Back to Bills

Commission to Study Reparations

Full Title:
Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act

Summary#

This bill creates a congressionally chartered Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans. The Commission must investigate slavery and its continuing effects, hold hearings, collect evidence, and deliver a report with recommendations — including whether the United States should apologize and how compensation or other remedies might work. The Commission would have subpoena power, access to federal records, and up to 18 months after its first full meeting to finish its report.

  • Main change: Establishes a 15‑member legislative-branch commission to study the history and ongoing effects of slavery and discrimination against African Americans and to recommend remedies.
  • Scope of study: From early colonial slave trade through present-day laws and practices that the bill ties to lasting harms.
  • Powers given: Hold hearings, require documents and testimony (subpoenas), get information from federal agencies, contract for research, and accept donations.
  • Output and timing: Written report and recommendations to Congress within 18 months of the Commission’s first full meeting; the Commission ends 90 days after submitting the report.
  • Funding: Authorizes up to $20,000,000 to carry out the Commission’s work.

What it means for you#

  • Living African Americans: The Commission’s work is focused on documenting how slavery and later discrimination have affected African Americans today. The bill itself does not award payments or other remedies. It could lead to future laws or programs if Congress acts on the Commission’s recommendations.
  • Members of Congress and federal agencies: Federal agencies must provide information to the Commission on request. Congress would receive the Commission’s report and could choose whether to act on its recommendations.
  • Civil society and reparations advocates: The Commission’s membership rules reserve six seats for nominees chosen by the Commission’s Director from “major civil society and reparations organizations,” so advocacy groups could have direct representation in the study process.
  • Universities, corporations, churches and other institutions: The Commission will examine how public and private institutions benefited from slavery and discriminatory policies. Institutions may be asked to provide records or testimony.
  • Taxpayers: The bill authorizes federal spending to run the Commission (see Expenses). Any future reparations or remedy programs recommended by the Commission would require separate legislation and funding.
  • Legal actors and witnesses: The Commission can issue subpoenas and enforce them through federal courts; witnesses and document holders may be required to comply.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: The bill authorizes up to $20,000,000 to carry out the Commission’s work. Actual spending would depend on future appropriations.

  • Direct authorized funding: $20,000,000 authorized to be appropriated for the Commission.
  • Typical uses likely include staff salaries, contracts for research, travel and hearing costs, and administrative support.
  • The bill allows federal agencies to provide support and permits detailees (government employees) to be assigned without reimbursement; those details could shift agency costs.
  • Subpoena enforcement could involve federal court time and associated costs, but no specific estimate is provided.
  • No publicly available fiscal note beyond the bill text.

Proponents' View#

The bill appears intended to create an official, comprehensive study that would form the factual and legal basis for any future apology, compensation, or other remedies. Possible arguments in favour, based on the bill text, include:

  • The Commission would gather and organize historical and legal evidence about slavery and later discriminatory policies to inform Congress.
  • A formal study could identify specific laws, agencies, and institutions that contributed to long-term harms, which could guide focused remedies.
  • The Commission’s subpoena power and required agency cooperation could allow for a more thorough and document-based inquiry.
  • Producing a public report and educational recommendations could aim to promote public awareness, racial healing, and policy changes.
  • Setting a clear timeline (report due within 18 months) could lead to relatively prompt findings.

Opponents' View#

Based on the bill’s design and what it does not specify, reasonable concerns or criticisms include:

  • The bill does not itself create or fund reparations or other remedies; it only studies options. Any actual compensation or programs would require separate Congressional action and funds.
  • The $20 million authorization may or may not be adequate for a broad, nationwide inquiry that includes hearings, document collection, staff, and research. The bill does not estimate total costs.
  • The Commission is exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This may affect public access rules and other oversight that FACA normally requires. The bill does not clearly explain how transparency, records access, or public participation will be handled.
  • Key details are left to the Commission: how compensation would be calculated, who would be eligible, and what instruments would be used. The bill requires the Commission to address these questions but does not set standards or formulas.
  • The appointment process mixes political appointees and director-selected members drawn from reparations organizations. This design could raise questions about balance, representativeness, or perceived partisanship; the bill does not set explicit rules to ensure ideological or geographic diversity.
  • Subpoena power and enforcement through federal courts could lead to litigation and added costs; the bill does not discuss how disputes over classified or sensitive documents would be handled.