George Floyd Justice in Policing Act

Summary#

This bill is titled the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2025. It would change many federal rules about policing, data, investigations, training, weapons transfers, and public access to police records. Key elements in the bill text include: removing qualified immunity as a defense in certain civil suits against officers; expanding Department of Justice authority to investigate patterns or practices of misconduct and to subpoena records; creating a National Police Misconduct Registry with public search tools; requiring regular state and federal reporting about use-of-force and stops; banning no-knock warrants in federal drug cases and conditioning some grant money on state or local bans; encouraging or requiring body-worn cameras and in-car cameras for federal and grant-funded agencies and restricting facial recognition use with those cameras; creating grant programs for civilian review boards, data collection, training, and other policing reforms; prohibiting racial profiling and authorizing enforcement and audits; limiting transfers of certain Department of Defense equipment to local law enforcement; and adding criminal and reporting provisions for sexual acts by persons acting under color of law.

What it means for you#

  • If you are a federal law enforcement officer, the bill text would require wearing and activating body cameras and in-car recording in many circumstances, set rules for retention and public access to footage, and ban facial recognition on those devices.
  • If you work for a state or local law enforcement agency and your state receives certain federal grants, the state may have to collect and report detailed use-of-force and stop data, adopt certification and decertification systems for officers, and meet training and policy conditions to keep grant funding.
  • Community members would see a publicly searchable National Police Misconduct Registry for complaints, discipline, and termination records (subject to Privacy Act limits), and could access some use-of-force data published by the Attorney General.
  • States and local governments could face reductions or loss of certain Department of Justice grant funds if they do not comply with the reporting, training, or statutory requirements the bill attaches to grant eligibility.
  • Law enforcement agencies that receive Department of Defense excess property would face new reporting, limitation, and certification rules before receiving some types of equipment.

Expenses#

The bill text includes specific authorizations and funding directions. Examples in the bill text (quoted or paraphrased from the bill) include:

  • Grants to assist States in conducting pattern and practice investigations: "There are authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 to the Attorney General for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2028 to carry out this subsection." (sec. 103)
  • Grants for independent-investigation statutes: "There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General $750,000,000 for fiscal years 2026 through 2028 to carry out this subsection." (sec. 104(a)(4))
  • Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity grants: "There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 to carry out the grant program authorized" (sec. 114(k))
  • Additional Department of Justice enforcement and community relations funding: "There are authorized to be appropriated ... $25,000,000 for additional expenses relating to the enforcement of section 210401 ... and $3,300,000 for additional expenses related to conflict resolution" for FY2026 (sec. 116)
  • Task Force on Law Enforcement Oversight: "There are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each fiscal year to carry out this section." (sec. 117)
  • Data collection demonstration project: "$5,000,000, over a 2-year period, to carry out the demonstration program" and "$500,000 to carry out the evaluation" (sec. 333)
  • Many other sections say funds are "authorized to be appropriated" or permit grants but do not list a dollar amount, or say "such sums as are necessary." No publicly available information in the bill text provides a complete total cost estimate.

Proponents' View#

No publicly available information.

Opponents' View#

No publicly available information.