Public Safety and Adoption Overhaul

Full Title:
Bill 119, Protecting Ontario’s Streets and Communities Act, 2026

Summary#

Bill 119 is an omnibus public‑safety bill. It changes adoption rules, policing and oversight, the sex offender registry, restraining orders, municipal by‑law enforcement, towing, private security, and more. The stated goal is to protect communities, support victims, and improve enforcement.

Key changes:

  • Makes restraining orders from other Canadian provinces/territories enforceable in Ontario as if issued by an Ontario court, with a way to vary or set them aside here.
  • Overhauls adoption and intercountry adoption: introduces Director‑approved “adoption practitioners,” adds per‑country licensing terms, and allows the Director to refuse or suspend some terms in the public interest (some decisions not appealable).
  • Aligns Ontario’s sex offender registry with federal orders/obligations (SOIRA), updates reporting rules and moves data removal/destruction to be governed by regulation.
  • Updates policing laws: the Minister can direct police boards’ priorities; expands who can be investigated for misconduct; allows posting certain personal information about high‑risk convicted persons on a public website; and lets RCMP/other out‑of‑province peace officers exercise prescribed powers in Ontario.
  • Creates the Pill Presses and Precursors Act, 2026 to prohibit certain use, possession, or sale of pill presses and drug precursors, require reporting stolen pill presses, and enable searches, seizures, and penalties.
  • Re‑enacts and expands protections against “coerced debts” for human trafficking victims, including pausing collections, simplified determinations, and penalties for prohibited collections.

Some parts start on Royal Assent; others on a date set by the government.

What it means for you#

  • Adoption applicants and families
    • Homestudies must be done by a person approved by the Director as an “adoption practitioner.”
    • Intercountry adoptions may depend on whether a licensee holds a country‑specific term; the Director can refuse or suspend such terms if safeguards in that country are inadequate.
  • Adoption licensees and practitioners
    • New approval system for practitioners, with directions, required training, and possible suspension/revocation.
    • Licensing can be refused or limited on “public interest” grounds; some decisions are not appealable. Compliance orders and binding directives may be issued.
  • People with restraining orders from other provinces/territories
    • Your order is enforceable in Ontario as an Ontario court order. You or the other party can ask an Ontario court to vary or set aside a final order if certain residency and criteria are met.
  • People subject to the sex offender registry (Ontario)
    • Reporting duties will be tied to the period you are a “sex offender” under federal SOIRA orders/obligations.
    • Processes about removing/destroying your information move to regulations (details to be set there).
  • Victims of human trafficking (and creditors/insurers/collectors)
    • You can work with designated organizations to pause collection and establish “coerced debts.”
    • Creditors and consumer reporting agencies must update records if a debt is established as coerced; collecting established coerced debts is an offence.
    • Licensing bodies (e.g., drivers/vehicle permits) must restore licences affected only by a coerced debt, with no restoration fee for that reason.
  • General public and people with recent convictions who pose significant risk
    • Police may disclose certain personal information publicly online if set criteria are met (e.g., conviction and significant ongoing risk); there are processes for notice, correction, and removal after a period.
  • Police boards and services
    • Must reflect Minister‑set priorities in strategic plans and revise plans on timelines set by the Minister.
    • More people and entities can fall under misconduct/complaints processes; complaint handling and reporting powers of the Inspector General are adjusted.
    • Meetings closed to the public are also closed to prescribed persons; broader confidentiality duties apply.
  • RCMP and out‑of‑province officers/employees
    • RCMP officers and prescribed out‑of‑province peace officers/employees may exercise prescribed powers or be deemed peace officers in prescribed areas of Ontario.
  • Municipalities and property owners
    • Municipalities can levy administrative penalties for land‑use by‑law (zoning/use) violations; unpaid penalties after 15 days can be added to the property tax roll.
  • Businesses handling pill presses/precursors
    • New offences for using/possessing/selling pill presses and precursors in prohibited ways; must report stolen pill presses; risk of seizure and significant fines/imprisonment.
  • Private security and investigative services
    • Registrar appointed by the Minister; digital licences recognized; complaint facilitation removed in favour of investigations; justices of the peace can issue production orders to investigators; licences must be destroyed (not returned) in set cases.
  • Tow truck drivers/operators
    • Cannot offer or provide towing services within 200 metres of a collision or park within 200 metres (with a narrow exception); tickets served on a driver are deemed served on the operator.
  • Social workers/social service workers
    • The College can impose interim suspensions/conditions earlier in the process if client harm risk is believed.
  • Dog/cat sellers/holders covered by PAWS record‑keeping
    • Record‑keeping duties expand from dogs to cats and prescribed animals.
  • Provincial offence defendants and prosecutors (tickets)
    • If you and the prosecutor agree at an early resolution meeting, the clerk can enter a conviction and impose the agreed fine; otherwise, the matter proceeds to trial.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

  • Implementation could add administrative and enforcement costs for ministries, police services/boards, courts, and municipalities (e.g., public website, designated organizations and adjudicators for coerced debts, adoption approvals, pill press enforcement). No estimates are provided.
  • Businesses and non‑profits may face compliance costs (e.g., adoption licensees/practitioners, private security firms, entities handling pill presses/precursors).
  • Municipalities may incur setup costs for administrative penalty systems but could recover some costs through penalties.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to improve public safety by:
    • Enforcing restraining orders across Canada without delay.
    • Targeting illegal drug manufacturing equipment and inputs.
    • Allowing public warnings about high‑risk convicted persons to reduce harm.
  • It could strengthen child protection in adoption by vetting practitioners, tightening intercountry adoption terms, and allowing rapid suspension where child safeguards abroad are weak.
  • It likely aims to support human trafficking victims by stopping collection of coerced debts, fixing credit harms, and restoring licences tied to those debts.
  • It could improve policing oversight and accountability through clearer powers for the Inspector General, broader misconduct coverage, and Minister‑set priorities for boards.
  • It gives municipalities a practical tool to address illegal land uses through administrative penalties rather than lengthy prosecutions.
  • It may reduce collision‑scene conflicts by keeping tow trucks back and clarifying service of offences.

Opponents' View#

  • Ministerial directives to police boards may raise questions about local board independence and the balance between provincial direction and community priorities.
  • Publishing personal information about certain convicted persons on a public website may pose privacy, accuracy, and safety concerns; the bill provides notice/correction/removal processes, but errors or misuse could still occur.
  • Several significant decisions are at the Director’s “sole discretion” and not appealable (e.g., refusing/suspending intercountry adoption terms), which may concern affected licensees about fairness and recourse.
  • The sex offender registry changes move data destruction/removal details to regulations, creating uncertainty until rules are set.
  • New powers around pill presses/precursors (ID demands, warrantless searches in exigent circumstances, seizures) and cross‑jurisdiction peace officer powers could prompt concerns about civil liberties and oversight.
  • Municipal administrative penalties added to the tax roll within 15 days may raise due‑process and proportionality questions for property owners.
  • Allowing youth in secure custody/detention to be placed in locked rooms (under future regulations) may draw concerns about conditions and safeguards.
  • The early‑resolution conviction process in Provincial Offences matters relies on correct paperwork; if forms are defective or misunderstood, there could be fairness issues for unrepresented defendants.