Back to Bills

Pause New Federal Immigration Facilities

Full Title:
Respect Our Communities Act

Summary#

This bill stops the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or another federal agency from building, buying, renovating, or operating any new immigration processing site or detention center until several steps are completed. The main change is that agencies must publish a public notice and accept comments, get a signed written agreement with state and local officials, and give Congress 30 days’ advance notice with the agreement attached. The bill’s broad goal is to increase local input, environmental and economic review, and congressional notice before new DHS processing or detention facilities are started.

  • Public notice and comment: Agencies must publish a Federal Register notice open for at least 30 days that describes the project, explains how the agency will follow detention guidance and environmental rules, and provides an economic impact analysis and engineering review covering waste export, water use, and electricity demand.
  • Local and state authorization required: After the comment period, the agency head must consider and respond to significant comments and must sign a written agreement with both the Governor and specified local government officials that authorizes the action.
  • Congressional notice: Agencies must send Congress a report including the fully executed agreement and wait at least 30 days after sending that report before starting the project.
  • Scope: The rule applies to facilities used to temporarily hold people for immigration processes that start on or after the bill’s enactment, including facilities under the “Detention Reengineering Initiative.”

What it means for you#

  • Federal agencies (DHS, CBP, ICE): They cannot begin building, buying, renovating, or operating a qualifying new processing or detention facility until they complete public notice, respond to comments under the Administrative Procedure Act process, sign a written agreement with state and local officials including the Governor, and wait 30 days after notifying Congress.
  • State governors and local elected officials: The bill requires a signed, written agreement with the Governor plus the local executive (mayor or county executive) and a majority of the local legislative body before a new site may proceed. This gives those officials formal authorization power over such projects.
  • Local communities near planned sites: Communities get a formal, at least 30-day public comment period and must be part of a written agreement before a project goes forward. The public notice must include environmental and economic information such as waste handling, water use, and electricity needs.
  • Immigrants and detainees: Any new temporary holding facilities begun after the bill’s enactment would be subject to the added review and local authorization steps before they open. The bill does not change detention standards directly but requires agencies to explain how they will follow federal detention guidance.
  • Congress and oversight committees: Agencies must send a report with the executed agreement to several House and Senate committees and wait 30 days before starting work, giving committees time to review.

Expenses#

No publicly available information on estimated federal costs or a fiscal note was provided with the bill text.

  • Possible added costs could include preparing the public notice, conducting economic impact analyses and engineering reviews, performing environmental reviews, and additional legal or negotiation costs to reach written agreements with state and local officials.
  • The requirement to wait for comment, negotiation, and a 30-day congressional review could delay projects, which could raise construction or leasing costs. (This is a likely effect based on the bill’s requirements, not an official cost estimate.)
  • Local governments may incur administrative or staff costs when negotiating and signing agreements.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to give communities more say and information before new immigration processing or detention sites are placed in their area.
  • It could increase transparency by requiring a public notice, a public comment period, and a published economic and engineering review covering waste, water, and electricity needs.
  • The written agreement requirement gives state and local elected officials a formal role and could ensure local concerns are addressed before projects proceed.
  • The 30-day congressional notice provides time for oversight and committee review before agencies start construction or operations.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is that the requirement for signed agreements and multiple review steps could slow or block federal agencies from opening facilities, including in situations that agencies consider urgent.
  • The bill does not include an explicit emergency exception; it is unclear how the process would apply if rapid action were needed.
  • Requiring authorization from state and local officials may create practical conflicts between federal immigration responsibilities and local preferences; the bill does not explain how such conflicts would be resolved.
  • The added environmental, engineering, and economic review steps and negotiation processes could increase administrative and project costs for federal agencies and for local governments.
  • It is unclear how the requirement to “consider and respond to significant comments” will be implemented in practice beyond the general reference to the Administrative Procedure Act.