An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (volunteer firefighting and search and rescue volunteer tax credit)

Summary#

Bill C-204, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (volunteer firefighting and search and rescue volunteer tax credit), would amend the federal Income Tax Act; it would not create a separate law. Its stated goal is to increase the tax-credit amounts for volunteer firefighters and search and rescue volunteers. The supplied text says the changes would apply to the 2026 and later taxation years; they are proposed changes, not provisions shown as in force.

  • The bill would raise the amount used to calculate each credit from $6,000 to $10,000, multiplied by the appropriate percentage for the tax year. That does not mean a $10,000 payment.
  • It would define eligible volunteer firefighting services to include being available or on call for firefighting and emergency services, and non-emergency duties, as needed by a fire department.
  • A volunteer firefighter could receive nominal remuneration that is not a “liveable wage” and still meet the new definition.
  • The bill does not change the listed calculation for other eligibility conditions: the text provided ends before those conditions.

What it means for you#

  • Volunteer firefighters: If you meet the applicable eligibility conditions, the larger calculation amount could reduce your tax payable. The bill’s new definition includes on-call availability and non-emergency duties. It does not set out a process for claiming the credit.
  • Search and rescue volunteers: If you meet the applicable eligibility conditions, the larger calculation amount could reduce your tax payable. The bill does not change the eligibility definition in the text provided.
  • Fire departments: The definition refers to services provided to a fire department as needed. The bill does not require departments to change how they assign duties.
  • Other taxpayers: The bill does not directly change your tax rate or create a new tax, fee, or penalty.

Money#

No cost estimate or revenue estimate is available in the supplied material.

  • The bill increases the amount used to calculate the two credits. This could reduce federal tax revenue, but the amount is not stated.
  • The credit is calculated by multiplying $10,000 by the appropriate percentage for the year. The supplied material does not give that percentage or the resulting dollar value.

What is unclear#

  • The bill text provided does not include the eligibility conditions that follow the calculation in each credit provision.
  • “Nominal remuneration” and “liveable wage” are not defined in the supplied text.
  • The supplied material does not explain how the credits interact with other tax rules or what happens if a person’s tax payable is less than the calculated amount.
  • The supplied text gives the application years but no other start-date or implementation details.
  • The current Income Tax Act was not supplied, so the existing eligibility rules and other current-law details could not be checked against it.

Case for#

  • A possible argument for the bill is that a larger credit calculation amount would provide more tax relief to eligible volunteers.
  • Including on-call time and non-emergency duties in the firefighter definition could recognize work that supports a fire department beyond responding to fires.
  • Allowing nominal remuneration could make clear that some payment does not, by itself, exclude a volunteer from the new definition.

Case against#

  • The bill does not estimate the public cost or explain how many people would qualify, so the size of the tax impact is unclear.
  • The bill does not define “nominal remuneration” or “liveable wage,” leaving uncertainty about where the limits fall.
  • The $10,000 figure is multiplied by an appropriate percentage; it is not necessarily the amount a volunteer would receive as a tax reduction. The supplied material does not explain the practical value for people with little or no tax payable.
  • The eligibility conditions are not included in the supplied text, making it hard to assess who would actually qualify.
Loading versions…Read this official publication

Summary matches the latest captured text

Summary version: First Reading · 2025-06-04

Last source check:

Read the latest official text

How the text changed

Loading versions…