the thousands of innocent people who died that day. 9/11 changed New York, and it changed America. It continues to impact our communities today. To today, we still have first responders dying of 9/11-related illnesses. It is why I have spent so much of my tenure in Congress working on behalf of the victims, their families, and our first responders. I am currently working to pass legislation to award a Congressional Gold Medal to Welles Crowther posthumously, a local hero who helped save 18 lives, known as the man in the red bandana. He represents the very best of America. I have also led efforts to ensure and expedite disbursements from the U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund, and just in the past few months, my New York colleagues and I secured lifetime funding for the World Trade Center Health Program. Not only am I committed to taking care of our 9/11 community today, but I am committed to keeping our fallen Americans in our hearts, our minds, and our prayers each and every day, and especially every year on September 11. This bill will allow the U.S. Mint to furnish a coin to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the attacks. Notably, the surcharge proceeds of this coin will go toward the National 9/11 Memorial & Museum to help with the incredible work they do to tell the story of 9/11 and the resilience of New York.

The SPEAKER pro tempore4:50 p.m.

The time of the gentleman has expired.

J. French Hill (R-AR)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from New York.

Michael Lawler (R-NY)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, we have promised never to forget 9/11, and we never will. We are committed to upholding that promise. I know my colleagues in Congress support this legislation, and I look forward to its unanimous adoption.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Goldman), the sponsor of this bill, who has been a real leader in putting this legislation together.

Daniel S. Goldman (D-NY)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for her support, as well as the chairman for moving this forward. I rise today in support of H.R. 1993, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act, as we are fast approaching the 25th anniversary of the worst attack on American soil in our history, a day when we lost almost 3,000 of our loved ones, neighbors, and friends in a coordinated attack by terrorists who wanted to destroy the very values for which our country stands: liberty and justice for all. We can never forget those we lost, and I will never forget that day myself, watching from my apartment building less than a mile away as the second plane hurled itself into the towers. Then, seeing people covered in soot walking uptown while our heroes, the NYPD, the New York Fire Department charged downtown into the building to try to save whomever they could. Nor can we forget what came in the days and weeks that followed: countless heroes who rushed into the danger, who then spent months on a pile that turned out to be poisonous, searching for survivors. These individuals are the very best of us, and their selflessness and courage embody the resilience of our city, what it means to be a New Yorker, and our country. We will never forget them. Since 9/11, more people have died from 9/11-related health problems than even died that day. I was proud to have joined last year with my Republican colleagues from New York to ensure that we fully fund and indefinitely fund the World Trade Center Health Program, which now has well over 100,000 members from every State in the country. As we approach this anniversary, I am proud to lead this bill to direct the Department of Treasury to issue coins to commemorate this dark day in American history and to ensure that the events of September 11, 2001, are forever enshrined in our collective memory. Commemorative coins recognize some of the most important events and people in American history: the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed racial segregation, the brave African-American high school students at Little Rock Central High School after Brown v. Board of Education, the astronauts who took the first steps on the Moon. It is fitting that the victims and heroes of 9/11 will be honored in this same way. Proceeds from the sale of this coin will go directly to the 9/11 Memorial & Museum at the World Trade Center to support its critical work educating future generations and remembering those we lost. This legislation has received overwhelming bipartisan support.

The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Yakym)4:50 p.m.

The time of the gentleman has expired.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from New York.

Daniel S. Goldman (D-NY)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank my friends and fellow New Yorkers, Chairman Garbarino and Representative Mike Lawler, for their partnership and work on this bill. We have over 300 of our colleagues who have joined in this effort, and I am deeply grateful for their support as the Representative of 9/11 in Congress. We must honor our promise to never forget, and I urge my colleagues to join me in passing this critical legislation.

J. French Hill (R-AR)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Garbarino), the chairman of our Homeland Security Committee who is also a distinguished member of our House Financial Services Committee.

Andrew R. Garbarino (R-NY)4:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the bill, the 25th Anniversary of 9/11 Commemorative Coin Act. As a Representative of Long Island and New York, I can say this is a deeply personal matter for me and the people I represent. This bill authorizes commemorative coins to mark the 25th anniversary of September 11 and honor the lives lost and the resilience of our country in the aftermath of the attacks. The design process will include the 9/11 Memorial & Museum, and the proceeds will support the 9/11 Memorial & Museum's operations and maintenance at the World Trade Center site. Importantly, this legislation comes at no cost to taxpayers. Mr. Speaker, New Yorkers will never forget the bravery of the first responders who ran toward danger or the unity this country showed in one of our darkest moments. As we approach the 25th anniversary of the attacks, we have a responsibility to preserve these stories and ensure future generations understand the sacrifices made that day. We must always remember the innocent people we lost on September 11, the first responders who answered the call, and the strength the American people showed in the face of tragedy. I thank my colleagues from both sides of the aisle for supporting this legislation, and I urge them all to support it.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. This legislation would establish the creation of commemorative coins in light of the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. These commemorative coins and the critical work of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum will help us honor the bravery of Americans for many generations to come. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Let me say how heartwarming it is to see Members on both sides of the aisle recall the service and sacrifice of 9/11 as we prepare for the 25th anniversary. I think it is a fitting way to demonstrate America's belief in its future and remembrance of a day that deserves to never be forgotten, like we experienced on 9/11. I thank the ranking member of the full committee for working with me to present this bill to the House today. I urge all of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support it, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:00 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1993, as amended.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:00 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

Daniel S. Goldman (D-NY)5:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:00 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

Keeping Deposits Local Act

Pages H3582–H3584 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3234) to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to modify the amount of reciprocal deposits of an insured depository institution that are not considered to be funds obtained by or through a deposit broker, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (3,248 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Keeping Deposits Local Act". SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF RECIPROCAL DEPOSITS THAT ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE FUNDS OBTAINED BY OR THROUGH A DEPOSIT BROKER. Section 29(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f(i)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: "(1) In general.--The sum of the following amounts of reciprocal deposits of an agent institution shall not be considered to be funds obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker: "(A) An amount equal to 50 percent of the portion of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is less than or equal to $1,000,000,000. "(B) An amount equal to 40 percent of the portion, if any, of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is greater than $1,000,000,000, but less than or equal to $10,000,000,000. "(C) An amount equal to 30 percent of the portion, if any, of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is greater than $10,000,000,000, but less than or equal to $250,000,000,000.". SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF AGENT INSTITUTION. Section 29(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f(i)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by striking subclause (I) and inserting the following: "(I) when most recently examined under section 10(d) was assigned a CAMELS rating of 1, 2, or 3 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and". SEC. 4. RECIPROCAL DEPOSITS STUDY. (a) In General.--The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in consultation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, shall carry out a study on reciprocal deposits. (b) Contents.--The study required under subsection (a) shall include-- (1) an analysis of how reciprocal deposits have performed since 2018, which shall include-- (A) the use of quantitative and qualitative data; (B) a breakdown of the usage of reciprocal deposits by size of insured depository institution; (C) the usage of reciprocal deposits during periods of stress; and (D) an analysis, to the extent practicable, of end-user depositors, such as municipalities, businesses, and non-profit organizations, that drive demand for reciprocal products; (2) an analysis, to the extent practicable, of how reciprocal deposits compare to other deposit arrangements; and (3) an analysis of the benefits and potential risks of reciprocal deposits. (c) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the report required under subsection (a). SEC. 5. DISCRETIONARY SURPLUS FUND. (a) In General.--The dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is reduced by $28,000,000. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 1, 2036.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material for this bill.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the CBO estimate for this bill. Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives announces bills that will be considered under suspension of the rules in that chamber. Under suspension, floor debate is limited, all floor amendments are prohibited, points of order against the bill are waived, and final passage requires a two-thirds majority vote. At the request of the Majority Leader and the House Committee on the Budget, CBO estimates the effects of those bills on direct spending and revenues. CBO has limited time to review the legislation before consideration. Although it is possible in most cases to determine whether the legislation would affect direct spending or revenues, time may be insufficient to estimate the magnitude of those effects. If CBO has prepared estimates for similar or identical legislation, a more detailed assessment of budgetary effects, including effects on spending subject to appropriation, may be included.
Text printed in the Record (1,236 characters)
EFFECTS ON DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES OF LEGISLATION CONSIDERED UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE RULES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Week of May 18, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Effect on Direct Information on Direct Link to Published Bill Number Title Spending Effect on Revenues Spending and Revenue Estimates Effects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------H.R. 3234.......................... Keeping Deposits Local Increase by at Least Increase by at Least Would increase direct N/A Act of 2025, as $500K. $500K. spending by $27 amended. million, increase revenues by $27 million, and result in no increase in the deficit. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3234, the Keeping Deposits Local Act, and I thank my longtime friend and our majority whip, Tom Emmer of Minnesota, and Congresswoman Joyce Beatty for their tremendous bipartisan leadership on this particular matter. I also thank the ranking member of our full committee, the House Financial Services Committee, for her continued willingness to work across the aisle on cornerstone reforms that benefit our Nation's community banks. Community banks are one of the most important economic drivers behind Main Street. They deserve a regulatory framework that encourages them to compete, grow, and better serve their customers. Reciprocal deposits are a proven tool that helps banks attract, retain, and diversify their funding sources while simultaneously giving depositors greater FDIC insurance coverage. As a former community bank CEO, I personally used this service to help provide better service for important customers. Right now, overly burdensome broker deposit regulations are standing in the way. Community banks, many of which operate with a limited branch network, are being penalized for using a funding tool that poses no meaningful risk to financial stability. Majority Whip Emmer and Congresswoman Beatty's bill addresses this issue. It allows community banks to accept a greater volume of reciprocal deposits before triggering the overly stringent broker deposit rules. This, in turn, frees up more capital to make loans in the communities they serve. Additionally, as a bank's size increases, the threshold for reciprocal deposits that it may accept decreases, ensuring that oversight scales with risk. The bill also directs the FDIC to study reciprocal deposits and report back to Congress, ensuring that we have the data to inform direction on deposit insurance policy. This is the kind of smart, targeted reform that has been at the heart of my efforts to make community banking great again in our legislative agenda in this 119th Congress. I am proud to support this bill by Mr. Emmer, and I urge my colleagues to do the same. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3234, the Keeping Deposits Local Act, sponsored by Representative Emmer and our former Diversity and Inclusion Subcommittee chairwoman, Mrs. Joyce Beatty. I appreciate the sponsors' bipartisan work on this bill. In 2018, I worked with them to establish the initial framework for the so-called reciprocal deposits. When a business comes to a bank and deposits, say, $1 million to cover payroll and other expenses, the FDIC only ensures up to $250,000. To help these customers receive deposit insurance on all of their deposits, banks can send a deposit over the $250,000 cap to another bank in exchange for a separate deposit from the receiving bank, which is known as a reciprocal deposit. The product has become popular, especially after the dramatic failures of Silicon Valley Bank and two other regional banks in 2023 because businesses wanted to make sure they don't have any uninsured deposits. This bill would increase the limits we set back in 2018 based on a bank's size. Now, megabanks don't need our help because they are, unfortunately, still perceived as too big to fail. In fact, a number of small businesses moved their deposits to megabanks after the 2023 regional bank failures. I appreciate that the chairman and the sponsors worked with me to address my concerns that an earlier version of this bill would have been a windfall for megabanks. It has been revised to ensure the bill prioritizes support for smaller community and midsize banks like MDIs and CDFI banks. There is more that we should do than just this bill. Since 2007, there have been at least 37 bank failures where emergency tools were not used to protect depositors because the bank was too small. As a result, small business customers with more than $250,000 lost money through no fault of their own when their bank failed. That is not fair. After convening a roundtable with industry experts and consulting extensively with our former chairman, Mr. McHenry, I introduced my bill, H.R. 4551, the Employee Paycheck and Small Business Protection Act. Under my bill, the government would take a data-driven approach, conduct an extensive analysis, and then propose an increase to the $250,000 deposit insurance threshold for business payment accounts. There would be multiple opportunities for stakeholders to weigh in as the proposal gets developed, with extensive congressional oversight. Furthermore, my bill would allow regulators to do an emergency Transaction Account Guarantee, or TAG, program for up to 9 months, just like the FDIC did in the 2008 crisis, to protect depositors from harm in a major crisis. My bill would help protect all small businesses and their employees while helping community banks and credit unions better serve their communities. This concept has broad support, including several House Republicans recently introducing their own bills, along with a bipartisan effort in the Senate. Moreover, Vice President Vance and Treasury Secretary Bessent are strongly supportive of these efforts. In a letter from when we marked up this bill we are considering today, the Independent Community Bankers of America wrote: "ICBA looks forward to working with the committee on the broader, comprehensive deposit insurance coverage level debate and ensuring more small businesses can have important protection for their deposits." We should do more, Mr. Speaker, but in the meantime, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 3234, which will complement broader deposit insurance reform efforts. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I want to recognize the author of this important bill from the Republican side that helps our community banks better serve their customers through a diverse approach to deposit insurance. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Emmer), who is the majority whip of the Republican-led House.

Tom Emmer (R-MN)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Hill for yielding. Mr. Speaker, reciprocal deposits are secure, fully FDIC-insured deposits that enable community banks to retain local funds, while at the same time ensuring those deposits remain protected. In 2018, Congress enacted nonpartisan legislation recognizing that most reciprocal deposits should not be treated as brokered deposits. I was proud to lead that initiative then, and I am proud to build on that progress with the bill before us today. Since the enactment of S. 2155 nearly 8 years ago, many banks have turned to these low-cost, core deposits, as they have approached the current limits of the lesser of $5 billion or 20 percent of total liabilities. In response, my colleague, Representative Beatty, and I introduced the Keeping Deposits Local Act, a nonpartisan bill that updates existing thresholds so that community and regional banks can more easily qualify for nonbrokered treatment of reciprocal deposits. Simply put, this bill brings our laws in line with today's economic realities. It gives banks much-needed flexibility and offers local communities better access to capital, all while making our banking system more resilient. I thank Chairman Hill for his tireless work and advocacy on this issue, and I encourage all of our colleagues to support this bill. Let's give our local banks the tools they need to grow, compete, and invest in Main Street.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Mrs. Beatty), who is the co-lead on the bill.

Joyce Beatty (D-OH)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of my bill, H.R. 3234, the Keeping Deposits Local Act, which I am very proud to co-lead with Congressman Emmer. This bill modernizes the treatment of reciprocal deposits to help small banks and midsize banks improve liquidity, increase local community lending, and better compete for larger accounts, all without jeopardizing the safety and the soundness of our financial system. Following the bank failures in 2023, we have seen many banks turn to reciprocal deposits to meet consumer demand, to increase their insured deposits, and, really, to prevent capital flight. However, community banks across the country and regional banks like in my home district, banks like Huntington, Fifth Third, and KeyBank are quickly running up against the current $5 billion or 20 percent threshold that was established in 2018. This means that they are limited in their capacity to attract deposits from nonprofits, small businesses, and local governments and municipalities that want to support economic and community development. To solve this problem, this bill replaces the current cap with a tiered system to ensure that the greatest benefit goes to the banks that need it the most: minority depository institutions, MDIs; community development financial institutions, or CDFIs; and inner-city, rural, and small banks at the front lines of providing financial services to underserved communities. Mr. Speaker, increasing nonbrokered treatment of reciprocal deposits will greatly support these institutions by allowing them to access stable funding to help finance affordable housing projects, small business loans, and community infrastructure. That is why I am proud to say that this bill has the support of the Ohio Bankers League and the Ohio regional banks. It is a bipartisan bill. Mr. Speaker, I thank our chairman, Congressman Hill, and I thank my ranking member, Congresswoman Maxine Waters, for supporting and pushing this bill forward. I urge my colleagues to support the passage of this bill.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Mr. Speaker, this is a good bill that will help community banks. The bill is supported by the National Bankers Association and the Community Development Bankers Association, and I am very pleased to support it. As we have discussed, there is more Congress can do to update the deposit insurance reform framework to ensure it is working for community banks, for midsize banks, for MDIs and CDFIs, for rural banks, and all of their customers, especially the small businesses, nonprofits, churches, and other organizations and their workers. Let's pass comprehensive deposit insurance reform into law without further delay. In the meantime, I, again, urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank, again, Whip Emmer and Mrs. Beatty for their tireless work on this. It has taken a lot of years of collaboration between both parties on both sides of the aisle to find a path to move this bill forward, and we couldn't have done it without the hard work of the gentleman from Minnesota and the gentlewoman from Ohio. I am grateful for their work. I recommend everybody on both sides of the aisle support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:10 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3234, as amended.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:10 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:10 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

American Access to Banking Act

Pages H3584–H3586 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4544) to direct certain Federal banking and credit union agencies to promote the formation of de novo regulated institutions through the review of application processes, the review of capital raising by de novo regulated institutions, and the establishment of various outreach programs, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (7,296 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "American Access to Banking Act". SEC. 2. STREAMLINING APPLICATION PROCESS AND REVIEW OF CAPITAL RAISING BY DE NOVO REGULATED INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall-- (1) for the purpose of streamlining the process of applying to become a de novo regulated institution, conduct a review of any application forms related to such process; (2) to the extent practicable, gather information needed from applicants seeking to become a de novo regulated institution from other Federal Government agencies or public sources to minimize information requests of such applicants; and (3) in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, review how de novo regulated institutions raise capital while maintaining investor protections, including the impact of-- (A) general capital raising restrictions; and (B) capital raising restrictions related to individuals who are not accredited investors. (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, and annually for 5 years thereafter, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and publish on a public website of such agency a report that contains-- (1) a description of the actions taken by such agency pursuant to subsection (a); and (2) as appropriate, any administrative or legislative recommendations with respect to the purpose described in subsection (a)(3). SEC. 3. IMPROVING COMMUNICATION WITH DE NOVO REGULATED INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall, at the request of an applicant to become a de novo regulated institution, designate an employee of the agency as a caseworker, who may perform such duty in addition to the other duties of the employee. (b) Caseworker Duties.--Each caseworker described in subsection (a) shall, to the maximum extent practicable-- (1) meet with the lead organizers applying to become a de novo regulated institution to provide a tutorial with respect to the application process; and (2) be the primary point of contact of the respective Federal financial institutions regulatory agency for such organizers during the application process. (c) New Caseworker.--Each agency described in subsection (a) may designate a new caseworker, as appropriate, to support continuity based on staffing and responsibilities assigned to the current caseworker. SEC. 4. DE NOVO MENTOR-PROTEGE PARTNERSHIPS. (a) In General.--At the request of an institution that seeks to become a de novo regulated institution, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall, to the maximum extent practicable, provide a list to such institution of similar types of institutions that-- (1) were recently approved to become a de novo regulated institution; and (2) are interested in volunteering to serve as a mentor to provide advice about the de novo application process. (b) Mentorship Information.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall provide public information and directions on how an institution may request a mentor or serve as a mentor as described in subsection (a). SEC. 5. STATE AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN. (a) In General.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall develop a plan to-- (1) regularly consult with State regulators to promote cooperation between State and Federal banking and credit union agencies in the creation of de novo regulated institutions, including responding to any State regulator that requests assistance on how a State-chartered financial institution can request Federal insurance; (2) regularly consult with stakeholders, including applicants to become de novo regulated institutions and recently approved regulated institutions, to inform any reforms that may support the creation of de novo regulated institutions, including rural institutions, community development financial institutions, and minority depository institutions; and (3) provide guidance, training material, and regular workshops to assist any interested parties to understand such agencies processes. (b) Submission to Congress.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this section, and every 5 years thereafter, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate the respective plan of such agency described in subsection (a). (2) Public comment.--With respect to developing the plan described in subsection (a), each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall-- (A) provide an opportunity for public comments; and (B) take such public comments into consideration. SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS. (a) In General.--In this Act: (1) Federal banking agency.--The term "Federal banking agency" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (2) Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies.--The term "Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies" has the meaning given the term in section 1003 of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3302). (3) Regulated institution.--The term "regulated institution" means-- (A) with respect to a Federal banking agency, a depository institution (as such term is defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)) for which the Federal banking agency is the appropriate Federal banking agency (as such term is defined in such section 3); and (B) with respect to the National Credit Union Administration, an insured credit union (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752)). (4) State.--The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Colombia, and each territory of the United States. (5) State regulator.--The term "State regulator" means-- (A) with respect to a Federal banking agency, a State banking regulator; and (B) with respect to the National Credit Union Administration, the State regulatory agency having jurisdiction over a State credit union (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752)). (b) Rule of Construction.--For purposes of this Act, the process of applying to become a de novo regulated institution shall include the process of applying for Federal deposit insurance, Federal share insurance, or membership of a Federal reserve bank. SEC. 7. DISCRETIONARY SURPLUS FUND. (a) In General.--The dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is reduced by $24,000,000. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 1, 2036.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this measure.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the CBO estimate for this bill. Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives announces bills that will be considered under suspension of the rules in that chamber. Under suspension, floor debate is limited, all floor amendments are prohibited, points of order against the bill are waived, and final passage requires a two-thirds majority vote. At the request of the Majority Leader and the House Committee on the Budget, CBO estimates the effects of those bills on direct spending and revenues. CBO has limited time to review the legislation before consideration. Although it is possible in most cases to determine whether the legislation would affect direct spending or revenues, time may be insufficient to estimate the magnitude of those effects. If CBO has prepared estimates for similar or identical legislation, a more detailed assessment of budgetary effects, including effects on spending subject to appropriation, may be included.
Text printed in the Record (1,239 characters)
EFFECTS ON DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES OF LEGISLATION CONSIDERATION UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE RULES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Week of May 18, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Effect on Direct Information on Direct Link to Published Bill Number Title Spending Effect on Revenues Spending and Revenue Estimates Effects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------H.R. 4544.......................... American Access to Increase by at Least Increase by at Least Would increase direct N/A Banking Act, as $500K. $500K. spending by $12 amended. million, increase revenues by $12 million, and result in no increase in the deficit. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the ranking member's bill, H.R. 4544, the American Access to Banking Act. I thank Ms. Waters for her diligent work on this important bipartisan legislation. Over the past decade, Mr. Speaker, the United States has lost nearly 2,000 community banks, while only 62 de novo banks have opened during that same period. These essential institutions have disappeared from Main Streets across America due to mergers, acquisitions, and bank failures. In one out of every three counties in our country, a community bank is the only on-the-ground banking option--one out of every three counties. That is why it is important to consider this bill. Mr. Speaker, I was the CEO of a community bank in the Mississippi Delta where there were very few banking offices available for small businesses and agricultural communities spread out across the rural heartland. I have to say it is very troubling when a local farmer tries to finance his equipment or where a small business owner wants to expand their restaurant or get their first loan to start a business if there is not a community bank. That is where families go to build relationships with lenders who know their names, understand their communities, and recognize their circumstances. Why aren't new banks forming? It is because we have made it extraordinarily difficult to start one. The application process is often complex, duplicative, and overly burdensome. Some of the requirements aren't even in statute that are held out for that young business development team, those young officers who want to go out on their own to serve a community by creating a new depository institution. That is why I am pleased to support the ranking member of the full committee, Ms. Waters of California's, American Access to Banking Act. This bill directs the Federal bank regulators to make it easier to start a new bank or credit union by streamlining the application process, improving the capital-raising options, establishing mentorship programs, and strengthening coordination between Federal and State regulators. Banking is not a partisan issue, and every American deserves access to a financial institution that can meet their needs. This bill is very complementary of efforts made by our Financial Institutions Subcommittee Chair, Andy Barr of Kentucky, to try to remove barriers to improving the ability to start a bank in this country. Mr. Speaker, I am a proud supporter of this bipartisan legislation. I thank the ranking member for her leadership on it. I encourage my colleagues to support it, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4544, the American Access to Banking Act that I sponsored. The number of new banks and credit unions called de novo institutions, that were formed over the past 15 years has been very low. There were only 6 new bank charters issued annually the past 15 years and only 29 new credit unions formed between 2014 and 2023. During that time, we saw about one-third of all Minority Depository Institutions, or MDIs, disappear, including half of our Black-owned banks. Now, research from the Federal Reserve and others found a strong correlation between the interest rate environment and new bank formation. In fact, we did have historically low interest rates at zero percent for many years as we slowly recovered from the crisis, but there is more we can do to help. Earlier this year, ReShonda Young testified before our committee about the challenges she is facing just trying to establish an MDI in Iowa. Ms. Young's story is remarkable. When she was a small business owner with a popcorn business, she tried to get a loan, and she was discriminated against by bank after bank after bank. What did she do? She joined with other entrepreneurs and sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for dragging its feet and not implementing section 1071 to ensure we have a more fair and transparent small business loan market. Her lawsuit helped push the CFPB to finalize that overdue rule. But Ms. Young did not stop there. She decided to start her own bank so that she could provide the kind of small business loans to others that she was repeatedly denied for. Ms. Young's story is an American story. When you get knocked down, you get back up and you keep pushing for a better way. Not only that, but you work to help others in your community so they can have chances that you never had. In her testimony, Ms. Young highlighted a few challenges with the de novo process, like a lengthy application checklist. My bill would require these outdated procedures to be streamlined. My bill would also minimize duplicative data requests, and require regulators to review capital-raising challenges de novos face in consultation with the SEC. My bill also requires the designation of a caseworker as a single point of contact to assist de novo applicants throughout the process. H.R. 4544 further requires the development of outreach and education program and Federal regulator engagement with stakeholders as well as coordination with State regulators to support them in chartering de novo firms. For any American like Ms. Young who wants to start a bank or credit union, they should have that chance, and the American Access to Banking Act will help give them that chance. Mr. Speaker, I urge Members to support my bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I, again, thank the gentlewoman for her work on this bill. Over this Congress, we have had some really inspirational people come and testify. In fact, all three that I am picturing in my mind are women and all three came to the committee to talk about the burdens of trying to start a new bank or build a small community bank. I remember BankMiami was a case, and there have been quite a number of start-up banks in south Florida that are Minority Depository Institutions. We had inspirational speakers in our committee, and they said we need to do better here on this. This is at the heart of what the ranking member is talking about. How can we improve this process so that more people can take that decision, if their market and the characteristics of their economics and their geography would be rewarded by new bank startups? Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for her leadership. I invite her to close, and I urge all of our colleagues to support her effort. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman very much for advancing my bill to this point and helping to get it passed through the House not only as a standalone bill but also as part of our housing bill. Entrepreneurs like Ms. ReShonda Young who dream of starting their own bank or credit union and providing access to affordable financial products and services to neighbors in their community should have that chance. My bill has broad support, including from the American Bankers Association, America's Credit Unions, Conference of State Bank Supervisors, Consumer Federation of America, Defense Credit Union Council, National Bankers Association, and National Community Reinvestment Coalition. Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I congratulate the ranking member for her work on this bill. I urge all my colleagues to support it, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:20 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 4544, as amended.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:20 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:20 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

Community Bank Deposit Access Act of 2025

Pages H3586–H3588 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 5317) to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to ensure that certain custodial deposits of well capitalized insured depository institutions are not considered to be funds obtained by or through deposit brokers, and for other purposes, as amended.

The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (4,733 characters)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Community Bank Deposit Access Act of 2025". SEC. 2. LIMITED EXCEPTION FOR CUSTODIAL DEPOSITS. (a) In General.--Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(j) Limited Exception for Custodial Deposits.-- "(1) In general.--Custodial deposits of an eligible institution shall not be considered to be funds obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker to the extent that the total amount of such custodial deposits does not exceed an amount equal to 20 percent of the total liabilities of the eligible institution. "(2) Definitions.--In this subsection: "(A) Custodial deposit.--The term `custodial deposit' means a deposit that is not deposited at an insured depository institution in return for fees paid by the insured depository institution pursuant to an agreement with a third party and that would otherwise be considered to be obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker, if the deposit is deposited at 1 or more insured depository institutions, for the purpose of providing or maintaining deposit insurance for the benefit of a third party, by or through any of the following, each acting in a formal custodial or fiduciary capacity for the benefit of a third party: "(i) An insured depository institution serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(ii) A trust entity controlled by an insured depository institution serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(iii) A State-chartered trust company serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(iv) A plan administrator or investment advisor, acting in a formal custodial or fiduciary capacity for the benefit of a plan. "(B) Eligible institution.--The term `eligible institution' means an insured depository institution that accepts custodial deposits, if the insured depository institution has less than $10,000,000,000 in total assets as reported on the consolidated report of condition and income as reported quarterly to the appropriate Federal banking agency and-- "(i)(I) when most recently examined under section 10(d) was assigned a composite rating of 1, 2, or 3 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and "(II) is well capitalized; or "(ii) has obtained a waiver pursuant to subsection (c). "(C) Plan.--The term `plan' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002). "(D) Plan administrator.--The term `plan administrator' has the meaning given the term `administrator' in section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002). "(E) Well capitalized.--The term `well capitalized' has the meaning given the term in section 38(b).". (b) Interest Rate Restriction.--Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding at the end the following: "(k) Restriction on Interest Rate Paid on Certain Custodial Deposits.-- "(1) Definitions.--In this subsection-- "(A) the terms `custodial deposit', `eligible institution', and `well capitalized' have the meanings given those terms in subsection (j); and "(B) the term `covered insured depository institution' means an insured depository institution that while acting as an eligible institution under subsection (j), accepts custodial deposits while not well capitalized. "(2) Prohibition.--A covered insured depository institution may not pay a rate of interest on custodial deposits that are accepted while not well capitalized that, at the time the funds or custodial deposits are accepted, significantly exceeds the limit set forth in paragraph (3). "(3) Limit on interest rates.--The limit on the rate of interest referred to in paragraph (2) shall be not greater than-- "(A) the rate paid on deposits of similar maturity in the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution for deposits accepted in the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution; or "(B) the national rate paid on deposits of comparable maturity, as established by the Corporation, for deposits accepted outside the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution.". SEC. 3. DISCRETIONARY SURPLUS FUND. (a) In General.--The dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is reduced by $4,000,000. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 1, 2036.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this bill.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:30 p.m.

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the Congressional Budget Office estimate for the bill.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:30 p.m.

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas? There was no objection. Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives announces bills that will be considered under suspension of the rules in that chamber. Under suspension, floor debate is limited, all floor amendments are prohibited, points of order against the bill are waived, and final passage requires a two-thirds majority vote. At the request of the Majority Leader and the House Committee on the Budget, CBO estimates the effects of those bills on direct spending and revenues. CBO has limited time to review the legislation before consideration. Although it is possible in most cases to determine whether the legislation would affect direct spending or revenues, time may be insufficient to estimate the magnitude of those effects. If CBO has prepared estimates for similar or identical legislation, a more detailed assessment of budgetary effects, including effects on spending subject to appropriation, may be included.
Text printed in the Record (1,238 characters)
EFFECTS ON DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES OF LEGISLATION CONSIDERATION UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE RULES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Week of May 18, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Effect on Direct Information on Direct Link to Published Bill Number Title Spending Effect on Revenues Spending and Revenue Estimates Effects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------H.R. 5317.......................... Community Bank Deposit Increase by at Least Increase by at Least Would increase direct N/A Access Act of 2025, $500K. $500K. spending by $3 as amended. million, increase revenues by $3 million, and result in no increase in the deficit,. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I will speak in support of H.R. 5317, the Community Bank Deposit Access Act. This is a bill that over my time in Congress I have introduced several times and worked with colleagues to extend the ability to attract deposits to local community banks to make them more competitive. This bill works to essentially give community banks greater flexibility to access stable and reliable funding sources so that they can continue to meet the financial needs of the communities they serve. Community banks, as we have talked about today, play a vital role in our local economies by supporting small businesses, farmers, and consumers who depend on them for access to credit and other essential financial services. That is why it is important that our community institutions have access to a diverse and dependable set of funding sources so that they can continue to meet these demands. One source of funding comes through custodial deposits, which are the funds placed at a bank by a third party on behalf of underlying customers or beneficiaries who own the funds but may not have a direct banking relationship with that institution. Mr. Speaker, a few minutes ago, we talked about reciprocal deposits. Let's say I am a small business, and I have $500,000 as a typical average collected balance in my business, but I only have deposit insurance of $250,000. The reciprocal deposit bill that Mrs. Beatty offered a few minutes ago with Tom Emmer of Minnesota allows that other $250,000 for that small business to be covered for deposit insurance. That is very important and very useful to have that customer-bank service relationship. Custodial deposits are similar, but what if it is a much larger amount of money, a much bigger business? Custodial deposits allow banks to serve their customer that way with one statement by seeing the money spread across more banks. This is a cash management product that allows a local community bank to play a lead role in Treasury management for a larger commercial customer. Let's say, for example, a landlord might place tenant security deposits in a custodial account at a local bank, even though the tenants remain the ultimate owner of those funds and, hence, the ability to be benefited by that. These arrangements provide benefits to all of the parties involved. Banks gain access to stable, low-cost deposits, while customers and third parties benefit from the convenience of a more centralized account management function, along with the protections provided by deposit insurance. The FDIC has long recognized this deposit insurance process and how it can apply on a pass-through basis, meaning that underlying funds remain insured so long as each beneficiary's share stays within the applicable deposit insurance limit. My bill would expand access to these arrangements for banks under $10 billion in assets that maintain strong capital levels and sound supervisory ratings or otherwise receive a waiver from their primary bank regulator. Custodial deposits are a stable relationship-based funding source that allows a community bank to support small businesses, families, and local economies. These deposits can provide smaller institutions with access to depositors and funding relationships that might otherwise be out of reach and help diversify their funding base and improve their financial stability. Yet, under current law, many of these deposits are treated the same as if they were brokered deposits and subject to rules that were never intended for these type of relationship accounts. This outdated treatment creates unnecessary burdens for community banks and limits their ability to responsibly utilize custodial deposits to support lending in their communities. By clarifying that custodial deposits are not brokered deposits, if they do not exceed 20 percent of the total liabilities of the community bank, my bill gives lenders the certainty they need to accept these funds and put that money to work in their communities. This is a commonsense, bipartisan solution that strengthens community banks, supports local lending, and preserves the safety and soundness of the financial system without increasing the risk to our Deposit Insurance Fund. Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 5317, the Community Bank Deposit Access Act of 2025, sponsored by Chairman Hill. Let me start by thanking the chairman for his focus on supporting community banks and credit unions, including community development financial institutions, or CDFIs, and minority depository institutions, or MDIs. This bill will allow community banks to receive so-called custodial deposits from larger banks and then use those funds to lend into their communities. Custodial deposits are shared between banks in a network, allowing them to provide FDIC insurance on amounts larger than $250,000, although for a fee paid by the MDI or community bank. Mr. Speaker, the original introduced bill would have provided an unnecessary exemption for the largest banks which, as we have discussed, honestly don't need help competing for deposits. I appreciate that Mr. Hill and his staff worked with us on important improvements to narrow the focus of this bill to just support community banks. Furthermore, as I have said before, I do not believe this reform will singlehandedly get community banks all the help they need to compete for deposits and acquire more small business customers. Mr. Speaker, I would again urge the chairman and the supporters of this bill to work with me and support advancing deposit insurance reform, like my bill, which takes a data-driven approach that the chairman said he would prefer, with opportunities for stakeholder input and congressional oversight. I also commend Representatives Lucas, Barr, Meuser, and Stutzman for recently introducing their own deposit insurance reform bills. I couldn't help but notice their bills have a lot of similarities with my bill and with similar bipartisan reform efforts in the Senate. It has been more than 15 years since Congress updated our deposit insurance framework, and it is time for Congress to comprehensively update it again. H.R. 5317 is a good piece of that reform effort, and I urge my colleagues to support the chairman's bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close and reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I again thank the chairman for working with me regarding improvements that were made to the bill in markup to ensure it focused on helping community banks. Custodial deposits are something that community banks can use as a funding source to help them better serve their communities. I hope today's vote on this bill and the bill of the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Emmer) and the gentlewoman from Ohio (Mrs. Beatty) is just the beginning in our efforts to modernize our deposit insurance framework broadly and to provide even more tools for community banks to compete for deposits from local churches, nonprofits, city governments, and small businesses. Mr. Speaker, I urge the chairman to work with me and our members to advance broad deposit insurance reform. In the meantime, I urge the House to advance the chairman's bill, which serves as a good, complementary reform to help our smallest banks compete. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:30 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, let me say I appreciate the gentlewoman's engagement on deposit insurance policy at large. I think it is an important topic. She and I both share the importance of reviewing our deposit insurance system, make sure it is competitive, make sure it encourages safe and sound banking, make sure it doesn't expand in any way the moral hazard associated with too much reliance on a government safety net in any way that might encourage too great risk-taking. She is right. We should do that in a data-dependent way and do that collectively, and we have had assistance in that regard from the FDIC and others. I am grateful for her cooperation on moving the reciprocal deposit bill earlier today, Mrs. Beatty and Mr. Emmer's bill, this custodial deposit effort. Both of these bills help our community banks be more competitive across the country as they try to grow their business in the face of a lot of competition. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for her support. I urge a "yes" vote on both sides of the aisle, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Kennedy of Utah)5:40 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 5317, as amended.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:40 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:40 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore5:40 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

Providing for the Concurrence by the House in the Senate Amendment to H.r. 6644, with Amendment

Pages H3588–H3624 · Official text

PROVIDING FOR THE CONCURRENCE BY THE HOUSE IN THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 6644, WITH AMENDMENT

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution (H. Res. 1299) providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment to H.R. 6644, with amendment.

The Clerk read the title of the resolution. The text of the resolution is as follows:

Text printed in the Record (11,955 characters)
Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the House shall be considered to have taken from the Speaker's table the bill, H.R. 6644, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to have concurred in the Senate amendment with the following amendment: In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the amendment of the Senate to the text of the bill, insert the following: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the "21st Century ROAD to Housing Act". (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 101. Reforms to housing counseling and financial literacy programs. Sec. 102. Federal guidelines for point access block buildings. Sec. 103. Exemption on construction or modification of residential housing located on an infill site. Sec. 104. Database of publicly owned land. Sec. 105. FHA Small-Dollar Mortgages. Sec. 106. Temperature Sensor Pilot Program. Sec. 107. Housing supply frameworks. Sec. 201. Increasing housing in opportunity zones. Sec. 202. Whole-Home Repairs Act. Sec. 203. Community Investment and Prosperity Act. Sec. 204. Addition of affordable housing construction as an eligible activity. Sec. 205. Better Use of Intergovernmental and Local Development (BUILD) Housing Act. Sec. 206. Unlocking Housing Supply Through Streamlined and Modernized Reviews Act. Sec. 207. Grants for planning and implementation associated with affordable housing. Sec. 208. Innovation Fund. Sec. 209. Accelerating Home Building Act. Sec. 210. Revitalizing Empty Structures Into Desirable Environments (RESIDE) Act. Sec. 211. Housing Affordability Act. Sec. 301. Housing Supply Expansion Act. Sec. 302. Modular Housing Production Act. Sec. 303. Property Improvement and Manufactured Housing Loan Modernization Act. Sec. 401. Creating incentives for small-dollar loan originators. Sec. 402. Small-dollar mortgage points and fees. Sec. 403. Appraisal Industry Improvement Act. Sec. 404. Helping More Families Save Act. Sec. 405. Choice in Affordable Housing Act. Sec. 501. HOME Investment Partnerships Reauthorization and Reform Act. Sec. 502. Rural Housing Service Reform Act. Sec. 503. Incentivizing local solutions to homelessness. Sec. 601. Military Service Question. Sec. 602. Housing Unhoused Disabled Veterans Act. Sec. 701. Requiring annual testimony and oversight from housing regulators. Sec. 702. FHA reporting requirements on safety and soundness. Sec. 703. United States Interagency Council on Homelessness oversight. Sec. 704. Appraisal Modernization Act. TITLE VIII--ACCOUNTABILITY, COORDINATION, STUDIES, AND REPORTING Sec. 801. HUD-USDA-VA Interagency Coordination Act. Sec. 802. Streamlining Rural Housing Act. Sec. 803. Improving self-sufficiency of families in HUD-subsidized housing. Sec. 804. GAO studies. Sec. 805. Improving public housing agency accountability. TITLE IX--STRENGTHENING COMMUNITY BANKS' ROLE IN HOUSING Sec. 901. Community bank deposit access. Sec. 902. Keeping deposits local. Sec. 903. Tailored regulatory updates for supervisory testing. Sec. 904. Credit union board modernization. Sec. 905. Systemic risk authority transparency. Sec. 906. Least cost exception. Sec. 907. Failing bank acquisition fairness. Sec. 908. Advancing the mentor-protege program for small financial institutions. Sec. 909. American access to banking. Sec. 910. Promoting new bank formation. Sec. 911. Rural depositories revitalization study. Sec. 912. Discretionary surplus fund. Sec. 1001. Homes are for people, not corporations. Sec. 1101. Central bank digital currency. Sec. 1201. Severability. Sec. 1202. No additional funds authorized. SEC. 101. REFORMS TO HOUSING COUNSELING AND FINANCIAL LITERACY PROGRAMS. Section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)(4)(C), by striking "adequate distribution" and all that follows through "foreclosure rates" and inserting "that the recipients are geographically diverse and include organizations that serve urban or rural areas"; (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following: "(6) Reviews.--The Secretary-- "(A) may conduct periodic reviews; and "(B) shall conduct performance reviews of all organizations receiving assistance under this section that-- "(i) consist of a review of the organization's compliance with all program requirements; and "(ii) may take into account the organization's aggregate counselor performance under paragraph (7)(B). "(7) Considerations.-- "(A) Covered mortgage loan defined.--In this paragraph, the term `covered mortgage loan' means any loan which is secured by a first or subordinate lien on residential real property (including individual units of condominiums and housing cooperatives) designed principally for the occupancy of between 1 and 4 families that is-- "(i) insured by the Federal Housing Administration under title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.); or "(ii) guaranteed under section 184 or 184A of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a, 1715z-13b). "(B) Comparison.--For each counselor employed by an organization receiving assistance under this section for prepurchase housing counseling, the Secretary may consider the performance of the counselor compared to the default rate of all counseled borrowers of a covered mortgage loan in comparable markets and such other factors as the Secretary determines appropriate to further the purposes of this section. "(8) Certification.--If, based on the comparison required under paragraph (7)(B), the Secretary determines that a counselor lacks competence to provide counseling in the areas described in subsection (e)(2) and such action will not create a significant loss of capacity for housing counseling services in the service area, the Secretary may-- "(A) require continued education coupled with successful completion of a probationary period; "(B) require retesting if the counselor continues to demonstrate a lack of competence under paragraph (7)(B); and "(C) suspend an individual certification if a counselor fails to demonstrate competence after not fewer than 2 retesting opportunities under subparagraph (B)."; (3) in subsection (i)-- (A) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: "(3) Termination of assistance.-- "(A) In general.--The Secretary may deny renewal of covered assistance to an organization or entity receiving covered assistance if the Secretary determines that the organization or entity, or the individual through which the organization or entity provides counseling, is not in compliance with program requirements-- "(i) based on the performance review described in subsection (e)(6); and "(ii) in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary. "(B) Notice.--The Secretary shall give an organization or entity receiving covered assistance not less than 60 days prior written notice of any denial of renewal under this paragraph, and the determination of renewal shall not be finalized until the end of that notice period. "(C) Informal conference.--If requested in writing by the organization or entity within the notice period described in subparagraph (B), the organization or entity shall be entitled to an informal conference with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Housing Counseling on behalf of the Secretary at which the organization or entity may present for consideration specific factors that the organization or entity believes were beyond the control of the organization or entity and that caused the failure to comply with program requirements, such as a lack of lender or servicer coordination or communication with housing counseling agencies and individual counselors."; and (4) by adding at the end the following: "(j) Offering Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling.-- "(1) Covered mortgage loan defined.--In this subsection, the term `covered mortgage loan' means any loan which is secured by a first or subordinate lien on residential real property (including individual units of condominiums and housing cooperatives) or stock or membership in a cooperative ownership housing corporation designed principally for the occupancy of between 1 and 4 families that is-- "(A) insured by the Federal Housing Administration under title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.); "(B) guaranteed under section 184 or 184A of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a, 1715z-13b); "(C) made, guaranteed, or insured by the Department of Veterans Affairs; or "(D) made, guaranteed, or insured by the Department of Agriculture. "(2) Opportunity for borrowers.--A borrower with respect to a covered mortgage loan who is 30 days or more delinquent on payments for the covered mortgage loan shall be given an opportunity to participate in available housing counseling. "(3) Cost.--If the requirements of sections 202(a)(3) and 205(f) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)(3), 1711(f)) are met, the fair market rate cost of counseling for delinquent borrowers described in paragraph (2) with respect to a covered mortgage loan described in paragraph (1)(A) shall be paid for by the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, as authorized under section 203(r)(4) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(r)(4)).". SEC. 102. FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR POINT ACCESS BLOCK BUILDINGS. (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall issue guidelines to provide States, territories, Tribes, and localities with model code language, best practices, and technical guidance that could be used to facilitate the permitting of point-access block residential buildings. (b) Contents.--When developing the guidelines under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider-- (1) fire safety considerations, including sprinkler coverage, smoke detection, ventilation, and building egress performance; (2) construction costs and potential impacts on housing affordability, including the potential for increasing housing supply in high-cost jurisdictions; (3) flexibility for diverse consumer needs, including family sizes, unit configurations, and accessibility; (4) examples of single-stair codes adopted or considered by States and cities in the United States; (5) examples of single-stair codes used in relevant international standards; (6) research and model language relating to single-stair codes produced by organizations that focus on point-access block building design and building-code reform; (7) consulting with experts, including developers, architects, fire marshals, researchers, economists, housing authorities, and officials in States that have enacted or piloted single-stair codes; and (8) alternative methods of safety compliance, including options that utilize additional passive or active safety features. (c) Coordination With the International Code Council.--The Secretary shall coordinate with the International Code Council to encourage the International Code Council to incorporate provisions about point-access block buildings into the International Building Code. (d) Grants.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary may establish a program to award competitive grants to eligible entities to implement pilot projects that evaluate, demonstrate, or validate the safety, feasibility, or cost-effectiveness of point-access block residential buildings. (2) Sunset.--The program established under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date that is 7 years after the date of the enactment of this subsection. (e) Treatment of Projects.--Projects assisted under this section shall be treated as projects assisted under the Community Development Block Grant program under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,505 characters)
5301 et seq.). (f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to preempt a State or local building code. (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Eligible entity.--The term "eligible entity" means a State, unit of local government, Tribal Government, public housing agency, nonprofit housing organization, community development organization, private developer, construction firm, qualified design firm, engineering firm, academic institution, research institution, or any partnership or consortium comprised of 2 or more such types of entities. (2) Point-access block building.--The term "point-access block building" means a Group R-2 occupancy residential structure, as such term is defined by the International Building Code, in which a single internal stairway provides access and egress for all dwelling units in a building that is not greater than 6 stories in height. SEC. 103. EXEMPTION ON CONSTRUCTION OR MODIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING LOCATED ON AN INFILL SITE. (a) Exemption.--In providing assistance under section 501, 502, 504, 515, 533, or 538 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471, 1472, 1474, 1485, 1490m, or 1490p-2) for the construction or modification of residential housing located on an infill site, the Secretary of Agriculture shall not be required to carry out any study or report on the environmental effects of such assistance. (b) Report.--Not later than the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit, to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, a report that-- (1) determines whether the implementation of this section-- (A) reduced the amount of time it takes to review an application for assistance under the sections of the Housing Act of 1949 identified in subsection (a); and (B) reduced the administrative cost of providing such assistance; (2) describes how the implementation of this section affects the affordable housing sector in rural America; and (3) includes any legislative recommendations from the Secretary of Agriculture. (c) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Greenfield.--The term "greenfield" means a site that has not been developed, including a woodland, farmland, and an open field. (2) Infill site.--The term "infill site"-- (A) means a site that is served by existing infrastructure, including water lines, sewer lines, and roads; and (B) does not include-- (i) a site that is served by existing infrastructure that only consists of a road; (ii) a site within a census tract designated as very high or relatively high risk for wildfire, coastal flooding, and riverine flooding under the National Risk Index of the Federal Emergency Management Agency pursuant to section 206 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5136); and (iii) a greenfield. SEC. 104. DATABASE OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND. (a) In General.--Section 104(b) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(b)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (5), by striking "and" at the end; (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(7) the grantee maintains, on a publicly accessible website, a searchable database that identifies all parcels of undeveloped land owned by the grantee.". (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this subsection shall take effect on October 1, 2026. SEC. 105. FHA SMALL-DOLLAR MORTGAGES. (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, acting through the Federal Housing Commissioner, may establish a Pilot Program to increase access to small-dollar mortgages for mortgagors which may include-- (1) authorizing direct payments to mortgagees to incentivize the origination of small-dollar mortgages; (2) adjusting terms and costs imposed by the Federal Housing Administration with respect to small-dollar mortgages; (3) providing direct grants for mortgagors who obtain small-dollar mortgages to cover costs associated with-- (A) down payments; (B) closing costs; (C) appraisals; and (D) title insurance; (4) conducting outreach to potential mortgagors about the availability of small-dollar mortgages; and (5) providing technical assistance for mortgagees that originate small-dollar mortgages. (b) Report.--Beginning not later than 1 year after the establishment of the Pilot Program under subsection (a) and ending 1 year after the sunset of the Pilot Program, the Federal Housing Commissioner shall submit to the Congress an annual report that-- (1) tracks and evaluates the outcomes of small-dollar mortgages originated by mortgagees as a result of support provided under subsection (a); (2) analyzes risks of the Pilot Program to the solvency of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund; (3) includes data with respect to-- (A) the number of small-dollar mortgages originated in the 10-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this section, including small-dollar mortgages insured or guaranteed by the Federal Government and small-dollar mortgages not insured by the Federal Government; (B) the original principal balance of each small-dollar mortgage identified under subparagraph (A); (C) demographic information about the mortgagors associated with each such small-dollar mortgages; and (D) the number and type of mortgagees that offer small-dollar mortgages; (4) provides a description of the fixed costs that are associated with mortgages and the impact of such costs on the ability of lenders to earn a market rate return on small-dollar mortgages; and (5) includes analysis, by regions of the United States, including rural regions, that identifies regions with the greatest need for, and the highest likelihood of, the origination of small-dollar mortgages and regions that could benefit the most from increased availability of small-dollar mortgages. (c) Sunset.--The Pilot Program established under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 4 years after the date on which the Pilot Program is established under subsection (a). (d) Expiration of Authority.--After the expiration of the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this section, neither the Federal Housing Commissioner nor the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may newly establish a Pilot Program to increase access to small-dollar mortgages for mortgagors. (e) Small-dollar Mortgage Defined.--The term "small-dollar mortgage" means a mortgage that-- (1) has an original principal balance of $100,000 or less; and (2) is secured by a 1- to 4-unit property that is the principal residence of the mortgagor. SEC. 106. TEMPERATURE SENSOR PILOT PROGRAM. (a) In General.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall establish a temperature sensor Pilot Program to provide grants to public housing agencies and owners of covered federally assisted rental dwelling units to acquire, install, and test the efficacy of approved temperature sensors in residential dwelling units to ensure such units remain in compliance with temperature requirements. (b) Eligibility.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, establish eligibility criteria for public housing agencies and owners of covered federally assisted rental dwelling units to participate in the Pilot Program established pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Criteria.--In establishing the eligibility criteria described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure-- (A) the Pilot Program includes a diverse range of participants that represent different geographic regions, climate regions, unit sizes, and types of housing; and (B) that the functionality of an approved temperature sensor will be installed and tested using amounts awarded under this section, including internet connectivity requirements. (c) Installation.--Each public housing agency or owner of a covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit that acquires 1 or more approved temperature sensors under this section shall, after receiving written permission from the resident of a dwelling unit, install such temperature sensor and monitor the data from such temperature sensor. (d) Collection of Complaint Records.-- (1) In general.--Each public housing agency or owner of a covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit that installs 1 or more approved temperature sensors under this section shall collect and retain information about temperature-related complaints and violations. (2) Definitions.--The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, define the terms "temperature-related complaints" and "temperature-related violations" for the purposes of this section. (e) Data Collection.-- (1) In general.--Data collected from temperature sensors acquired and installed by public housing agencies and owners of covered federally assisted rental dwelling units under this section shall be retained until the Secretary notifies the public housing agency or owner that the Pilot Program and the evaluation of the Pilot Program are complete. (2) Personally identifiable information.--The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, establish standards for the protection of personally identifiably information collected during the Pilot Program by public housing agencies, owners of federally assisted rental dwelling units, and the Secretary. (f) Pilot Program Evaluation.-- (1) Interim evaluation.--Not later than 12 months after the establishment of the Pilot Program under this section, the Secretary shall publicly publish and submit to the Congress a report that-- (A) examines the number of temperature-related complaints and violations in federally assisted rental dwelling units with temperature sensors, disaggregated by temperature sensor technology and climate region-- (i) that occurred before the installation of such sensor, if known; and (ii) that occurred after the installation of such sensor; and (B) identifies any barriers to full utility of temperature sensor capabilities, including broadband internet access and tenant participation. (2) Final evaluation.--Not later than 36 months after the conclusion of the Pilot Program established by the Secretary under this section, the Secretary shall publicly publish and submit to the Congress a report that-- (A) examines the number of temperature-related complaints and violations in federally assisted rental dwelling units with temperature sensors, disaggregated by temperature sensor technology and climate region-- (i) that occurred before the installation of such sensor; and (ii) that occurred after the installation of such sensor; (B) identifies any barriers to full utility of temperature sensor capabilities, including broadband internet access and tenant participation; and (C) compares the utility of various temperature sensor technologies based on-- (i) climate zones; (ii) cost; (iii) features; and (iv) any other factors identified by the Secretary. (g) Treatment of Projects.--Projects assisted under this section shall be treated as projects assisted under the Community Development Block Grant program under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,827 characters)
5301 et seq.). (h) Sunset.--The Pilot Program established under this section shall terminate on the date that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this section. (i) Definitions.--For the purposes of this section: (1) Approved temperature sensor.--The term "approved temperature sensor" means an internet capable temperature reporting device able to measure ambient air temperature to the tenth degree Fahrenheit and Celsius selected from a list of such devices approved in advance by the Secretary. (2) Assistance.--The term "assistance" means any grant, loan, subsidy, contract, cooperative agreement, or other form of financial assistance, but such term does not include the insurance or guarantee of a loan, mortgage, or pool of loans or mortgages. (3) Covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit.--The term "covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit" means a residential dwelling unit that is made available for rental and for which assistance is provided, or that is part of a housing project for which assistance is provided, under-- (A) the program for project-based rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of (42 U.S.C. 1437f); (B) the public housing program under the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.); (C) the program for supportive housing for the elderly under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q); or (D) the program for supportive housing for persons with disabilities under section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013). (4) Owner.--The term "owner" means-- (A) with respect to the program for project-based rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f), any private person or entity, including a cooperative, an agency of the Federal Government, or a public housing agency, having the legal right to lease or sublease dwelling units; (B) with respect to the public housing program under the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. et seq.), a public housing agency or an owner entity of public housing units as defined in section 905.108 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations; (C) with respect to the program for supportive housing for the elderly under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q), a private nonprofit organization as defined under section (k)(4) of the Housing Act of 1959; and (D) with respect to the program for supportive housing for persons with disabilities under section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013), a private nonprofit organization as defined under section 811(k)(5) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act. SEC. 107. HOUSING SUPPLY FRAMEWORKS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Affordable housing.--The term "affordable housing" means housing for which the monthly payment is not more than 30-percent of the monthly income of the household. (2) Assistant secretary.--The term "Assistant Secretary" means the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (3) Local zoning framework.--The term "local zoning framework" means the local zoning codes and other ordinances, procedures, and policies governing zoning and land-use at the local level. (4) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (5) State zoning framework.--The term "State zoning framework" means the State legislation or State agency and department procedures, or such legislation or procedures in an insular area of the United States, enabling local planning and zoning authorities and establishing and guiding related policies and programs. (b) Guidelines on State and Local Zoning Frameworks.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall publish documents outlining guidelines and best practices to support production of adequate housing to meet the needs of communities and provide housing opportunities for individuals at every income level across communities with respect to-- (A) State zoning frameworks; and (B) local zoning frameworks. (2) Consultation; public comment.--During the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, in developing the guidelines and best practices required under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary shall-- (A) publish draft guidelines and best practices in the Federal Register for public comment; and (B) establish a task force for the purpose of providing consultation to draft the guidelines and best practices published under subparagraph (A), the members of which shall include-- (i) urban planners and architects; (ii) housing developers, including affordable and market-rate housing developers, manufactured housing developers, cooperative housing developers, and other business interests; (iii) community engagement experts and community members impacted by zoning decisions; (iv) public housing agencies and transit authorities; (v) members of local zoning and planning boards and local and regional transportation planning organizations; (vi) State officials responsible for housing or land use, including members of State zoning boards of appeals; (vii) academic researchers; and (viii) home builders. (3) Contents.--The guidelines and best practices required under paragraph (1) shall-- (A) with respect to State zoning frameworks, outline potential models for updated State enabling legislation or State agency and department procedures; (B) include recommendations regarding-- (i) the reduction or elimination of parking minimums; (ii) the increase in maximum floor area ratio requirements and maximum building heights and the reduction in minimum lot sizes and set-back requirements; (iii) the elimination of restrictions against accessory dwelling units; (iv) increasing by-right uses, including duplex, triplex, or quadplex buildings, across cities or metropolitan areas; (v) mechanisms, including proximity to transit, to determine the appropriate scope for rezoning and ensure development that does not disproportionately burden residents of economically distressed areas; (vi) provisions regarding review of by-right development proposals to streamline review and reduce uncertainty, including-- (I) nondiscretionary, ministerial review; and (II) entitlement and design review processes; (vii) the reduction of obstacles, regulatory or otherwise, to a range of housing types at all levels of affordability, including manufactured and modular housing; (viii) State model zoning regulations for directing local reforms, including mechanisms to encourage adoption; (ix) provisions to encourage transit-oriented development, including increased permissible units per structure and reduced minimum lot sizes near existing or planned public transit stations; (x) potential reforms to strengthen the public engagement process; (xi) reforms to protest petition statutes; (xii) the standardization, reduction, or elimination of impact fees; (xiii) cost-effective and appropriate building codes; (xiv) models for community benefit agreements; (xv) mechanisms to preserve affordability, limit disruption of low-income communities, and prevent displacement of existing residents; (xvi) with respect to State zoning frameworks-- (I) State model codes for directing local reforms, including mechanisms to encourage adoption; (II) a model for a State zoning appeals process, which would-- (aa) create a process for developers or builders requesting a variance, conditional use, special permit, zoning district change, similar discretionary permit, or otherwise petitioning a local zoning or planning board for a project including a State-defined amount of affordable housing to appeal a rejection to a State body or regional body empowered by the State; and (bb) establish qualifications for communities to be exempted from the appeals process based on their available stock of affordable housing; and (III) streamlining of State environmental review policies; (xvii) with respect to local zoning frameworks-- (I) the simplification and standardization of existing zoning codes; (II) maximum review timelines; (III) best practices for the disposition of land owned by local governments for affordable housing development; (IV) differentiations between best practices for rural, suburban, and urban communities, and communities with different levels of density or population distribution; and (V) streamlining of local environmental review policies; and (xviii) other land use measures that promote access to new housing opportunities identified by the Secretary; and (C) consider-- (i) the effects of adopting any recommendation on eligibility for Federal discretionary grants and tax credits for the purpose of housing or community development; (ii) coordination between infrastructure investments and housing planning; (iii) local housing needs, including ways to set and measure housing goals and targets; (iv) a range of affordability for rental units, with a prioritization of units attainable to extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income residents; (v) a range of affordability for homeownership; (vi) accountability measures; (vii) the long-term cost to residents and businesses if more housing is not constructed; (viii) barriers to individuals seeking to access affordable housing in growing communities and communities with economic opportunity; (ix) with respect to State zoning frameworks-- (I) distinctions between States providing constitutional or statutory home rule authority to municipalities and States operating under the Dillon Rule, as articulated in Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (1907); and (II) Statewide mechanisms to preserve existing affordability over the long term, including support for land banks and community land trusts; (x) public comments elicited under paragraph (2)(A); and (xi) other considerations, as identified by the Assistant Secretary. (c) Abolishment of the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse.-- (1) In general.--The Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse established pursuant to section 1205 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 12705d) is abolished. (2) Repeal.--Section 1205 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 12705d) is repealed. (d) Reporting.--Not later than 5 years after the date on which the Assistant Secretary publishes the final guidelines and best practices for State and local zoning frameworks under this section, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report describing-- (1) the States that have adopted recommendations from the guidelines and best practices, pursuant to subsection (b); (2) a summary of the localities that have adopted recommendations from the guidelines and best practices, pursuant to subsection (b); (3) a list of States that adopted a State zoning framework; (4) a summary of the modifications that each State has made in their State zoning framework; (5) a general summary of the types of updates localities have made to their local zoning framework; (6) with respect to the States that have adopted a State zoning framework or recommendations from the guidelines and best practices, the effect of such adoptions; and (7) a summary of any recommendations that were routinely not adopted by States or by localities. (e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to permit the Department of Housing and Urban Development to take an adverse action against or fail to provide otherwise offered actions or services for any State or locality if the State or locality declines to adopt a guideline or best practice under subsection (b). SEC. 201.
Text printed in the Record (11,744 characters)
INCREASING HOUSING IN OPPORTUNITY ZONES. (a) Covered Grant Defined.--In this section, the term "covered grant" means any competitive grant relating to the construction, modification, rehabilitation, or preservation of housing, as determined by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) Priority.--When awarding a covered grant, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may give additional weight to applicants with proposed activities or projects that are located in or substantially and directly benefit a community designated as a qualified opportunity zone under section 1400Z-1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. SEC. 202. WHOLE-HOME REPAIRS ACT. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Affordable unit.--The term "affordable unit" means a unit for which the monthly rental payment is not more than 30 percent of the gross income of an individual earning at or below 80 percent of the area median income, as defined by the Secretary. (2) Assisted unit.--The term "assisted unit" means a unit that undergoes repair or rehabilitation work through a whole-home repairs program administered by an implementing organization under this section. (3) Eligible home-owner.--The term "eligible home-owner" means a home-owner-- (A) with a household income that-- (i) is not more than 80 percent of the area median income; or (ii) meets the income eligibility requirements for receiving assistance or benefits under a specified program, as defined in paragraph (11); and (B) who is-- (i) an owner of record as evidenced by a publicly recorded deed, or other document recorded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and occupies the home on which repairs are to be conducted as their principal residence; (ii) an owner-occupant of the manufactured home on which repairs are to be conducted; (iii) an owner-occupant of the cooperative housing unit on which repairs are to be conducted; or (iv) an owner who can demonstrate an ownership interest in the property, or trust land leasehold, on which repairs are to be conducted, including a person who has inherited an interest in that property. (4) Eligible landlord.--The term "eligible landlord" means an individual-- (A) who owns, as determined by the relevant implementing organization, fewer than 10 eligible rental properties, with a majority of affordable units and not more than 25 total units, operated as primary residences in which a majority ownership interest is held by the individual, the spouse of the individual, or the dependent children of the individual, or any closely held legal entity controlled by the individual, the spouse of the individual, or the dependent children of the individual, either individually or collectively; and (B) who agrees to the provisions described in subsection (b)(3). (5) Eligible rental property.--The term "eligible rental property" means a residential property that-- (A) is leased, or offered exclusively for lease, as a primary residence by an eligible landlord; and (B) includes affordable units. (6) Forgivable loan.--The term "forgivable loan" means a loan-- (A) made to an eligible landlord; (B) that is secured by a lien recorded against a residential property; and (C) that may be forgiven by the implementing organization not later than the date that is 3 years after the completion of the repairs if the eligible landlord has maintained compliance with the loan agreement described in subsection (b)(3). (7) Implementing organization.--The term "implementing organization"-- (A) means a unit of general local government or a State that-- (i) will administer a whole-home repairs program through an agency, department, or other entity; or (ii) enters into agreements with 1 or more local governments, Indian Tribes, municipal authorities, other governmental authorities, including a tribally designated housing entity, or qualified nonprofit organizations, to administer a whole-home repairs program as a subrecipient; and (B) does not include a redundant entity in a jurisdiction already served by a grantee under subsection (b). (8) Indian tribe.--The term "Indian Tribe" has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103). (9) Qualified nonprofit.--The term "qualified nonprofit" means a nonprofit organization that-- (A) has received funding, as a recipient or subrecipient, through-- (i) the Community Development Block Grant program under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.); (ii) the HOME Investment Partnerships program under subtitle A of title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12741 et seq.); (iii) the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction grant program under section 1011 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4852), a grant under the Healthy Homes Initiative administered by the Secretary pursuant to sections 501 and 502 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970 (12 U.S.C. 1701z-1, 1701z-2), or a grant under the Older Adult Home Modification Grants Program authorized under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (Public Law 118-42), or any successor Act, to make safety and functional home modification repairs and renovations to meet the needs of low-income seniors to enable them to remain in their primary residence; (iv) the Self-Help and Assisted home-ownership Opportunity program authorized under section 11 of the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 12805 note); (v) a rural housing program under title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.); or (vi) the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation established under the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 8101 et seq.); (B) has coordinated, performed, or otherwise been engaged in weatherization, lead remediation, or home-repair work for not less than 2 years; (C) has been certified by the Environmental Protection Agency, or by a State authorized by the Environmental Protection Agency to administer a certification program, as-- (i) eligible to carry out activities under the lead renovation, repair, and painting program under section 402(c) or 404 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2682(c), 2684); or (ii) a Home Certification Organization under the Energy Star program established by section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6294a) or the WaterSense program under section 324B of that Act (42 U.S.C. 6294b), or recognized or otherwise approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as a Home Certification Organization under either of those programs; or (D) is a community development financial institution, as defined in section 103 of the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4702). (10) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (11) Specified program.--For purposes of paragraph (3)(A)(ii), the term "specified program" means any of the following: (A) The Medicaid program established under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.). (B) The State Children's Health Insurance Program established under title XXI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.). (C) The supplemental security income benefits program established under title XVI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.). (D) The supplemental nutrition assistance program established under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.). (E) The temporary assistance for needy families program established under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). (12) State.--The term "State" means-- (A) each State of the United States; (B) the District of Columbia; (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (D) any territory or possession of the United States; and (E) an Indian Tribe. (13) Tribally designated housing entity.--The term "tribally designated housing entity" has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103). (14) Whole-home repairs.--The term "whole-home repairs" means modifications, repairs, or updates to home-owner or renter-occupied units to address-- (A) physical and sensory accessibility for individuals with disabilities and older adults, such as bathroom and kitchen modifications, installation of grab bars and handrails, guards and guardrails, lifting devices, ramp additions or repairs, sidewalk addition or repair, or doorway or hallway widening; (B) habitability and safety concerns, such as repairs needed to ensure residential units are fit for human habitation and free from defective conditions or health and safety hazards; or (C) energy and water efficiency, resilience, and weatherization. (b) Pilot Program.-- (1) Establishment.--There is authorized a Pilot Program to provide grants to implementing organizations to administer a whole-home repairs program for eligible home-owners and eligible landlords. (2) Use of funds.--An implementing organization that receives a grant from appropriated funds made available for this subsection-- (A) shall provide grants to eligible home-owners to implement whole-home repairs not covered by other Federal home repair programs up to a maximum amount per unit, which maximum amount should-- (i) reflect local construction costs and the level of repairs needed in each unit; and (ii) be calculated and approved by the Secretary; (B) shall provide loans, which may be forgivable, to eligible landlords to implement whole-home repairs not covered by other Federal home repair programs for individual affordable units, public and common use areas within the property, and common structural elements up to a maximum amount per unit, area, or element, as applicable, which maximum amount should-- (i) reflect local construction costs; and (ii) be calculated and approved by the Secretary; (C) shall evaluate, or provide assistance to eligible home-owners and eligible landlords to evaluate, whole-home repair program funds provided under this subsection with Federal, State, Tribal, and local home repair programs to provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number of eligible landlords and eligible home-owners and avoid duplication of benefits and redundancies for the same home repairs; (D) shall require that-- (i) all repairs funded or facilitated through an award under this subsection have been completed; (ii) if repairs are not completed and the plan for whole-home repairs is not updated to reflect the new scope of work, that the loan or grant is repaid on a prorated basis based on completed work; and (iii) any unused grant or loan balance is returned to the implementing organization, and is reused by the implementing organization for a new whole-home repair grant or loan under this subsection; (E) may use not more than 5 percent of the awarded funds to carry out related functions, including workforce training for home repair professions, which shall be related to efforts to increase the number of home repairs performed and approved by the Secretary; (F) may use not more than 10 percent of the awarded funds for administrative expenses; (G) shall comply with Federal accessibility requirements and standards under applicable Federal fair housing and civil rights laws and regulations, including section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794); and (H) shall ensure that rental properties assisted under subparagraph (B) shall be treated as projects assisted under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,858 characters)
5301 et seq.). (3) Loan agreement.--In a loan agreement with an eligible landlord under this subsection, an implementing organization shall include provisions establishing that the eligible landlord shall, for each eligible rental property for which a loan is used to fund repairs under this subsection-- (A) comply with Federal accessibility requirements and standards under applicable Federal fair housing and civil rights laws and regulations, including section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794); and (B)(i) if the landlord is renting the assisted units available in the eligible rental property to tenants receiving tenant-based rental assistance under section 8(o) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)), under another tenant-based rental assistance program administered by the Secretary or the Secretary of Agriculture, or under a tenant-based rental subsidy provided by a State or local government, comply with the program requirements under the relevant tenant-based rental assistance program; or (ii) if the eligible landlord is not renting to tenants receiving rental-based assistance as described in clause (i)-- (I)(aa) offer to extend the lease of current tenants on current terms, other than the terms described in subclause (iv) for not less than 3 years beginning after the completion of the repairs, unless the lease is terminated due to failure to pay rent, performance of an illegal act within the rental unit, or a violation of an obligation of tenancy that the tenants failed to correct after notice; and (bb) if the tenant of an assisted unit moves out of the assisted unit at any point in the 3-year period following the loan agreement, maintain the unit as an affordable unit for the remainder of the 3-year period; (II) provide documentation verifying that the property, upon completion of approved renovations, has met all applicable State and local housing and building codes; (III) attest that the landlord has no known serious violations of renter protections that have resulted in fines, penalties, or judgments during the preceding 10 years; and (IV) cap annual rent increases for each assisted unit at 5 percent of base rent or at the rate of inflation, whichever is lower, for not less than 3 years beginning after the completion of the repairs. (4) Application.-- (A) In general.--An implementing organization desiring an award under this subsection shall submit to the Secretary an application that includes-- (i) the geographic scope of the whole-home repairs program to be administered by the implementing organization, including the plan to address need in any rural, Tribal, suburban, or urban area within a jurisdiction; (ii) a plan for selecting subrecipients, if applicable; (iii) a description of how the implementing organization plans to execute the coordination of Federal, State, Tribal, and local home repair programs, including programs administered by the Department of Energy, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Veteran Affairs, or the Department of Agriculture, to increase efficiency and reduce redundancy; (iv) available data on the need for affordable and quality housing within the geographic scope of the whole-home repairs program, and any plans to preserve affordability through the term of the award; (v) a description of how the implementing organization plans to process and verify applications for grants from eligible home-owners and applications for loans from eligible landlords; and (vi) such other information as the Secretary requires to determine the ability of an applicant to carry out a program under this subsection. (B) Considerations.--In making awards under this subsection, the Secretary shall-- (i) with respect to applications submitted by States other than the District of Columbia and the territories of the United States, prioritize those applications with a demonstrated plan to-- (I) make a good-faith effort to implement the Pilot Program in every jurisdiction; and (II) provide nonmetropolitan areas, or subrecipients serving non-metropolitan areas if applicable, with a share of total funds commensurate with their population; (ii) aim to select applicants so that the awardees collectively span diverse geographies, with an intent to understand the impact of the Pilot Program under this subsection in urban, suburban, rural, and Tribal settings; and (iii) not disqualify implementing organizations that were awarded grants under the Pilot Program in prior application cycles. (5) Program information.--The Secretary shall make available to grant recipients under this subsection information regarding existing Federal programs for which grant recipients may coordinate or provide assistance in coordinating applications for those programs in accordance with paragraph (2)(C). (6) Grant number.--In each year in which an award is made under this subsection, the Secretary shall award assistance to-- (A) not less than 2, and not more than 10, implementing organizations, as application numbers and funding permit; and (B) not more than 1 implementing organization in any State. (7) Loans that are not forgiven.--If a loan made by an implementing organization under paragraph (2)(B) is not forgiven, the loan repayment funds shall be reused by the implementing organization for a new whole-home repair grant or loan under this subsection, which shall remain subject to the original terms of the assistance awarded under this subsection. (8) Supplement, not supplant.--Amounts awarded under this subsection to implementing organizations shall supplement, not supplant, other Federal, State, Tribal, and local funds made available to those entities. (9) Streamlining program delivery and ensuring efficiency.--To the extent possible, in carrying out the Pilot Program under this subsection, the Secretary shall-- (A) endeavor to improve efficiency of service delivery, as well as the experience of and impact on the taxpayer, by encouraging programmatic collaboration and information sharing across Federal, State, Tribal, and local programs for home repair or improvement, including programs administered by the Department of Agriculture, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Department of Energy; and (B) enhance collaboration and cross-agency streamlining efforts that reduce the burden of multiple income verification processes and applications on the eligible home-owner, the eligible landlord, the implementing organization, and the Federal Government, including by establishing assistance application procedures for income eligibility under this subsection that recognize income eligibility determinations for assistance using any of the criteria under subsection (a)(3)(A) that have been used for assistance applications during the 1-year period preceding the date on which an eligible home-owner or eligible landlord applies for assistance under this subsection. (10) Reporting requirements.-- (A) Annual report.--An implementing organization that receives a grant under this subsection shall submit to the Secretary an annual report on initial funding that includes-- (i) the number of units served, including reporting on both home-ownership and rental units, as well as accessible units; (ii) the average cost per unit for modifications or repairs and the nature of those modifications or repairs, including reporting on accessibility in both home-ownership and rental units; (iii) the number of applications received, served, denied, or not completed, disaggregated by geographic area; (iv) the aggregated demographic data of grant recipients, which may include data on income range, urban, suburban, and rural residency, age, and racial and ethnic identity; (v) the aggregated demographic data of loan recipients, which may include data on income range, urban, suburban, and rural residency, age, and racial and ethnic identity; (vi) an affirmation that the implementation organization has complied with the applicable regulations, including compliance with Federal accessibility requirements; (vii) in the first year of receiving a grant, and as certified in subsequent reports, a comprehensive plan to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the administration of the Pilot Program, which shall include, at a minimum-- (I) a policy enacted and enforced by the implementing organization to monitor ongoing expenditures under this subsection and ensure compliance with applicable regulations; (II) a policy enacted and enforced by the implementing organization to detect and deter fraudulent activity, including fraud occurring in individual projects and patterns of fraud by parties involved in the expenditure of funds under this subsection; (III) a statement setting forth any violations detected by the implementing organization during the previous calendar year, including details about steps taken to achieve compliance and any remedial measures; and (IV) a certification by the chief executive or most senior compliance officer of the organization that the organization maintains sufficient staff and resources to effectively carry out the above-mentioned policies; and (viii) such other information as the Secretary may require. (B) Reporting requirement alignment.--To limit the costs of implementing the Pilot Program under this subsection, the Secretary shall endeavor, to the extent possible, to structure reporting requirements such that they align with the data reporting requirements in place for funding streams that implementing organizations are likely to use together with funding from this subsection, including the reporting requirements under-- (i) the Community Development Block Grant program under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.); (ii) the HOME Investment Partnerships program under subtitle A of title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12741 et seq.); (iii) the Weatherization Assistance Program for low-income persons established under part A of title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.); and (iv) the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.). (C) Pilot program period reports.--Not less frequently than twice during the period in which the Pilot Program established under this subsection operates, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall complete an assessment of the implementation of measures to ensure the fair and legitimate use of the Pilot Program. (D) Summary to congress.--The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives an annual report providing a summary of the data provided under subparagraphs (A) and (C) during the 1-year period preceding the report and all data previously provided under those subparagraphs. (11) Environmental review.--A grant under this subsection shall be-- (A) treated as assistance for a special project for purposes of section 305(c) of the Multifamily Housing Property Disposition Reform Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 3547); and (B) subject to the regulations promulgated by the Secretary to implement such section. (12) Termination.--The Pilot Program established under this subsection shall terminate on October 1, 2031. SEC. 203. COMMUNITY INVESTMENT AND PROSPERITY ACT. (a) Revised Statutes.--The paragraph designated as the "Eleventh" of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24) is amended, in the fifth sentence, by striking "15" each place the term appears and inserting "20". (b) Federal Reserve Act.--Section 9(23) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,218 characters)
338a) is amended, in the fifth sentence, by striking "15" each place the term appears and inserting "20". (c) Study.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this section, and every 2 years thereafter, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall each submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, a report, after consulting with the other agency in the development of such report, about public welfare investments that were made by associations under section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of the United States and State member banks under section 9(23) of the Federal Reserve Act in the 2 previous calendar years, that-- (1) identifies the number of such investments, broken down by-- (A) purpose; (B) type; (C) amount of assets of the association or State member bank that made the investment, using not less than 4 categories to describe the amount of assets of the associations and banks; and (D) State, or other location; (2) identifies the dollar amounts of such investments, broken down by-- (A) purpose; (B) type; (C) amount of assets of the association or State member bank that made the investment, using not less than 4 categories to describe the amount of assets of the associations and banks; and (D) State or other location; and (3) for each type of public welfare investment identified under paragraphs (1) and (2), a description of the substantive and procedural requirements that apply to each type of investment made under-- (A) in the case of a report by the Comptroller of the Currency, section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of the United States; or (B) in the case of a report by the Board of Governors, section 9(23) of the Federal Reserve Act. SEC. 204. ADDITION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION AS AN ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY. (a) Eligible Activity.--Section 105(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (25)(D), by striking "and" at the end; (2) in paragraph (26), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(27) the new construction of affordable housing, within the meaning given such term under section 215 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12745), and which shall not exceed 20 percent of the amounts allocated to the recipient.". (b) Low- and Moderate-income Requirement.--Section 105(c)(3) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(c)(3)) is amended by striking "or rehabilitation" and inserting ", rehabilitation, or new construction". (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect only to amounts appropriated after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 205. BETTER USE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT (BUILD) HOUSING ACT. (a) Designation of Environmental Review Procedure.--The Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3531 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 12 (42 U.S.C. 3537a) the following: "SEC. 13. DESIGNATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURE. "(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary may, for purposes of environmental review, decision making, and action pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and other provisions of law that further the purposes of such Act, designate the treatment of assistance administered by the Secretary as funds for a special project for purposes of section 305(c) of the Multifamily Housing Property Disposition Reform Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 3547). "(b) Exception.--The designation described in subsection (a) shall not apply to assistance for which a procedure for carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and other provisions of law that further the purposes of such Act, is otherwise specified in law.". (b) Tribal Assumption of Environmental Review Obligations.--Section 305(c) of the Multifamily Housing Property Disposition Reform Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 3547) is amended-- (1) by striking "State or unit of general local government" each place it appears and inserting "State, Indian Tribe, or unit of general local government"; (2) in paragraph (1)(C), in the heading, by striking "State or unit of general local government" and inserting "State, indian tribe, or unit of general local government"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(5) Definition of indian tribe.--For purposes of this subsection, the term `Indian Tribe' means a federally recognized Tribe, as defined in section 4(13)(B) of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103(13)(B)).". (c) Implementation.-- (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), a designation of assistance under section 13 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act, as added by subsection (a), shall only apply with respect to funds appropriated after the date of enactment of this Act. (2) Exception.--If a grantee of assistance administered by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development combines funds appropriated before and after the date of enactment of this Act to carry out a project, section 13 of the Department of and Urban Development Act, as added by subsection (a), shall not apply to that assistance. SEC. 206. UNLOCKING HOUSING SUPPLY THROUGH STREAMLINED AND MODERNIZED REVIEWS ACT. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Infill project.--The term "infill project" means a project that-- (A) occurs within the geographic limits of a municipality; (B) is adequately served by existing utilities and public services as required under applicable law; (C) is located on a site of previously disturbed land of not more than 5 acres and substantially surrounded by residential or commercial development; (D) will repurpose a vacant or underutilized parcel of land, or a dilapidated or abandoned structure; and (E) will serve a residential or commercial purpose. (2) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) NEPA Streamlining for HUD Housing-related Activities.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall, in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, and section 103 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4333), expand and reclassify housing-related activities under the necessary administrative regulations as follows: (A) The following housing-related activities shall be subject to regulations equivalent or substantially similar to the regulations entitled "exempt activities" as set forth in section 58.34 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2025: (i) Tenant-based rental assistance. (ii) Supportive services, including health care, housing services, permanent housing placement, day care, nutritional services, short-term payments for rent, mortgage, or utility costs, and assistance in gaining access to Federal Government and State and local government benefits and services. (iii) Operating costs, including maintenance, security, operation, utilities, furnishings, equipment, supplies, staff training, and recruitment and other incidental costs. (iv) Economic development activities, including equipment purchases, inventory financing, interest subsidies, operating expenses, and similar costs not associated with construction or expansion of existing operations. (v) Activities to assist home-buyers in the purchase of existing dwelling units or dwelling units under construction, including closing costs and down payment assistance, interest rate buydowns, and similar activities that result in the transfer of title. (vi) Affordable housing predevelopment costs related to obtaining site options, project financing, administrative costs and fees for loan commitment, zoning approvals, and other related activities that do not have a physical impact. (vii) Approval of supplemental assistance, including insurance or guarantee, to a project previously approved by the Secretary. (viii) Emergency home-owner or renter assistance for the repair or replacement of HVAC, hot water heaters, and other necessary existing utilities required under applicable law. (B) The following housing-related activities shall be subject to regulations equivalent or substantially similar to the regulations entitled, (i) "categorical exclusions not subject to section 58.5" and (ii) "categorical exclusions not subject to the Federal laws and authorities cited in section 50.4" in section 58.35(b) and section 50.19, respectively of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2025, if such activities do not materially alter environmental conditions and do not materially exceed the original scope of the project: (i) Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) if the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20 percent, including replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of curbs and sidewalks, and repaving of streets. (ii) Rehabilitation of 1-to-4 unit residential buildings, and existing housing-related infrastructure, such as repairs or rehabilitation of existing wells, septics, or utility lines that connect to that housing. (iii) New construction, development, demolition, acquisition, or disposition of up to 4 scattered site existing dwelling units where there is a maximum of 4 units on any 1 site. (iv) Acquisitions (including leasing) of, disposition of, or equity loans on an existing structure, or acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land if the structure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use. (C) The following housing-related activities shall be subject to regulations equivalent or substantially similar to the regulations entitled, (i) "categorical exclusions subject to section 58.5" and (ii) "categorical exclusions subject to the Federal laws and authorities cited in section 50.4" in section 58.35(a) and section 50.20, respectively, of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2025, if such activities do not materially alter environmental conditions and do not materially exceed the original scope of the project: (i) Acquisitions of open space or residential property, where such property will be retained for the same use or will be converted to open space to help residents relocate out of an area designated as a high-risk area by the Secretary. (ii) Conversion of existing office buildings into residential development, subject to-- (I) a maximum number of units to be determined by the Secretary; and (II) a limitation on the change in building size of not more than 20 percent. (iii) New construction, development, demolition, acquisition, or disposition of 5 to 15 dwelling units where there is a maximum of 15 units on any 1 site.
Text printed in the Record (8,859 characters)
The units can be 15 1-unit buildings or 1 15-unit building, or any combination in between. (iv) New construction, development, demolition, acquisition, or disposition of 15 or more housing units developed on scattered sites when there are not more than 15 housing units on any 1 site, and the sites are more than a set number of feet apart as determined by the Secretary. (v) Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements in the case of a building for residential use with 5 to 15 units, if the density is not increased beyond 15 units and the land use is not changed. (vi) Infill projects consisting of new construction, rehabilitation, or development of residential housing units. (vii) The voluntary acquisition of properties-- (I) located in-- (aa) a floodway; (bb) a floodplain; or (cc) any other area, clearly delineated by the grantee; and (II) that have been impacted by a predictable environmental threat to the safety and well-being of program beneficiaries caused or exacerbated by a federally declared disaster. (c) Implementation.--For purposes of implementing the streamlining of environmental review for housing-related activities under subsection (b), the agency actions carried out under that subsection-- (1) shall only apply with respect to funds appropriated after the effective date of those actions; and (2) shall not apply with respect to a grantee that combines funds appropriated before and after the effective date of those actions to carry out a project. (d) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives an annual report during the 5-year period beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act that provides a summary of findings of reductions in review times and administrative cost reduction, with a particular focus on the affordable housing sector, as a result of the actions set forth in this section, and any recommendations of the Secretary for future congressional action with respect to revising categorical exclusions or exemptions under title 24, Code of Federal Regulations. SEC. 207. GRANTS FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION ASSOCIATED WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Eligible entity.--The term "eligible entity" means-- (A) a State, insular area, metropolitan city, or urban county, as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302); or (B) a regional planning agency or consortia of regional planning agencies. (2) Housing plan.--The term "housing plan" means a plan to, with respect to an area within the jurisdiction of an eligible entity-- (A) increase the amount of available housing to meet the demand for such housing and any projected increase in the demand for such housing; (B) increase the affordability of housing; (C) increase the accessibility of housing for people with disabilities, including location-efficient housing; (D) preserve or improve the quality of housing; (E) reduce barriers to housing development; and (F) coordinate with transportation-related agencies. (3) Housing strategy.--The term "housing strategy" means a housing strategy required under section 105 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12705). (4) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a program to award grants on a competitive basis to eligible entities to assist planning and implementation activities associated with affordable housing, except that such grant awards may not be used for construction, alteration, or repair work. (c) Use of Amounts.-- (1) By regional planning agencies.--If an eligible entity that receives amounts under this section is an eligible entity described in subsection (a)(1)(B), the eligible entity shall use those amounts to assist planning activities with respect to affordable housing, including-- (A) the development of housing plans; (B) the substantial improvement of State or local housing strategies; (C) the development of new regulatory requirements and processes; (D) updating zoning codes; (E) increasing the capacity to conduct housing inspections; (F) increasing the capacity to reduce barriers to housing supply elasticity and housing affordability; (G) the development of local or regional plans for community development; and (H) the substantial improvement of community development strategies, including strategies designed to-- (i) increase the availability of affordable housing and access to affordable housing; (ii) increase access to public transportation; and (iii) advance sustainable or location-efficient community development goals. (2) By states, insular areas, metropolitan cities, and urban counties.--If an eligible entity that receives amounts under this section is an eligible entity described in subsection (a)(1)(A), the eligible entity shall use those amounts to-- (A) implement and administer housing strategies and housing plans; (B) implement and administer any plans to increase housing choice, address disparities in housing needs, and provide greater access to opportunity; (C) fund any community investments that support goals identified in a housing strategy or housing plan; (D) implement and administer regulatory requirements and processes with respect to reformed zoning codes; (E) increase the capacity to conduct housing inspections; (F) increase the capacity to reduce barriers to housing supply elasticity and housing affordability; (G) implement and administer local or regional plans for community development; and (H) fund any planning to increase-- (i) the availability of affordable housing and access to affordable housing; (ii) access to public transportation; and (iii) any location-efficient community development goals. (3) Use for administrative costs.--A eligible entity that receives amounts under this section may not use more than 10 percent of those amounts for administrative costs. (d) Coordination.--To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration in carrying out this section. (e) Expiration of Authority.--After the expiration of the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may not newly establish a program as described in this section. (f) Sunset.--The program established under this section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act. SEC. 208. INNOVATION FUND. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Attainable housing.--The term "attainable housing" means housing that serves households earning not more than 120 percent of the area median income, if the majority of the housing units are affordable to households earning not more than 60 percent of the area median income. (2) Eligible entity.--The term "eligible entity" means-- (A) a metropolitan city or urban county, as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302), that has demonstrated an objective improvement in housing supply growth, as determined by the Secretary, whose methodology for determining such growth is published in the Federal Register to allow for public comment not less than 90 days before the date on which the notice of funding opportunity is made available; or (B) a unit of general local government or an Indian Tribe, as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302), that has demonstrated an objective improvement in housing supply growth, as determined by the Secretary, whose methodology for determining such improvement is published in the Federal Register to allow for public comment not less than 90 days before the date on which the notice of funding opportunity is made available. (3) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) Establishment of a Grant Program.-- (1) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a program to award grants on a competitive basis to eligible entities that have increased their local housing supply. (2) List of eligible entities.--The Secretary shall make a list of eligible entities publicly available on the website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (3) Eligible purposes.--An eligible entity receiving a grant under this section may use funds to-- (A) carry out any of the activities described in section 105 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (10,665 characters)
5305); (B) carry out any of the activities permitted under the Local and Regional Project Assistance Program established under section 6702 of title 49, United States Code; and (C) carry out initiatives of the eligible entity that facilitate the expansion of the supply of attainable housing and that supplement initiatives the eligible entity has carried out, or is in the process of carrying out, as specified in the application submitted under paragraph (4). (4) Application.-- (A) In general.--An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit to the Secretary an application that provides-- (i) a description of each purpose for which the eligible entity will use the grant, and an attestation that the grant will be used only for 1 or more eligible purposes described in paragraph (3); (ii) data on characteristics of increased housing supply during the 3-year period ending on the date on which the application is submitted, which may include whether such housing-- (I) serves households at a range of income levels; and (II) has improved the quality and affordability of housing in the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; (iii) a description of how each eligible purpose described in clause (i) may address a community need or advance an objective, or an aspect of an objective, included in the comprehensive housing affordability strategy and community development plan of the eligible entity under part 91 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation (commonly referred to as a "consolidated plan"); and (iv) a description of how the eligible entity has carried out, or is in the process of carrying out, initiatives that facilitate the expansion of the supply of housing. (B) Initiatives.--Initiatives that meet the criteria described in paragraph (3)(C) include, but shall not be limited to-- (i) increasing by-right uses, including duplex, triplex, quadplex, and multifamily buildings, in areas of opportunity; (ii) revising or eliminating off-street parking requirements to reduce the cost of housing production; (iii) revising minimum lot size requirements, floor area ratio requirements, set-back requirements, building heights, and bans or limits on construction that allow for denser and more affordable development; (iv) instituting incentives to promote dense development for communities where increased density is needed; (v) passing zoning overlays or other ordinances that enable the development of mixed-income housing; (vi) streamlining regulatory requirements and shortening processes, increasing code enforcement and permitting capacity, reforming zoning codes, or other initiatives that reduce barriers to increasing housing supply and affordability; (vii) eliminating restrictions against accessory dwelling units and expanding their by-right use; (viii) using local tax incentives or public financing to promote development of attainable housing; (ix) streamlining environmental regulations; (x) eliminating unnecessary manufactured-housing or cooperative housing regulations and restrictions; (xi) minimizing the impact of overburdensome energy and water efficiency standards on housing costs; and (xii) other activities that reduce the cost of construction, as determined by the Secretary. (5) Grants.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall make not fewer than 25 grants on an annual basis (unless amounts appropriated to provide grant amounts consistent with subsection (b) are insufficient, in which case fewer grants may be awarded), with strong consideration of different geographical areas and a relatively even spread of rural, suburban, and urban communities. (B) Limitations on awards.--No grant awarded under this paragraph may be-- (i) more than $10,000,000; or (ii) less than $250,000. (C) Priority.--When awarding grants under this paragraph, the Secretary shall give priority to an eligible entity that has-- (i) demonstrated the use of innovative policies, interventions, or programs for increasing housing supply; and (ii) demonstrated a marked improvement in housing supply growth, as needed. (D) Grant administration and terms.--Projects assisted under this section for activities described in sector 23 of the North American Industry Classification System shall be treated as projects assisted under the Community Development Block Grant program under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.). (c) Rules of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed-- (1) to authorize the Secretary to mandate, supersede, or preempt any local zoning or land use policy; or (2) to affect the requirements of section 105(c)(1) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12705(c)(1)). (d) Sunset.--The program established under this section shall terminate on the date that is 7 years after the date of enactment of this Act. (e) Authorization of Appropriations.-- (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031. (2) Adjustment.--The amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1) shall be adjusted for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Customers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor. SEC. 209. ACCELERATING HOME BUILDING ACT. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Affordable housing.--The term "affordable housing" means housing for which the total monthly housing cost payment is not more than 30 percent of the monthly household income for a household earning not more than 80 percent of the area median income. (2) Covered structure.--The term "covered structure" means-- (A) a low-rise or mid-rise structure with not more than 25 dwelling units; and (B) includes-- (i) an accessory dwelling unit; (ii) infill development; (iii) a duplex; (iv) a triplex; (v) a fourplex; (vi) a cottage court; (vii) a courtyard building; (viii) a townhouse; (ix) a multiplex; and (x) any other structure with not less than 2 dwelling units that the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Eligible entity.--The term "eligible entity" means-- (A) a unit of general local government, as defined in section 102(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)); (B) a municipal membership organization; and (C) an Indian Tribe, as defined in section 102(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)). (4) High opportunity area.--The term "high opportunity area" has the meaning given the term in section 1282.1 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. (5) Infill development.--The term "infill development" means residential development on small parcels in previously established areas for replacement with new or refurbished housing that utilizes existing utilities and infrastructure. (6) Mixed-income housing.--The term "mixed-income housing" means a housing development that is comprised of housing units that promote differing levels of affordability in the community. (7) Prereviewed designs.--The term "prereviewed designs", also known as pattern books, means sets of construction plans that are assessed and approved by localities for compliance with local building and permitting standards to streamline and expedite approval pathways for housing construction. (8) Rural area.--The term "rural area" means any area other than a city or town that has a population of less than 50,000 inhabitants. (9) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) Authority.--The Secretary is authorized to award grants to eligible entities utilizing funds appropriated for such purpose to select prereviewed designs of covered structures of mixed-income housing for use in the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, except that such grant awards may not be used for construction, alteration, or repair work. (c) Considerations.--In reviewing applications submitted by eligible entities for a grant under this section, the Secretary shall consider-- (1) the need for affordable housing in the service area of the eligible entity; (2) the presence of high opportunity areas in the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; (3) coordination between the eligible entity and a State agency; and (4) coordination between the eligible entity and State, local, and regional transportation planning authorities. (d) Set-Aside for Rural Areas.--Of the amount made available in each fiscal year for grants under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 10 percent shall be used for grants to eligible entities that are located in rural areas. (e) Reports.--The Secretary shall require eligible entities receiving grants under this section to report on-- (1) the impacts of the activities carried out using the grant amounts in improving the production and supply of affordable housing; (2) the prereviewed designs selected using the grant amounts in their communities; (3) the number of permits issued for housing development utilizing prereviewed designs; and (4) the number of housing units produced in developments utilizing the prereviewed designs. (f) Availability of Information.--The Secretary shall-- (1) to the extent possible, encourage localities to make publicly available through a website information on the prereviewed designs selected and submitted to the Secretary by eligible entities receiving grants under this section, including information on the benefits of use of those designs; and (2) collect, identify, and disseminate best practices regarding such designs and make such information publicly available on the website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (g) Design Adoption and Repayment.--The Secretary may require an eligible entity to return to the Secretary any grant funds received under this section if the selected prereviewed designs submitted under this section have not been adopted during the 5-year period following receipt of the grant, unless that period is extended by the Secretary. (h) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary may set aside not more than 5 percent of amounts appropriated in a fiscal year to provide technical assistance to grant recipients under this section and pregrant technical assistance to prospective applicants. SEC. 210. REVITALIZING EMPTY STRUCTURES INTO DESIRABLE ENVIRONMENTS (RESIDE) ACT. (a) In General.--Subtitle A of title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 227.
Text printed in the Record (10,650 characters)
REVITALIZING EMPTY STRUCTURES INTO DESIRABLE ENVIRONMENTS. "(a) Definitions.--In this section: "(1) Attainable housing.--The term `attainable housing' means housing that serves households earning not more than 120 percent of the area median income, if the majority of the housing units are affordable to households earning not more than 60 percent of the area median income. "(2) Converted housing unit.--The term `converted housing unit' means a housing unit that is created using a covered grant. "(3) Covered grant.--The term `covered grant' means a grant awarded under the Pilot Program. "(4) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means a participating jurisdiction. "(5) Pilot program.--The term `Pilot Program' means the Pilot Program established under subsection (b). "(6) Vacant and abandoned building.--The term `vacant and abandoned building' means a property-- "(A) that was constructed for use as a warehouse, factory, mall, strip mall, or hotel, or for another industrial or commercial use; and "(B)(i) with respect to which-- "(I) a code enforcement inspection has determined that the property is not safe; and "(II) not less than 90 days have elapsed since the owner was notified of the deficiencies in the property and the owner has taken no corrective action; or "(ii) that is subject to a court-ordered receivership or nuisance abatement related to abandonment pursuant to State or local law or otherwise meets the definition of an abandoned property under State law. "(b) Purpose of Grant Program.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this subsection, the Secretary is authorized to establish a Pilot Program, spanning from fiscal years 2027 through 2031, which shall have the purpose of awarding grants on a competitive basis to eligible entities to convert vacant and abandoned buildings into attainable housing. "(c) Amount of Grant.-- "(1) In general.--For any fiscal year for which not less than $100,000,000 is made available to carry out the Pilot Program, the amount of a covered grant shall be not less than $1,000,000 and not more than $10,000,000. "(2) Fiscal years with lower funding.--For any fiscal year for which less than $100,000,000 is made available to carry out the Pilot Program pursuant to subsection (b), the Secretary shall seek to maximize the number of covered grants awarded. "(d) Relation to Formula Allocation.--A covered grant awarded to an eligible entity shall be in addition to, and shall not affect, the formula allocation for the eligible entity under section 217. "(e) Priority.--In awarding covered grants, the Secretary shall give priority to an eligible entity that-- "(1) will use the covered grant in a community that is experiencing economic distress; "(2) will use the covered grant in a qualified opportunity zone (as defined in section 1400Z-1(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); "(3) will use the covered grant to construct housing that will serve a need identified in the comprehensive housing affordability strategy and community development plan of the eligible entity under part 91 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation (commonly referred to as a `consolidated plan'); or "(4) has enacted ordinances to reduce regulatory barriers to conversion of vacant and abandoned buildings to housing, which shall not include any alteration of an ordinance that governs safety and habitability. "(f) Use of Funds.--An eligible entity may use a covered grant for-- "(1) property acquisition; "(2) demolition; "(3) health hazard remediation; "(4) site preparation; "(5) construction, renovation, or rehabilitation; or "(6) the establishment, maintenance, or expansion of community land trusts or housing cooperatives. "(g) Waiver Authority.--In administering covered grants, the Secretary may waive, or specify alternative requirements for, any statute or regulation that the Secretary administers in connection with the obligation by the Secretary or the use by eligible entities of covered grant funds (except for requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor standards, or the environment) if the Secretary makes a public finding that good cause exists for the waiver or alternative requirement. "(h) Study; Report.--Not later than 180 days after the termination of the Pilot Program, the Secretary shall study and submit to Congress a report on the impact of the Pilot Program on-- "(1) improving the tax base of local communities; "(2) increasing access to affordable housing, especially for elderly individuals, disabled individuals, and veterans; "(3) increasing home-ownership; and "(4) removing blight.". (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (Public Law 101-625; 104 Stat. 4079) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 226 the following: "Sec. 227. Revitalizing empty structures into desirable environments.". SEC. 211. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ACT. (a) In General.--Title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.) is amended-- (1) in section 206A (12 U.S.C. 1712a)-- (A) in subsection (a), in the matter following paragraph (7), by striking "(commencing in 2004" and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: ", commencing on July 1, 2025. The adjustment of the dollar amounts shall be calculated by the Secretary using the percentage change in the Price Deflator Index of Multifamily Residential Units Under Construction released by the Bureau of the Census from March of the previous year to March of the year in which the adjustment is made, or by the Secretary using an alternative indicator after publishing information about such alternative indicator in the Federal Register for public comment if the Price Deflator Index of Multifamily Residential Units Under Construction is not available or published."; and (B) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: "(b) Publication.-- "(1) In general.--The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register any adjustments made to the Dollar Amounts. "(2) Rounding.--The dollar amount of any adjustment described in paragraph (1) shall be rounded to the next lower dollar."; (2) in section 207(c)(3)(A) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3)(A))-- (A) by striking "$38,025" and inserting "$167,310"; (B) by striking "$42,120" and inserting "$185,328"; (C) by striking "$50,310" and inserting "$221,364"; (D) by striking "$62,010" and inserting "$272,844"; (E) by striking "$70,200" and inserting "$308,880"; (F) by striking ", or not to exceed $17,460 per space"; (G) by striking "$43,875" and inserting "$193,050"; (H) by striking "$49,140" and inserting "$216,216"; (I) by striking "$60,255" and inserting "$265,122"; (J) by striking "$75,465" and inserting "$332,046"; and (K) by striking "$85,328" and inserting "$375,443"; (3) in section 213(b)(2) (12 U.S.C. 1715e(b)(2))-- (A) by striking "$41,207" and inserting "$181,311"; (B) by striking "$47,511" and inserting "$209,048"; (C) by striking "$57,300" and inserting "$252,120"; (D) by striking "$73,343" and inserting "$322,709"; (E) by striking "$81,708" and inserting "$359,515"; (F) by striking "$43,875" and inserting "$193,050"; (G) by striking "$49,710" and inserting "$218,724"; (H) by striking "$60,446" and inserting "$265,962"; (I) by striking "$78,197" and inserting "$344,067"; and (J) by striking "$85,836" and inserting "$377,678"; (4) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(I) (12 U.S.C. 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(I))-- (A) by striking "$38,025" and inserting "$167,310"; (B) by striking "$42,120" and inserting "$185,328"; (C) by striking "$50,310" and inserting "$221,364"; (D) by striking "$62,010" and inserting "$272,844"; (E) by striking "$70,200" and inserting "$308,880"; (F) by striking "$43,875" and inserting "$193,050"; (G) by striking "$49,140" and inserting "$216,216"; (H) by striking "$60,255" and inserting "$265,122"; (I) by striking "$75,465" and inserting "$332,046"; and (J) by striking "$85,328" and inserting "$375,443"; (5) in section 221(d)(4)(ii)(I) (12 U.S.C. 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(I))-- (A) by striking "$37,843" and inserting "$166,509"; (B) by striking "$42,954" and inserting "$188,997"; (C) by striking "$51,920" and inserting "$228,448"; (D) by striking "$65,169" and inserting "$286,744"; (E) by striking "$73,846" and inserting "$324,922"; (F) by striking "$40,876" and inserting "$179,854"; (G) by striking "$46,859" and inserting "$206,180"; (H) by striking "$56,979" and inserting "$250,708"; (I) by striking "$73,710" and inserting "$324,324"; and (J) by striking "$80,913" and inserting "$356,017"; (6) in section 231(c)(2)(A) (12 U.S.C. 1715v(c)(2)(A))-- (A) by striking "$35,978" and inserting "$166,509"; (B) by striking "$40,220" and inserting "$188,997"; (C) by striking "$48,029" and inserting "$228,448"; (D) by striking "$57,798" and inserting "$286,744"; (E) by striking "$67,950" and inserting "$324,922"; (F) by striking "$40,876" and inserting "$179,854"; (G) by striking "$46,859" and inserting "$206,180"; (H) by striking "$56,979" and inserting "$250,708"; (I) by striking "$73,710" and inserting "$324,324"; and (J) by striking "$80,913" and inserting "$356,017"; and (7) in section 234(e)(3)(A) (12 U.S.C. 1715y(e)(3)(A))-- (A) by striking "$42,048" and inserting "$185,011"; (B) by striking "$48,481" and inserting "$213,316"; (C) by striking "$58,469" and inserting "$257,263"; (D) by striking "$74,840" and inserting "$329,296"; (E) by striking "$83,375" and inserting "$366,850"; (F) by striking "$44,250" and inserting "$194,700"; (G) by striking "$50,724" and inserting "$223,186"; (H) by striking "$61,680" and inserting "$271,392"; (I) by striking "$79,793" and inserting "$351,089"; and (J) by striking "$87,588" and inserting "$385,387". (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to revise the statutory exceptions for high-cost percentage and high-cost areas annual indexing. SEC. 301. HOUSING SUPPLY EXPANSION ACT. (a) In General.--Section 603(6) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5402(6)) is amended by striking "on a permanent chassis" and inserting "with or without a permanent chassis". (b) Standards for Manufactured Homes Built Without a Permanent Chassis.--Section 604(a) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,836 characters)
5403(a)) is amended by adding the following: "(7) Standards for manufactured homes built without a permanent chassis.-- "(A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the consensus committee, shall issue revised standards for manufactured homes built without a permanent chassis using the process described in paragraph (4). "(B) Creating final standards.--The Secretary shall, after consulting and conferring with the consensus committee, establish standards to ensure that manufactured homes without a permanent chassis have-- "(i) a distinct label, with revenue generated to be deposited into the Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund established under section 620(e)(1), to be issued by the Secretary distinguishing manufactured home built without a permanent chassis from manufactured homes built on a permanent chassis; "(ii) a data plate, as described in section 3280.5 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), distinguishing manufactured homes built without a permanent chassis from manufactured homes built on a permanent chassis; and "(iii) a notation on any invoice produced by the manufacturer of a manufactured home that is distinguishable from the invoice for a manufactured home constructed with a permanent chassis.". (c) Manufactured Home Certifications.--Section 604 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5403) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(i) Manufactured Home Certifications.-- "(1) In general.-- "(A) Initial certification.--Subject to subparagraph (B), not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, a State shall submit to the Secretary an initial certification that the laws and regulations of the State-- "(i) treat any manufactured home in parity with a manufactured home (as defined and regulated by the State); and "(ii) subject a manufactured home without a permanent chassis to the same laws and regulations of the State as a manufactured home built on a permanent chassis, including with respect to financing, title, insurance, manufacture, sale, taxes, transportation, installation, and other areas as the Secretary determines, after consultation with and approval by the consensus committee, are necessary to give effect to the purpose of this section. "(B) State plan submission.--Any State plan submitted under section 623(b) shall contain the required State certification under subparagraph (A) and, if contained therein, no additional or State certification under subparagraph (A) or paragraph (3). "(C) Extended deadline.--With respect to a State with a legislature that meets biennially, the deadline for the submission of the initial certification required under subparagraph (A) shall be 2 years after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. "(D) Late certification.-- "(i) No waiver.--The Secretary may not waive the prohibition described in paragraph (5)(B) with respect to a certification submitted after the deadline under subparagraph (A) or paragraph (3) unless the Secretary approves the late certification. "(ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent a State from submitting the initial certification required under subparagraph (A) after the required deadline under that subparagraph. "(2) Form of state certification not presented in a state plan.--The initial certification required under paragraph (1)(A), if not submitted with a State plan under paragraph (1)(B), shall contain, in a form prescribed by the Secretary, an attestation by an official that the State has taken the steps necessary to ensure the veracity of the certification required under paragraph (1)(A), including, as necessary, by-- "(A) amending the definition of `manufactured home' in the laws and regulations of the State; and "(B) directing State agencies to amend the definition of `manufactured home' in regulations. "(3) Annual recertification.--Not later than a date to be determined by the Secretary each year, a State shall submit to the Secretary an additional certification that-- "(A) confirms the accuracy of the initial certification submitted under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1); and "(B) certifies that any new laws or regulations enacted or adopted by the State since the date of the previous certification do not change the veracity of the initial certification submitted under paragraph (1)(A). "(4) List.--The Secretary shall publish and maintain in the Federal Register and on the website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development a list of States that are up to date with the submission of initial and subsequent certifications required under this subsection. "(5) Prohibition.-- "(A) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term `covered manufactured home' means a home that is-- "(i) not considered a manufactured home under the laws and regulations of a State because the home is constructed without a permanent chassis; "(ii) considered a manufactured home under the definition of the term in section 603; and "(iii) constructed after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. "(B) Building, installation, and sale.--If a State does not submit a certification under paragraph (1)(A) or (3) by the date on which those certifications are required to be submitted-- "(i) with respect to a State in which the State administers the installation of manufactured homes, the State shall prohibit the manufacture, installation, or sale of a covered manufactured home within the State; and "(ii) with respect to a State in which the Secretary administers the installation of manufactured homes, the State and the Secretary shall prohibit the manufacture, installation, or sale of a covered manufactured home within the State.". (d) Other Federal Laws Regulating Manufactured Homes.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may coordinate with the heads of other Federal agencies to ensure that Federal agencies treat a manufactured home (as defined in Federal laws and regulations other than section 603 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5402)) in the same manner as a manufactured home (as defined in section 603 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5402), as amended by this Act). (e) Assistance to States.--Section 609 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5408) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking "and" at the end; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(3) model guidance to support the submission of the certification required under section 604(i).". (f) Preemption.--Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section may be construed as limiting the scope of Federal preemption under section 604(d) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5403(d)). (g) Primary Authority to Establish Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards.--The National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.) is further amended-- (1) in section 603(7), by inserting "energy efficiency," after "design,"; and (2) in section 604, by adding at the end the following: "(j) Primary Authority to Establish Standards.-- "(1) In general.--The Secretary shall have the primary authority to establish Federal manufactured home construction and safety standards. "(2) Approval from secretary.-- "(A) In general.--The head of any Federal agency that seeks to establish a manufactured home construction and safety standard on or after the date of the enactment of this subsection-- "(i) shall submit to the Secretary a proposal describing such standard; and "(ii) may not establish such standard without approval from the Secretary. "(B) Rejection of standards.--The Secretary shall reject a standard submitted to the Secretary for approval under subparagraph (A)-- "(i) if the standard would significantly increase the cost of producing manufactured homes, as determined by the Secretary; "(ii) if the standard would conflict with existing manufactured home construction and safety standards established by the Secretary; or "(iii) for any other reason as determined appropriate by the Secretary. "(C) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require the Secretary to establish new or revised Federal manufactured home construction and safety standards.". SEC. 302. MODULAR HOUSING PRODUCTION ACT. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Manufactured home.--The term "manufactured home" has the meaning given the term in section 603 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5402). (2) Modular home.--The term "modular home" means a home that is constructed in a factory in 1 or more modules, each of which meets applicable State and local building codes of the area in which the home will be located, and that are transported to the home building site, installed on foundations, and completed. (3) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (b) FHA Construction Financing Programs.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of Federal Housing Administration construction financing programs to identify barriers to the use of modular home methods. (2) Requirements.--In conducting the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall-- (A) identify and evaluate regulatory and programmatic features that restrict participation in construction financing programs by modular home developers, including construction draw schedules; and (B) identify administrative measures authorized under section 525 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1735f-3) to facilitate program utilization by modular home developers. (3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a report that describes the results of the review conducted under paragraph (1), which shall include a description of programmatic and policy changes that the Secretary recommends to reduce or eliminate identified barriers to the use of modular home methods in Federal Housing Administration construction financing programs. (4) Rulemaking.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Secretary publishes the report under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking to examine an alternative draw schedule for construction financing loans provided to modular and manufactured home developers, which shall include the ability for interested stakeholders to provide robust public comment. (B) Determination.--Following the period for public comment under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall-- (i) issue a final rule regarding an alternative draw schedule described in subparagraph (A); or (ii) provide an explanation as to why the rule shall not become final. (c) Standardized Uniform Commercial Code for Modular Homes.--The Secretary may award a grant to study the design and feasibility of a standardized uniform commercial code for modular homes, which shall evaluate-- (1) the utility of a standardized coding system for serializing and securing modules, streamlining design and construction, and improving modular home innovation; and (2) a means to coordinate a standardized code with financing incentives. SEC. 303. PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING LOAN MODERNIZATION ACT. (a) National Housing Act Amendments.-- (1) In general.--Section 2 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,449 characters)
1703) is amended-- (A) in subsection (a), by inserting "construction of additional or accessory dwelling units, as defined by the Secretary," after "energy conserving improvements,"; and (B) in subsection (b)-- (i) in paragraph (1)-- (I) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following: "(A) $75,000 if made for the purpose of financing alterations, repairs, and improvements upon or in connection with an existing single-family structure, including a manufactured home;"; (II) in subparagraph (B)-- (aa) by striking "$60,000" and inserting "$150,000"; (bb) by striking "$12,000" and inserting "$37,500"; and (cc) by striking "an apartment house or"; (III) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D) and inserting the following: "(C)(i) $106,405 if made for the purpose of financing the purchase of a single-section manufactured home; and "(ii) $195,322 if made for the purpose of financing the purchase of a multi-section manufactured home; "(D)(i) $149,782 if made for the purpose of financing the purchase of a single-section manufactured home and a suitably developed lot on which to place the home; and "(ii) $238,699 if made for the purpose of financing the purchase of a multi-section manufactured home and a suitably developed lot on which to place the home;"; (IV) in subparagraph (E)-- (aa) by striking "$23,226" and inserting "$43,377"; and (bb) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; (V) in subparagraph (F), by striking "and" at the end; (VI) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (VII) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following: "(H) such principal amount as the Secretary may prescribe if made for the purpose of financing the construction of an accessory dwelling unit."; (ii) in the matter immediately preceding paragraph (2)-- (I) by striking "regulation" and inserting "notice"; (II) by striking "increase" and inserting "set"; (III) by striking "(A)(ii), (C), (D), and (E)" and inserting "(A) through (H)"; (IV) by inserting ", or as necessary to achieve the goals of the Federal Housing Administration, periodically reset the dollar amount limitations in subparagraphs (A) through (H) based on justification and methodology set forth in advance by regulation" before the period at the end; and (V) by adjusting the margins appropriately; (iii) in paragraph (3), by striking "exceeds--" and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting "exceeds such period of time as determined by the Secretary, not to exceed 30 years."; (iv) by striking paragraph (9) and inserting the following: "(9) Annual indexing of certain dollar amount limitations.--The Secretary shall develop or choose 1 or more methods of indexing in order to annually set the loan limits established in paragraph (1), based on data the Secretary determines is appropriate for purposes of this section."; and (v) in paragraph (11), by striking "lease--" and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting "lease meets the terms and conditions established by the Secretary". (2) Deadline for development or choice of new index; interim index.-- (A) Deadline for development or choice of new index.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall develop or choose 1 or more methods of indexing as required under section 2(b)(9) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1703(b)(9)), as amended by paragraph (1) of this subsection. (B) Interim index.--During the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development develops or chooses 1 or more methods of indexing as required under section 2(b)(9) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1703(b)(9)), as amended by paragraph (1) of this subsection, the method of indexing established by the Secretary under such section 2(b)(9) before the date of enactment of this Act shall apply. (b) HUD Study of Offsite Construction.-- (1) Definitions.--In this subsection: (A) Offsite construction housing.--The term "offsite construction housing" includes manufactured homes and modular homes. (B) Manufactured home.--The term "manufactured home" means any home constructed in accordance with the construction and safety standards established under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.). (C) Modular home.--The term "modular home" means a home that is constructed in a factory in 1 or more modules, each of which meets applicable State and local building codes of the area in which the home will be located, and that are transported to the home building site, installed on foundations, and completed. (2) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on the cost effectiveness of offsite construction housing, that includes-- (A) an analysis of the advantages and the impact of centralization in a factory and transportation to a construction site on cost, precision, and materials waste; (B) the extent to which offsite construction housing meets housing quality standards under the National Standards for the Physical Inspection of Real Estate, or other standards as the Secretary may prescribe, compared to the extent for site-built homes, for such standards; (C) the expected replacement and maintenance costs over the first 40 years of life of offsite construction homes compared to those costs for site-built homes; and (D) opportunities for use beyond single-family housing, such as applications in accessory dwelling units, two- to four-unit housing, and large multifamily housing. SEC. 401. CREATING INCENTIVES FOR SMALL-DOLLAR LOAN ORIGINATORS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Director.--The term "Director" means the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. (2) Small-dollar mortgage.--The term "small-dollar mortgage" means a mortgage loan having an original principal obligation of not more than $100,000 that is-- (A) secured by real property designed for 1 to 4 dwelling units; and (B)(i) insured by the Federal Housing Administration under title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.); (ii) made, guaranteed, or insured by the Department of Veterans Affairs; (iii) made, guaranteed, or insured by the Department of Agriculture; or (iv) eligible to be purchased or securitized by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Federal National Mortgage Association. (b) Requirement Regarding Loan Originator Compensation Practices.--Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on loan originator compensation practices throughout the residential mortgage market, including the relative frequency of loan originators being compensated-- (1) with a salary; (2) with a commission reflecting a fixed percentage of the amount of credit extended; (3) with a commission based on a factor other than a fixed percentage of the amount of credit extended; (4) with a combination of salary and commission; (5) on a loan volume basis; and (6) with a commission reflecting a percentage of the amount of credit extended, for which a minimum or maximum compensation amount is set. (c) Community Development Financial Institution Loan Originators.--In performing the study required under subsection (b), the Secretary shall, in coordination with relevant Federal agencies that regulate federally backed small-dollar mortgages and in consultation with the Director of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund established under section 104 of the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4703), give due consideration to the practices for compensating loan originators that are employed by or originate loans on behalf of community development financial institutions. (d) Contents.--The report required under subsection (b) shall include-- (1) data and other analyses regarding the effect of the approaches to loan originator compensation described in subsection (b) on the availability of small-dollar mortgage loans; and (2) an analysis and a discussion regarding potential barriers to small-dollar mortgage lending. SEC. 402. SMALL-DOLLAR MORTGAGE POINTS AND FEES. (a) Small-dollar Mortgage Defined.--In this section, the term "small-dollar mortgage" means a mortgage with an original principal obligation of less than $100,000. (b) Amendments.--Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, shall evaluate the impact of the thresholds under section 1026.43 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), on small-dollar mortgage originations. SEC. 403. APPRAISAL INDUSTRY IMPROVEMENT ACT. (a) Appraisal Standards.-- (1) Certification or licensing.-- (A) In general.--Section 202(g)(5) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(g)(5)) is amended-- (i) by moving the paragraph two ems to the left; and (ii) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following: "(A) be certified or licensed by the State in which the property to be appraised is located, except that an appraiser who has as their primary duty conducting appraisal-related activities and who chooses to become a State-licensed or certified real estate appraiser need only to be licensed or certified in 1 State or territory to perform appraisals on mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration in all States and territories; "(B) meet the requirements under the competency rule set forth in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice before accepting an assignment; and "(C) have demonstrated verifiable education in the appraisal requirements established by the Federal Housing Administration under this subsection, which shall include the completion of a course or seminar that educates appraisers on those appraisal requirements, which shall be provided by-- "(i) the Federal Housing Administration; or "(ii) a third party, if the course is approved by the Secretary or a State appraiser certifying or licensing agency.". (B) Application.--Subparagraph (C) of section 202(g)(5) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(g)(5)), as added by subparagraph (A), shall not apply with respect to any certified appraiser approved by the Federal Housing Administration to conduct appraisals on property securing a mortgage to be insured by the Federal Housing Administration on or before the effective date described in paragraph (3)(C). (2) Compliance with verifiable education and competency requirements.--On and after the effective date described in paragraph (3)(C), no appraiser may conduct an appraisal on a property securing a mortgage to be insured by the Federal Housing Administration unless-- (A) the appraiser is in compliance with the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 202(g)(5) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (6,193 characters)
1708(g)(5)), as amended by paragraph (1); and (B) if the appraiser was not approved by the Federal Housing Administration to conduct appraisals on mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration before the date on which the mortgagee letter or guidance takes effect under paragraph (3)(C), the appraiser is in compliance with subparagraph (C) of such section 202(g)(5). (3) Implementation.--Not later than the 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall issue a mortgagee letter or guidance that-- (A) implements the amendments made by paragraph (1); (B) clearly sets forth all of the specific requirements under section 202(g)(5) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(g)(5)), as amended by paragraph (1), for approval to conduct appraisals on property secured by a mortgage to be insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which shall include-- (i) providing that, before the effective date of the mortgagee letter or guidance, compliance with the requirements under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of such section 202(g)(5), as amended by paragraph (1), shall be considered to fulfill the requirements under such subparagraphs; and (ii) providing a method for appraisers to demonstrate such prior compliance; and (C) takes effect not later than the date that is 180 days after the date on which the Secretary issues the mortgagee letter or guidance. (b) Annual Registry Fees for Appraisal Management Companies.--Section 1109(a) of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3338(a)) is amended, in the matter following clause (ii) of paragraph (4)(B), by adding at the end the following: "Subject to the approval of the Council, the Appraisal Subcommittee may adjust fees established under clause (i) or (ii) to carry out its functions under this Act.". (c) State Credentialed Trainees.-- (1) Maintenance on national registry.--Section 1103(a) of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3332(a)) is amended-- (A) in paragraph (3)-- (i) by inserting "and State credentialed trainee appraisers" after "licensed appraisers"; and (ii) by striking "and" at the end; (B) by striking paragraph (4); (C) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and (D) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated-- (i) by striking "year. The report shall also detail" and inserting "year, detailing"; (ii) by striking "provide" and inserting "provides"; and (iii) by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and". (2) Annual registry fees.-- (A) In general.--Section 1109 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3338) is amended-- (i) in the section heading, by striking "certified or licensed" and inserting ", certified, licensed, and credentialed trainee"; and (ii) in subsection (a)-- (I) in paragraph (1), by inserting ", and in the case of a State with a supervisory or trainee program, a roster listing individuals who have received a State trainee credential" after "this title"; and (II) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following: "(2) transmit reports on the issuance and renewal of licenses, certifications, credentials, sanctions, and disciplinary actions, including license, credential, and certification revocations, on a timely basis to the national registry of the Appraisal Subcommittee;". (B) Rule of construction.--Nothing in the amendments made by subparagraph (A) shall require a State to establish or operate a program for State credentialed trainee appraisers, as defined in paragraph (12) of section 1121 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as added by paragraph (4) of this subsection. (3) Transactions requiring the services of a state certified appraiser.--Section 1113 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3342) is amended-- (A) by striking "In determining" and inserting "(a) In General.--In determining"; and (B) by adding at the end the following: "(b) Use of State Credentialed Trainee Appraisers.--In performing an appraisal under this section, a State certified appraiser may use the assistance of a State credentialed trainee appraiser or an unlicensed trainee appraiser, except that the State certified appraiser assisted by a trainee shall be liable for appraisal and valuation work.". (4) Definition.--Section 1121 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3350) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(12) State credentialed trainee appraiser.--The term `State credentialed trainee appraiser' means an individual who-- "(A) meets the minimum criteria established by the Appraiser Qualification Board for a trainee appraiser credential; and "(B) is credentialed by a State appraiser certifying and licensing agency.". (d) Grants for Workforce and Training.--Section 1109(b) of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3338(b)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking "and" at the end; (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(7) to make grants to State appraiser certifying and licensing agencies to support the carrying out of education and training activities or other activities related to addressing appraiser industry workforce needs, including recruiting and retaining workforce talent, such as through scholarship assistance and career pipeline development, and such agencies shall report on the use of funds and outcomes.". (e) Appraisal Subcommittee.--Section 1011 of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3310) is amended, in the first sentence, by inserting "the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Housing and Urban Development," after "Financial Protection,". SEC. 404. HELPING MORE FAMILIES SAVE ACT. Section 23 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,839 characters)
1437u) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(p) Escrow Expansion Pilot Program.-- "(1) Definitions.--In this subsection: "(A) Covered family.--The term `covered family' means a family that receives assistance under section 8 or 9 of this Act and is enrolled in the Pilot Program. "(B) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means an entity described in subsection (c)(2). "(C) Pilot program.--The term `Pilot Program' means the Pilot Program established under paragraph (2). "(D) Welfare assistance.--The term `welfare assistance' has the meaning given the term in section 984.103 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. "(2) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish a Pilot Program under which the Secretary shall select not more than 25 eligible entities to establish and manage escrow accounts for not more than 5,000 covered families, in accordance with this subsection. "(3) Escrow accounts.-- "(A) In general.--An eligible entity selected to participate in the Pilot Program-- "(i) shall establish an interest-bearing escrow account and place into the account an amount equal to any increase in the amount of rent paid by each covered family in accordance with the provisions of section 3, 8(o), or 8(y), as applicable, that is attributable to increases in earned income by the covered families during the participation of each covered family in the Pilot Program; and "(ii) notwithstanding any other provision of law, may use funds it controls under section 8 or 9 for purposes of making the escrow deposit for covered families assisted under, or residing in units assisted under, section 8 or 9, respectively, provided such funds are offset by the increase in the amount of rent paid by the covered family. "(B) Income limitation.--An eligible entity may not escrow any amounts for any covered family whose adjusted income exceeds 80 percent of the area median income at the time of enrollment. "(C) Withdrawals.--A covered family may withdraw funds, including interest earned, from an escrow account established by an eligible entity under the Pilot Program-- "(i) after the covered family ceases to receive welfare assistance; and "(ii)(I) not earlier than the date that is 5 years after the date on which the eligible entity establishes the escrow account under this subsection; "(II) not later than the date that is 7 years after the date on which the eligible entity establishes the escrow account under this subsection, if the covered family chooses to continue to participate in the Pilot Program after the date that is 5 years after the date on which the eligible entity establishes the escrow account; "(III) on the date the covered family ceases to receive housing assistance under section 8 or 9, if such date is earlier than 5 years after the date on which the eligible entity establishes the escrow account; "(IV) earlier than 5 years after the date on which the eligible entity establishes the escrow account, if the covered family is using the funds to advance a self-sufficiency goal as approved by the eligible entity; "(V) for any reason listed under section 984.303(k) of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations; or "(VI) under other circumstances in which the Secretary determines an exemption for good cause is warranted. "(D) Interim recertification.--For purposes of the Pilot Program, a covered family may recertify the income of the covered family multiple times per year at the request of the participating family, as determined by the Secretary, and not less frequently than once per year, unless the eligible entity has established an alternative rent structure with approval from the Secretary. "(E) Contract or plan.--A covered family is not required to complete a standard contract of participation or an individual training and services plan in order to participate in the Pilot Program. "(4) Effect of increases in family income.--Any increase in the earned income of a covered family during the enrollment of the family in the Pilot Program may not be considered as income or a resource for purposes of eligibility of the family for other benefits, or amount of benefits payable to the family, under any program administered by the Secretary. "(5) Application.-- "(A) In general.--An eligible entity seeking to participate in the Pilot Program shall submit to the Secretary an application-- "(i) at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require by notice; and "(ii) that includes the number of proposed covered families to be served by the eligible entity under this subsection. "(B) Geographic and entity variety.--The Secretary shall ensure that eligible entities selected to participate in the Pilot Program-- "(i) are located across various States and in both urban and rural areas; and "(ii) vary by size and type, including both public housing agencies and private owners of projects receiving project-based rental assistance under section 8. "(6) Notification and opt-out.--An eligible entity participating in the Pilot Program shall-- "(A) notify covered families of their enrollment in the Pilot Program; "(B) provide covered families with a detailed description of the Pilot Program, including how the Pilot Program will impact their rent and finances; "(C) inform covered families that the families cannot simultaneously participate in the Pilot Program and the Family Self-Sufficiency program under this section; and "(D) provide covered families with the ability to elect not to participate in the Pilot Program-- "(i) not less than 2 weeks before the date on which the escrow account is established under paragraph (3); and "(ii) at any point during the duration of the Pilot Program. "(7) Maximum rents.--During the term of participation by a covered family in the Pilot Program, the amount of rent paid by the covered family shall be calculated under the rental provisions of section 3 or 8(o), as applicable. "(8) Pilot program timeline.-- "(A) Awards.--Not later than 1 year after establishing the Pilot Program, the Secretary shall select the eligible entities to participate in the Pilot Program. "(B) Establishment and term of accounts.--An eligible entity selected to participate in the Pilot Program shall-- "(i) not later than 6 months after selection, establish escrow accounts under paragraph (3) for covered families; and "(ii) maintain those escrow accounts for not less than 5 years, or until a determination is made for termination with FSS escrow disbursement under section 984.303(k) of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, or until the date the family ceases to receive assistance under section 8 or 9, and, at the discretion of the covered family, not more than 7 years after the date on which the escrow account is established. "(9) Nonparticipation and housing assistance.-- "(A) In general.--Assistance under section 8 or 9 for a family that elects not to participate in the Pilot Program shall not be delayed or denied by reason of such election. "(B) No termination.--Housing assistance may not be terminated as a consequence of participating, or not participating, in the Pilot Program under this subsection for any period. "(10) Study.--Not later than 10 years after the date the Secretary selects eligible entities to participate in the Pilot Program under this subsection, the Secretary shall, if awards were made, conduct a study and submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on outcomes for covered families under the Pilot Program, which shall evaluate the effectiveness of the Pilot Program in assisting families to achieve economic independence and self-sufficiency, and the impact coaching and supportive services, or the lack thereof, had on individual incomes. "(11) Waivers.--To allow selected eligible entities to effectively administer the Pilot Program and make the required escrow account deposits under this subsection, the Secretary may waive requirements under this section. "(12) Termination.--The Pilot Program under this subsection shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this subsection. "(13) Eligible uses of appropriations.--Subject to the appropriation of funds, the Secretary may use funds-- "(A) for technical assistance related to implementation of the Pilot Program; and "(B) to carry out an evaluation of the Pilot Program under paragraph (10).". SEC. 405. CHOICE IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT. (a) Satisfaction of Inspection Requirements Through Participation in Other Housing Programs.--Section 8(o)(8) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(I) Satisfaction of inspection requirements through participation in other housing programs.-- "(i) Low-income housing tax credit-financed buildings.--A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if-- "(I) the dwelling unit is in a building, the acquisition, rehabilitation, or construction of which was done by a building owner who may be eligible for low-income housing credits because the building had been allocated a housing credit dollar amount under section 42(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or is described in section 42(h)(4) of such Code (concerning buildings that meet a criterion for a certain amount of tax-exempt financing); "(II) the dwelling unit, during the preceding 12-month period, was physically inspected and satisfied the suitability-for-occupancy requirement in section 42(i)(3)(B)(ii) of such Code; and "(III) the applicable public housing agency performed the inspection itself or is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). "(ii) Home investment partnerships program.--A dwelling shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if-- "(I) the dwelling unit is assisted under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program under title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.); "(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection as part of the program described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and "(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). "(iii) Rural housing service.--A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if-- "(I) the dwelling unit is assisted by the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture; "(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection in connection with the assistance described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and "(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). "(iv) Remote or video inspections.--When complying with inspection requirements for a housing unit located in a rural or small area using assistance under this section, the Secretary may allow a grantee to conduct a remote or video inspection of a unit if the remote or video inspection-- "(I) is thorough; "(II) does not misrepresent the condition of the unit; and "(III) provides the information necessary to fully and accurately evaluate the conditions of the unit to ensure that the unit meets the relevant standards. "(v) Rule of construction.--Nothing in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) shall be construed to affect the operation of a housing program described in, or authorized under a provision of law described in, that clause.". (b) Pre-approval of Units.--Section 8(o)(8)(A) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (6,282 characters)
1437f(o)(8)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(iv) Initial inspection prior to lease agreement.-- "(I) Definition.--In this clause, the term `new landlord' means an owner of a dwelling unit who has not previously entered into a housing assistance payment contract with a public housing agency under this subsection for any dwelling unit. "(II) Early inspection.--Upon the request of a new landlord, a public housing agency may inspect the dwelling unit owned by the new landlord to determine whether the unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) before the unit is selected by a tenant assisted under this subsection. "(III) Effect.--An inspection conducted under subclause (II) that determines that the dwelling unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) shall satisfy this subparagraph and subparagraph (C) if the new landlord enters into a lease agreement with a tenant assisted under this subsection not later than 60 days after the date of the inspection. "(IV) Information when family is selected.--When a public housing agency selects a family to participate in the tenant-based assistance program under this subsection, the public housing agency shall include in the information provided to the family a list of dwelling units that have been inspected under subclause (II) and determined to meet the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B).". SEC. 501. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS REAUTHORIZATION AND REFORM ACT. (a) Authorization.--Section 205 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12724) is amended to read as follows: "SEC. 205. AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM. "The HOME Investment Partnerships Program under subtitle A is hereby authorized.". (b) Definition of Community Housing Development Organization.--Section 104(6)(B) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12704(6)(B)) is amended by striking "significant". (c) Assistance for Low-income Families.--Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.) is amended-- (1) in section 214(2) (42 U.S.C. 12742(2)), by striking "households that qualify as low-income families" and inserting "families with a household income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary"; and (2) in section 271(c) (42 U.S.C. 12821(c))-- (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking "low-income" and inserting "families with a household income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families"; and (B) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking "low-income families" and inserting "families with a household income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families". (d) Choices Made by Participating Jurisdictions.--Section 212(a)(2) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12742(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows: "(2) Limitation.--The Secretary may not restrict the choice by a participating jurisdiction of rehabilitation, substantial rehabilitation, new construction, reconstruction, acquisition, or other eligible housing uses authorized in paragraph (1) unless the restriction is explicitly authorized under section 223(2).". (e) Use of Amounts by Certain Jurisdictions for Infrastructure Improvements.-- (1) In general.--Section 212(a) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12742(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: "(4) Infrastructure improvements in nonentitlement areas.-- "(A) In general.--A participating jurisdiction may use funds provided under this subtitle for infrastructure improvements, including the installation or repair of water and sewer lines, sidewalks, roads, and utility connections if-- "(i) such participating jurisdiction does not receive assistance under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5310); and "(ii) such improvements are directly related to, and located within or immediately adjacent to-- "(I) housing assisted under this subtitle; or "(II) housing assisted under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. "(B) Application of labor standards.--The labor standards and requirements set forth in section 110 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5310) shall apply to any infrastructure improvement conducted using funds provided under this subtitle. "(C) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to impose any requirements of the HOME Investment Partnerships program on housing that benefits from an infrastructure improvement conducted using funds provided under this subtitle but was not otherwise assisted under the HOME Investment Partnerships program.". (2) Rulemaking.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall issue rules to carry out the amendment made by paragraph (1). (f) Per Unit Investment Limitations.--Section 212(e)(1) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12742(e)(1)) is amended by striking the second sentence. (g) Affordable Rental Housing Qualifications.--Section 215(a) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12745(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(7) Qualification exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A), a rental unit shall be considered to qualify as affordable housing under this title if-- "(A) the unit is occupied by a tenant receiving tenant-based rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f); "(B) the contribution of the tenant toward rent does not exceed the amount permitted under the assistance described in subparagraph (A); and "(C) the total rent for the unit does not exceed the amount approved by the public housing agency administering the assistance described in subparagraph (A).". (h) Affordable Home-ownership Housing Qualifications.--Section 215 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,836 characters)
12745) is amended-- (1) in subsection (b)-- (A) in paragraph (2), by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; (B) in paragraph (3)-- (i) in subparagraph (A), by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; and (ii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; (C) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; (D) by striking "Housing that is for home-ownership" and inserting the following: "(1) Qualification.--Housing that is for home-ownership"; (E) in paragraph (1), as so designated-- (i) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated-- (I) by striking "95 percent" and inserting "110 percent"; and (II) by inserting "(defined as the amount borrowed by the homebuyer to purchase the home, or the estimated value after rehabilitation, which may be adjusted to account for the limits on future value imposed by the resale restriction)" after "purchase price"; (ii) in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking "whose family qualifies as a low-income family" and inserting "with a family income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families"; (iii) in subparagraph (C), as so redesignated-- (I) in clause (i)(II)-- (aa) by striking "low-income home-buyers" and inserting "home-buyers with a household income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families"; and (bb) by striking "or" at the end; (II) in clause (ii), by striking "and" at the end and inserting "or"; and (III) by adding at the end the following: "(iii) maintain long-term affordability through a shared equity ownership model, a community land trust, a limited equity cooperative, a community development corporation, or other mechanism approved by the Secretary, that preserves affordability for future eligible home-buyers and ensures compliance with the purposes of this title, including through the use of purchase options, rights of first refusal, or other preemptive rights to purchase housing;"; (iv) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (v) by adding at the end the following: "(E) is subject to restrictions that are established by the participating jurisdiction and determined by the Secretary to be appropriate, including with respect to the useful life of the property, to-- "(i) require that any subsequent purchase of the property be-- "(I) only by a person who meets the qualifications specified under subparagraph (B); and "(II) at a price that is determined by a formula or method established by the participating jurisdiction that provides the owner with a reasonable return on investment, which may include a percentage of the cost of any improvements; or "(ii) recapture the investment provided under this title in order to assist other persons in accordance with the requirements of this title, except where there are no net proceeds or where the net proceeds are insufficient to repay the full amount of the assistance."; and (F) by adding at the end the following: "(2) Purchase by community land trust or cooperative housing corporation.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (C)(i) of paragraph (1) and under terms determined by the Secretary, the Secretary may permit a participating jurisdiction to allow a community land trust, housing cooperative, or a community development corporation that used assistance provided under this subtitle for the development of housing that meets the criteria under paragraph (1), to acquire the housing-- "(A) in accordance with the terms of the preemptive purchase option, lease, covenant on the land, or other similar legal instrument of the community land trust or housing cooperative when the terms and rights in the preemptive purchase option, lease, covenant, or legal instrument are and remain subject to the requirements of this title; "(B) when the purchase is for-- "(i) the purpose of-- "(I) entering into the chain of title; "(II) enabling a purchase by a person who meets the qualifications specified under paragraph (1)(B) and is on a waitlist maintained by the community land trust or housing cooperative, subject to enforcement by the participating jurisdiction of all applicable requirements of this title, as determined by the Secretary; "(III) performing necessary rehabilitation and improvements; or "(IV) adding a subsidy to preserve affordability, which may be from Federal or non-Federal sources; or "(ii) another purpose determined appropriate by the Secretary; and "(C) if, within a reasonable period of time after the applicable purpose under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph is fulfilled, as determined by the Secretary, the housing is then sold to a person who meets the qualifications specified under paragraph (1)(B)."; and (2) by adding at the end the following: "(c) Qualification Exceptions for Home-ownership.-- "(1) Military members.--A participating jurisdiction, in accordance with terms established by the Secretary, may suspend or waive the income qualifications described in subsection (b)(1)(B) with respect to housing that otherwise meets the criteria described in subsection (b)(1) if the owner of the housing-- "(A) is a member of a regular component of the armed forces or a member of the National Guard on full-time National Guard duty, active Guard and Reserve duty, or inactive-duty training (as those terms are defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code); and "(B) has received-- "(i) temporary duty orders to deploy with a military unit or military orders to deploy as an individual acting in support of a military operation, to a location that is not within a reasonable distance from the housing, as determined by the Secretary, for a period of not less than 90 days; or "(ii) orders for a permanent change of station. "(2) Heirs and beneficiaries of deceased owners.--Housing that meets the criteria described in subsection (b)(1)(C) prior to the death of an owner of such housing shall continue to qualify as affordable housing under this title if-- "(A) the housing is the principal residence of an heir or beneficiary of the deceased owner, as defined by the Secretary; and "(B) the heir or beneficiary, in accordance with terms established by the Secretary, assumes the duties and obligations of the deceased owner with respect to funds provided under this title.". (i) Elimination of Expiration of Right to Draw Home Investment Trust Funds.--Section 218 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12748) is amended-- (1) by striking subsection (g); and (2) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (g). (j) Adjusted Recapture and Reuse of Set-aside for Community Housing Developmental Organizations.--Section 231(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12771(b)) is amended to read as follows: "(b) Recapture and Reuse.--If any funds reserved under subsection (a) remain uninvested for a period of 24 months, the Secretary shall make such funds available to the participating jurisdiction for any eligible activities under this title without regard to whether a community housing development organization materially participates in the use of such funds.". (k) Asset Recycling Information Dissemination Expansion.--Section 245(b)(2) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12785(b)(2)) is amended by striking "95 percent" and inserting "110 percent". (l) Environmental Review Requirements.-- (1) In general.--Section 288 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12838) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(e) Categorical Exemptions.--The following categories of activities carried out under this title shall be statutorily exempt from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and shall not require further review under such Act-- "(1) new construction infill housing projects; "(2) acquisition of real property for affordable housing purposes; "(3) rehabilitation projects carried out pursuant to section 212(a)(1); and "(4) new construction projects of 15 units or less. "(f) Removing Duplicative Reviews.-- "(1) In general.--To the extent practicable and permitted by law, the Secretary shall ensure that a project that has undergone an environmental review under this section shall not be subject to a duplicative environmental review solely due to the addition, substitution, or reallocation of other sources of Federal assistance, if the scope, scale, and location of the project remain substantially unchanged. "(2) Coordination of environmental review responsibilities.--The Secretary shall, by regulation, provide for coordination of environmental review responsibilities with other Federal agencies to streamline interagency compliance and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and other applicable laws. "(3) Recognition of prior reviews by responsible entities.--A project may not be subject to an environmental review under this section if a substantially similar review has already been completed by an entity designated under section 104(g)(1) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(g)(1)) or by another entity the Secretary determines to have equivalent authority, if the scope, scale, and location of the project remain substantially unchanged.". (2) Rulemaking.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue such rules as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the amendment made by this subsection. (3) Applicability.--Any activity generated under this subsection would be subject to an authorization of appropriations. (4) Definition.--Section 104 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12704) is amended by adding at end the following new paragraph: "(27) The term `infill housing project' means a residential housing project that-- "(A) is located within the geographic limits of a municipality; "(B) is adequately served by existing utilities and public services as required under applicable law; "(C) is located on a site of previously disturbed land of not more than 5 acres; and "(D) is substantially surrounded by residential or commercial development, as determined by the Secretary.". (m) Application of Build America, Buy America Requirements for Home Investment Partnerships Program.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall complete a review of the implementation of the Build America, Buy America Act (title IV of division G of Public Law 117-58; 42 U.S.C. 8301 note) with respect to the activities assisted under title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.). (2) Updated guidance.--Not later than 90 days after the review described in subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall issue updated guidance to clarify the application of the Build America, Buy America Act (title IV of division G of Public Law 117-58; 42 U.S.C. 8301 note) with respect to the activities assisted under title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,754 characters)
12721 et seq.). (3) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report that describes-- (A) the results of the review required under subsection (a); and (B) the guidance issued as described in subsection (b). (n) Application of Other Specified Statutory Requirements.--Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 291. NONAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL PROJECTS. "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the requirements of section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and any implementing regulations or guidance, shall not apply to an activity assisted under this title that involves rehabilitation, construction, or other development of housing if-- "(1) the recipient of assistance under this title is-- "(A) a State recipient pursuant to section 216; or "(B) a participating jurisdiction that received a total allocation of less than $3,000,000 in the most recent fiscal year pursuant to section 216; and "(2) the total number of dwelling units assisted as a part of such activity is not more than 50.". (o) Reallocation Not Available for Certain Jurisdictions.--Section 217(d) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12747(d)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: "Subject to paragraph (4), jurisdictions eligible for such reallocations shall include participating jurisdictions and jurisdictions meeting the requirements of this title, including the requirements in paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) of section 216."; and (2) by adding at the end the following: "(4) Reallocation not available for certain jurisdictions.--The Secretary may decline to make a reallocation available to a jurisdiction eligible for such reallocation if such jurisdiction has failed to meet or comply with any requirement under this title.". (p) Amendments to Qualification as Affordable Housing.--Section 215(a)(1)(E) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12745(a)) is amended by striking "except upon a foreclosure by a lender (or upon other transfer in lieu of foreclosure) if such action (i) recognizes any contractual or legal rights of public agencies, nonprofit sponsors, or others to take actions that would avoid termination of low-income affordability in the case of foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, and (ii) is not for the purpose of avoiding low-income affordability restrictions, as determined by the Secretary; and" and inserting the following: "except-- "(i) upon a foreclosure by a lender (or upon other transfer in lieu of foreclosure) if such action-- "(I) recognizes any contractual or legal rights of public agencies, nonprofit sponsors, or others to take actions that would avoid termination of low-income affordability in the case of foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure; and "(II) is not for the purpose of avoiding low-income affordability restrictions, as determined by the Secretary; or "(ii) where existing affordable housing is no longer financially viable due to unforeseen acts or occurrences beyond the reasonable contemplation or control of the participating jurisdiction in which the affordable housing is located or the owner of the affordable housing that significantly impact the financial or physical condition of the affordable housing, as determined by the Secretary; and". (q) Tenant and Participant Protections for Affordable Housing.--Section 225 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12755) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(e) Exception.--Paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of subsection (d) shall not apply to housing under this section that meets the following criteria: "(1) The housing is affordable housing with not more than 4 dwelling units, each of which is made available for rental. "(2) Each dwelling unit in the housing bears rent in an amount that complies with the requirements described in paragraph (1)(A). "(3) Each dwelling unit in the housing is accompanied by a low-income family. "(4) No dwelling in the housing is refused for leasing to a holder of a voucher under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f) because of the status of the prospective tenant as a holder of that voucher. "(5) The housing complies with the requirement described in paragraph (1)(E). "(6) The participating jurisdiction in which the housing is located monitors the compliance of the housing with the requirements of this title in a manner consistent with the purposes of section 226(b), as determined by the Secretary.". (r) Revision of Definition of Community Land Trust.--Section 104 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12704) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(26) The term `community land trust' means a nonprofit entity, a State, a unit of local government, or an instrumentality of a State or unit of local government that-- "(A) is not managed by, or an affiliate of, a forprofit organization; "(B) has as a primary purpose of acquiring, developing, or holding land to provide housing that is permanently affordable to low- and moderate-income persons; "(C) monitors properties to ensure affordability is preserved; "(D) provides housing that is permanently affordable to low- and moderate-income persons using a ground lease, deed covenant, or other similar legally enforceable measure, determined acceptable by the Secretary, that-- "(i) keeps housing affordable to low- and moderate-income persons for not less than 30 years; and "(ii) enables low- and moderate-income persons to rent or purchase the housing for home-ownership; and "(E) maintains preemptive purchase options to purchase the property if such purchase would allow the housing to remain affordable to low-and moderate-income persons.". (s) Set-aside for Community Housing Development Organizations.--Section 231(a) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12771(a)) is amended, in the first sentence, by striking "to be developed, sponsored, or owned by community housing development organizations" and inserting "when a community housing development organization materially participates in the ownership or development of that housing, as determined by the Secretary". (t) Administrative Reforms.-- (1) Increase in program administration resources.--Section 220(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12750(b)) is amended-- (A) by striking "Recognition.--" and all that follows through "A contribution" and inserting "Recognition.--A contribution"; (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively and (C) by striking paragraph (2). (2) Modification of jurisdictions eligible for reallocations.--Section 217(d)(3) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12747(d)(3)) is amended-- (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking "Limitation" and inserting "Limitations"; and (B) by striking "Unless otherwise specified" and inserting the following: "(A) Removal of participating jurisdictions from reallocation.--The Secretary may, upon a finding that the participating jurisdiction has failed to meet or comply with the requirements of this title, remove a participating jurisdiction from participation in reallocations of funds made available under this title. "(B) Reallocation to same type of entity.--Unless otherwise specified". (3) Home property inspections.--Section 226(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12756(b)) is amended-- (A) by striking "Each participating jurisdiction" and inserting the following: "(1) In general.--Each participating jurisdiction"; and (B) by striking "Such review shall include" and all that follows and inserting the following: "(2) Onsite inspections.-- "(A) Inspections by units of general local government.--A review conducted under paragraph (1) by a participating jurisdiction that is a unit of general local government shall include an onsite inspection to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations. "(B) Inspections by states.--A review conducted under paragraph (1) by a participating jurisdiction that is a State shall include an onsite inspection to determine compliance with a national standard as determined by the Secretary. "(3) Inclusion in performance report and publication.--A participating jurisdiction shall include in the performance report of the participating jurisdiction submitted to the Secretary under section 108(a), and make available to the public, the results of each review conducted under paragraph (1).". (4) Revisions to strengthen enforcement and penalties for noncompliance.--Section 223 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12753) is amended-- (A) in the section heading, by striking "penalties for misuse of funds" and inserting "program enforcement and penalties for noncompliance"; (B) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting after "any provision of this subtitle" the following: ", including any provision applicable throughout the period required by section 215(a)(1)(E) and applicable regulations,"; (C) in paragraph (2), by striking "or" at the end; (D) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; or"; and (E) by adding at the end the following: "(4) reduce payments to the participating jurisdiction under this subtitle by an amount equal to the amount of such payments that were not expended by the participating jurisdiction in accordance with this title.". (u) Minimum Allocations.--Section 217(b) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12747 (b)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (2), by striking "$500,000" each place that term appears and inserting "$750,000"; (2) in paragraph (3)-- (A) by striking "jurisdictions that are allocated an amount of $500,000 or more" and inserting "jurisdictions that are allocated an amount of $750,000 or more"; (B) by striking "that are allocated an amount less than $500,000" and inserting "that are allocated an amount less than $500,000 before the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act or less than $750,000 on or after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act"; and (C) by striking ", except as provided in paragraph (4)"; and (3) by striking paragraph (4). (v) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12701 et seq.) is amended-- (1) by striking "Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act" each place that term appears and inserting "McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act"; (2) by striking "Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs" each place that term appears and inserting "Committee on Financial Services"; (3) in the table of contents in section 1(b) (Public Law 101-625; 104 Stat. 4079)-- (A) by striking the item relating to section 205 and inserting the following: "Sec. 205. Authorization of program."; (B) by striking the item relating to section 223 and inserting the following: "Sec. 223. Program enforcement and penalties for noncompliance."; and (C) by inserting after the item relating to section 290 the following: "Sec. 291. Nonapplicability of certain requirements for small projects."; (4) in section 104 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (6,115 characters)
12704)--(A) by redesignating paragraph (23) (relating to the definition of the term "to demonstrate to the Secretary") as paragraph (22); and (B) by redesignating paragraph (24) (relating to the definition of the term "insular area", as added by section 2(2) of Public Law 102-230) as paragraph (23); (5) in section 105(b)(8) (42 U.S.C. 12705(b)(8)), by striking "subparagraphs" and inserting "paragraphs"; (6) in section 108(a)(1) (42 U.S.C. 12708(a)(1)), by striking "section 105(b)(15)" and inserting "section 105(b)(18)"; (7) in section 212 (42 U.S.C. 12742)--(A) in subsection (a)(3)(A)(ii), by inserting "United States" before "Housing Act"; (B) in subsection (d)(5), by inserting "United States" before "Housing Act"; and (C) in subsection (e)(1)--(i) by striking "section 221(d)(3)(ii)" and inserting "section 221(d)(4)"; and (ii) by striking "not to exceed 140 percent" and inserting "as determined by the Secretary"; (8) in section 215(a)(6)(B) (42 U.S.C. 12745(a)(6)(B)), by striking "grand children" and inserting "grandchildren"; (9) in section 217 (42 U.S.C. 12747)--(A) in subsection (a)--(i) in paragraph (1), by striking "(3)" and inserting "(2)"; (ii) by striking paragraph (3), as added by section 211(a)(2)(D) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-550; 106 Stat. 3756); and (iii) by redesignating the remaining paragraph (3), as added by the matter under the heading "home investment partnerships program" under the heading "Housing Programs" in title II of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law 102-389; 106 Stat. 1581), as paragraph (2); and (B) in subsection (b)(1)--(i) in subparagraph (A), in the first sentence-- (I) by striking "in regulation" and inserting ", by regulation,"; and (II) by striking "eligible jurisdiction" and inserting "eligible jurisdictions"; and (ii) in subparagraph (F), in the first sentence-- (I) in clause (i), by striking "Subcommittee on Housing and Urban Affairs" and inserting "Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development"; and (II) in clause (ii), by striking "Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development" and inserting "Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance"; (10) in section 220(c) (42 U.S.C. 12750(c))-- (A) in paragraph (3), by striking "Secretary" and all that follows and inserting "Secretary;"; (B) in paragraph (4), by striking "under this title" and all that follows and inserting "under this title;"; and (C) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively; (11) in section 225(d)(4)(B) (42 U.S.C. 12755(d)(4)(B)), by striking "for" the first place that term appears; and (12) in section 233 (42 U.S.C. 12773)-- (A) in subsection (b)(6), by striking "to community land trusts (as such term is defined in subsection (f))" and inserting "to community land trusts (as such term is defined in section 104)"; and (B) by striking subsection (f). SEC. 502. RURAL HOUSING SERVICE REFORM ACT. (a) Application of Multifamily Mortgage Foreclosure Procedures to Multifamily Mortgages Held by the Secretary of Agriculture and Preservation of the Rental Assistance Contract Upon Foreclosure.-- (1) Multifamily mortgage procedures.--Section 363(2) of the Multifamily Mortgage Foreclosure Act of 1981 (12 U.S.C. 3702(2)) is amended-- (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking "and" at the end; (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; or"; and (C) by adding at the end the following: "(F) section 514, 515, or 538 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1484, 1485, 1490p-2).". (2) Preservation of contract.--Section 521(d) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490a(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in managing and disposing of any multifamily property that is owned or has a mortgage held by the Secretary, and during the process of foreclosure on any property with a contract for rental assistance under this section-- "(A) the Secretary shall maintain any rental assistance payments that are attached to any dwelling units in the property; and "(B) the rental assistance contract may be used to provide further assistance to existing projects under 514, 515, or 516.". (b) Study on Rural Housing Loans for Housing for Low- and Moderate-income Families.--Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a publicly available report on the loan program under section 521 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490a), including-- (1) the total amount provided by the Secretary in subsidies under such section 521 to borrowers with loans made pursuant to section 502 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1472); (2) how much of the subsidies described in paragraph (1) are being recaptured; and (3) the amount of time and costs associated with recapturing those subsidies. (c) Staffing and Information Technology Upgrades.--Utilizing funds appropriated for such purposes, the Secretary of Agriculture may increase staffing capacity and upgrade information technology to support all Rural Housing Service programs. (d) Technical Improvements.-- (1) Authorization of appropriations.--Utilizing funds appropriated for such purposes, the Secretary of Agriculture may make improvements to the technology of the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture used to process and manage housing loans. (2) Availability.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) shall remain available until the date that is 5 years after the date of the appropriation. (3) Timeline.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall make the improvements described in paragraph (1) during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which amounts are appropriated under paragraph (1). (e) Permanent Establishment of Housing Preservation and Revitalization Program.--Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 545.
Text printed in the Record (11,129 characters)
HOUSING PRESERVATION AND REVITALIZATION PROGRAM. "(a) Establishment.--The Secretary shall carry out a program under this section for the preservation and revitalization of multifamily rental housing projects financed under section 514, 515, or 516. "(b) Notice of Maturing Loans.-- "(1) To owners.--On an annual basis, the Secretary shall provide written notice to each owner of a property financed under section 514, 515, or 516 that will mature within the 4-year period beginning upon the provision of the notice, setting forth the options and financial incentives that are available to facilitate the extension of the loan term or the option to decouple a rental assistance contract pursuant to subsection (f). "(2) To tenants.-- "(A) In general.--On an annual basis, for each property financed under section 514, 515, or 516, not later than the date that is 2 years before the date that the loan will mature, the Secretary shall provide written notice to each household residing in the property that informs them of-- "(i) the date of the loan maturity; "(ii) the possible actions that may happen with respect to the property upon that maturity; and "(iii) how to protect their right to reside in federally assisted housing, or how to secure housing voucher, after that maturity. "(B) Language.--Notice under this paragraph shall be provided in plain English and shall be translated to other languages in the case of any property located in an area in which a significant number of residents speak such other languages. "(c) Loan Restructuring.--Under the program under this section, in any circumstance in which the Secretary proposes a restructuring to an owner or an owner proposes a restructuring to the Secretary, the Secretary may restructure such existing housing loans, as the Secretary considers appropriate, for the purpose of ensuring that those projects have sufficient resources to preserve the projects to provide safe and affordable housing for low-income residents and farm laborers, by-- "(1) reducing or eliminating interest; "(2) deferring loan payments; "(3) subordinating, reducing, or reamortizing loan debt; "(4) providing other financial assistance, including advances, payments, and incentives (including the ability of owners to obtain reasonable returns on investment) required by the Secretary; and "(5) permanently removing a portion of the housing units from income restrictions when sustained vacancies have occurred. "(d) Renewal of Rental Assistance.-- "(1) In general.--When the Secretary proposes to restructure a loan or agrees to the proposal of an owner to restructure a loan pursuant to subsection (c), the Secretary shall offer to renew the rental assistance contract under section 521(a)(2) for a term that is the shorter of 20 years and the term of the restructured loan, subject to annual appropriations, provided that the owner agrees to bring the property up to such standards that will ensure maintenance of the property as decent, safe, and sanitary housing for the full term of the rental assistance contract. "(2) Additional rental assistance.--With respect to a project described in paragraph (1), if rental assistance is not available for all households in the project for which the loan is being restructured pursuant to subsection (c), the Secretary may extend such additional rental assistance to unassisted households at that project as is necessary to make the project safe and affordable to low-income households. "(e) Restrictive Use Agreements.-- "(1) Requirement.--As part of the preservation and revitalization agreement for a project, the Secretary shall obtain a restrictive use agreement that is recorded and obligates the owner to operate the project in accordance with this title. "(2) Term.-- "(A) No extension of rental assistance contract.--Except when the Secretary enters into a 20-year extension of the rental assistance contract for a project, the term of the restrictive use agreement for the project shall be consistent with the term of the restructured loan for the project. "(B) Extension of rental assistance contract.--If the Secretary enters into a 20-year extension of the rental assistance contract for a project, the term of the restrictive use agreement for the project shall be for the longer of-- "(i) 20 years; or "(ii) the remaining term of the loan for that project. "(C) Termination.--The Secretary may terminate the 20-year restrictive use agreement for a project before the end of the term of the agreement if the 20-year rental assistance contract for the project with the owner is terminated at any time for reasons outside the control of the owner. "(f) Decoupling of Rental Assistance.-- "(1) Renewal of rental assistance contract.--If the Secretary determines that a loan maturing during the 4-year period beginning upon the provision of the notice required under subsection (b)(1) for a project cannot reasonably be restructured in accordance with subsection (c) because it is not financially feasible or the owner does not agree with the proposed restructuring, and the project was operating with rental assistance under section 521 and the recipient is a borrower under section 514 or 515, the Secretary may renew the rental assistance contract, notwithstanding any requirement under section 521 that the recipient be a current borrower under section 514 or 515, for a term of 20 years, subject to annual appropriations. "(2) Additional rental assistance.--With respect to a project described in paragraph (1), if rental assistance is not available for all households in the project for which the loan is being restructured pursuant to subsection (c), the Secretary may extend such additional rental assistance to unassisted households at that project as is necessary to make the project safe and affordable to low-income households. "(3) Rents.-- "(A) In general.--Any agreement to extend the term of the rental assistance contract under section 521 for a project shall obligate the owner to continue to maintain the project as decent, safe, and sanitary housing and to operate the development as affordable housing in a manner that meets the goals of this title. "(B) Rent amounts.--Subject to subparagraph (C), in setting rents, the Secretary-- "(i) shall determine the maximum initial rent based on current fair market rents established under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f); and "(ii) may annually adjust the rent determined under clause (i) by the operating cost adjustment factor as provided under section 524 of the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1437f note). "(C) Higher rent.-- "(i) In general.--Subparagraph (B) shall not apply if the Secretary determines that the budget-based needs of a project require a higher rent than the rent described in subparagraph (B). "(ii) Rent.--If the Secretary makes a positive determination under clause (i), the Secretary may approve a budget-based rent level for the project. "(4) Conditions for approval.--Before the approval of a rental assistance contract authorized under this section, the Secretary shall require, through an annual notice in the Federal Register, the owner to submit to the Secretary a plan that identifies financing sources and a timetable for renovations and improvements determined to be necessary by the Secretary to maintain and preserve the project. "(g) Multifamily Housing Transfer Technical Assistance.--Under the program under this section, the Secretary may provide grants to qualified nonprofit organizations, housing cooperative corporations, and public housing agencies to provide technical assistance, including financial and legal services, to borrowers under loans under this title for multifamily housing to facilitate the acquisition or preservation of such multifamily housing properties in areas where the Secretary determines there is a risk of loss of affordable housing. "(h) Administrative Expenses.--Of any amounts made available for the program under this section for any fiscal year, the Secretary may use not more than $1,000,000 for administrative expenses for carrying out such program. "(i) Rulemaking.-- "(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, the Secretary shall-- "(A) publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking; and "(B) consult with appropriate stakeholders. "(2) Interim final rule.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, the Secretary shall publish an interim final rule to carry out this section.". (f) Rental Assistance Contract Authority.--Section 521(d) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490a(d)), as amended by this section, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: "(B) upon request of an owner of a project financed under section 514 or 515, the Secretary is authorized to enter into renewal of such agreements for a period of 20 years or the term of the loan, whichever is shorter, subject to amounts made available in appropriations Acts;"; (C) in subparagraph (C), as so redesignated, by striking "subparagraph (A)" and inserting "subparagraphs (A) and (B)"; and (D) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking "subparagraphs (A) and (B)" and inserting "subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C)"; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking "shall" and inserting "may"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(4) In the case of any rental assistance contract authority that becomes available because of the termination of assistance on behalf of an assisted family-- "(A) at the option of the owner of the rental project, the Secretary shall provide the owner a period of not more than 6 months before unused assistance is made available pursuant to subparagraph (B) during which the owner may use such authority to provide assistance on behalf of an eligible unassisted family that-- "(i) is residing in the same rental project in which the assisted family resided before the termination; or "(ii) newly occupies a dwelling unit in the rental project during that 6-month period; and "(B) except for assistance used as provided in subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall use such remaining authority to provide assistance on behalf of eligible families residing in other rental projects originally financed under section 514, 515, or 516.". (g) Modifications to Loans and Grants for Minor Improvements to Farm Housing and Buildings; Income Eligibility.--Section 504(a) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1474(a)) is amended-- (1) in the first sentence, by inserting "and may make a loan to an eligible low-income applicant" after "applicant"; and (2) by striking "$7,500" and inserting "$15,000". (h) Rural Community Development Initiative.--Subtitle E of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2009 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 381O.
Text printed in the Record (11,475 characters)
RURAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE. "(a) Definitions.--In this section: "(1) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means-- "(A) a private, nonprofit community-based housing or community development organization; "(B) a rural community; or "(C) a federally recognized Indian Tribe. "(2) Eligible intermediary.--The term `eligible intermediary' means a qualified-- "(A) private, nonprofit organization; or "(B) public organization. "(b) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a Rural Community Development Initiative, under which the Secretary shall provide grants, subject to the availability of appropriations, to eligible intermediaries to carry out programs to provide financial and technical assistance to eligible entities to develop the capacity and ability of eligible entities to carry out projects to improve housing, community facilities, and community and economic development projects in rural areas. "(c) Amount of Grants.--The amount of a grant provided to an eligible intermediary under this section shall be not more than $500,000. "(d) Matching Funds.-- "(1) In general.--An eligible intermediary receiving a grant under this section shall provide matching funds from other sources, including Federal funds for related activities, in an amount not less than the amount of the grant. "(2) Waiver.--The Secretary may waive paragraph (1) with respect to a project that would be carried out in a persistently poor rural region, as determined by the Secretary.". (i) Annual Report on Rural Housing Programs.--Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.), as amended by this section, is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 546. ANNUAL REPORT. "(a) In General.--The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and publish on the website of the Department of Agriculture an annual report on rural housing programs carried out under this title, which shall include significant details on the health of Rural Housing Service programs, including-- "(1) raw data sortable by programs and by region regarding loan performance; "(2) the housing stock of those programs, including information on why properties end participation in those programs, such as for maturation, prepayment, foreclosure, or other servicing issues; and "(3) risk ratings for properties assisted under those programs. "(b) Protection of Information.--The data included in each report required under subsection (a) may be aggregated or anonymized to protect participant financial or personal information.". (j) GAO Report on Rural Housing Service Technology.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report that includes-- (1) an analysis of how the outdated technology used by the Rural Housing Service impacts participants in the programs of the Rural Housing Service; (2) an estimate of the amount of funding that is needed to modernize the technology used by the Rural Housing Service; and (3) an estimate of the number and type of new employees the Rural Housing Service needs to modernize the technology used by the Rural Housing Service. (k) Adjustment to Rural Development Voucher Amount.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall issue regulations to establish a process for adjusting the voucher amount provided under section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490r) after the issuance of the voucher following an interim or annual review of the amount of the voucher. (2) Interim review.--The interim review described in paragraph (1) shall, at the request of a tenant, allow for a recalculation of the voucher amount when the tenant experiences a reduction in income, change in family composition, or change in rental rate. (3) Annual review.-- (A) In general.--The annual review described in paragraph (1) shall require tenants to annually recertify the family composition of the household and that the family income of the household does not exceed 80 percent of the area median income at a time determined by the Secretary of Agriculture. (B) Considerations.--If a tenant does not recertify the family composition and family income of the household within the time frame required under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Agriculture-- (i) shall consider whether extenuating circumstances caused the delay in recertification; and (ii) may alter associated consequences for the failure to recertify based on those circumstances. (C) Effective date.--Following the annual review of a voucher under paragraph (1), the updated voucher amount shall be effective on the 1st day of the month following the expiration of the voucher. (4) Deadline.--The process established under paragraph (1) shall require the Secretary of Agriculture to review and update the voucher amount described in paragraph (1) for a tenant not later than 60 days before the end of the voucher term. (l) Eligibility for Rural Housing Vouchers.--Section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490r) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(c) Eligibility of Households in Sections 514, 515, and 516 Projects.--The Secretary may provide rural housing vouchers under this section for any low-income household (including those not receiving rental assistance) residing for a term longer than the remaining term of their lease that is in effect on the date of prepayment, foreclosure, or mortgage maturity, in a property financed with a loan under section 514 or 515 or a grant under section 516 that has-- "(1) been prepaid with or without restrictions imposed by the Secretary pursuant to section 502(c)(5)(G)(ii)(I); "(2) been foreclosed; or "(3) matured after September 30, 2005.". (m) Amount of Voucher Assistance.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of any rural housing voucher provided pursuant to section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490r), the amount of the monthly assistance payment for the household on whose behalf the assistance is provided shall be determined as provided in subsection (a) of such section 542, including providing for interim and annual review of the voucher amount in the event of a change in household composition or income or rental rate. (n) Transfer of Multifamily Rural Housing Projects.--Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1485) is amended-- (1) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the following: "(3) Transfer to nonprofit organizations.--A nonprofit or public body purchaser, including a limited partnership with a general partner with the principal purpose of providing affordable housing, may purchase a property for which a loan is made or insured under this section that has received a market value appraisal, without addressing rehabilitation needs at the time of purchase, if the purchaser-- "(A) makes a commitment to address rehabilitation needs during ownership and long-term use restrictions on the property; and "(B) at the time of purchase, accepts long-term use restrictions on the property."; and (2) in subsection (w)(1), in the first sentence in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking "9 percent" and inserting "25 percent". (o) Extension of Loan Term.-- (1) In general.--Section 502(a)(2) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472(a)(2)) is amended-- (A) by inserting "(A)" before "The Secretary"; (B) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, by striking "paragraph" and inserting "subparagraph"; and (C) by adding at the end the following: "(B) The Secretary may refinance or modify the period of any loan, including any refinanced loan, made under this section in accordance with terms and conditions as the Secretary shall prescribe, but in no event shall the total term of the loan from the date of the refinance or modification exceed 40 years.". (2) Application.--The amendment made under paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to loans made under section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472) before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act. (p) Release of Liability for Section 502 Guaranteed Borrower Upon Assumption of Original Loan by New Borrower.--Section 502(h) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472(h)) is amended-- (1) by striking paragraph (10) and inserting the following: "(10) Transfer and assumption.--Upon the transfer of property for which a guaranteed loan under this subsection was made, and the assumption of the guaranteed loan by an approved eligible borrower, the original borrower of a guaranteed loan under this subsection shall be relieved of liability with respect to the loan."; (2) by redesignating paragraph (16) as paragraph (17); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (15) the following: "(16) Fee.-- "(A) In general.--The mortgagee may charge an assuming borrower a reasonable and customary processing fee for an assumption request made under this subsection. "(B) Maximum fee.--The Secretary shall set a maximum allowable fee described in subparagraph (A), which may be indexed for inflation.". (q) Department of Agriculture Loan Restrictions.-- (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the terms "State" and "tribal organization" have the meanings given those terms in section 658P of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858n). (2) Revision.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall revise section 3555.102(c) of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, to exclude from the restriction under that section-- (A) a home-based business that is a licensed, registered, or regulated child care provider under State law or by a tribal organization; and (B) an applicant that has applied to become a licensed, registered, or regulated child care provider under State law or by a tribal organization. (r) Loan Guarantees.--Section 502(h)(4) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472(h)(4)) is amended-- (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; (2) by striking "Loans may be guaranteed" and inserting the following: "(A) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term `accessory dwelling unit' means a single, habitable living unit-- "(i) with means of separate ingress and egress; "(ii) that is usually subordinate in size; "(iii) that can be added to, created within, or detached from a primary 1-unit, single-family dwelling; and "(iv) in combination with a primary 1-unit, single-family dwelling, constitutes a single interest in real estate. "(B) Single-family requirement.--Loans may be guaranteed"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(C) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the leasing of an accessory dwelling unit or the use of rental income derived from such a lease to qualify for a loan guaranteed under this subsection-- "(i) after the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act; and "(ii) if the property that is the subject of the loan was constructed before the date of enactment of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.". (s) Application Review.-- (1) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress, not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Agriculture receives an application for a loan, grant, or combined loan and grant under section 502 or 504 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (10,234 characters)
1472, 1474), the Secretary of Agriculture should-- (A) review the application; (B) complete the underwriting; (C) make a determination of eligibility with respect to the application; and (D) notify the applicant of determination. (2) Report.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the date described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report-- (i) detailing the timeliness of eligibility determinations and final determinations with respect to applications under sections 502 and 504 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472, 1474), including justifications for any eligibility determinations taking longer than 90 days; and (ii) that includes recommendations to shorten the timeline for notifications of eligibility determinations described in clause (i) to not more than 90 days. (B) Date described.--The date described in this subparagraph is the date on which, during the preceding 5-year period, the Secretary of Agriculture provides each eligibility determination described in subparagraph (A) during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which each application is received. SEC. 503. INCENTIVIZING LOCAL SOLUTIONS TO HOMELESSNESS. Section 414 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11373) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(f) Funding Cap Waiver Authority.-- "(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, a recipient may request a waiver to the expenditure limit established pursuant to section 415(b) for amounts provided for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2030. "(2) Waiver request.-- "(A) In general.--A recipient seeking a waiver described in paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary a waiver request that includes not more than the following: "(i) A demonstration of local needs and circumstances that necessitate a waiver. "(ii) A detailed plan for how the recipient intends to use funds. "(iii) A justification for how the proposed use of funds supports the most recent Consolidated Plan submitted by the recipient. "(iv) Any public input solicited under subparagraph (B)(ii). "(B) Notification.--Each recipient shall-- "(i) notify all subrecipients and local Continuums of Care that serve the recipient's geographic area of the availability of waivers under this subsection; and "(ii) prior to the submission of a waiver request under subparagraph (A), solicit public input regarding the potential need for and proposed uses of such waiver. "(C) Approval; publication.--The Secretary shall-- "(i) make all waiver requests submitted under subparagraph (A) publicly available on the website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development; "(ii) not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a waiver request under subparagraph (A), approve or deny the request; and "(iii) deny any waiver request submitted under subparagraph (A) by a recipient that relocates or threaten to relocate individuals or their property without providing emergency shelter, rapid rehousing, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, or other permanent housing options. "(3) Revocation.-- "(A) In general.--A waiver approved under this subsection shall remain in effect for the duration of the period of performance of fiscal year 2027 through 2030 grants, unless the recipient notifies the Secretary in writing that the recipient wishes to revoke the waiver. "(B) Notification.--If a recipient intends to revoke a waiver under subparagraph (A), the recipient shall-- "(i) solicit input from subrecipients regarding the revocation before submitting the revocation; and "(ii) provide subrecipients with a summary of the input and the justification for the revocation in its submittal prior to notifying the Secretary in writing. "(C) Publication.--The Secretary shall publish any revocation of a waiver under subparagraph (A) and the justification of the recipient for the waiver on the website of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.". SEC. 601. MILITARY SERVICE QUESTION. (a) In General.--Subpart A of part 2 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4541 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: "SEC. 1329. UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LOAN APPLICATION. "Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Director shall, by regulation or order, require each enterprise to include a disclosure below the military service question which shall be above the signature line on the form known as the Uniform Residential Loan Application stating, `If yes, you may qualify for a VA Home Loan. Consult your lender regarding eligibility.'.". (b) GAO Study.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Congress a report on whether or not less than 80 percent of lenders using the Uniform Residential Loan Application have included on that form the disclaimer required under section 1329 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as added by subsection (a). SEC. 602. HOUSING UNHOUSED DISABLED VETERANS ACT. (a) Exclusion of Certain Disability Benefits.--Section 3(b)(4)(B) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b)(4)(B)) is amended-- (1) by redesignating clauses (iv) and (v) as clauses (vi) and (vii), respectively; and (2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following: "(iv) for the purpose of determining income eligibility with respect to the supported housing program under section 8(o)(19), any disability benefits received under chapter 11 or chapter 15 of title 38, United States Code, received by a veteran, except that this exclusion shall not apply to the income in the definition of adjusted income; "(v) for the purpose of determining income eligibility with respect to any household receiving rental assistance under the supported housing program under section 8(o)(19) as it relates to eligibility for other types of housing assistance, any disability benefits received under chapter 11 or chapter 15 of title 38, United States Code, received by a veteran, but such amounts shall not be excluded from income when determining adjusted income;". (b) Treatment of Certain Disability Benefits.-- (1) In general.--When determining the eligibility of a veteran to rent a residential dwelling unit constructed on Department property on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, for which assistance is provided as part of a housing assistance program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary shall exclude from income any disability benefits received under chapter 11 or chapter 15 of title 38, United States Code by such person. (2) Definitions.--In this subsection: (A) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (B) Department property.--The term "Department property" has the meaning given the term in section 901 of title 38, United States Code. SEC. 701. REQUIRING ANNUAL TESTIMONY AND OVERSIGHT FROM HOUSING REGULATORS. Section 7 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(u) Annual Testimony.--The Secretary shall appear before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives at an annual hearing and present testimony regarding the operations of the Department during the preceding year, including-- "(1) the current programs and operations of the Department; "(2) the physical condition of all public housing and other housing assisted by the Department; "(3) the financial health of the mortgage insurance funds of the Federal Housing Agency; "(4) oversight by the Department of grantees and subgrantees for purposes of preventing waste, fraud, and abuse; "(5) the progress made by the Federal Government in ending the affordable housing and homelessness crises; "(6) the capacity of the Department to deliver on its statutory mission; and "(7) other ongoing activities of the Department, as appropriate.". SEC. 702. FHA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ON SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS. Section 202(a) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(8) Other required reporting.--The Secretary shall-- "(A) submit to Congress monthly reports on the capital ratio required under section 205(f)(2); and "(B) notify Congress as soon as practicable after the Fund falls below the capital ratio required under section 205(f)(2).". SEC. 703. UNITED STATES INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOMELESSNESS OVERSIGHT. Section 203(a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11313(a)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)-- (A) by striking "Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of 2009" and inserting "21st Century ROAD to Housing Act"; and (B) by striking "update such plan annually" and inserting "submit to the President and Congress a report every year thereafter that includes-- "(A) the status of completion of the plan; and "(B) any modifications that were made to the plan and the reasons for those modifications;"; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (13) as paragraphs (11) through (14), respectively; (3) by redesignating the second paragraph (9) (relating to collecting and disseminating information) as paragraph (10); (4) in paragraph (13), as so redesignated, by striking "and" at the end; (5) in paragraph (14), as so redesignated, by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (6) by adding at the end the following: "(15) testify annually before Congress, if requested.". SEC. 704. APPRAISAL MODERNIZATION ACT. (a) Reconsideration of Value.-- (1) Federally backed mortgage loan defined.--In this subsection, the term "federally backed mortgage loan" has the meaning given the term in section 4022 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,882 characters)
9056). (2) Requirement.--The Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration, and the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency shall each implement and maintain requirements that creditors of a federally backed mortgage loan have a review and resolution procedure for a consumer-initiated reconsideration of value or subsequent appraisal in connection with a consumer credit transaction secured by a consumer's principal dwelling. (b) Public Appraisal Database.-- (1) Covered agencies defined.--In this subsection, the term "covered agencies" means-- (A) the Federal Housing Finance Agency, on behalf of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; (B) the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including the Federal Housing Administration; (C) the Department of Agriculture; and (D) the Department of Veterans Affairs. (2) Feasibility report.--No later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a public report assessing the feasibility of creating a publicly available appraisal database that consists of a searchable and downloadable appraisal-level public use file that consolidates appraisal data held or aggregated by covered agencies, including-- (A) the costs and benefits associated with establishing and maintaining the public database; (B) the benefits and risks associated with the Federal Housing Finance Agency or the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection being responsible for the public database and whether there is another Federal agency best suited for implementing and administering such database; (C) any safety and soundness, antitrust, or consumer privacy-related risks associated with making certain appraisal data factors publicly available, including whether-- (i) there are any existing legal requirements, including under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 (12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) and section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the "Freedom of Information Act"), or additional actions Federal agencies could take to mitigate such risks, such as modifying or aggregating data or eliminating personally identifiable information; and (ii) there are any data factors that, if made public, may violate conduct, ethics, or other professional standards as they relate to appraisals and appraisal or valuation professionals; (D) the feasibility of consolidating or matching appraisal data held by covered agencies with corresponding data that are required and made public under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 (12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.); (E) whether the publication of any appraisal data factors may pose unfair business advantages within the valuation industry; (F) the feasibility of including all valuation data held by covered agencies, including data produced by automated valuation models; (G) the feasibility and benefits of making the full appraisal dataset, including any modified fields, available to-- (i) Federal agencies, including for purposes related to enforcement and supervision responsibilities; (ii) relevant State licensing, supervision, and enforcement agencies and State attorneys general; (iii) approved researchers, including academics and nonprofit organizations that, in connection with their mission, work to ensure the fairness and consistency of home valuations, including appraisals; and (iv) any other entities identified by the Comptroller General as having a compelling use for disaggregated data; (H) what appraisal data are already available in the public domain; and (I) the feasibility of incorporating legacy data held by covered agencies during the period beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, and whether there are specific data points not easily consolidated or matched, as described in subparagraph (D), with more recent data. (3) Purpose.--The database described in paragraph (2) shall be used to provide the public, the Federal Government, and State governments with residential real estate appraisal data to help determine whether financial institutions, appraisal management companies, appraisers, valuation technologies, such as automated valuation models, and other valuation professionals are effectively serving the entire housing market. (4) Consultation.--As part of the information used in the report required under paragraph (2), the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct interviews with-- (A) relevant Federal agencies; (B) relevant State licensing, supervision, and enforcement agencies and State attorneys general; (C) appraisers and other home valuation industry professionals; (D) mortgage lending institutions; (E) fair housing and fair lending experts; and (F) any other relevant stakeholders as determined by the Comptroller General. (5) Hearing.--Upon the completion of the report under paragraph (2), the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives shall each hold a hearing on the findings of the report and the feasibility of establishing a public appraisal-level appraisal database. TITLE VIII--ACCOUNTABILITY, COORDINATION, STUDIES, AND REPORTING SEC. 801. HUD-USDA-VA INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACT. (a) Memorandum of Understanding.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a memorandum of understanding, or other appropriate interagency agreement, to share relevant housing-related research and market data that facilitate evidence-based policymaking. (b) Interagency Report.-- (1) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report containing-- (A) a description of opportunities for increased collaboration between the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to reduce inefficiencies in housing programs; (B) a list of Federal laws (including regulations) that adversely affect the availability and affordability of new construction of assisted housing and single-family and multifamily residential housing subject to mortgages insured under title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.), insured, guaranteed, or made by the Secretary of Agriculture under title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.), or insured, guaranteed, or made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under chapter 37 of title 38, United States Code; and (C) recommendations for Congress regarding the Federal laws (including regulations) described in subparagraph (B). (2) Publication.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall, prior to submission under this subsection, be published in the Federal Register and open for comment for a period of 30 days. SEC. 802. STREAMLINING RURAL HOUSING ACT. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to-- (1) evaluate categorical exclusions under the environmental review process for housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture; (2) develop a process to designate a lead agency and streamline adoption of environmental impact statements and environmental assessments approved by the other Department to construct housing projects funded by both agencies; (3) maintain compliance with environmental regulations under part 58 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2025, except as required to amend, add, or remove categorical exclusions identified under section 58.35 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, through standard rulemaking procedures; and (4) evaluate the feasibility of a joint physical inspection process for housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture. (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that includes recommendations for legislative, regulatory, or administrative actions-- (1) to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture; and (2) that do not materially, with respect to residents of housing projects described in paragraph (1)-- (A) reduce the safety of those residents; (B) shift long-term costs onto those residents; or (C) undermine the environmental standards of those residents. SEC. 803. IMPROVING SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF FAMILIES IN HUD- SUBSIDIZED HOUSING. (a) In General.-- (1) Study.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall conduct a study on the implementation of work requirements implemented prior to the date of enactment of this Act by public housing agencies described in paragraph (4) participating in the Moving to Work demonstration authorized under section 204 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1437f note). (2) Scope.--The study required under paragraph (1) shall-- (A) consider the short-, medium-, and long-term benefits and challenges of work requirements on public housing agencies described in paragraph (4) and on program participants who are subject to such requirements, including the effects work requirements have on homelessness rates, poverty rates, asset building, earnings growth, job attainment and retention, and public housing agencies' administrative capacity; and (B) include quantitative and qualitative evidence, including interviews with program participants described in subparagraph (A) and their respective resident councils. (3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on the initial findings of the study required under paragraph (1). (4) Public housing agencies described.--The public housing agencies described in this paragraph are public housing agencies that, as part of an application to participate in the demonstration authorized under section 204 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1437f note), submit a proposal identifying work requirements as an innovative proposal. (b) Determination.--The requirement under subsection (a) shall apply if the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development determines that-- (1) there are a sufficient number of public housing agencies described in subsection (a)(4) such that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development can rigorously evaluate the impact of the implementation of work requirements described in that subsection; and (2) the study would not negatively impact low-income families receiving assistance through a public housing agency described in subsection (a)(4). SEC. 804.
Text printed in the Record (10,558 characters)
GAO STUDIES. (a) Workforce Housing Study.-- (1) Middle-income household defined.--In this subsection, the term "middle-income household" means a household with an income above 80 percent but that does not exceed 120 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development with adjustments for smaller and larger families. (2) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a report that-- (A) identifies obstacles middle-income households face when looking to secure affordable housing; (B) identifies geographic areas where housing is the most unaffordable and unavailable for middle-income households; (C) includes a list of Federal housing programs, including Federal tax credits, grants, and loan programs, that are not available to middle-income households due to their income status, including Federal housing programs designed to promote affordability; (D) recommends income and other parameters to establish a clear and consistent Federal definition for the term "workforce housing" for use when describing the segment of housing that could be made available to those middle-income households in Federal housing programs if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available; and (E) analyzes how to modify or newly develop new Federal housing programs and incentives to include "workforce housing" if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available. (b) Housing for Elderly or Disabled.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study and submit to Congress a report that identifies options to remove barriers and improve housing for persons who are elderly or disabled, including any potential impacts of providing capital advances for-- (1) the program for supportive housing for the elderly under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q); and (2) the program for supportive housing for persons with disabilities under section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013). (c) Proximity of Housing to Superfund Sites.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study and submit to Congress a report that identifies how many residential dwelling units, and how many dwelling units that are a part of public housing (as defined in section 3(b) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b))), are located less than 1 mile from a site that is included on the National Priorities List established pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9605). (d) Residential Heirs Property.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study and submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that-- (1) establishes a comprehensive definition of residential heirs property, or family land inherited without a will or legal documentation of ownership; (2) examines the occurrence of and consequences to owners of residential heirs property, and provides an estimate regarding the number of current residential heirs properties; (3) describes the objectives and requirements of the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act as approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2010; (4) details the various resources that may be available to the owners of residential heirs properties, including housing counseling, legal services, and financial assistance to resolve residential heirs property title issues from the Federal Government, nonprofit organizations, and institutions of higher education; and (5) makes recommendations with respect to how to reduce the number of residential heirs properties, including-- (A) by incentivizing States and other jurisdictions which enact or adopt the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act or similar such reforms; (B) by awarding grants to States and other jurisdictions to assist residents of those States and jurisdictions to establish and document property ownership rights or settle a decedent's estate; (C) by awarding grants to entities that-- (i) provide housing counseling, legal assistance, and financial assistance to home-owners and their heirs relating to title clearing and home retention efforts of heirs' property; and (ii) target services to low- and moderate-income persons or provide services in neighborhoods that have a high concentration of low- and moderate-income persons; and (D) by conducting other activities that assist individuals to clear title with respect to heirs' property and with general estate planning. SEC. 805. IMPROVING PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY ACCOUNTABILITY. (a) In General.--The Secretary shall require each covered public housing agency to provide a notice each year to the Secretary that-- (1) indicates that if a receiver or Federal monitor remains appointed for the covered public housing agency as of October 1 of the calendar year to which such notice relates; (2) provides the date on which the receiver or Federal monitor was first appointed and the projected date, if known, the appointment of the receiver or Federal monitor will be terminated; and (3) identifies the current receiver or Federal monitor appointed to oversee the public housing agency. (b) Federal Monitor and Receiver Transparency.-- (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than October 1 of each year, each receiver or Federal monitor that is currently appointed to oversee a covered public housing agency shall provide to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a written assessment that-- (A) describes the management and oversight activities of the receiver or Federal monitor for the covered public housing agency; (B) identifies the significant factors that led to the appointment of the receiver or Federal monitor for the covered public housing agency; (C) identifies the factors that remain unresolved at the covered public housing agency that have led to the continued oversight of the receiver or Federal monitor; and (D) includes a timeline developed by the receiver or Federal monitor that projects when the factors identified under subparagraphs (B) and (C) will be resolved. (2) In addition to the written assessment required in paragraph (1), upon written request by the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, each receiver or Federal monitor appointed to oversee a covered public housing agency shall promptly furnish additional or supplemental information requested by the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the covered public housing agency which such receiver or Federal monitor is appointed to oversee, including presenting testimony upon request. (c) Disclosure Required.--The Secretary shall, not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, require each covered public housing agency to publicly disclose, on the website of the covered public housing agency, with respect to each contract entered into by such covered public housing agency in the preceding year, the following information: (1) All material information about the contract, including the goods and service provided. (2) The identity of the vendor selected to receive the contract. (3) The date of the solicitation of the contract. (4) The relevant information pertaining to the bids and quotes solicited for the contract. (5) The name of the official who solicited the contract. (d) Inspector General Review.--Not later than 180 days after receiving a written request from the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, the Inspector General shall provide to the requesting committee an analysis of-- (1) the status of any covered public housing agency's compliance with any agreements entered into between the covered public housing agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including specific areas of deficiency and progress toward compliance; (2) a review of actions taken by the receiver or Federal monitor appointed to oversee a covered public housing agency and any private sector housing development partners pursuant to such agreement, including any gaps in oversight by the receiver or Federal monitor; (3) an assessment of the physical conditions of housing provided by the covered public housing agency, including the status of the covered public housing agency's compliance with relevant health and safety requirements; (4) an examination of any allegations of waste, fraud, abuse or violations of Federal law committed by employees or contractors of the covered public housing agency; (5) any additional pertinent information, as determined necessary and appropriate by the inspector general; and (6) any recommendations of the inspector general that relate to how to improve the compliance of the covered public housing agency with any agreements entered into with the Department of Housing and Urban Development or enhance the oversight of the receiver or Federal monitor over such covered public housing agency. (e) Definitions.-- (1) Covered public housing agency.--The term "covered public housing agency" means a public housing agency (as such term is defined in section 3(b) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(b))) for which an administrative or judicial receiver or Federal monitor was appointed. (2) Inspector general.--The term "inspector general" means the inspector general of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (3) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. TITLE IX--STRENGTHENING COMMUNITY BANKS' ROLE IN HOUSING SEC. 901. COMMUNITY BANK DEPOSIT ACCESS. (a) In General.--Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (10,765 characters)
1831f) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(j) Limited Exception for Custodial Deposits.-- "(1) In general.--Custodial deposits of an eligible institution shall not be considered to be funds obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker to the extent that the total amount of such custodial deposits does not exceed an amount equal to 20 percent of the total liabilities of the eligible institution. "(2) Definitions.--In this subsection: "(A) Custodial deposit.--The term `custodial deposit' means a deposit that is not deposited at an insured depository institution in return for fees paid by the insured depository institution pursuant to an agreement with a third party and that would otherwise be considered to be obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker, if the deposit is deposited at 1 or more insured depository institutions, for the purpose of providing or maintaining deposit insurance for the benefit of a third party, by or through any of the following, each acting in a formal custodial or fiduciary capacity for the benefit of a third party: "(i) An insured depository institution serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(ii) A trust entity controlled by an insured depository institution serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(iii) A State-chartered trust company serving as agent, trustee, or custodian. "(iv) A plan administrator or investment advisor, acting in a formal custodial or fiduciary capacity for the benefit of a plan. "(B) Eligible institution.--The term `eligible institution' means an insured depository institution that accepts custodial deposits, if the insured depository institution has less than $10,000,000,000 in total assets as reported on the consolidated report of condition and income as reported quarterly to the appropriate Federal banking agency and-- "(i)(I) when most recently examined under section 10(d) was assigned a composite rating of 1, 2, or 3 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and "(II) is well capitalized; or "(ii) has obtained a waiver pursuant to subsection (c). "(C) Plan.--The term `plan' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002). "(D) Plan administrator.--The term `plan administrator' has the meaning given the term `administrator' in section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002). "(E) Well capitalized.--The term `well capitalized' has the meaning given the term in section 38(b).". (b) Interest Rate Restriction.--Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding at the end the following: "(k) Restriction on Interest Rate Paid on Certain Custodial Deposits.-- "(1) Definitions.--In this subsection-- "(A) the terms `custodial deposit', `eligible institution', and `well capitalized' have the meanings given those terms in subsection (j); and "(B) the term `covered insured depository institution' means an insured depository institution that while acting as an eligible institution under subsection (j), accepts custodial deposits while not well capitalized. "(2) Prohibition.--A covered insured depository institution may not pay a rate of interest on custodial deposits that are accepted while not well capitalized that, at the time the funds or custodial deposits are accepted, significantly exceeds the limit set forth in paragraph (3). "(3) Limit on interest rates.--The limit on the rate of interest referred to in paragraph (2) shall be not greater than-- "(A) the rate paid on deposits of similar maturity in the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution for deposits accepted in the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution; or "(B) the national rate paid on deposits of comparable maturity, as established by the Corporation, for deposits accepted outside the normal market area of the covered insured depository institution.". SEC. 902. KEEPING DEPOSITS LOCAL. (a) Amount of Reciprocal Deposits That Are Not Considered to Be Funds Obtained by or Through a Deposit Broker.--Section 29(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f(i)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: "(1) In general.--The sum of the following amounts of reciprocal deposits of an agent institution shall not be considered to be funds obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through a deposit broker: "(A) An amount equal to 50 percent of the portion of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is less than or equal to $1,000,000,000. "(B) An amount equal to 40 percent of the portion, if any, of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is greater than $1,000,000,000, but less than or equal to $10,000,000,000. "(C) An amount equal to 30 percent of the portion, if any, of the total liabilities of the agent institution that is greater than $10,000,000,000, but less than or equal to $250,000,000,000.". (b) Definition of Agent Institution.--Section 29(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f(i)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by striking subclause (I) and inserting the following: "(I) when most recently examined under section 10(d) was assigned a CAMELS rating of 1, 2, or 3 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and". (c) Reciprocal Deposits Study.-- (1) In general.--The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in consultation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, shall carry out a study on reciprocal deposits. (2) Contents.--The study required under paragraph (1) shall include-- (A) an analysis of how reciprocal deposits have performed since 2018, which shall include-- (i) the use of quantitative and qualitative data; (ii) a breakdown of the usage of reciprocal deposits by size of insured depository institution; (iii) the usage of reciprocal deposits during periods of stress; and (iv) an analysis, to the extent practicable, of end-user depositors, such as municipalities, businesses, and nonprofit organizations, that drive demand for reciprocal products; (B) an analysis, to the extent practicable, of how reciprocal deposits compare to other deposit arrangements; and (C) an analysis of the benefits and potential risks of reciprocal deposits. (3) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1). SEC. 903. TAILORED REGULATORY UPDATES FOR SUPERVISORY TESTING. Section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking "$3,000,000,000" and inserting "$6,000,000,000"; and (2) in paragraph (10), by striking "$3,000,000,000" and inserting "$6,000,000,000". SEC. 904. CREDIT UNION BOARD MODERNIZATION. Section 113 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1761b) is amended-- (1) by striking "monthly" each place such term appears; (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking "The board of directors" and inserting the following: "(a) In General.--The board of directors"; (3) in subsection (a) (as so designated), by striking "shall meet at least once a month and"; and (4) by adding at the end the following: "(b) Meetings.--The board of directors of a Federal credit union shall meet as follows: "(1) With respect to a de novo Federal credit union, not less frequently than monthly during each of the first five years of the existence of such Federal credit union. "(2) Not less than six times annually, with at least one meeting held during each fiscal quarter, with respect to a Federal credit union-- "(A) with a composite rating of either 1 or 2 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and "(B) with a capability of management rating under such composite rating of either 1 or 2. "(3) Not less frequently than once a month, with respect to a Federal credit union-- "(A) with a composite rating of either 3, 4, or 5 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); or "(B) with a capability of management rating under such composite rating of either 3, 4, or 5.". SEC. 905. SYSTEMIC RISK AUTHORITY TRANSPARENCY. (a) GAO Review.--Section 13(c)(4)(G)(iv) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)(G)(iv)) is amended to read as follows: "(iv) GAO review.-- "(I) In general.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall, not later than 60 days after a determination is made under clause (i), and again 180 days thereafter, review and report to the Congress on the determination under clause (i), including-- "(aa) the basis for the determination; "(bb) the purpose for which any action was taken pursuant to such clause; "(cc) the likely effect of the determination and such action on the incentives and conduct of insured depository institutions and uninsured depositors; "(dd) any mismanagement by the executives and board of the insured depository institution that contributed to the failure of the insured depository institution; "(ee) a review of the compensation practices of the insured depository institution; "(ff) any supervisory or regulatory shortcomings with respect to the appropriate Federal banking agency of the insured depository institution; "(gg) any actions taken by the Federal banking regulators, Financial Stability Oversight Council, Department of the Treasury, and other relevant financial regulators in relation to the failure of the insured depository institution; and "(hh) any additional relevant entities or activities that may have contributed to the failure of the insured depository institution, including with respect to auditing, accounting, credit rating agencies, investment bank underwriters, and emergency liquidity options such as loans from the Federal reserve banks or advances through the Federal Home Loan Bank system. "(II) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this clause or a report issued pursuant to this clause may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal agency to enforce violations of Federal statutes, rules, or orders.". (b) Appropriate Federal Banking Agency Report.--Section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,735 characters)
1823(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: "(12) Appropriate federal banking agency report.-- "(A) In general.--The appropriate Federal banking agency of an insured depository institution about which a determination is made under paragraph (4)(G)(i) shall, not later than 90 days after the date of such determination, and again 210 days thereafter, submit a report to the Congress that discloses the following: "(i) Subject to such redactions as the appropriate Federal banking agency determines appropriate to protect personally identifiable information about customers and other financial institutions (as such term is defined under section 11(e)(9)(D))-- "(I) all reports of examination and inspection that relate to the failed insured depository institution in the previous 3-year period; "(II) all formal communications of a material supervisory determination conveyed to the failed insured depository institution in the previous 3-year period; and "(III) any additional exam reports and correspondence that the appropriate Federal banking agency determines may be relevant to the failure of the insured depository institution. "(ii) An examination of any mismanagement by the executives and board of the insured depository institution that contributed to the failure of the insured depository institution. "(iii) Any supervisory or regulatory shortcomings by such appropriate Federal banking agency with respect to the insured depository institution. "(iv) Any dynamics that the appropriate Federal banking agency determines may have contributed to the failure of the insured depository institution. "(v) Any supervisory, regulatory, or legislative recommendations such appropriate Federal banking agency may have to improve the safety and soundness of similarly situated insured depository institutions, the banking system, and financial stability. "(B) Protection of sensitive information.-- "(i) Effect on privilege.--The provision of any information by a Federal banking agency under this paragraph may not be construed as-- "(I) waiving, destroying, or otherwise affecting any privilege applicable to the information; or "(II) waiving any exemption applicable to the information under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the `Freedom of Information Act'). "(ii) Transparency.-- "(I) In general.--A Federal banking agency shall publish materials contained in a report required under subparagraph (A) to the fullest extent possible to promote transparency. "(II) Consultation on omitting materials.--If a Federal banking agency determines particular materials described under subclause (I) should not be published, the Federal banking agency shall consult with the chair and ranking member of the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the chair and ranking member of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. "(III) Omitting materials.--If, after the consultation required under subclause (II), the Federal banking agency determines there is a substantial public interest in not publishing such materials, the Federal banking agency shall provide those materials to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with a written explanation describing the reasons for not publishing those materials. "(iii) Privilege.--For purposes of this subparagraph, the term `privilege' includes any work-product, attorney-client, or other privilege recognized under Federal or State law. "(C) Report extension.--A Federal banking agency may extend a deadline described under subparagraph (A) for an additional 60 days, if the Federal banking agency-- "(i) faces ongoing circumstances that require the Federal banking agency to prioritize activities to promote stability of the United States banking system; and "(ii) notifies the Congress of such extension and the reasons for such extension. "(D) Consolidated reports.--A Federal banking agency may consolidate multiple reports required under this paragraph so long as the individual reports being consolidated all meet the timing requirements under this paragraph. "(E) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this paragraph or reports or materials provided pursuant to this paragraph may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal agency to enforce violations of Federal statutes, rules, or orders.". SEC. 906. LEAST COST EXCEPTION. (a) In General.--Section 13(c)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)) is amended-- (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by inserting "except as provided in subparagraph (I)," before "the total amount"; (2) in subparagraph (E)(i), by inserting "and except as provided in subparagraph (I)," after "appropriate,"; and (3) by adding at the end the following: "(I) Least cost resolution exception.-- "(i) In general.--With respect to an exercise of authority by the Corporation described in subparagraph (A), the Corporation may, at the discretion of the Corporation, select an alternative method of exercising such authority that is not the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund, if-- "(I) the Corporation determines that the selected alternative complies with the requirements of clause (iii); and "(II) the Corporation and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determine that the potential additional risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the selected alternative are outweighed by the reasonably expected benefits of limiting further concentration of the United States banking system in global systemically important banking organizations. "(ii) Maximum cost to the deposit insurance fund.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Corporation, by rule, shall establish criteria for determining on a case-by-case basis the maximum allowable cost against the net worth of the Deposit Insurance Fund that may be utilized to account for any determination under clause (i). "(iii) Requirements described.--The requirements for the selected alternative described in clause (i) are as follows: "(I) The selected alternative is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund of all alternatives that do not involve a transaction with a global systemically important banking organization and that do not exceed the cost of liquidating the insured depository institution. "(II) The difference between the cost of the selected alternative and the cost of a covered alternative is less than or equal to the maximum cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund specified pursuant to the rule adopted under clause (ii). "(III) In the case of a selected alternative that involves another person purchasing assets of the insured depository institution or assuming deposit liabilities of the insured depository institution, such person agrees to pay an assessment to the Corporation comprised of payments-- "(aa) made over a period to be determined by the Corporation, but which may not be less than 5 years; and "(bb) in an amount that takes into account, on a case-by-case basis, criteria the Corporation, by rule, shall establish, including a realistic discount rate, the aggregate amount equal to the difference calculated in subclause (II), and any bid inconsistent with the purposes of this Act, with such rule to be established by the Corporation not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subparagraph. "(iv) Report to congress.--Not later than 30 days after selecting an alternative described in clause (i), the Corporation shall issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing an analysis of the economic difference between the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the selected alternative and the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the least costly alternative that would have been selected absent the application of this subparagraph. "(v) Cost determinations.--All cost determinations required under this subparagraph shall be made in accordance with subparagraphs (B) and (C). "(vi) Definitions.--In this subparagraph: "(I) Covered alternative.--The term `covered alternative' means a method of exercising authority described in subparagraph (A) that is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund of all such methods that involve a sale of all or substantially all assets of the insured depository institution to, and assumption of all or substantially all deposit liabilities of the insured depository institution by, a global systemically important banking organization. "(II) Global systemically important banking organization.--The term `global systemically important banking organization' means a global systemically important BHC (as such term is defined in section 217.402 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto) and any affiliate thereof.". (b) Rule of Construction.--Section 13(c)(4)(H) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)(H)) does not apply to the amendments made by subsection (a). SEC. 907. FAILING BANK ACQUISITION FAIRNESS. (a) Concentration Limit Exceptions Only Available to Avoid Serious Adverse Economic or Financial Effects.-- (1) Concentration limits with respect to deposits.-- (A) Federal deposit insurance act.--The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.) is amended-- (i) in section 18(c)(13)-- (I) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: "(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an interstate merger transaction if-- "(i) such interstate merger transaction involves 1 or more insured depository institutions in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A); or "(ii) the Corporation provides assistance under section 13 to facilitate such interstate merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A)."; and (II) in subparagraph (C)-- (aa) in clause (i), by striking "and" at the end; (bb) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (cc) by adding at the end the following: "(iii) the term `qualified bid' means an application, proposed application, or bid from a company where-- "(I) if applicable, the company, any affiliate insured depository institution, and any affiliate depository institution holding company are well capitalized and well managed, as of the date of the application, proposed application, or bid; and "(II) upon consummation of the transaction, the resulting insured depository institution is well capitalized; "(iv) the term `well capitalized'-- "(I) with respect to an insured depository institution, has the meaning given such term in section 38(b) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831o(b)); "(II) with respect to a bank holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(1)(B) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (9,579 characters)
1841(o)(1)(B)); "(III) with respect to a savings and loan holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 238.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations; and "(IV) with respect to a company that is not an insured depository institution, bank holding company, or savings and loan holding company, means maintaining equity capital that the Corporation determines is commensurate with the capital maintained by an insured depository institution that is well capitalized; and "(v) the term `well managed' has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(9) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(9))."; and (ii) in section 44, by amending subsection (e) to read as follows: "(e) Exception for Banks in Default or in Danger of Default.-- "(1) General exception.--The responsible agency may, without regard to paragraph (1), (3), (4), or (5) of subsection (b) or paragraph (2), (4), or (5) of subsection (a), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if-- "(A) the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or "(B) the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction. "(2) Concentration limit exception.--The responsible agency may, without regard to subsection (b)(2), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if-- "(A) the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2); or "(B) the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2). "(3) Qualified bid defined.--In this subsection, the term `qualified bid' has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C).". (B) Bank holding company act of 1956.--The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) is amended-- (i) in section 3(d), by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows: "(5) Exception for banks in default or in danger of default.-- "(A) General exception.--The Board may, without regard to subparagraph (B) or (D) of paragraph (1) or paragraph (3), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if-- "(i) the application is for an acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or "(ii) the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. "(B) Concentration limit exception.--The Board may, without regard to paragraph (2), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if-- "(i) the application is for the acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or "(ii) the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2). "(C) Qualified bid defined.--In this paragraph, the term `qualified bid' has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act."; and (ii) in section 4(i)(8), by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: "(B) Exception.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an acquisition if-- "(i) such acquisition involves an insured depository institution in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or "(ii) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to facilitate such acquisition and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2).". (2) Concentration limit with respect to consolidated liabilities.--Section 14(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1852(c)) is amended-- (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively; (B) by striking "With the" and inserting the following: "(1) In general.--With the"; and (C) by adding at the end the following: "(2) Limitation.--The Board may provide written consent for an acquisition described in paragraph (1)(A) or in paragraph (1)(B) only if the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b).". (b) Congressional Notification and Justification for Waivers.-- (1) In general.--Whenever the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation waives a concentration limit under section 18(c)(13)(B) or section 44(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or under section 3(d)(5), section 4(i)(8)(B), or section 14(c)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, in connection with the acquisition of a bank or insured depository institution in default or in danger of default, or in connection with an acquisition with respect to which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the waiving agency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, jointly, shall, not later than 30 days after such waiver, submit a written report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing-- (A) a justification for the waiver, including an analysis of why it was necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability; (B) a description of alternative bids or outcomes considered, including efforts to solicit and encourage bids from entities that would not require a waiver; (C) an explanation of why alternative bids were not selected, if applicable; and (D) any recommendations for legislative or regulatory changes to improve competition in future insured depository institution resolutions. (2) Public disclosure.--The waiving agency submitting a report under paragraph (1) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall make the report publicly available on their respective websites, subject to redactions for confidential supervisory information and any other information described under section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code. (c) Limitation on Considering Bad Faith Bids in Least Cost Determination.--Section 13(c)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)), as amended by section 906(a)(3), is further amended by adding at the end the following: "(J) Limitation on considering bad faith bids.--In making a determination under this paragraph of whether an exercise of authority is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund, the Corporation may not consider any application, proposed application, or bid from a company, if such application, proposed application, or bid would result in violation of-- "(i) section 18(c)(13) or 44(b)(2); or "(ii) section 3(d)(2), 4(i)(8), or 14 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.". SEC. 908. ADVANCING THE MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAM FOR SMALL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. Section 308 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (9,753 characters)
1463 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: "(d) Financial Agent Mentor-protege Program.-- "(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish a program to be known as the `Financial Agent Mentor-Protege Program' (in this subsection referred to as the `Program') under which a financial agent designated by the Secretary or a large financial institution may serve as a mentor, under guidance or regulations prescribed by the Secretary, to a small financial institution to allow such small financial institution-- "(A) to be prepared to perform as a financial agent; or "(B) to improve capacity to provide services to the customers of the small financial institution. "(2) Outreach.--The Secretary shall hold outreach events to promote the participation of financial agents, large financial institutions, and small financial institutions in the Program at least once a year. "(3) Exclusion.--The Secretary shall issue guidance or regulations to establish a process under which a financial agent, large financial institution, or small financial institution may be excluded from participation in the Program. "(4) Report.--The Secretary shall report to Congress information pertaining to the Program, including-- "(A) the number of financial agents, large financial institutions, and small financial institutions participating in such Program; and "(B) the number of outreach events described in paragraph (2) held during the year covered by such report. "(5) Definitions.--In this subsection: "(A) Financial agent.--The term `financial agent' means any national banking association designated by the Secretary of the Treasury to be employed as a financial agent of the Government. "(B) Large financial institution.--The term `large financial institution' means any entity regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the National Credit Union Administration that has total consolidated assets greater than or equal to $50,000,000,000. "(C) Rural depository institution.--The term `rural depository institution' means a depository institution (as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act)-- "(i) with total consolidated assets of less than $10,000,000,000; and "(ii) located in a rural area, as defined under section 1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A) of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations. "(D) Small financial institution.--The term `small financial institution' means-- "(i) any entity regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the National Credit Union Administration that has total consolidated assets less than or equal to $2,000,000,000; "(ii) a minority depository institution; or "(iii) a rural depository institution.". SEC. 909. AMERICAN ACCESS TO BANKING. (a) Streamlining Application Process and Review of Capital Raising by De Novo Regulated Institutions.-- (1) In general.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall-- (A) for the purpose of streamlining the process of applying to become a de novo regulated institution, conduct a review of any application forms related to such process; (B) to the extent practicable, gather information needed from applicants seeking to become a de novo regulated institution from other Federal Government agencies or public sources to minimize information requests of such applicants; and (C) in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, review how de novo regulated institutions raise capital while maintaining investor protections, including the impact of-- (i) general capital raising restrictions; and (ii) capital raising restrictions related to individuals who are not accredited investors. (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, and annually for 5 years thereafter, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and publish on a public website of such agency a report that contains-- (A) a description of the actions taken by such agency pursuant to paragraph (1); and (B) as appropriate, any administrative or legislative recommendations with respect to the purpose described in paragraph (1)(C). (b) Improving Communication With De Novo Regulated Institutions.-- (1) In general.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall, at the request of an applicant to become a de novo regulated institution, designate an employee of the agency as a caseworker, who may perform such duty in addition to the other duties of the employee. (2) Caseworker duties.--Each caseworker described in paragraph (1) shall, to the maximum extent practicable-- (A) meet with the lead organizers applying to become a de novo regulated institution to provide a tutorial with respect to the application process; and (B) be the primary point of contact of the respective Federal financial institutions regulatory agency for such organizers during the application process. (3) New caseworker.--Each agency described in paragraph (1) may designate a new caseworker, as appropriate, to support continuity based on staffing and responsibilities assigned to the current caseworker. (c) De Novo Mentor-protege Partnerships.-- (1) In general.--At the request of an institution that seeks to become a de novo regulated institution, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall, to the maximum extent practicable, provide a list to such institution of similar types of institutions that-- (A) were recently approved to become a de novo regulated institution; and (B) are interested in volunteering to serve as a mentor to provide advice about the de novo application process. (2) Mentorship information.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall provide public information and directions on how an institution may request a mentor or serve as a mentor as described in paragraph (1). (d) State and Stakeholder Engagement Plan.-- (1) In general.--Each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall develop a plan to-- (A) regularly consult with State regulators to promote cooperation between State and Federal banking and credit union agencies in the creation of de novo regulated institutions, including responding to any State regulator that requests assistance on how a State-chartered financial institution can request Federal insurance; (B) regularly consult with stakeholders, including applicants to become de novo regulated institutions and recently approved regulated institutions, to inform any reforms that may support the creation of de novo regulated institutions, including rural institutions, community development financial institutions, and minority depository institutions; and (C) provide guidance, training material, and regular workshops to assist any interested parties to understand such agencies' processes. (2) Submission to congress.-- (A) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this section, and every 5 years thereafter, each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate the respective plan of such agency described in paragraph (1). (B) Public comment.--With respect to developing the plan described in paragraph (1), each of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall-- (i) provide an opportunity for public comments; and (ii) take such public comments into consideration. (e) Definitions.-- (1) In general.--In this section: (A) Federal banking agency.--The term "Federal banking agency" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (B) Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies.--The term "Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies" has the meaning given the term in section 1003 of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3302). (C) Regulated institution.--The term "regulated institution" means-- (i) with respect to a Federal banking agency, a depository institution (as such term is defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)) for which the Federal banking agency is the appropriate Federal banking agency (as such term is defined in such section 3); and (ii) with respect to the National Credit Union Administration, an insured credit union (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752)). (D) State.--The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and each territory of the United States. (E) State regulator.--The term "State regulator" means-- (i) with respect to a Federal banking agency, a State banking regulator; and (ii) with respect to the National Credit Union Administration, the State regulatory agency having jurisdiction over a State credit union (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752)). (2) Rule of construction.--For purposes of this section, the process of applying to become a de novo regulated institution shall include the process of applying for Federal deposit insurance, Federal share insurance, or membership in the Federal Reserve System. SEC. 910.
Text printed in the Record (11,981 characters)
PROMOTING NEW BANK FORMATION. (a) Pilot Phase-in of Capital Standards.--The Federal banking agencies may issue rules that provide for a 2-year phase-in period for a qualifying community bank or its depository institution holding company to meet any Federal capital requirements that would otherwise be applicable to the qualifying community bank or its depository institution holding company, beginning on-- (1) the date on which the qualifying community bank became an insured depository institution; or (2) in the case of its depository institution holding company, the date on which the qualifying community bank of the depository institution holding company became an insured depository institution. (b) Pilot Changes to Business Plans.-- (1) In general.--During the 2-year period beginning on the date on which a qualifying community bank became an insured depository institution, the qualifying community bank or its depository institution holding company may request to deviate from a business plan that has been approved by the appropriate Federal banking agency by submitting a request to such agency pursuant to this section. (2) Review of changes.--The appropriate Federal banking agency shall, not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning on the receipt of a request under paragraph (1)-- (A) approve, conditionally approve, or deny such request; and (B) notify the applicant of such decision and, if the agency denies the request-- (i) provide the applicant with the reason for such denial; and (ii) suggest changes to the request that, if adopted, would allow the agency to approve such request. (3) Result of failure to act.--If the appropriate Federal banking agency fails to approve or deny a request within the 90-day period required under paragraph (2), such request shall be deemed to be approved. (c) Pilot Program Study.-- (1) Study.--The Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, carry out a study on the impact of the Pilot Program carried out pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this section on the formation of de novo insured depository institutions, including such institutions which are rural depository institutions, community development financial institutions, and minority depository institutions, taking into account safety and soundness, promoting competition, and expanding access to affordable financial products and services to underserved communities. (2) Report to congress.--Not later than December 31, 2031, the Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1). (d) Study on De Novo Insured Depository Institutions.-- (1) Study.--The Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, carry out a study on-- (A) the principal causes for the low number of de novo insured depository institutions in the 10-year period ending on the date of enactment of this subsection; (B) ways to promote more de novo insured depository institutions in areas currently underserved by insured depository institutions; and (C) ways to ensure de novo depository institutions, including institutions which are rural depository institutions, community development financial institutions, and minority depository institutions, can utilize the Community Bank Leverage Ratio. (2) Report to congress.--Not later than the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1). (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Appropriate federal banking agency.--The term "appropriate Federal banking agency" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (2) Depository institution.--The term "depository institution" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (3) Depository institution holding company.--The term "depository institution holding company" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (4) Federal banking agency.--The term "Federal banking agency" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (5) Insured depository institution.--The term "insured depository institution" has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (6) Qualifying community bank.--The term "qualifying community bank" means a depository institution that-- (A) including its holding company and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, has total combined assets of less than $10,000,000,000; and (B) became an insured depository institution between January 1, 2026, and December 31, 2028. SEC. 911. RURAL DEPOSITORIES REVITALIZATION STUDY. (a) Study.--The Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, carry out a study-- (1) to identify methods to improve the growth, capital adequacy, and profitability of depository institutions in the United States that primarily serve rural areas; and (2) to identify Federal statutes (other than appropriations Acts) or regulations of the Federal banking agencies that limit-- (A) the methods identified under paragraph (1); or (B) the establishment of de novo depository institutions in rural areas. (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal banking agencies shall, jointly, issue a report to Congress containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under subsection (a). (c) Study on Rural Credit Unions.--The National Credit Union Administration shall carry out a study-- (1) to identify methods to improve the growth, capital adequacy, and profitability of credit unions in the United States that primarily serve rural areas; and (2) to identify Federal statutes (other than appropriations Acts) or regulations of the National Credit Union Administration that limit-- (A) the methods identified under paragraph (1); or (B) the establishment of de novo credit unions in rural areas. (d) Report on Rural Credit Unions.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Credit Union Administration shall issue a report to Congress containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under subsection (c). (e) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Depository institution.--The term "depository institution" has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (2) Federal banking agencies.--The term "Federal banking agencies" means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (3) Rural.--With respect to an area, the term "rural" has the meaning given that term in section 1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A) of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations. SEC. 912. DISCRETIONARY SURPLUS FUND. (a) In General.--The dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is reduced by $115,000,000. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 30, 2035. SEC. 1001. HOMES ARE FOR PEOPLE, NOT CORPORATIONS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Consumer reporting agency.--The term "consumer reporting agency" has the meaning given the term in section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a)). (2) Excepted purchase.--The term "excepted purchase" means any purchase of a single-family home that is-- (A) newly constructed, renovated, or a rental conversion for sale by a large institutional investor and not as a residence rented pending sale; (B) pursuant to a build-to-rent program where the large institutional investor purchases, constructs, or constructs and retains a newly constructed single-family homes to be managed as a rental property, whether as part of a community made up exclusively of renter-occupied single-family homes or as part of a community made up of single-family homes that are both owner- and renter-occupied; (C) pursuant to a renovate-to-rent program that-- (i) substantially rehabilitates single-family homes that do not meet structural or core system elements of local building codes; and (ii) makes improvements in an aggregate dollar amount of not less than 15 percent of the purchase price of the single-family home; (D) pursuant to a homeownership program that-- (i) requires rental payments and any other fees that are not greater than those collected by the large institutional investor on other similarly situated single-family homes not covered by the eligible homeownership program; (ii) is subject to a contract between the large institutional investor and renter that shall be considered a consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling or real property; (iii) provides for positive reporting of rental payments to consumer reporting agencies for any renter, who shall be informed of and opts into such reporting; and (iv) requires contribution of meaningful financial support from the large institutional investor, including price concessions, for the purchase of the single-family home by the renter; (E) pursuant to a program to boost homeownership that-- (i) provides for positive reporting of rental payments to consumer reporting agencies for any renter, who shall be informed of and opts into such reporting; (ii) provides for the right of first refusal and a 30-day "first look" period; and (iii) may entail the meaningful financial support from the large institutional investor, including price concessions, for the purchase of a single-family home by the renter (whether it is the home the renter occupies or another home); (F) in connection with the satisfaction of debts previously contracted in good faith and where the large institutional investor has the right to repossess the single-family home under such contract; (G) undertaken by a mortgage servicer, lender, or other entity that has a legal right to a single-family home, for the purpose of loss mitigation or compliance with servicing or investor obligations, and not as a long-term investment strategy, and is solely as a result of-- (i) a foreclosure; (ii) a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure; (iii) enforcement of a mortgage, deed of trust, or other security interest; or (iv) operation of law following borrower default; (H) purchased from another large institutional investor that either owned the single-family home on the date of enactment of this Act or purchased the single-family home in compliance with this section; (I) purchased from an investor not covered under this section, so long as the purchase occurred not more than 2 years after the effective date under subsection (f); (J) newly constructed, renovated, or a rental conversion that is intended and operated for occupancy as part of a community for households with 1 or more members aged 55 years or older, and satisfies visitability standards established by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; or (K) purchased through a single purchase or combination or series of purchases described in subparagraphs (A) through (J). (3) Single-family home.--The term "single-family home"-- (A) means a structure that contains 2 or fewer dwelling units that are each intended for residential occupancy by a single household; and (B) does not include a manufactured home, as defined in section 603 of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (11,534 characters)
5402). (4) Large institutional investor.-- (A) In general.--The term "large institutional investor"-- (i) means an investment fund, corporation, general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, association, or other for-profit entity that is a legal entity structured in a manner that is not aforementioned that-- (I) is engaged, in whole or in part, in the business of investing in, owning, renting, managing, or holding single-family homes; and (II) alone or in concert with 1 or more other entities, beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, directly or indirectly has investment control of not less than 350 single-family homes in the aggregate, not including any single-family home purchased in an excepted purchase made after the date of enactment of this Act; and (ii) does not include any local, State, Tribal, or Federal government entity or instrumentality thereof. (B) Rule of construction.--For purposes of this paragraph, an entity has direct or indirect investment control over a single-family home if the entity-- (i) owns, or has primary authority or fiduciary responsibility to make material investment or management decisions relating to, the single-family home; (ii) is, or directly or indirectly controls, the general partner or managing member of the entity that owns the single-family home; (iii) is or controls the investment manager, management company, or investment advisor of the entity that owns the single-family home; (iv) owns or controls more than 25 percent of any class of equity interests of the entity that owns the single-family home, unless such entity is a passive investor; or (v) otherwise controls the entity that owns the single-family home. (5) Purchase.--The term "purchase" includes any purchase, transfer, or other acquisition of a single family home, including through mergers, acquisitions, construction, foreclosures, or bulk purchases, whether or not for cash consideration. (b) Prohibition on Purchases by Large Institutional Investors.-- (1) In general.--No large institutional investor may purchase, or enter into a contract to directly or indirectly purchase, any single-family home. (2) Exceptions.--The prohibition under paragraph (1) shall not apply to-- (A) any excepted purchase; or (B) any purchase of a single-family home in connection with a restructuring or other reorganization of ownership of single-family homes that were owned or purchased on or before the date of enactment of this Act. (3) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to-- (A) require any large institutional investor to divest or otherwise sell any single-family home purchased before the date of enactment of this Act; or (B) prevent the filing of a petition, or otherwise affect any bankruptcy proceeding, under title 11, United States Code. (4) Implementation.-- (A) In general.--In consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Director of Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Secretary of the Treasury may issue regulations in accordance with the notice and comment rulemaking procedures under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, to carry out the purposes of this section, including regulations to-- (i) minimize market disruptions upon identifying a risk of material negative impact on the housing market, including an impact on the ability of market participants to dispose of single-family homes in an orderly fashion; and (ii) mitigate, to the extent possible, negative impacts on consumers and communities. (B) Rule of construction.--For the avoidance of doubt, no regulation issued under subparagraph (A) may amend the definitions of the terms defined under subsection (a), including to-- (i) alter the scope of excepted purchases in a manner that would undermine the goal of expanding the number of single-family homes available to individual households for purchase; (ii) alter any type of excepted purchase in a manner that would undermine the goal of expanding the number of single-family homes available to individual households for purchase; (iii) add any category of large institutional investor as an eligible class if not determined by this section; or (iv) alter the quantitative threshold in the definition of "large institutional investor". (c) Renter Outreach Resource Established.-- (1) In general.--The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, establish a renter outreach resource that consists of a toll-free telephone number and a public website designed to assist renters of residential properties owned by a large institutional investor in-- (A) notifying Federal agencies about disputes relating to the rental of such properties, including disputes about potential violations of Federal law; (B) sharing information about such disputes with other Federal agencies, including other Federal agencies that manage similar disputes; (C) monitoring such disputes; and (D) resolving such disputes, to the extent practicable. (2) Response to outreach.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall establish reasonable procedures to-- (i) promptly respond, in writing where appropriate, to a renter who provides information to the Secretary about a dispute using the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1); and (ii) document such responses. (B) Contents.--Responses provided under subparagraph (A) shall include, where appropriate, information about-- (i) steps that have been taken by the Secretary or another Federal agency in response to the information about the dispute provided by the renter, including determining the appropriate large institutional investor involved as described in paragraph (3); (ii) any responses received by the Secretary or another Federal agency from the large institutional investor related to such dispute; and (iii) any outcome of the dispute, to the extent practicable. (3) Investigation of potential violations of federal law.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall promptly process and investigate any information relating to a dispute received through the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1) about a potential violation of Federal law that is received from a renter of a residential property owned by a large institutional investor through the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1), including: (i) Requesting information from a large institutional investor; (ii) Determining the appropriate large institutional investor involved in the dispute; and (iii) Sharing information about such potential violation of Federal law with any relevant Federal agencies, as the Secretary may determine appropriate. (B) Responses to requests for information.--Upon request for information made pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide a large institutional investor the opportunity to respond, including regarding whether such large institutional investor currently owns the property described in such request for information. (4) Information for appropriate state authority.--When the Secretary receives information about a potential violation of State law or about a dispute received through the renter outreach resource, from a renter of a residential property owned by a large institutional investor through the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, at a minimum, provide the renter with contact information for the appropriate, State-specific, State authority authorized to process and investigate such information. (5) Notice about renter outreach resource.--Each large institutional investor shall-- (A) provide to each renter of a residential property owned by such investor at the time such renter first occupies such home and annually thereafter-- (i) written notice about the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1); and (ii) the name, phone number, and email address of the person or entity responsible for receiving and addressing renter disputes for the large institutional investor, and update the name, phone number, and email address within 30 days if such information changes prior to the subsequent time at which such notice is required to be provided; and (B) prominently feature information about the renter outreach resource established under paragraph (1) on a public website of such investor that is accessible by such renter. (6) Annual report to the congress.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary shall, not later than March 31 of each year, submit to the Congress a public report which analyzes and aggregates the information received or obtained pursuant to this subsection during the prior year that includes-- (i) information about the types and the number of disputes received about potential violations of Federal law; (ii) information about the types and the number of disputes received about potential violations of State law; (iii) where practicable, information about the resolution of such disputes; and (iv) information provided to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under paragraph (8). (B) Anonymization of data.--Any data included in a report that is submitted under this paragraph shall be aggregated or anonymized so as to protect any individual dispute or personally identifiable information received through the renter outreach resource. (7) Protection of personal information.--In complying with the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary shall take such measures as the Secretary determines are necessary to provide for the protection of personally identifiable information received through the renter outreach resource in a manner that conforms with existing standards for protection of the confidentiality of personally identifiable information. (8) Annual notification.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not later than December 31st of each year thereafter, each person or entity that satisfies the definition of a large institutional investor, as such term is defined in subsection (a) shall-- (A) notify the Secretary each year whether such owner is a large institutional investor as defined in subsection (a); and (B) in such notification, identify how many single-family homes such large institutional investor has direct or indirect investment control of as of the date of the submission of such notice, and the city and State where each such single-family home is located, unless such large institutional investor owns 10 or fewer single-family homes in such city. (d) Enforcement.-- (1) Civil penalties.--The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Attorney General at the request of the Secretary of the Treasury, may bring an action against a large institutional investor that violates subsection (b) for a civil penalty in an amount that is not more than $1,000,000 per violation, or 3 times the purchase price of the property involved, whichever is greater. (2) Transfer to hud for homeownership expansion activities.--For fiscal year 2027 and each fiscal year thereafter, to the extent and in the amounts provided in advance in appropriations Acts, civil penalties assessed under this section shall be transferred to and available to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide additional funding for the HOME Investment Partnerships program under subtitle A of title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C.
Text printed in the Record (4,960 characters)
12741 et seq.), to be allocated in accordance with the formula under that program, for new construction, acquisition, and rehabilitation of single-family homes and to provide assistance grants to first-time homebuyers, which may be for downpayments, closing costs, and interest rate buydowns. (e) Studies on Large Institutional Investors.-- (1) Gao report.--Not later than 2 years after the date on which the prohibition under subsection (b)(1) takes effect, and again not later than 10 years after that date, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services a report on-- (A) the impact of the ownership by large institutional investors of single-family homes on housing availability and affordability for renters and homebuyers; and (B) the effectiveness of this section in reducing demand by large institutional investors for single-family homes and expanding homeownership for renters and homebuyers. (2) Hud report.--Not later than 2 years after the date on which the prohibition under subsection (b)(1) takes effect, and again not later than 10 years after that date, the Secretary of the Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Administrator of the Rural Housing Service, the Executive Director of the Loan Guaranty Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Chair of Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on-- (A) whether there should be adjustments to the definition of the term "large institutional investor"; (B) the financial impact of this section on large institutional investors, renters, and homebuyers; and (C) any legislative recommendations regarding ways to improve the authorities provided under this section to increase the supply and affordability of single-family homes for purchase by individual homebuyers. (3) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress that-- (A) this section is intended to expand the number of single-family homes available to individuals for purchase and is aimed at preserving and expanding the supply of single-family homes available to individuals; and (B) any further study on the effectiveness of this section and any legislative recommendations therefrom should consider this sense of Congress. (f) Effective Date.--The requirements and prohibitions under subsections (b) and (d) of this section-- (1) shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act; and (2) are repealed on the date that is 15 years after the effective date under paragraph (1). SEC. 1101. CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY. The Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 221 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 16 (12 U.S.C. 411 et seq.) the following: "SEC. 16A. CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY. "(a) Definitions.--In this section: "(1) Central bank digital currency.--The term `central bank digital currency' means a digital asset that-- "(A) is denominated in United States dollars; "(B) is a United States currency; "(C) is a direct liability of the Federal Reserve System; and "(D) is widely available to the general public. "(2) Digital asset.--The term `digital asset' has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). "(b) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (c), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or a Federal reserve bank may not issue or create a central bank digital currency or any digital asset that is substantially similar to a central bank digital currency directly or indirectly through a financial institution or other intermediary. "(c) Exception.--Subsection (b) shall not prohibit any dollar-denominated currency that is open, permissionless, and private, and fully preserves the privacy protections of United States coins and physical currency. "(d) Sunset.--This provisions of this section shall cease to be effective on December 31, 2030. "(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to allow the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to issue a central bank digital currency or any digital asset that is substantially similar to a central bank digital currency directly or indirectly absent authorization by an Act of Congress.". SEC. 1201. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the Act, and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby. SEC. 1202. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the requirements of this Act or any amendment made by this Act.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this resolution.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the Congressional Budget Office estimate for this bill. Legislation Considered Under Suspension of the Rules The Majority Leader of the House of Representatives announces bills that will be considered under suspension of the rules in that chamber. Under suspension, floor debate is limited, all floor amendments are prohibited. points of order against the bill are waived, and anal passage requires a two-thirds majority vote. At the request of the Majority Leader and the House Committee on the Budget, CBO estimates the effects of those bills on direct spending and revenues. CBO has limited time to review the legislation before consideration. Although it is possible in most cases to determine whether the legislation would affect direct spending or revenues, time may be insufficient to estimate the magnitude of those effects. If CBO has prepared estimates for similar or identical legislation, a more detailed assessment of budgetary effects, including effects on spending subject to appropriation, may be included.
Text printed in the Record (1,700 characters)
EFFECTS ON DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES OF LEGISLATION CONSIDERED UNDER SUSPENSION OF THE RULES IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Week of May 18, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Effect on Direct Information on Direct Link to Published Bill Number Title Spending Effect on Revenues Spending and Revenue Estimates Effects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------H. Res. 6644....................... 21st Century ROAD to Increase by at Least Increase by at Least Would reduce the N/A Housing Act, as $500K. $500K. deficit by tens of amended. millions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------On May 18, 2026, this table was updated to include the addition of S. 1003, LuLu's Law, to the list of bills that may be considered under suspension of the rules in the House of Representatives during the week of May 18, 2026. On May 18, 2026, the text for H. Res. 6644, 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, as amended, was revised. The changes to the legislation did not affect CBO's assessment of the effects of the resolution on direct spending and revenues. Sources: Congressional Budget Office; staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the House amendment to the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. I share in President Trump's commitment to delivering a housing bill that puts American families first and expands access to American homeownership. Over the last couple of months, we have heard clear concerns from literally hundreds of bipartisan Members and stakeholders expressing concerns with some of the provisions that were contained in the Senate-passed version of the housing bill. For Ranking Member Waters and me, Ranking Member Cleaver and Chairman Flood on the Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance, this has been years of work in the making and months of intensive work in this 119th Congress to find a path that improves accessibility to housing for the American people, and affordability for the American people, that could be a bicameral, bipartisan housing measure. This amendment that is before us today, which amends the good work of the Senate, is exactly that: hours and hours of listening to the American people across our cities, hours of testimony in our Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance, led by the gentleman from Nebraska. We have that feedback. That feedback, Mr. Speaker, informs this amendment. It informs this debate. Ranking Member Waters and I have collaborated together today on several revisions that ensure that these reforms are narrowly tailored and do not, in any way, in some unintentional way, reduce housing supply, disrupt housing markets, or harm those in the rental community. The focus of the bill in the House and the Senate, and the focus of our work today in the amendment, is to continue to cut unnecessary barriers to new home construction, modernize HUD programs, and allow our community banks to more freely deploy funding into their communities that aid in the development of new housing products, whether it is single-family housing or housing for rent. This bill has a provision in it that also meets the request of President Trump, which he outlined in this room in his State of the Union Address, that we limit institutional investors from competing with Moms and Dads and Americans out there trying to buy a house. It removes some of the legal challenges that we felt were in the structure of the Senate's approach. Ultimately, in my view, and I believe the view of Chairman Flood, Ranking Member Cleaver, and Ranking Member Waters, this delivers on that goal of not having a young family buying their first home, being informed by their Realtor that somehow they missed that opportunity because the house was bought out from under them by some big-shot institutional investor. That is what President Trump talked about here in this House Chamber at the State of the Union Address. I believe, Mr. Speaker, that the changes that we made in a collaborative, bipartisan way deliver on the President's goal and, in fact, help this bill. Additionally, this bill modernizes outdated banking regulations so that community banks can focus on doing what they do best: lending and providing loans to families who are looking to buy a home and companies looking to finance construction. Together, these changes strengthen our joint, bicameral focus on expanding housing access and affordability without discouraging investment in new housing development. The amendment we are voting on advances practical, bipartisan solutions to modernizing the Federal housing programs, reducing regulatory burdens, streamlining the development process, and building more homes to meet growing demand. Congress has a responsibility to pursue reforms that expand opportunity and keep this great American Dream within reach. Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member. I thank Mr. Flood and Mr. Cleaver for their tireless effort over the last year and a half, and I am proud to support this effort. I urge my colleagues to do the same. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H. Res. 1299, amending H.R. 6644, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, sponsored by Chairman Hill and me. Tomorrow, the House has a historic opportunity to pass an improved bipartisan housing package, negotiated in partnership with Chairman Hill and me, and with the input of many House Democrats. Mr. Speaker, our housing bill is the most comprehensive housing reform bill in a generation and is a huge step toward finally addressing the affordable housing and homelessness crises in our country. Let me make it clear, and let me take a moment to remind everyone what is at stake or who we are trying to help. The age of a median first-time homebuyer is now 40 years old. That is largely because the average cost of a single-family home has skyrocketed, and wages have not kept pace. In fact, 22 million households spend over 30 percent of their paycheck on rent, and 12 million spend over 50 percent on housing. What is most shameful is that nearly 800,000 people experience homelessness on any given night. This is unacceptable, and we must act now. The House first passed H.R. 6644 back in February. A month later, the Senate amended our bill, stripping out numerous House provisions that would address real problems in the housing market. However, the Senate also added a poorly drafted ban on large institutional investors buying new single-family homes. I say this not as someone who is a fan of private equity ownership of these homes, but as someone who was concerned that the Senate's drafting was unconstitutional and could lead to thousands of families and persons living with disabilities being evicted, students and servicemembers without housing options, and private equity being incentivized to use certain types of contracts with tenants that have been rife with abuses. For this reason, I called on the Senate to join us in a conference to resolve our differences. While I am disappointed that our Senate colleagues chose not to conference with us, Chairman Hill and I just kept on going. We pressed on, making those critical improvements to restore the legislation to its intent to address the housing crisis. To be clear, the consequences of simply passing the Senate's bill were stark. The Urban Institute concluded that 72,000 housing units would not be built as a result of the Senate's bill. Even more alarming, the Senate's language also threatened tens of thousands of families with eviction. Mr. Speaker, before I go on, I must say that the process to get here today has been less than ideal. That is an understatement. Chairman Hill, the Speaker, the White House, and I were making changes to this text right up until the last minute. While I support our final agreement, we must inform our colleagues about how this bill has changed since it was posted on Friday, as they will be voting on it tomorrow, so I am going to describe those changes here. First, the bill removes section 204, which was the Build Now Act. Second, we added a new section 107, called Housing Supply Frameworks. Third, section 208, the Housing Innovation Fund, now sunsets after 7 years instead of 5 years. Fourth, we added language ensuring prevailing wage requirements under the Davis-Bacon Act apply to sections 102 and 106 of this bill. Fifth, we are revising section 1001 of the bill, which relates to private equity ownership of single-family homes, by replacing our text with the Senate-based language while removing the divestment requirement, changing the definition of build-to-rent, and inserting a renter hotline that requires HUD to respond to renter complaints. Mr. Speaker, this revised House package of needed housing reforms preserves more than 90 percent of the Senate's bill, while strengthening it by adding numerous, critical House-passed, Democratic-led housing and community banking provisions. As a result, we will be providing more relief and support to millions of families and communities all across the Nation. Mr. Speaker, there is broad recognition in this Chamber of the problems in our housing markets. We need comprehensive reforms at the Federal, State, and local levels, along with a commitment by everyone to get America building housing again. How do we do this? We do this by: creating a pilot to increase access to small-dollar mortgages, especially in rural areas; allowing housing cooperatives, a type of affordable housing option, to participate in Federal programs; creating local databases about unused, government-owned land--very important; increasing access to more family-sized affordable housing units; and adding in community bank and credit union reforms so that these small institutions can help. These and so many other reforms in this bill are a huge first step toward finally addressing the housing crisis in this country. Finally, the Senate had a temporary ban on central bank digital currencies, that is the CBDC. This is the status quo we have in effect today as Trump's new Fed Chair has stated that he will not issue a CBDC during his tenure. More importantly, this temporary ban is only partial and will still allow the Fed to study other forms of CBDC, like the ones that more closely parallel how currency is used in our economy. Mr. Speaker, I urge Members to join me in passing this bill. I will just say that we have learned an awful lot over a number of years about what we could do to create some real opportunities. We are now using our experiences working on housing bills to interject into how we are going to be able to get more housing for all of those who are in desperate need and to get the homeless off of our streets. We have learned a lot. You are going to hear in this bill about how we are learning about land that is owned by cities and counties for years that they could get rid of and don't have to do it for market value, on and on and on. Mr. Speaker, I am very proud, even though this has been a real, real labor--I want to say of love, but it has been a real labor, maybe not of love but something that really had to be done. I think we have finally made these meaningful steps to our Nation's housing crisis and strengthened our community banks. Mr. Speaker, I ask everyone to please support this bill. I reserve the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)5:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, when I think about the ranking member, she knows the respect I have for her, and she has, I am sure, no less than four decades as one of the Nation's most strong and effective advocates for housing and housing solutions in our country. To say she supports a bill is high praise, and we are grateful to her. Mr. Speaker, I have to say that I started what is a modest career in D.C. as a youngster in my twenties, and I was a staffer on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs during the first term of President Ronald Reagan. President Reagan was trying to restart the economy after the grim decade of the 1970s. It was bad. President Carter had struggled with it. We were in two back-to-back recessions. One of his ideas was: What could we do in housing? Interest rates were at 20 percent. It is a little hard to buy a house when interest rates are 20 percent. But he had a commission on housing; and one of his top ideas was to change the building codes, make them more modern, make them more competitive, both in manufactured housing and in modular construction techniques for resiliency and for energy efficiency. Guess what, Mr. Speaker. We are going to do that today, 40 years later. We wouldn't be doing it if we didn't have the hard work of Mike Flood, the chairman of the Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance in this Congress, and his partner in this effort, Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Flood), the chair of the Housing and Insurance Subcommittee.

Mike Flood (R-NE)5:50 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Hill and Ranking Member Waters for supporting this bill. When I got the privilege of leading this subcommittee given to me by our chairman, the first order of business, after I found out where my office was, was to go meet Emanuel Cleaver for dinner. We shared a prime rib, and I knew that night that we had something special. Housing is personal. Housing is not a building or a garage. It is where you bring home your first baby, and the first bath is under the sink faucet. It is where you tuck your little 7-year-old into bed, and you say: I am doing my part as a parent to protect her from being homeless or living a better life. When I met Emanuel Cleaver, I could see in his eyes that this was personal to him. I thought, I am a Republican. He is a Democrat. God has placed us in these spots to try and fix something for the American people, to make it easier to get that first house, to buy a manufactured home that doesn't have a chassis and save $25,000, and to do it for all the right reasons. Last Sunday, as I was coming back to Omaha, we were flying. Because of storms, I was flying over Kansas City and I looked at the lights of Kansas City, and I thought to myself: I want this as much for him as I want it for Lincoln or Waverly or Papillion. Mr. Speaker, because of our chairman, our ranking member, our Speaker, our leader, and the leadership in both parties, we have a product that the American people can look at tonight on this floor and say: Congress did its job. They worked together. They compromised. Did we get everything we wanted? No. Have you ever met the ranking member? She drives a hard bargain. Yet, did we move the ball forward for the American people? The answer is yes. People send us to this town because they want solutions. They don't want what they get too often at 9 o'clock eastern. They want to wake up and know that their kids have a chance to get into a home, to park their car in a garage, go to work at the factory the next day, and build a better life for the next generation. What do we have in this bill? We have a bicameral, bipartisan solution. The institutional investor ban language by the Senate created massive unintended consequences for the market. We know that. However, the Senate impressed us with sending a truly bipartisan bill over here. What the American people need to know is this is what the Founders envisioned, House versus Senate, Republicans and Democrats united in the House, Republicans and Democrats united in the Senate behind an issue, not a personality. I credit the leadership for working the way they did that allowed Mr. Cleaver and I to set a table and listen to the Habitat for Humanity folks from Huntsville, Alabama, to welcome in the mayor of San Diego, to talk to the mayor of Lincoln, who is high up on the United States Conference of Mayors, and find out what her priorities are. People are going to get into homes, and they are going to get into homes easier because of this. I, for one, want the people I signed up to represent to know this is exactly why I want to be in Congress. I would like to take a moment to highlight a few provisions that I feel will make a difference. Sections 205 and 206 of the bill work to rightsize environmental reviews on both HUD and USDA housing projects. Mr. Nunn of Iowa is a big fan of that. This legislation ensures these environmental reviews are properly tailored to the real impact of the project going forward, not just a box that needs to be checked. I worked with Mr. Cleaver on this section of the bill for a long time as it relates to the reform of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, the largest block grant program at HUD dedicated to building affordable housing. What does it do? It slashes the environmental review requirements and eases labor cost burdens like the ones created by Section 3.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:00 p.m.

The time of the gentleman has expired.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman from Nebraska.

Mike Flood (R-NE)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, in addition, it provides greater flexibility for cities and towns across the country to utilize HOME dollars to promote homeownership. Sometimes it is as easy as extending the wastewater and the water system another 15 blocks. Think how far that goes in California or a small town in Nebraska where they only have two blocks, and another block means you get 10 more houses there. That is 10 more families. That is 50 more kids for a school that is on life support. Now they have housing. I am very proud of the committee I serve on. I am proud of the way we work in a bipartisan manner. I want my career in Congress to be experiences like this, and I thank Mr. Cleaver for everything that he has accomplished in Congress and look forward to a continued great relationship.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Cleaver), the ranking member of the Housing and Insurance Subcommittee and coauthor of this bill. He is someone who worked very hard to make some changes in the HOME program and that when some questions were raised about Davis-Bacon, he was right there to ensure that they were protected. I thank him so very much.

Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the revision of H.R. 6644, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act introduced by Chairman Hill, Ranking Member Waters, Chairman Flood, and myself. I appreciate very much the leadership of Ranking Member Waters and Chairman Hill in negotiating this very important revision. To quote Chairman Hill: "This is how Congress is supposed to work." I could not agree more. I might add, this is how the vast majority of the American public would like to see us conduct business. Housing remains the single largest expense for the Americans who sent us to Washington. Rising housing costs are consuming an increasing share of household income. Families are struggling to cover necessities and are increasingly unable to save enough to transition into homeownership. The legislation we will be voting on is extraordinary. The underlying concept--updating Federal housing programs--is a matter, really, of common sense. What sets this moment apart is not just the concept of the bill, but the bipartisan, open, and deliberative process. The process in the House has made the bill appealing legislatively and politically. It reflects a monthslong and difficult effort to do what our constituents sent us here to do. Chairman Hill did not get everything he wanted. Ranking Member Waters did not get everything she wanted. Chairman Flood did not get everything he wanted, and I can say very clearly I did not get everything I wanted. However, I understand that democracy demands deliberation, and we have a bill that is supported by housing stakeholders and will deliver for the American people. I thank Chairman Flood for working with me to reform the HOME program. I thank Chairman Flood and Representative Rose for working with me to expand access to manufactured housing. I thank Representative Nunn for working with me to reform USDA rural housing programs. I thank Representative Lawler for working with me on HUD oversight and to improve Section 8. Finally, I thank Ranking Member Warren for her partnership in working with me on the innovation piece. I also thank Ranking Member Warren and Chairman Scott in the Senate, who I greatly respect. The revised bill, negotiated by Chairman Hill and Ranking Member Waters, is an effort to advance the priorities of the House, Senate, and White House. The constituents in my district, like those all around this country, want to see this bill passed and signed into law. This was one of the greatest opportunities I have had since I have been in Congress.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Meuser), the chair of our Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

Daniel Meuser (R-PA)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I am very honored to rise in support of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. I congratulate our full committee chairman, Chairman Hill, for his diligence and ability to find a solution to a very important issue as well to the chair of the Housing and Insurance Subcommittee, my friend Michael Flood, for his words and just his tenacity in seeing this through. I also offer special thanks to Ranking Member Waters and as well as the subcommittee chair, Mr. Cleaver, for everything that they have done to find a solution. America, Mr. Speaker, faces a housing shortage of well over 4 million homes, while only 1.5 million housing units are built each year. It is a big problem. We have a housing supply program. This bill addresses that shortfall and, importantly, expands affordability in homeownership. Homebuilders tell us their costs are nearly $100,000 before a shovel even hits the dirt due to overregulation, permitting, environmental reviews, and zoning delays. Many can't build a home for less than $250,000. This bill cuts through the blue tape, I tend to call it, by streamlining bank financing for construction and development loans, giving banks greater flexibility to support new housing, which is so very important. It modernizes zoning guidance to create new housing developments, speeds up environmental and project reviews that too often delay construction for months, if not years, and increase costs. President Trump and Republicans in Congress and, clearly, many Democrats are determined to address our housing challenges, including preventing institutional investors from owning single-family homes, which is, again, very important. This legislation proves bipartisan and bicameral solutions are actually possible where results matter more than politics.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:00 p.m.

The time of the gentleman has expired.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 15 seconds to the gentleman from Pennsylvania.

Daniel Meuser (R-PA)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, all future and existing homeowners throughout the United States will benefit from this bill.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Velazquez), the ranking member of the Small Business Committee and an author of several provisions of this bill.

Nydia M. Velazquez (D-NY)6:00 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6644. I thank Ranking Member Waters and Chairman Hill for including my language on cooperative housing developments and oversight of monitors and receivers of public housing authorities. Cooperatives provide more than 1.5 million families with financially stable housing across the United States and are a critical source of homeownership. Unfortunately, however, they are often excluded from Federal housing programs. Explicit recognition in this bill will ensure that cooperatives can access the bill's benefits and continue to remain a critical component of our affordable housing stock. Additionally, my language requiring Federal monitors and receivers of PHAs to provide annual testimony and written assessments to Congress will ensure Congress is coordinated and providing struggling PHAs with the resources they need to improve their operations and conditions. It will also help ensure effective use of the taxpayers' money.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:10 p.m.

The time of the gentlewoman has expired.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from New York.

Nydia M. Velazquez (D-NY)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, finally, let me say that this bill is a much-needed first step. It is not the entire answer. We must all recognize that we still need substantial monetary investments in housing programs to ensure effective development and reconstruction of the units we need. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote "yes."

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I say to Chairman Hill that in light of changes we agreed to today, I want to take a moment to make clarifications about the authority the Treasury has and should use related to the provisions banning large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. Under our bill, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of HUD, FHFA, and SEC, may issue regulations to minimize market disruptions and negative impacts on consumers and communities. He and I both firmly agree that the bill allows Treasury to do this and that Treasury must use this authority to issue regulations and clarify the following things. First, the bill was not intended to impact military housing, student housing, disability housing, or LIHTC-supported housing, as defined in our earlier May 15, 2026, posted draft of this bill. This bill was also not intended to include or impact nonprofits or community land trusts that purchase single-family homes. These entities are not for-profit, large institutional investors. In addition, large institutional investors are still prohibited from buying properties with land contracts, again, as defined in our earlier May 15 posted draft. These are not subject to landlord-tenant laws and are harmful to renters. Large institutional investors should only be allowed to purchase foreclosed, federally backed properties after individuals and approved nonprofits have been given the first chance to buy them through a 30-day first look period, as described in our earlier May 15 posted draft. Given our congressional intent, Treasury should use its authority to address these concerns and to minimize market disruption and mitigate negative impacts on consumers and communities. Mr. Speaker, I know Mr. Hill agrees with me on all of this, as we have discussed, and I would love for him to share his thoughts with our colleagues on this also. I yield to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill).

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the gentlewoman yielding time. I agree with her that throughout this process, we have tried to be on the same page and be focused on that. We have heard from a lot of stakeholders, a lot of different companies, and a lot of different business models that provide housing options for Americans. Ms. Waters outlined a number in her comments. These include providers of housing for Active-Duty military families, for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, near-campus student housing, and, of course, the senior market. Also included are providers who are organized as nonprofits, as was noted, community land trusts, or entities engaged in Federal or State affordability programs, like the low-income housing tax credit program. We have also heard from many about tools that we use today to provide for more affordable housing options, like First Look programs, to give current renters a leg up on becoming homeowners. These are all valuable features of our current system that encourage, not reduce, the great availability and affordability of housing. I agree with Ms. Waters that we need to make sure that, in the implementation of this section, these beneficial features are not inadvertently caught up when really they have done nothing to the fundamental problem that we are trying to solve today, which is this institutional investor challenge. Leveling the playing field between individual buyers and large institutional investors is the goal. I think we have achieved it in what we have drafted. These features did not cause the problem that we are here today to solve. I thank the ranking member for working with me to ensure that the build-to-rent industry, particularly, is appropriately exempted in the text that we negotiated and considered today, and I commit to working with the Treasury Department and the ranking member throughout the rulemaking process on these issues.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I reclaim my time. I approve of everything Chairman Hill said, and I thank him.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for this long process. It was a labor of love, I think. When Arkansas and L.A. get together, good things happen. I thank Ms. Waters for her diligence. I thank her staff for their diligence in working with my team, Ed and Shannon, and Cary. They all worked very hard and collaboratively on what we did today. I also thank Senators Tim Scott and Elizabeth Warren in the Senate. I think too often we play back and forth work here, but you are actually seeing legislation, Mr. Speaker, going back and forth between the committees. This is regular order. Mr. Speaker, 390 Members came to the House floor a few weeks ago and voted for a housing bill that Ms. Waters and I put forward. That is a pretty big vote in today's time. Likewise, in the Senate, as Chairman Flood referenced, Senators Scott and Warren got 89 Senators to vote for a housing bill. What does that tell us? That tells us that on a bicameral, bipartisan basis, we ought to have a housing bill. President Trump has attempted to spur housing and housing ownership through tax changes in the Working Families Tax Cut Act, lowering regulatory burden so we can do more housing across this country. In his own State of the Union Address, he pointed out that we ought to have moms and dads being able to buy a house without competing on cash against somebody that is some big institutional investor. That is the executive branch and the House and Senate all on the same page. Today, we come to the House floor eager to bring that to fruition, to have a win, as Chairman Flood referenced, for the American people on greater affordability of housing and greater accessibility of housing. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, let me just say that I appreciate Mr. Hill's support of some of the efforts that we made. Because of his background in banking and his experience, he understood exactly what we were talking about when we talked about the banks being able to do smaller loans and to provide mortgages for homes that cost a lot less than the millions of dollars. It was because of his background and his experience that he understood right away that we want this pilot program so that we can show everybody that it is impossible to be able to have a mortgage if, in fact, you are buying a home that costs less than millions of dollars. I thank him very much. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr. Liccardo), a member of the Financial Services Committee and an author of several provisions in this bill.

Sam T. Liccardo (D-CA)6:10 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member and the chair for their leadership on this effort. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of this amendment to the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. Today, a rapidly growing number of our families, nearly 13 million, appear severely rent burdened, meaning they spend more than half of their income on housing and utilities. Our housing crisis requires many actions from this Congress, but we should start precisely where we all agree, Republicans and Democrats, on improving affordability through accelerating expansion of housing supply. This legislation, which includes four bills that I either lead or co-lead with my colleagues, will take important steps to cut red tape, lower costs, and boost supply of multifamily housing construction, both market-rate and affordable. Let's embrace this too rare moment of bipartisanship and approve this package to expand supply, and then let's continue this momentum, rolling up our sleeves, to address the affordability crisis that too many of our families are pressed by. Mr. Speaker, the rent is too damn high. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this package.

Maxine Waters (D-CA)6:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time is remaining.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:20 p.m.

The gentleman from Arkansas has 4\1/4\ minutes remaining.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I thank Members from both sides of the aisle for their perseverance and efforts. Let me thank my friends in the Senate for their perseverance and support of the important policy of having more accessible and more affordable housing by cutting red tape and increasing capital availability to housing. I want to think about my own constituency in central Arkansas. The community development officers, Mr. Howard and his team, at the city of Little Rock, have constantly approached me that if we could make reforms to the HOME Program, like Mr. Flood and Mr. Cleaver have proposed, it will lower the cost per square foot of the ability to use that program by the city of Little Rock for new housing construction. They have approached me about CDBG money being more flexible in how it can be used for infrastructure and how that could produce more housing availability in Little Rock. In this bill, we reform the incentives to investment by bank holding companies to directly invest in housing. That is a major, new source of capital that will come to the housing market. Then just think about the reforms we talked about in building codes, Mr. Speaker, that have a nationwide benefit. Some 3,000 zoning agencies will be benefited from those changes. Then, also in Little Rock, there is the importance of HUD oversight. I thank Mr. Torres of New York and Mr. Lawler of New York and their provisions in this bill that talk about HUD's oversight. How do we hold HUD accountable for doing a better job? Finally, Mr. Speaker, I will close by saying that the ranking member and I have included some commonsense, bipartisan reforms to our community banks to make it easier for them to be engaged in their community and delivering for those homebuilders who are building for our families across our communities. It is important because, Mr. Speaker, six out of ten home construction loans in this country--six out of ten of those loans--are made by community banks under $10 billion. That is the heart of America. It is the heart of Main Street, and that is why the ranking member and I have put a modest number of consensus elements to signal to Americans living on Main Street and living in our neighborhoods we want to have a supply side approach: more capital available for the banks, more funding for our homebuilders, and more investment in one-to-four family properties through the provisions of cutting red tape in this bill led by Mr. Flood and Mr. Cleaver. I just insist that that, I believe, is so important, and I believe that has been recognized by policymakers on both sides of the aisle. The White House recently reinforced this principle in an executive order promoting access to mortgage credit which recognized that regulatory changes over the past two decades have made it increase the cost to originate a mortgage and service a mortgage and have distorted the structure of the mortgage market. This executive order specifically emphasized the importance of ensuring that community banks and smaller lenders can continue participating in mortgage lending markets, reducing unnecessary regulatory burden. The executive branch is on the same page with the legislative branch. I think this poses an opportunity for a bicameral success that we can send to President Trump's desk that increases accessibility to housing, increases affordability to housing, and is a real success in economic policy for this country. Mr. Speaker, I encourage all Members on both sides of the aisle to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)6:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, the bill we are debating today, 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, is a meaningful investment in addressing the Nation's housing crisis. It appears to be a comprehensive legislation, but manufactured housing is left out. For no good reason the House removed a bipartisan provision from this legislation that would revitalize manufactured housing communities. 22 million Americans, including many veterans, seniors, and working families, live in manufactured homes, and manufactured housing communities provide a critical source of attainable homeownership. The Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement--or PRICE Act--helps to preserve existing low-cost homes at a fraction of the cost of new construction. Although this housing package makes major investments, rural communities and people living in manufactured houses are being left behind. Both the President and Senate support keeping the PRICE program in the bill, so I urge my colleagues to add PRICE back in and recognize the needs of the millions of low-income Americans who live in manufactured housing communities.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:20 p.m.

The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) that the House suspend the rules and agree to the resolution, H. Res. 1299.

The question was taken.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:20 p.m.

In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.

J. French Hill (R-AR)6:20 p.m.

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

The yeas and nays were ordered.

The SPEAKER pro tempore6:20 p.m.

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

Hour of Meeting on Tomorrow

Page H3624 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that when the House adjourns today, it adjourn to meet at 11 a.m. tomorrow.

The SPEAKER pro tempore

Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Arkansas?

There was no objection.

Adjournment

Page H3624 · Official text

J. French Hill (R-AR)

Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.

The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 6 o'clock and 26 minutes p.m.), under its previous order, the House adjourned until tomorrow, Wednesday, May 20, 2026, at 11 a.m.

Executive Communications, Etc.

Pages H3624–H3625 · Official text

Under clause 2 of rule XIV, executive communications were taken from the Speaker's table and referred as follows:

Text printed in the Record (11,755 characters)
EC-3546. A letter from the Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Department of Agriculture, transmitting the Department's final rule --Oranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines, and Pummelos Grown in Florida; Increased Assessment Rate [Doc. No.: AMS-SC-24-0071] received May 5, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Agriculture. EC-3547. A letter from the Administrator, Agriculture Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Department of Agriculture, transmitting the Department's final rule --Spearmint Oil Produced in the Far West; Salable Quantities and Allotment Percentages for the 2025-2026 Marketing Year [Doc. No.: AMS-SC-24-0069] received May 5, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Agriculture. EC-3548. A letter from the Acting Branch Chief, Regulatory Management Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, transmitting the Administration's final rule -- Approval and Promulgation of Delegation of Authority for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Allegheny County; Delegation of Authority of the Federal Plan for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units [EPA-R03-OAR-2025-0487; FRL-12943-02-R3] received May 7, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3549. A letter from the Acting Branch Chief, Regulatory Management Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, transmitting the Agency's final rule -- Approval of Missouri's Request for Partial Program Delegation of Clean Air Act 112(r) Prevention of Accidental Release Program [EPA-R07-OAR-2026-0497; FRL-13206-02-R7] received April 29, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3550. A letter from the Supervisory, Program Analyst, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, transmitting the Commission's final rule -- Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Enterprise, Utah) [MB Docket No. 25-243] (RM-12006) (RM-12019); FM Application for Minor Modification for Station KXUT, Page, Arizona [File No. 0000280777] (Facility ID No. 36340); FM Application for Minor Modification for Station KXQX, Tusayan, Arizona [File No. 0000280] (Facility ID No. 762488) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3551. A letter from the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, transmitting the Commission's final rule -- Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Licensing of New Nuclear Reactors [NRC-2020-0101] (RIN: 3150-AK55) received April 27, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3552. A letter from the Director, Office of Congressional Affairs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, transmitting the Commission's direct final rule -- Exceptions From Foreign Ownership, Control, or Domination [NRC-2024-0218] (RIN: 3150-AL32) received April 29, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3553. A letter from the Director, Office of Congressional Affairs, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, transmitting the Commission's final rule -- Cost Expenditure Criteria for Research and Development Utilization Facilities [NRC-2020-0071] (RIN: 3150-AL35) received April 27, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. EC-3554. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 26-027, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3555. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-035, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3556. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 26-002, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3557. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 26-017, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3558. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-110, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3559. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-119, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3560. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-133, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3561. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 24-134, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3562. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 26-009, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3563. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 26-012, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3564. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-108, Certification of proposed issuance of an export license, pursuant to sections 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3565. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-145, Certification of proposed issuance of an export license, pursuant to sections 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3566. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-122, Certification of proposed issuance of an export license, pursuant to sections 36(c) and 36(d) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3567. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-068, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3568. A letter from the Senior Bureau Official, Bureau of Legislative Affairs, Department of State, transmitting Transmittal No. DDTC 25-150, certification of proposed issuance of an export license pursuant to section 36(c) of the Arms Export Control Act; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. EC-3569. A letter from the Chairman, Council of the District of Columbia, transmitting DC Act 26-317, "Youth Curfew Amendment Act of 2026", pursuant to Public Law 93-198, Sec. 602(c)(1); (87 Stat. 813); to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. EC-3570. A letter from the Chief Financial Officer, Director, Office of Financial Manage, United States Capitol Police, transmitting the Statement of Disbursements for the U.S. Capitol Police for the period October 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026, pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 1910(a); Public Law 109-55, Sec. 1005; (119 Stat. 575) (H. Doc. No. 119--159); to the Committee on House Administration and ordered to be printed. EC-3571. A letter from the Chief Regulatory Officer, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, transmitting the Department's interim final rule --Signatures on Immigration Benefit Requests [CIS No.: 2855-26; Docket No.: USCIS-2026-0166] (RIN: 1615-AD17) received May 11, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on the Judiciary. EC-3572. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Amendment of Class D Airspace; Appleton, WI [Docket No.: FAA-2026-2212; Airspace Docket No.: 26-AGL-1] (RIN: 2120-AA66) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3573. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes [Docket No.: FAA-2026-0728; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01823-T; Amendment 39-23310; AD 2026-08-02] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3574. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Modification of Class E Airspace; Florence Municipal Airport, Florence, OR [Docket No.: FAA-2025-5142; Airspace Docket No.: 25-ANM-133] (RIN: 2120-AA66) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3575. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Establishment of Restricted Areas R-5305A, R-5305B, and R-5305C; Camp Lejeune, NC; and Restricted Areas R-5307A, R-5307B, and R-5307C; Cherry Point, NC [Docket No. FAA-2025-0273; Airspace Docket No. 23-ASO-43] (RIN 2120-AA66) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3576. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Establishment of Class E Airspace; Sparta, KY [Docket No.: FAA-2025-0583; Airspace Docket No.: 25-ASO-7] (RIN: 2120-AA66), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3577.
Text printed in the Record (5,904 characters)
A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes [Docket No.: FAA-2026-3486; Project Identifier MCAI-2026-00002-T; Amendment 39-23314; AD 2026-08-06] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3578. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters [Docket No.: FAA-2025-5038; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01035-R; Amendment 39-23309; AD 2026-08-01] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3579. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes [Docket No.: FAA-2026-0727; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01659-T; Amendment 39-23312; AD 2026-08-04] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3580. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes [Docket No.: FAA-2026-0740; Project Identifier MCAI-2025-01037-T; Amendment 39-23313; AD 2026-08-05] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3581. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes [Docket No.: FAA-2026-3862; Project Identifier MCAI-2026-00317-A; Amendment 39-23319; 2026-08-11] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3582. A letter from the Manager, Legal Litigation and Support, FAA, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's final rule -- Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Engines [Docket No.: FAA-2025-0918; Project Identifier AD-2024-00526-E; Amendment 39-23301; AD 2026-07-06] (RIN: 2120-AA64) received May 4, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3583. A letter from the Paralegal, Office of Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's direct final rule -- Pipeline Safety: Standards Update -- NFPA 58 [Docket No.: PHMSA-2026-1522; Amdt. No.: 192-158] (RIN: 2137-AG26) received April 30, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3584. A letter from the Paralegal, Office of Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's direct final rule -- Pipeline Safety: Standards Update-ASTM A53/A53M [Docket No.: PHMSA-2026-1523; Amdt. Nos.: 192-159 and 195-119] (RIN: 2137-AG27) received April 30, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3585. A letter from the Paralegal, Office of Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's direct final rule -- Pipeline Safety: Electronic Retention of Part 194 Response Plans [Docket No.: PHMSA-2026-1519; Amdt. No.: 194-6] (RIN: 2137-AG23) received April 30, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3586. A letter from the Paralegal, Office of Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, transmitting the Department's direct final rule -- Pipeline Safety: Standards Update-ASTM A372/A372M [Docket No.: PHMSA-2026-1524; Amdt. No.: 192-160] (RIN: 2137-AG28) received April 30, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3587. A letter from the Paralegal, Office of the Chief Counsel, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, transmitting the Administration's direct final rule -- Pipeline Safety: Standards Update -- ASTM D2564 [Docket No.: PHMSA-2026-1526; Amdt. No.: 192-162] (RIN: 2137-AG30) received May 5, 2026, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A); Public Law 104-121, Sec. 251; (110 Stat. 868); to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. EC-3588. A letter from the National Adjutant, Chief Executive Officer, Disabled American Veterans, transmitting the reports and proceedings of the 2023 National Convention of Disabled American Veterans, held in Phoenix, Arizona, August 3-6, 2024 (H. Doc. No. 119--157); to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and ordered to be printed. EC-3589. A letter from the National Adjutant, Chief Executive Officer, Disabled American Veterans, transmitting the reports and proceedings of the 2025 National Convention of Disabled American Veterans, held in Las Vegas, Nevada, August 9-12, 2025 (H. Doc. No. 119--158); to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and ordered to be printed.

Reports of Committees on Public Bills and Resolutions

Page H3625 · Official text

Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

Text printed in the Record (1,020 characters)
Mr. JACK: Committee on Rules. House Resolution 1300. Resolution providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1041) to amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain information to the Department of Justice for use by the national instant criminal background check system; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6047) to amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the dollar amounts for the payment of certain disability compensation and dependency and indemnity compensation under the laws administered by the Secretary; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1329) to permit the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum to be located within the Reserve of the National Mall, and for other purposes; and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules (Rept. 119-653). Referred to the House Calendar.

Public Bills and Resolutions

Pages H3625–H3627 · Official text

Under clause 2 of rule XII, public bills and resolutions of the following titles were introduced and severally referred, as follows:

Text printed in the Record (11,890 characters)
Webster of Florida, and Ms. Norton): H.R. 8870. A bill to authorize funding for Federal-aid highways, bridge construction and rehabilitation, highway safety programs, transit programs, and rail programs, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. By Mr. BEAN of Florida: H.R. 8871. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to promote Medicare program integrity with respect to certain medical equipment and supplies; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. CAREY (for himself, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, and Ms. Tenney): H.R. 8872. A bill to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to target funds to low-income families, strengthen program integrity guardrails for State expenditure of funds, require measurement of improper payments, and establish goals for eliminating fraud and improper payments under the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself and Mr. Suozzi): H.R. 8873. A bill to recover unclaimed pandemic-era unemployment compensation funds held by financial institutions or escheated to State unclaimed property administrators, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Mr. CARTER of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. Thompson of Mississippi): H.R. 8874. A bill to amend the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 to require recurring reports on the transition of jurisdictions no longer eligible for Urban Area Security Initiative funding, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Homeland Security. By Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia: H.R. 8875. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include certain additional services as self-care home dialysis support services under the Medicare program; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. WALBERG (for himself and Ms. Elfreth): H.R. 8876. A bill to amend the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to provide for the prevention, management, control, and eradication of aquatic nuisance species, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Ms. GARCIA of Texas: H.R. 8877. A bill to direct the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to conduct a study on the implementation of work requirements by public housing agencies, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Financial Services. By Ms. GARCIA of Texas (for herself and Ms. Bynum): H.R. 8878. A bill to amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to incentivize local solutions to homelessness; to the Committee on Financial Services. By Mr. OLSZEWSKI (for himself and Mr. Wied): H.R. 8879. A bill to amend the Small Business Act to require a report on small business concern participation in a covered contracting programs, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Small Business. By Ms. SIMON (for herself and Mr. Bresnahan): H.R. 8880. A bill to require the Comptroller General to evaluate Federal cybersecurity assistance to small business concerns, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Small Business. By Mr. FINSTAD (for himself and Mr. Latimer): H.R. 8881. A bill to amend the Small Business Act to require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to report on the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning by the Administration, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Small Business. By Ms. SCHOLTEN (for herself and Mr. Schmidt): H.R. 8882. A bill to amend the Small Business Economic Policy Act of 1980 to examine how the competitiveness of small businesses is affected by the enforcement of Federal antitrust laws, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Small Business. By Ms. VAN DUYNE: H.R. 8883. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for additional oversight of hospice programs and home health agencies under the Medicare program, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia: H.R. 8884. A bill to amend title II of the Social Security Act to reauthorize demonstration authority for the disability insurance program; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Ms. CROCKETT: H.R. 8885. A bill to amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the use of appropriated funds, including the Judgment Fund, to settle or satisfy certain claims involving the President, political associates, or alleged governmental "weaponization", to require repayment of unlawfully disbursed funds, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. CROW: H.R. 8886. A bill to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide funding for innovations in community policing, mental health care, and community safety, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Clyburn): H.R. 8887. A bill to establish the Julius Rosenwald and Rosenwald Schools National Historical Park, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Natural Resources. By Mr. DELUZIO (for himself and Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania): H.R. 8888. A bill to amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of carriage, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. By Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. Moolenaar): H.R. 8889. A bill to improve dam and hydropower safety, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. By Mr. DUNN of Florida: H.R. 8890. A bill to amend the Public Health Services Act, commonly referred to as the "Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments" or "CLIA", with respect to laboratory developed tests, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. FEENSTRA (for himself, Mr. LaHood, Ms. Tokuda, and Ms. Schrier): H.R. 8891. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude certain beds from counting as acute care inpatient beds for critical access hospitals under the Medicare program; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Mr. FONG: H.R. 8892. A bill to amend title XII of the Social Security Act to require States to first use certain funds to pay outstanding balances on advances made under such title prior to using such funds for any other purpose; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Mrs. FOUSHEE (for herself, Mr. Moylan, Mr. Beyer, and Mr. Fitzpatrick): H.R. 8893. A bill to require the National Institute of Standards and Technology to establish task forces to facilitate and inform the development of technical standards and guidelines relating to the identification of content created by generative artificial intelligence, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. By Ms. GILLEN (for herself and Mr. Van Drew): H.R. 8894. A bill to prosecute, as a Federal crime, the assault or intimidation of a passenger train crew member in a manner consistent with the prosecution of assault or intimidation of an aircraft crew member; to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. GOTTHEIMER (for himself and Mr. Lawler): H.R. 8895. A bill to prohibit food retailers and third party delivery service providers from using technology that uses the personal data of consumer to engage in dynamic pricing, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. By Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ (for herself, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Craig, Ms. Stansbury, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Peters, Mr. Carbajal, Ms. Norton, Mr. DeSaulnier, and Mr. Correa): H.R. 8896. A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide enhanced student loan relief to educators, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Education and Workforce. By Mr. MACKENZIE (for himself and Mrs. Foushee): H.R. 8897. A bill to improve travel for American families, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Homeland Security. By Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself and Mrs. Dingell): H.R. 8898. A bill to amend title 5, United States Code, to deny Federal retirement benefits to Members of Congress convicted of sexual offenses, and for other purposes; to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. MILLER of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Carey, and Ms. DelBene): H.R. 8899. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the tax treatment of digital assets; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia: H.R. 8900. A bill to redesignate a playground in the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve in the State of West Virginia as the "Hearts of Gold Playground: In Honor of West Virginia Children and Families Impacted by Childhood Cancer"; to the Committee on Natural Resources. By Mr. MOOLENAAR: H.R. 8901. A bill to prohibit certain federally funded research collaborations with certain foreign entities, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. By Ms. POU: H.R. 8902. A bill making continuing appropriations for essential Transportation Security Administration pay and operations during the lapse in appropriations beginning on February 14, 2026, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Ms. PRESSLEY: H.R. 8903. A bill to require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to establish a renter outreach resource, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Financial Services. By Mrs. RADEWAGEN: H.R. 8904. A bill to amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide for the regulation of fishing in marine national monuments; to the Committee on Natural Resources. By Mr. ROY: H.R. 8905. A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit leaders of certain religious denominations from being admitted to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(R) of that Act, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. ROY: H.R. 8906.
Text printed in the Record (6,394 characters)
A bill to prohibit the purchase of American Housing supply by Foreign Countries, Adversaries, and Entities of Concern and to require the divestiture of existing housing ownership; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. By Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Budzinski, Mr. Carbajal, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Craig, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Gottheimer, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Lynch, Ms. McCollum, Ms. McClellan, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Mr. Morelle, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Mullin, Ms. Pressley, Mr. Schneider, Ms. Sewell, Ms. Simon, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Strickland, Ms. Stansbury, Mrs. Sykes, Mr. Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Tonko, Mrs. Torres of California, Mrs. Trahan, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Veasey, and Ms. Williams of Georgia): H.R. 8907. A bill to direct the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to implement the Perinatal Care Alternative Payment Model Demonstration Project to test various payment models with respect to maternity care provided to pregnant and postpartum individuals, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. By Mr. SORENSEN (for himself and Mrs. Bice): H.R. 8908. A bill to amend subsection (q) of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify the process for denying certain petitions whose primary purpose is to delay the approval of an application submitted under subsection (b)(2) or (j) of such section 505, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. By Ms. TENNEY (for herself, Mr. Morelle, Ms. Meng, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Riley of New York, Mr. Mannion, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. LaLota, Mr. Kennedy of New York, Mr. Latimer, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Gillen, Mr. Torres of New York, and Mr. Langworthy): H.R. 8909. A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15422 NY 104 in Martville, New York, as the "Sergeant Staret J. Ingleston Memorial Post Office Building"; to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. By Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Sanchez, Ms. Sewell, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Chu, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Horsford, and Mr. Suozzi): H.R. 8910. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a tax on specified settlement fund payments, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means. By Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. Buchanan, and Mr. Fitzpatrick): H.R. 8911. A bill to direct the Attorney General to conduct a study on animal cruelty, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. TORRES of New York: H.R. 8912. A bill to prohibit the use of campaign funds for prediction-market transactions, and for other purposes; to the Committee on House Administration. By Mr. VALADAO (for himself and Mr. Fong): H.R. 8913. A bill to authorize the conveyance of and remove the reversionary interest of the United States in certain lands in the City of Tulare, California; to the Committee on Natural Resources. By Mr. LANDSMAN (for himself and Ms. DelBene): H.J. Res. 187. A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model"; to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. By Mr. HILL of Arkansas (for himself and Ms. Waters): H. Res. 1299. A resolution providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment to H.R. 6644, with amendment; to the Committee on Rules. By Mr. BOST (for himself, Ms. Schrier, Mr. Crawford, Ms. Brown, Mr. Mann, Ms. Salinas, Ms. De La Cruz, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Riley of New York, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mrs. Miller- Meeks, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, Mr. Flood, Ms. Craig, Mrs. Fischbach, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Tokuda, and Mr. Bishop): H. Res. 1301. A resolution supporting the designation of May 29, 2026, as "Mental Health Awareness in Agriculture Day" to raise awareness around mental health in the agricultural industry and workforce and to continue to reduce stigma associated with mental illness; to the Committee on Agriculture. By Mr. BRESNAHAN (for himself and Ms. Bynum): H. Res. 1302. A resolution designating May 2026 as "National Electrical Safety Month" in the United States and supporting the goals and ideals of "National Electrical Safety Month" to raise awareness of electrical hazards in homes, schools, and workplaces and the action citizens can take to protect against electrically related hazards; to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. By Mr. JACKSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. Crow, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Peters, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Van Orden, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Mills, and Mr. McGuire): H. Res. 1303. A resolution recognizing the critical importance of the United States Special Operations Forces community and expressing support for the designation of SOF Week; to the Committee on Armed Services. By Ms. NORTON: H. Res. 1304. A resolution recognizing on Memorial Day, May 25, 2026, the denial of voting representation in Congress and full local self-government through statehood for active duty servicemembers, National Guard members, reservists, veterans, and their families who are residents of the District of Columbia; to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. By Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mr. Cohen): H. Res. 1305. A resolution congratulating the Jewish War Veterans on the 130th anniversary of the organization's founding and honoring their commitment to Jewish war veterans; to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Constitutional Authority Statement

Page H3627 · Official text

Pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following statements are submitted regarding the specific powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the accompanying bill or joint resolution.

Additional Sponsors

Pages H3628–H3630 · Official text

Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors were added to public bills and resolutions, as follows:

Text printed in the Record (7,797 characters)
H.R. 305: Ms. Ross. H.R. 392: Mr. Gottheimer, Ms. Balint, and Mr. Whitesides. H.R. 507: Ms. Goodlander and Ms. Adams. H.R. 740: Mr. Mackenzie. H.R. 850: Mr. Patronis. H.R. 915: Mr. McGarvey. H.R. 966: Ms. Norton. H.R. 1004: Mr. Carey. H.R. 1137: Mr. Steube and Ms. Foxx. H.R. 1260: Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia. H.R. 1288: Mr. Kennedy of New York. H.R. 1340: Mr. Steube. H.R. 1384: Ms. Norton. H.R. 1493: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 1509: Ms. Scholten. H.R. 1607: Mrs. Sykes. H.R. 1628: Ms. Schrier, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Stutzman, Ms. McDonald Rivet, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Hoyle of Oregon, and Mr. Whitesides. H.R. 1657: Mrs. Watson Coleman. H.R. 1732: Mr. Mfume, Ms. Davids of Kansas, and Mr. Pallone. H.R. 1787: Ms. Chu. H.R. 1849: Mr. Gooden. H.R. 1877: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 1921: Mr. Moore of Utah. H.R. 1956: Mr. Pfluger. H.R. 1993: Mr. Huizenga and Mr. Tiffany. H.R. 1995: Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H.R. 2004: Mr. Fine. H.R. 2028: Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Kennedy of New York, and Mr. Hernandez. H.R. 2055: Ms. Wilson of Florida. H.R. 2089: Mr. Bost. H.R. 2095: Mr. Cisneros and Mr. Sorensen. H.R. 2102: Ms. Waters. H.R. 2165: Mr. Grothman. H.R. 2172: Mr. Langworthy. H.R. 2203: Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H.R. 2218: Mr. Grothman. H.R. 2220: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 2324: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 2395: Mr. Patronis. H.R. 2424: Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H.R. 2442: Mr. Patronis. H.R. 2470: Mrs. Hayes. H.R. 2487: Mr. Lieu. H.R. 2497: Mr. Pocan. H.R. 2509: Mr. Moran. H.R. 2512: Ms. Davids of Kansas. H.R. 2538: Mr. Shreve, Mr. Crow, and Mr. Crank. H.R. 2555: Mr. Rose. H.R. 2592: Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia and Ms. De La Cruz. H.R. 2691: Mr. Wilson of South Carolina. H.R. 2696: Mr. Edwards. H.R. 2804: Mr. Williams of Texas. H.R. 2902: Mrs. Houchin. H.R. 2978: Mr. Kennedy of New York and Mr. Pfluger. H.R. 3104: Mr. Suozzi. H.R. 3128: Mr. Thanedar. H.R. 3144: Ms. Davids of Kansas. H.R. 3164: Mrs. Houchin. H.R. 3206: Ms. De La Cruz. H.R. 3226: Ms. Ross. H.R. 3228: Mr. Patronis. H.R. 3273: Mr. Stanton. H.R. 3274: Mr. Stanton. H.R. 3337: Ms. DeGette and Mr. Crow. H.R. 3385: Mr. Grothman. H.R. 3452: Mr. Morelle. H.R. 3499: Mr. Simpson. H.R. 3501: Mr. Auchincloss. H.R. 3505: Mr. Vindman and Mr. Deluzio. H.R. 3513: Ms. Waters. H.R. 3544: Mr. Sherman, Ms. Ansari, and Ms. Adams. H.R. 3593: Mr. Rutherford and Mr. Van Orden. H.R. 3597: Mr. Gooden and Mr. Conaway. H.R. 3604: Ms. Schrier. H.R. 3708: Mr. Davis of Illinois. H.R. 3723: Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas. H.R. 3921: Mr. Grothman. H.R. 3946: Ms. DeLauro. H.R. 3978: Mrs. Harshbarger. H.R. 4081: Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H.R. 4105: Mr. Casten. H.R. 4157: Ms. Ansari. H.R. 4185: Ms. Sewell. H.R. 4206: Mr. Joyce of Ohio. H.R. 4238: Ms. Goodlander. H.R. 4348: Mr. Bentz and Mr. Rutherford. H.R. 4382: Mr. Nunn of Iowa and Mr. Keating. H.R. 4640: Mrs. Grijalva. H.R. 4668: Mr. Fuller. H.R. 4669: Mrs. Fischbach, Mrs. Fletcher, and Mr. Panetta. H.R. 4710: Mr. McGuire. H.R. 4731: Mr. Deluzio. H.R. 4784: Mr. Van Orden. H.R. 4797: Ms. Scholten. H.R. 4901: Ms. Lee of Nevada. H.R. 4919: Ms. Ansari. H.R. 4957: Mr. Stauber. H.R. 5027: Mr. Case. H.R. 5092: Mr. Thanedar. H.R. 5123: Mr. Sorensen. H.R. 5168: Mr. Menefee. H.R. 5269: Ms. Wasserman Schultz. H.R. 5283: Mr. Foster. H.R. 5343: Mr. Kustoff and Ms. Davids of Kansas. H.R. 5387: Mr. Shreve. H.R. 5408: Ms. Escobar. H.R. 5449: Ms. Budzinski. H.R. 5475: Mr. Alford, Mr. Bergman, Ms. Pou, Mr. Van Orden, and Mr. Walkinshaw. H.R. 5490: Mr. Moran. H.R. 5517: Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida. H.R. 5519: Mr. Bost. H.R. 5631: Ms. Lee of Nevada, Ms. Maloy, and Mr. Kennedy of Utah. H.R. 5657: Ms. Scholten. H.R. 5692: Mr. Magaziner. H.R. 5817: Mr. Fuller. H.R. 5823: Ms. Schrier. H.R. 5940: Ms. Sanchez. H.R. 6055: Mr. Moore of Utah. H.R. 6130: Mr. Bresnahan, Mr. Bell, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Kean, and Ms. Bonamici. H.R. 6149: Mr. Vargas. H.R. 6167: Mr. Moolenaar. H.R. 6182: Mr. Gomez and Mr. Raskin. H.R. 6204: Mr. Lieu. H.R. 6212: Mrs. Wagner. H.R. 6231: Ms. Goodlander. H.R. 6238: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 6277: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 6280: Ms. Scanlon. H.R. 6324: Mr. Nunn of Iowa and Mr. Suozzi. H.R. 6327: Mr. Bera. H.R. 6400: Mr. Gooden. H.R. 6423: Mr. Lynch. H.R. 6485: Mr. Pfluger. H.R. 6574: Mr. Bell. H.R. 6617: Mr. Tonko, Mr. Casten, and Mr. Krishnamoorthi. H.R. 6694: Ms. Gillen. H.R. 6796: Mr. Haridopolos. H.R. 6809: Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Fine, and Mr. Subramanyam. H.R. 6832: Mr. Steil. H.R. 6845: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 6856: Ms. Pou, Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, and Mr. Thanedar. H.R. 7016: Ms. Wilson of Florida. H.R. 7188: Ms. Houlahan and Mr. Levin. H.R. 7362: Mr. Rose. H.R. 7381: Ms. Salinas. H.R. 7383: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 7390: Mrs. Cammack. H.R. 7391: Mr. Vindman. H.R. 7534: Mr. Rouzer. H.R. 7540: Mr. Fleischmann and Mr. Bacon. H.R. 7548: Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia and Mrs. Hayes. H.R. 7622: Mr. Sorensen. H.R. 7645: Mr. Courtney and Ms. Ansari. H.R. 7678: Mr. Bost. H.R. 7715: Mr. Huizenga and Ms. Scholten. H.R. 7745: Ms. Tokuda. H.R. 7957: Mr. Casar. H.R. 7960: Ms. Jayapal. H.R. 7961: Ms. Meng and Mr. McGovern. H.R. 7969: Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H.R. 7977: Mr. Liccardo. H.R. 7997: Mr. Grothman. H.R. 8011: Mr. Bishop. H.R. 8028: Mr. Fuller. H.R. 8032: Mr. Rutherford. H.R. 8041: Mr. Thompson of California and Ms. Escobar. H.R. 8047: Ms. Norton. H.R. 8124: Mr. Nunn of Iowa and Ms. Norton. H.R. 8126: Ms. Simon. H.R. 8163: Mr. Estes, Mr. Vindman, and Mr. Thanedar. H.R. 8170: Mr. Haridopolos. H.R. 8205: Mr. Rouzer and Mr. Bishop. H.R. 8217: Mr. Figures. H.R. 8239: Mr. Gottheimer and Mr. Bilirakis. H.R. 8261: Ms. Sanchez. H.R. 8283: Mr. Miller of Ohio. H.R. 8300: Mr. Van Orden. H.R. 8313: Mr. Nunn of Iowa. H.R. 8355: Mr. Langworthy. H.R. 8359: Mr. Graves. H.R. 8374: Mr. Rouzer. H.R. 8380: Mr. Rose. H.R. 8405: Ms. Elfreth. H.R. 8421: Mr. Carter of Louisiana and Mr. Lynch. H.R. 8433: Mr. Rouzer. H.R. 8482: Mr. Carter of Georgia. H.R. 8494: Ms. Jayapal. H.R. 8497: Mr. Feenstra. H.R. 8582: Mr. Cohen and Ms. Waters. H.R. 8612: Mrs. Watson Coleman and Ms. Tlaib. H.R. 8619: Mr. Liccardo. H.R. 8658: Mr. Hurd of Colorado. H.R. 8666: Mrs. Watson Coleman. H.R. 8675: Mr. Stauber. H.R. 8680: Mr. Harrigan, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, and Mr. Hunt. H.R. 8690: Ms. Randall, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, and Mr. Carson. H.R. 8691: Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Fine, and Mr. Mackenzie. H.R. 8694: Mr. Goldman of New York. H.R. 8700: Mr. Smith of Nebraska. H.R. 8707: Mr. Mfume, Mrs. Ramirez, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Hoyle of Oregon. H.R. 8736: Mr. Steil. H.R. 8740: Mr. Neguse and Mr. Goldman of New York. H.R. 8742: Mr. Fitzpatrick. H.R. 8750: Mr. Fitzpatrick. H.R. 8780: Mr. Hurd of Colorado. H.R. 8781: Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Fry, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Rose, and Mr. Harrigan. H.R. 8827: Mr. Babin and Mr. Davidson. H.R. 8831: Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Ms. Scanlon, Ms. McClellan, Ms. McBride, and Mr. Casten. H.R. 8850: Ms. Titus and Ms. Norton. H.R. 8855: Mr. Higgins of Louisiana. H.R. 8856: Mr. Steube and Mrs. Luna. H.R. 8860: Mr. Goldman of New York and Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania. H.R. 8861: Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania. H.R. 8863: Mr. Levin. H.R. 8869: Mr. Kennedy of New York. H.J. Res. 12: Mr. Cloud. H.J. Res. 54: Ms. Matsui. H. Con. Res. 12: Mr. Fulcher. H. Res. 50: Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Timmons, and Mr. Ogles. H. Res. 317: Mr. Keating. H. Res. 925: Mr. Cisneros. H. Res. 1082: Ms. Pou and Mr. Suozzi. H. Res. 1179: Ms. Salazar. H. Res. 1188: Mr. Suozzi. H. Res. 1237: Mr. Crank. H. Res. 1242: Mr. Whitesides. H. Res. 1270: Ms. Bonamici, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Dingell, and Mr. Davis of North Carolina. H. Res. 1298: Mr. Ciscomani.