Summary#
This bill gives the United States Postal Service building at 298 Route 292 in Holmes, New York, a new official name: the "Sheriff Adrian 'Butch' Anderson Post Office Building." The bill also says that any official reference to that facility should use the new name. The change is purely a naming action and does not change postal services or funding rules.
- Main change: Renames a specific USPS facility in Holmes, NY.
- Official effect: Requires federal laws, maps, and documents to treat that facility by the new name.
- Scope: Does not create new programs, change services, or add regulatory powers.
- Timing: The bill was introduced on February 5, 2025, and is in committee.
What it means for you#
- Local residents and mail users: The post office will be known publicly by the new name. Mail delivery, post office services, and addresses are not changed by the bill.
- United States Postal Service (USPS): USPS must use the new name in its records, signs, and official references for that facility.
- Visitors and delivery services: Signs and local directions may change to show the new name. This could briefly affect wayfinding until maps and web listings update.
- Federal agencies and mapmakers: Official federal documents and maps that mention that facility should use the new name after the bill takes effect.
Expenses#
No publicly available information.
- The bill text and provided material do not include a fiscal note or cost estimate.
- This could mean small administrative costs for USPS, such as making and installing new signs, updating websites and databases, and changing printed materials.
- Those costs are typically one-time and are usually handled from routine facility or operations budgets, but the bill does not say who will pay.
Proponents' View#
- The bill appears intended to honor Sheriff Adrian "Butch" Anderson by giving his name to a local federal building.
- This could be seen as recognizing public service or local leadership.
- Naming a building is a common way for Congress to formally acknowledge a person’s role in a community.
Opponents' View#
- One concern is that the bill does not explain why this person was chosen or whether the local community supports the naming.
- The bill does not include a cost estimate, so it is unclear how much USPS or local budgets will pay for new signs and updates.
- Naming federal property for individuals can raise questions about precedent and how names are selected, but the bill does not address selection criteria or a review process.