Back to Bills

Smart Gun Safety Pilot Grants

Full Title:
Advancing Gun Safety Technology Act

Summary#

This bill would create a short pilot grant program run by the Attorney General through the Director of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). It would give money to a small number of small businesses to develop and commercialize gun safety technology meant to reduce accidental or unauthorized gun use. The bill authorizes $10 million for fiscal year 2026.

  • Main change: Authorizes the Attorney General (through NIJ) to make 3 to 5 grants to eligible small businesses to develop gun safety technology and prepare it for commercial sale.
  • Who can get grants: Small businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
  • What counts as gun safety technology: Includes smart guns, user-authorized or personalized handguns, childproof designs, and safes or locks that use personalized tech.
  • Reporting: Grant recipients must report milestones such as building a prototype, reliability testing, trial production plans, and commercialization plans.
  • Funding: $10,000,000 is authorized for fiscal year 2026.
  • What is unclear: The bill does not set grant sizes, selection criteria, required matching funds, intellectual property rules, or a schedule for the program beyond the single-year appropriation.

What it means for you#

  • Small businesses and startups in gun technology: Eligible small firms (under 500 employees) could apply for pilot grants to develop and commercialize safety-related gun products. Only 3–5 grants will be made, so competition could be strong.
  • Gun owners and consumers: This could lead to more commercial options for personalized or “smart” safety devices in the future, if grantees successfully move to market. The bill does not require owners to buy new products.
  • Manufacturers and retailers: If funded products reach commercialization, some manufacturers and retailers might offer new safety-enabled firearms or locking devices. The bill does not change manufacturing rules, certifications, or sales regulations.
  • Federal agencies (DOJ/NIJ): NIJ would run the pilot and track milestones. The bill gives NIJ authority to administer grants but does not detail staff or process changes.
  • Taxpayers: Federal funds may be used to support early-stage development of gun safety tech. Actual spending depends on whether Congress provides the authorized money.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: The bill authorizes up to $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2026. Actual spending would depend on whether and how Congress appropriates this amount.

  • The only dollar figure in the bill is the $10 million authorization for FY2026.
  • The bill does not provide a fiscal note with expected grant sizes, administrative costs, or multi-year costs.
  • No publicly available information in the bill text about additional costs for enforcement, oversight, matching funds, or longer-term funding beyond FY2026.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to help move gun safety technologies from prototype to market by providing targeted federal seed funding.
  • It could make it more likely that technologies designed to prevent accidental or unauthorized use reach commercial availability.
  • Focusing on small businesses may encourage innovation and private-sector development of personalized or childproof gun designs.
  • Requiring milestone reporting (prototype, testing, production planning, commercialization) could help measure progress and accountability for grant money.
  • Limiting the number of grants could concentrate resources on a few promising projects.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that $10 million for 3–5 grants may be too small to cover full development, testing, and commercialization costs for complex safety technologies.
  • The bill does not state how grants will be sized or how recipients will be chosen. This leaves selection standards and fairness unclear.
  • The bill does not address intellectual property, data privacy, liability, or regulatory barriers that can block adoption of new gun technologies.
  • It is unclear how products funded by the pilot would meet safety standards, legal requirements, or state laws that affect firearms and smart-gun features.
  • The pilot is short on procedural detail (matching funds, timelines, long-term support), so it may not be enough by itself to bring durable commercial products to market.