Back to Bills

Major Border Enforcement Funding Package

Full Title:
Secure America Act

Summary#

The Secure America Act is a law that provides new federal funding for U.S. border and immigration enforcement, border technology, and related Homeland Security work. The law adds a set of one-time appropriations for fiscal year 2026. The money is available until September 30, 2029, and is aimed at hiring personnel, buying technology and equipment, and supporting operations.

  • Total new appropriations provided in the law: about $69.545 billion for fiscal year 2026, available through Sept 30, 2029.
  • Major buckets: funds for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel and technology; funds for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations and personnel; separate funds for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and other DHS uses.
  • Specific earmarks: $108.5 million for child exploitation investigators and forensics analysts; at least $350 million for arrests and related operations targeting certain noncooperating jurisdictions.
  • Some funds are explicitly limited to non‑immigration or non‑customs missions; other funds are explicitly for immigration enforcement.
  • Rules on autonomous surveillance: funds cannot buy or deploy surveillance towers that have not been tested and accepted by CBP to deliver autonomous capabilities; the law defines what “autonomous” means for these systems.

What it means for you#

  • General public / Taxpayers

    • The federal government is allocating about $69.545 billion in one-time appropriations for border and immigration enforcement and related technology. These are paid from Treasury funds.
    • The funds are available until Sept 30, 2029, so purchases, hiring, and spending can continue during that period.

  • Border and immigration enforcement personnel

    • CBP and ICE will receive large new budgets for hiring, training, paying, equipping, and supporting agents and staff.
    • CBP gets separate funds for agents who will perform functions other than immigration enforcement and customs work, and additional funds for CBP to carry out immigration enforcement.
    • ICE receives funds for officers, agents, investigators, attorneys, and support staff for immigration enforcement.

  • Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and child-protection work

    • HSI gets funds to hire and equip agents and support staff for non-immigration/customs missions.
    • $108.5 million is set aside to hire and equip child exploitation investigators and forensics analysts and to train state and local law enforcement in identifying victims.

  • Communities, state and local governments

    • The law funds expansion and facilitation of 287(g) agreements (agreements that can deputize local officers to perform immigration tasks).
    • The law ties some ICE activity to whether a state or locality is a “qualified cooperating jurisdiction,” which requires either a 287(g) agreement or a certification of certain information-sharing compliance.
    • Indian tribal governments are explicitly excluded from being treated as non‑cooperating jurisdictions under a specific operations provision.

  • People subject to immigration enforcement

    • ICE is funded for transportation, detention-related operations, arrests, and removals. The law defines categories of noncitizens who are targeted as “covered unlawful aliens.”
    • The law bars using certain funds to release or facilitate release into the community of covered unlawful aliens, except as required by existing law.

  • Technology and privacy

    • CBP gets money for nonintrusive inspection equipment, AI and machine learning tools, biometric entry and exit, upgraded surveillance, and air and marine assets.
    • The law restricts buying untested “autonomous” surveillance towers but does not set broader privacy rules or oversight details for AI or biometrics.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: about $69,545,000,000 in new appropriations for fiscal year 2026, available until September 30, 2029.

  • Direct appropriations by line (as stated in the law):

    • $9.55 billion to CBP for Border Patrol personnel for non‑immigration/customs functions.
    • $7.45 billion to ICE for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) non‑immigration/customs missions (includes $108.5 million for child exploitation investigators).
    • $3.45 billion to CBP for border technology, air and marine assets, inspection equipment, biometric entry/exit work, and related mission support.
    • $2.5 billion to the DHS Secretary for purposes in Title I.
    • $13.02 billion to CBP for immigration enforcement personnel and support.
    • $31.075 billion to ICE for immigration enforcement operations, transportation, IT, facilities, fleet, legal staff, 287(g) expansion, and related costs (includes minimum $350 million for certain arrest and transfer operations).
    • $2.5 billion to the DHS Secretary for purposes in Title II and related prior law references.

  • Other cost notes from the text:

    • Funds are labeled “in addition to amounts otherwise available,” so they supplement existing budgets.
    • The law does not include a separate fiscal analysis or long‑term cost breakdown in the supplied material.

Proponents' View#

The bill appears intended to address border security, law enforcement capacity, and specific criminal threats. Possible arguments in favor based on the bill text:

  • It would increase staffing so agencies can carry out more patrol, investigative, and enforcement work.
  • It would buy technology (like inspection systems, biometric entry/exit, AI-enhanced tools, and air/marine platforms) to detect illegal drugs, undocumented cross-border activity, and other threats.
  • It provides dedicated funding for child exploitation investigations and victim identification, which could support rescue and prosecution efforts.
  • It funds transportation, IT, facilities, and legal staff needed to carry out removals and court-related immigration work.
  • It supports more coordination with state and local law enforcement through expanded 287(g) agreements.

Opponents' View#

The law’s text raises several concerns or trade-offs that opponents or neutral analysts might point to:

  • The overall price tag is large (about $69.5 billion) for a one-time fiscal year 2026 appropriation; long-term recurring costs are not detailed in the law text.
  • The bill authorizes expanded enforcement activity, including funds specifically aimed at arrests and transfers in jurisdictions that do not meet the law’s cooperation criteria; this could affect community policing relationships and public trust in some areas.
  • The law funds AI, machine learning, biometrics, and surveillance upgrades but provides limited detail on privacy safeguards, oversight, auditing, or limits on data use.
  • The restriction on deploying surveillance towers only after CBP testing and acceptance addresses some risk but leaves open how “testing and acceptance” will be done and supervised.
  • The law does not specify exact hiring targets or timelines, so it is unclear how many agents will be hired or when the workforce increase will occur.
  • There is limited information on how funds for “non-immigration” missions will be separated in practice from immigration enforcement, or how missions and roles will be balanced.
  • No separate cost-benefit or implementation plan is included in the supplied material to show how success will be measured or how operations will be managed over the multi-year availability window.