Summary#
The bill gives an official name to a U.S. Postal Service building in Waiʻanae, Hawaiʻi. It would call the facility at 86-014 Farrington Highway the "U.S. Representative Colleen Hanabusa Post Office Building." The bill also says that any official reference to that facility should use the new name.
- Main change: assigns an honorary name to one postal facility in Waiʻanae.
- It does not change the facility’s address or say anything about changing mail delivery or services.
- It directs that future references in laws, maps, or documents use the new name.
- Introduced in the House on May 20, 2026; sponsors are listed in the bill text.
What it means for you#
- Residents and postal customers in Waiʻanae: The name on the building and on some official lists may change, but your mailing address and mail service should not change.
- USPS employees and management: May update building signage, internal records, and public-facing listings to reflect the new name.
- Local government and map or directory publishers: May update maps, guides, and databases to use the new building name.
- People using legal or official documents: Future references to the facility in government records would be taken to mean the building by its new name.
Expenses#
No direct public cost estimate is identified in the available material.
- No publicly available information on a fiscal note or budget estimate was included with the bill text.
- This could mean minor costs for the Postal Service to replace or add building signs and to update internal records and public listings.
- It is not stated who would pay for any signage, plaques, or updates (for example, USPS, the sponsoring member’s office, or a local group).
Proponents' View#
- The bill appears intended to honor U.S. Representative Colleen Hanabusa by naming a post office after her.
- Supporters may argue this recognizes her public service and ties her name to a building in her community.
- Requiring official references to use the new name helps ensure consistency in government records and maps.
Opponents' View#
- One concern is that the bill does not explain any costs or say who will pay for new signs or other updates.
- The bill does not give criteria for naming or explain why this facility was chosen over others.
- It is unclear how widely the new name must be adopted in private databases, maps, or third-party services, or what enforcement, if any, applies.