This bill would add rules for Federal immigration enforcement personnel about when and how they can use force, what equipment they can carry, how they must identify themselves, camera use, training, reporting, and oversight. Key limits include a non-deadly use-of-force standard that requires force to be proportional and used only when no safe alternative exists; a duty to de-escalate and to intervene to stop excessive force; limits on masks and a ban on using the title "Police" on uniforms; and prohibitions on certain crowd-control tools (flash bangs, rubber bullets, pepper balls, tear gas) except in specific, approved circumstances. The bill also would require body-worn and dashboard cameras, set default-on principles, and set video retention rules (generally 1 year, with at least 3 years for incidents involving force or complaints). It requires annual training on force, de-escalation, constitutional protections, bias in target selection, and medical aid. The Department of Homeland Security must create a searchable database of certifications and incident reports and provide semiannual reports to Congress on force use, assaults, identification use, and facial covering frequency. Offices in DHS and DOJ would investigate and, if needed, discipline personnel who violate the rules. The text defines who counts as Federal immigration enforcement personnel and how DHS may define "public safety" and "national security" threats. A rule-of-construction section says the bill does not give new authority to use deadly force, does not stop personnel from taking necessary safety actions, and does not force local law enforcement to help.
If enacted, the bill would change how federal immigration agents operate inside the country. Agents would be required to wear identifiable agency markings (with limited exceptions), use body and vehicle cameras by default, follow stricter limits on non-deadly force, and receive yearly training on de-escalation and constitutional rights. Certain crowd-control tools would generally be off-limits unless specific conditions and approvals are met. DHS would report to Congress regularly and keep a public, redacted version of an incident database.
No publicly available information.
The bill's findings and provisions emphasize reducing excessive force, protecting human rights and dignity, minimizing community disruption during interior enforcement, protecting journalists and lawful protesters under the First Amendment, and improving accountability through cameras, reporting, training, and oversight. Supporters in the bill text argue for clearer use-of-force standards, required de-escalation, duties to intervene and render aid, and stronger reporting and certification systems to improve safety and public trust.
No publicly available information.