Summary#
Council passed Bylaw 12P2026 at third reading on April 21, 2026. It amends the Millican-Ogden Area Redevelopment Plan for 7604 – 21A Street SE in Ogden, Ward 9. The stated goal is to allow more housing types and make more efficient use of land and existing infrastructure.
- The plan now allows rowhouses and townhouses at the site, in addition to the housing types it already allowed, such as detached, semi-detached and duplex homes.
- The property is already in the R-CG land use district, which supports rowhouses and townhouses. The plan amendment does not approve construction.
- A separate application for a four-unit townhouse with four secondary suites is under review; this decision does not approve that application.
What it means for you#
- Nearby residents: The plan permits more housing types at this site. The proposed building’s design, height, units, parking and access are still being reviewed through the separate development-permit process.
- People seeking housing: The amendment allows additional housing options at the site, but does not guarantee that the proposed project will proceed.
- Property owner: The amendment aligns the area plan with the R-CG district for this site; the development permit remains a separate step.
Money#
City staff report no anticipated financial impact.
- The report provides no cost estimate or details of any costs to the owner or neighbours.
What is unclear#
- Whether the four-unit townhouse and four secondary suites will receive development-permit approval.
- What the final building design, height, parking and access would be; these are under development-permit review.
- The minutes record that one member of the public spoke, but do not say what they said.
Case for#
- City staff say the amendment would allow more housing choice and could better accommodate changing household needs.
- City staff consider the density increase appropriate and say the change fits the Municipal Development Plan and allows more efficient use of existing infrastructure and nearby services.
- Two public letters supported the application, citing housing options and increased density.
Case against#
- Twelve public letters opposed the application, raising concerns about traffic and street parking, privacy, possible shadowing, neighbourhood character and overdevelopment.
- The Millican-Ogden Community Association also opposed the application; the report points to its response but does not summarize its reasons.
- Councillor Chabot voted against the bylaw. The minutes give no reason for the vote.