New Abortion Provider Standards

Full Title:
Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act of 2025

Summary#

This bill would add new federal rules for how abortions are provided. It requires doctors who perform abortions to have hospital admitting privileges nearby and to tell patients where they can get follow-up care. It would also make most non-hospital abortion clinics meet the same structural standards as ambulatory surgery centers to receive federal funds.

  • Main change: Doctors who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a hospital within 15 miles of their main office and the abortion location, and must tell the patient which hospital can provide follow-up care.
  • New criminal penalty: A physician who knowingly fails to meet those requirements could face a fine, up to 2 years in prison, or both.
  • Federal funding condition: Abortion clinics (not hospitals or existing ambulatory surgery centers) must be state-licensed and comply with ambulatory surgery center standards under federal Medicare law to receive federal funds, although a state health board can ask HHS to waive some structural rules.
  • Patient protection: A woman who receives an abortion cannot be prosecuted under this new rule for the physician’s violation.
  • Definitions: The bill defines “abortion clinic” to mean a non-hospital facility that performs first-, second-, or third-trimester abortions in a 12-month period.

What it means for you#

  • Physicians who perform abortions: You must have admitting privileges at a hospital within 15 miles of your main medical office and the place where the abortion is done. You must tell patients which hospital can provide follow-up care. Failing to comply could lead to criminal charges, a fine, and up to 2 years in prison.
  • Patients seeking abortions: You would be told which hospital the physician can use for follow-up care if complications occur. The bill prevents a patient from being prosecuted under this federal rule for the physician’s violation.
  • Abortion clinics (non-hospital): To keep receiving any federal funds, you must be licensed by your state and meet ambulatory surgery center standards used under Medicare, unless the state health board secures waivers of some structural requirements. This could require facility changes or administrative steps.
  • Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: Hospitals and existing ambulatory surgery centers are excluded from the definition of “abortion clinic,” but hospitals may receive more requests from physicians seeking admitting privileges.
  • States and state health boards: States license clinics and can request waivers from some structural rules through HHS. States may need to review their licensing rules and waiver processes.
  • Federal agencies: HHS would have a role in determining which structural requirements can be waived and in overseeing compliance tied to federal funding.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

  • The bill does not include a fiscal estimate or cost analysis in the provided material.
  • This could increase costs for clinics that must upgrade facilities to meet ambulatory surgery center standards or obtain new licenses.
  • Hospitals may face administrative costs from reviewing admitting-privilege requests.
  • Federal and state agencies may have additional administrative work to check compliance and process waivers.
  • Potential legal costs could arise from enforcement or court challenges, but the bill does not provide cost numbers.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to improve patient safety by ensuring that abortion providers have a direct link to nearby hospital care and that clinics meet surgical facility standards.
  • Requiring doctors to tell patients where they can receive follow-up care could help continuity of care if complications occur.
  • Conditioning federal funds on licensing and facility standards could be seen as raising the quality of outpatient surgical care at clinics that provide abortions.
  • Allowing state health boards to request waivers gives some flexibility for states and clinics where full structural changes would be hard to implement.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the admitting-privileges requirement could reduce the number of doctors willing or able to provide abortions. It is often hard for some doctors to obtain hospital privileges for reasons unrelated to clinical skill.
  • A possible trade-off is that requiring ambulatory surgery center standards may force clinics to upgrade facilities or close, which could reduce local access to abortion services and increase travel or wait times for patients.
  • The bill does not provide details on how “principal medical office” is defined, how admitting privileges are verified, or how enforcement would work, leaving implementation questions.
  • Criminal penalties for physicians may deter some providers from offering abortion services, even where complications are rare.
  • It is unclear how the federal funding condition would interact with existing federal and state law and programs; the bill does not include a cost estimate or enforcement plan.