Close arms export loophole
Petitioners ask the House to pass Bill C-233 to close Canada's arms-export loopholes and prevent Canadian arms aiding human-rights abusers. The government responds it already reviews permits case-by-case and can suspend or revoke them.
Why we would sign this petition
- It would close the identified loophole via the United States, reducing the risk that Canadian-made weapons are diverted to parties committing human-rights abuses.
- Strengthened oversight and clearer rules could improve permit assessments, increase transparency, and make it easier to deny risky transfers.
- Enacting the bill would signal stronger compliance with international law and the Arms Trade Treaty, lowering legal and reputational risks from diverted exports.
Why we wouldn’t sign this petition
- The government says it already evaluates permits case-by-case under the Export and Import Permits Act and the Arms Trade Treaty, so the bill could be redundant.
- Tighter rules risk delaying or restricting legitimate defence trade and cooperation, imposing costs on exporters and partners.
- The law might duplicate existing enforcement tools like suspending or revoking licences without clearly improving practical enforcement or diversion prevention.
The summary and both sets of reasons are AI-generated from the petition and given equal weight. Claims are the petitioners’ own; consult the official record for the full text.
Official petition
Petition to the House of Commons of Canada Whereas: • Canada is bound by international law to ensure its arms exports do not fuel atrocities and human rights violations; • A significant loophole in Canada's export laws currently allows Canadian-made weapons, parts and components to be exported to the United States, where they may be transferred to third countries engaged in armed conflict or with records of grave human rights violations; • This loophole undermines Canada's international commitments, risks making Canada complicit in human rights abuses abroad, and allows Canadian arms to be used in conflicts against civilians; • International bodies including the UN Human Rights Council and independent UN experts have called on all states to halt arms transfers when there is a substantial risk of their use in violations of international humanitarian law. We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons to pass into law Bill C-233, the No More Loopholes Act, to close existing loopholes in Canada's arms export laws, strengthening oversight, and ensure that Canadian arms are never used to commit or facilitate human rights abuses.
Government response
Response by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Signed by Rob Oliphant Canada's export control regime was built to keep pace with this changing world. Respect for human rights is enshrined in Canada’s legislation and a cornerstone of Canada’s export control system. Each export permit application for controlled items is reviewed on a case-by-case basis under Canada’s robust risk assessment framework. Canada’s diplomatic missions abroad and relevant government experts are consulted as part of the export permit review process to ensure consideration for local and regional situations and associated security risks. Under the Export and Import Permits Act, there is a legal requirement that export permit applications for arms, ammunition, implements or munitions of war be assessed against mandatory criteria, which include the Arms Trade Treaty criteria. In particular, Canada’s regime carefully assesses potential human rights violations. Under Canadian law, the Minister of Foreign Affairs must deny an export permit for military items if, after considering available mitigating measures, they determine that there is a substantial risk that the proposed export would result in any of the negative consequences referred to in the Arms Trade Treaty assessment criteria, including serious violations of international human rights law or international humanitarian law. Canada came into full compliance with the Arms Trade Treaty with the passage of Bill C-47 in 2018. Canada’s already strong export control system was enhanced in rigour and transparency by amendments to Canada’s Export and Import Permits Act that implemented the Arms Trade Treaty in 2019, going beyond the Treaty’s requirements in the goods and technologies subcategory. In fact, Canada submitted annual public reports on military exports to Parliament for more than 30 years before it became a legal requirement in 2019. The House of Commons recently had the occasion to debate expanded measures related to arms exports in Private Member’s Bill C-233, but this proposed legislation was defeated at Second reading. The Government of Canada maintains a strong export control system to prevent the misuse of weapons anywhere and everywhere. Canada assesses destination countries based on factors such as the strength of their export control systems and the potential risk of diversion, consistent with how its allies operate. Canada cooperates with other states to uphold the responsible export of military equipment and prevent diversion, including through its active membership in the four main multilateral export control regimes, which include the Wassenaar Arrangement, the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Australia Group. Canada’s export control regime seeks to ensure that exports of controlled items are consistent with Canada's foreign and defence policies. Canada’s Export Control List identifies specific goods and technology that require a permit to be exported, using carefully selected technical parameters based on Canada’s international obligations and agreements. Canada has suspended or revoked permits when credible evidence of misuse has emerged. Any violations of the Export and Import Permits Act are taken extremely seriously and may result in enforcement actions, including seizure of goods and potential criminal prosecution leading to fines or imprisonment.