Correction: Eritrea Regulations Repeal Notice

Summary#

This is an erratum published in the Canada Gazette on July 22, 2020. It corrects wording in the earlier notice (published June 10, 2020) about the Regulations Repealing the Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolution on Eritrea (SOR/2020-118). The corrections change a description line and a sentence about the application of the one-for-one rule.

What it does#

• Replaces the text under "Description and justification" on page 1087 so the title reads Regulations Repealing the Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolution on Eritrea.
• Replaces the sentence under "One-for-one rule and small business lens" to say the one-for-one rule applies because a regulatory title is removed and the regulations are considered a "title out."
• These changes fix the published notice in the Canada Gazette. The erratum itself corrects the public record; the notice does not say the underlying regulations were altered by this erratum.

Who's affected#

• People and groups tracking Canadian notices about sanctions or United Nations-related regulations, especially those following measures related to Eritrea.
• Government staff and regulatory analysts who record or report on regulatory burden and the application of the one-for-one rule.
• Small business policy teams who monitor regulatory accounting.
• If it is unclear whether this erratum changes any legal text, the source does not say; this appears to be a correction to the published notice rather than a change to the regulation text itself.

Why it matters#

• It corrects the official public record so readers know the notice is about repealing those earlier regulations, not implementing them.
• Saying the one-for-one rule applies matters for how this action is counted against federal targets on regulatory burden. That affects government reporting and how the change is tallied for business impacts.
• The correction helps anyone relying on the Gazette notice (lawyers, businesses, researchers, journalists) avoid confusion about what the original regulation item actually did.