Back to Bills

New Crime for Fleeing Border Patrol

Full Title:
Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

Summary#

This bill creates a new federal crime for driving a motor vehicle within 100 miles of the United States border while intentionally fleeing a pursuing U.S. Border Patrol agent or a law enforcement officer who is assisting or under the command of Border Patrol. It sets prison terms that rise if the flight causes serious bodily injury or death. The bill also makes a conviction (or an admission of conduct that meets the law’s elements) an immigration ground for inadmissibility, deportability, and ineligibility for immigration relief, including asylum. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security must provide an annual report with counts and outcomes.

  • Main change: Establishes a federal offense for intentionally fleeing a pursuing Border Patrol agent (or officers assisting them) while driving within 100 miles of the border.
  • Penalties: Up to 2 years in prison for the basic offense; 5–20 years if serious bodily injury results; 10 years up to life if death results. Fines also apply.
  • Immigration consequences: Conviction or an admission of the conduct makes a noncitizen inadmissible (barred from entry), deportable (removable), and ineligible for relief from removal, including asylum.
  • Reporting requirement: Annual report to congressional judiciary committees listing numbers charged, apprehended, not charged, not apprehended, penalties sought, and penalties imposed.
  • What is unclear: The bill does not define some key terms used in practice (for example, how to prove someone “intentionally” fled, or what counts as an officer “actively assisting” or “under the command of” Border Patrol).

What it means for you#

  • Drivers near the border: If you drive a motor vehicle within 100 miles of the border and intentionally flee from a pursuing U.S. Border Patrol agent or an officer assisting Border Patrol, you could face federal criminal charges and prison time.
  • People accused of causing injury or death: If a crash during such a flight causes serious bodily injury or death, the law raises the minimum and maximum prison terms substantially.
  • Noncitizens (the bill uses the word “alien”): A conviction, or admitting conduct that meets the law’s elements, can make a noncitizen unable to enter the U.S, subject to removal from the U.S., and barred from getting asylum or other immigration relief.
  • Law enforcement agencies: The Department of Justice would prosecute the new federal offense. Border Patrol and assisting officers would be the triggering pursuers under the law.
  • Courts and prosecutors: Federal prosecutors and courts would apply the new criminal penalties and determine whether immigration consequences follow from convictions or admissions.
  • Congressional oversight: DOJ and DHS must produce yearly data about how often the law is used and case outcomes.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

  • The bill does not include a fiscal note in the provided material.
  • This could lead to increased federal costs for investigations, prosecutions, court processing, incarceration, and immigration enforcement, and for compiling the required annual report. The bill text does not estimate or itemize those costs.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to deter dangerous vehicle flights from Border Patrol and officers assisting them.
  • Supporters may argue this strengthens officer safety by creating a clear federal offense tied to Border Patrol pursuits near the border.
  • Making convictions an immigration ground could be seen as a way to align criminal penalties with immigration enforcement for noncitizens who commit these acts.
  • The annual report is intended to provide Congress with data on how often the new offense is used and what penalties are imposed.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the bill covers a wide area (within 100 miles of the border) and could reach many communities and drivers not closely tied to border enforcement activity.
  • The bill does not clearly define key terms such as “intentionally fleeing,” “actively assisting,” or what counts as being “under the command of” Border Patrol. That may create uncertainty in charging and proof.
  • Removing eligibility for asylum and other immigration relief after conviction or admission could block people with legitimate protection claims; the bill does not distinguish motives or protection needs.
  • The law creates a new federal layer of criminal exposure that may overlap with state or local laws on evading law enforcement and vehicle-related crimes. It is unclear how federal and state prosecutions would interact.
  • The bill does not provide cost estimates or explain how DOJ and DHS will handle possible increases in prosecutions, detentions, removals, or reporting workload.